Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Knowledge of bloodless medicine among nurses at the Medical/Surgical Directorate of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana; a descriptive cross sectional study

  • Yaa Obirikorang1,
  • Christian Obirikorang2,
  • Enoch Odame Anto2, 3,
  • Emmanuel Acheampong2Email author,
  • Emmanuella Nsenbah Batu1,
  • Flora Macaulary1,
  • Christopher Kwaku Paavire1 and
  • Bright Amankwaa2
BMC Research Notes201710:747

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3094-7

Received: 6 June 2017

Accepted: 13 December 2017

Published: 19 December 2017

Abstract

Objective

This study assessed the knowledge of bloodless medicine (BM) among nurses at the medical and surgical directorate of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital. A paper questionnaire was administered to 322 nurses to obtain information on socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge of BM.

Results

More than half (52.1%) of the nurses were aware of BM. The major source of information on BM was from the internet. Out of the study population, 90.1% knew iron therapy as BM strategy. The largest proportions of the participants (51.2%) had witnessed BM treatment at the medical and surgical directorate with the Tot’hema (44.6%) being the major used drug. Flu-like symptoms (37.0%) and organ damage (50.0%) were the commonly known side effects of BM respectively. Most of the participants (97.5%) knew that doctors request for blood transfusion. The major known reason for demand of BM was religious beliefs (53.7%). Higher percentages (71.9%) of the participants were not aware of bloodless surgery although the few who were aware, had heard of this through an internet search. Participants were generally aware of BM but less knowledgeable of specific components of BM. There is the need for prompt hospital and public health education through workshops and in-service training.

Keywords

Bloodless medicineKnowledgeNurses

Introduction

Bloodless medicine (BM) is one of the most important advances in the medical field both economically and technologically. Surgeons, physicians, and nurses began developing techniques for blood conservation in the early 1990’s as patients yearned to avoid blood transfusions due to the increasing risk of HIV or hepatitis contaminated blood, religious beliefs, or the harmful and weakening effects on the body’s defense system [1]. Blood transfusion is the transfer of blood and its products such as plasma, platelet clotting factors from one person to the other [2]. Some individuals view blood transfusion as something important when one is very ill. However, transfused blood can cause a number of haemolytic reactions due to incompatibility of blood [3].

Recent research has shown that allogeneic blood transfusion is similar to receiving an organ transplant, which is often associated with many risks and complications [2]. These practices have gained grounds in modern times all over the world including Africa and specifically Ghana, as blood continues to be scarce. Reports have shown that acute blood loss have been successfully treated with hyperbaric oxygen chambers [4]. Knowledge of blood conservation as part of blood management is essential to providing appropriate care and avoidance of unnecessary blood transfusion. There is paucity of published data on the knowledge of bloodless medicine among nurses. Therefore, this study explores the knowledge of BM among nurses at the Medicine and Surgery Departments of the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Ghana.

Main text

Study design and setting

This hospital-based cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at KATH. It is located in Kumasi, the Regional capital of the Ashanti Region in Ghana with a total projected population of 4,780,380 (Ghana Statistical Service, 2010). It is the second largest hospital in Ghana and is the site for training doctors, biomedical scientists, nurses, health care assistants. Specialties in surgery, internal medicine, obstetrical and gynaecological, child health, oncology, family medicine and emergency medicine. The geographical location of the 1000 bed capacity of KATH, the road network of the country and commercial nature of Kumasi make the hospital accessible to all the areas that share the boundaries with Ashanti Region and others that are further away.

Study population/selection of participants

Using a non-probability convenience sampling technique, a total of 322 nurses at the KATH were recruited from the period of January 2015 to February 2015. A quantitative research approach was used to assess the knowledge of BM. A structured questionnaire was developed based on the review of related journals. The pre-test or pilot study was conducted among 20 nurses to ascertain the contents and clarity of the questionnaire. The questions were piloted using a one-on-one interview with nurses by the study researchers who have been trained in data collection methods. Reliability coefficients ranging from 0.00 to 1.00, with higher coefficients indicating higher levels of reliability was used to determine the validity and the reliability of the questionnaire. The reliability coefficients for all the questions were 0.903. Changes were made to modify the questionnaire after the pilot study and the entire questionnaire was available in English. The questionnaire was then personally delivered to the nurses in paper form by the researchers. The questions were divided into two sections with close-ended questions. Section A: involved questions that elicited information on socio-demographic variables of the nurses such as age, years of experience, academic experience such as nurses with certificate, diploma degree, bachelor of science degree, and master of science degree: professional ranking such as principal nursing officer, senior nursing officer, nursing officer, senior staff nurse, staff nurse and enrolled nurse. Section B: included questions on the knowledge of BM comprising of yes/no questions and multiple choice formats. Nurses recruited for the study were instructed to choose multiple answers where applicable.

Sample size

A total of 322 nurses from the medical and surgical directorate were recruited from a population of 2518 Nurses at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital using a assumed distribution response rate among the respondent of 60%, a precision of 5% at 95% confidence interval (z-score = 1.96).

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

The study included all nurses present at the time of recruitment. The study excluded those who were unable to give informed consent. From the original 370 questionnaires distributed, a total of 322 were returned, deemed valid and analyzed.

Statistical methods

The data entry and analysis were performed using IBM statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 20. Descriptive statistics were used and results obtained on the socio-demographic characteristic and knowledge of BM was presented into frequencies, proportions and percentages which were summarized into tables.

Results

The study included 322 nurses for a response rate of 86.5%. Higher proportions of the participants were with age of 20–50 years. There were more females (94.2%) than male participants. Most (54.7%) of the participants were diploma holders followed by degree holders (30.4%), certificate (14.0%) and masters (0.9%). Majority of the nurses were senior staff (37.3%) followed by staff nurse (19.9%) and nursing officer (17.4%) (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of nurses

Variables

Frequency (n = 322)

Percentages (%)

Age groups (years)

 20–30

210

65.2

 31–40

75

23.1

 41 and above

37

11.5

Gender

 Males

19

5.8

 Females

303

94.2

Academic qualification

 Certificate

45

14.0

 Diploma

176

54.5

 Degree

98

30.5

 Masters

26

0.8

Directorate

 Medicine

141

43.8

 Surgery

181

56.2

Professional rankings

 Enrolled nurse

45

14.0

 Staff nurse

64

19.9

 Snr. staff nurse

120

37.3

 Nursing officer

56

17.4

 Snr. nursing officer

16

5.0

 Principal nursing officer

21

6.5

Majority of the nurses (52.5%) have heard of BM and higher proportions (38.5%) of the nurses heard of BM through internet search while 23.1% heard of BM from their colleague nurses, 16.0% read from books or health publications, 13.0% heard from workshops and 9.5% heard of BM from the media (radio/TV). Out of the total participants, 68.2% knew the definition of BM. Two hundred and ninety nurses (90.1%) knew alternative medicine to blood transfusion. The commonest known alternative medicine reported by the participants were iron treatment (79.8%) followed by food supplements (63.3%), hormonal therapy (11.9%) and coagulation factors (4.6%) respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Knowledge, awareness of bloodless medicine and sources of information

Variables

Frequency (n = 322)

Percentages (%)

Awareness of bloodless medicine

 Yes

169

52.5

 No

153

47.5

Sources of information on bloodless medicine

 Radio/TV

16

9.5

 Internet

65

38.5

 Workshop

22

13.0

 Books/health publications

27

16.0

 A fellow nurse

39

23.1

Definition of bloodless medicine

 Treatment of patients with only plasma components of blood

13

4.1

 Treatment of patients without packed red blood cell

32

9.9

 Treatment of patient with only his/her own blood

11

3.3

 Clinical care without allogeneic blood transfusion

146

45.5

 Don’t know

120

37.2

Alternatives to blood transfusion

 Yes

290

90.08

 No

32

9.92

Which alternative do you know?

 Iron treatment

257

79.8

 Food supplements

204

63.3

 Antifibrinolytics

 Hormonal therapy

38

11.9

 Coagulation factor

15

4.6

More than half the nurse (51.2%) had witness patients receiving BM. The most commonly used BM was Tot’hema (liquid iron supplement) (44.6%). Most of the participants (57.9%) did not know side effects/complications associated with BM. The most commonly known side effects/complication of BM were flu-like symptoms (98.6%), thrombosis (97.2%), skin reaction (83.3%) vomiting (87.5%) and hypertension (66.7%) (Table 3).
Table 3

Knowledge of the common type of BM, and side effects/complications of bloodless medicine used at KATH

Variable

Frequency (n = 322)

Percentage (%)

Have you witnessed a patient receiving bloodless medicine?

 Yes

165

51.2

 No

157

48.8

Which of these medicines are commonly given?

 Interferon

42

12.9

 Erythropoietin

99

30.6

 Tothema

144

44.6

 Novoseven

 Tranexamic acid

62

19.3

Is bloodless medicine associated with complications?

 Yes

72

22.3

 No

64

19.8

 Don’t know

186

57.9

If yes which of these are known complication of bloodless medicine

 Hypertension

48

66.7

 Skin reaction

60

83.3

 Vomiting

63

87.5

 Thrombosis

70

97.27

 Flu-like symptoms

71

98.6

Discussion

This study determined the knowledge of BM among nurses at KATH. Knowledge of BM among nurses has not been studied in the Ghanaian population. This study observed that majority of the nurses was aware of BM. It was interesting to know that majority of them had information on BM through the internet while others heard it from colleague nurses, health publications and the media (Table 2). This implies that there is lack of hospital-based education and in-service training on BM among study participants. Nursing interventions are based on conserving the patient’s energy and therefore creates healing environment [5]. However, this integrity cannot occur when there is lack of knowledge about therapeutic interventions.

The results of the study found majority of the nurses understood BM as “clinical care without allogeneic blood transfusion”. However, the proportions of the participants who did not know the definition of bloodless were comparable with those who knew the definition (37.2% vs. 45.5%). The probable explanation to the high knowledge of the definition of BM among nurse could be due to the internet search and the fact that as intellectuals, they are capable of understanding clinical terms. This study also observed that 90.1% of the participants knew alternatives to blood transfusion. The most commonly known alternative was iron treatment (79.8%). A previous study by Cuenca et al. [6] indicated that preoperative intravenous iron therapy reduced the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and hence could have accounted for it known use in the hospital of study. Another study by Muñoz et al. [7] showed that iron therapy is efficacious and safe compared allogeneic blood transfusion. However, it is noteworthy that many of the recommendations given for intravenous iron treatment could also be due to information from internet search.

Moreover, higher proportions of the participants had witnessed bloodless medicinal therapy. The most commonly known therapies by the participants were Tot’hema. The high usage of Tot’hema which largely contains iron, in this regard can be traced to the majority’s choice from the previous finding that iron treatment is the common alternative to bloodless medicinal therapy. A study by Feagan et al. [8] has also shown that erythropoietin was used as an alternative to prevent allogeneic blood transfusion in total hip joint arthroplasty. Moreover, allogeneic blood transfusions have been associated with increased morbidity and decreased survival; therefore knowledge of BM is needed in order to deliver holistic health care. Participants were less knowledgeable of the side effect associated with BM. For participants who knew bloodless medicine-associated side effect, majority of them knew flu-like symptom, followed by thrombosis, skin reaction, vomiting and hypertension. Previous study by Plješa [9] showed that hypertensive reaction, and thrombosis were possible complications of erythropoietin therapy, which is consistent with the findings of the present study. Flu-like symptoms, skin reaction and high blood pressure have also been associated with erythropoietin therapy in a study by Turner et al. [10].

The finding of the study revealed that more than half of the participants did not know risk factors of BM. Among those who knew the risk factors of BM, organ damage was the most common reported risk of BM followed by liver disease, severe exsanguination. The poor knowledge of the risk factors of BM may be explained by the fact that BM in contrast to blood transfusion is associated with little or no risk [11].

As expected, most of them agreed that doctors request blood transfusion. The results that doctors request for blood transfusion is due to the protocol that doctors are the only health professional who request for blood. Religious beliefs being the most commonly known factor is expected because the issue of bloodless medicine have been linked with religious beliefs by several studies [1214]. Although BM and BS were created in response to the needs of Jehovah’s Witness patients, the interest in BM has expanded to people outside this group. In 2002, non-Witnesses comprised 25–30% of patients underwent BS [1]. The finding that, fear of complications was one of the factors associated with request for BM over blood transfusion is consistent with Shander [15]. In contrast to BM, majority of the participants were not aware of BS. The most common source of information was through internet search whiles others read it from medical journals, medical textbooks, media and seminars (Additional file 1: Table S1). Similar to the earlier finding on BM, most of the participants had information of BS through an internet search with a very few who had it from seminars. This presupposes that there is lack of in-service training, seminars and workshops on BM and surgery. However, nurses need to be knowledgeable on BM to remain current with prominent practice changes and regulatory practice guidelines.

Conclusion

Nurses in the study were aware of BM; however they were less knowledgeable of the various side effects/complication and risk factors of BM. This study highlights the need for education of nurses on blood conservation methods and blood management for patients through incorporation of all facets of patient blood management in the curriculum of nursing schools. Moreover, prompt hospital and public health education on BM through seminars, workshops and in-service training is also required.

Limitations

The major limitation of this study was the small sample size and the fact that this study used a cross-sectional design which does not make the findings of this study to be generalized. However, it would serve as a baseline for further research to use a large sample size coupled with inferential statistics to help make a general argument.

Abbreviations

BM: 

bloodless medicine

BS: 

blood surgery

KATH: 

Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

YO, CO contributed to the conception of the research idea, design data analysis and interpretation, paper drafting and revision. EOA contributed to the conception of the research idea, design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, paper drafting and revision. EA contributed to research design, patient recruitment, collection data analysis and interpretation, paper drafting and revision. ADS contributed to research design, patient recruitment and collection. OC contributed to the conception of the research idea, design and data collection. ENB, BA contributed to the conception of the research idea, design, and data collection. MF contributed to the research idea, design and data collection. PKF contributed to research design, patient recruitment, collection data analysis and interpretation. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Gratitude goes to students and authorities of various faculties and departments in GCUC and KNUST, Kumasi-Ghana.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the paper.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for this study was obtained from the committee on Human Research, Publication and Ethics of the School of Medical Sciences (SMS), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) and the Research and development (R&D) unit at KATH and the Head of Department of the Surgical/Medical Directorate. Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained from each participants. Respondents were assured that the information gathered was to be used strictly for research and academic purpose only. In addition, respondents were given the freedom to opt out any time they think they cannot continue with the study.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this research.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Allied Sciences, Garden City University College (GCUC), Kumasi, Ghana
(2)
Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana
(3)
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Royal Ann College of Health, Kumasi, Ghana

References

  1. Cogliano J, Kisner D. Bloodless medicine and surgery in the OR and beyond. AORN J. 2002;76:830–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Klein HG, Anstee DJ. Mollison’s blood transfusion in clinical medicine. New York: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Klein HG. How safe is blood, really? Biologicals. 2010;38:100–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gill A, Bell C. Hyperbaric oxygen: its uses, mechanisms of action and outcomes. QJM. 2004;97:385–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tomey AM, Alligood MR. Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002.Google Scholar
  6. Cuenca J, García-Erce JA, Martínez F, Pérez-Serrano L, Herrera A, et al. Perioperative intravenous iron, with or without erythropoietin, plus restrictive transfusion protocol reduce the need for allogeneic blood after knee replacement surgery. Transfusion. 2006;46:1112–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Muñoz M, Breymann C, García-Erce J, Gómez-Ramírez S, Comin J, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron therapy as an alternative/adjunct to allogeneic blood transfusion. Vox Sang. 2008;94:172–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feagan BG, Wong CJ, Kirkley A, Johnston D, Smith FC, et al. Erythropoietin with iron supplementation to prevent allogeneic blood transfusion in total hip joint arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:845–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Plješa SJ. Possible complications of erythropoietin therapy in patients with chronic renal failure. Med Pregl. 2004;57:254–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Turner R, Anglin P, Burkes R, Couture F, Evans W, et al. Epoetin alfa in cancer patients: evidence-based guidelines. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2001;22:954–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Keefe S. Bloodless medicine. Adv Healthc Netw Nurses. 2005;3:33.Google Scholar
  12. Doyle DJ. Blood transfusions and the Jehovah’s Witness patient. Am J Ther. 2002;9:417–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Remmers PA, Speer AJ. Clinical strategies in the medical care of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Am J Med. 2006;119:1013–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Malyon D. Transfusion-free treatment of Jehovah’s Witnesses: respecting the autonomous patient’s rights. J Med Ethics. 1998;24:302–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Shander A. Surgery without blood. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:S708–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement