Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Depressive symptoms are associated with poor glycemic control among women with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BMC Research Notes201811:38

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3141-z

  • Received: 28 October 2017
  • Accepted: 9 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, depressive symptoms may be associated with metabolic deterioration. The impact of sex on this association is unclear. The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between depression and metabolic control by sex. The data presented is the side product of the clinical investigation by Rui Duarte, MD, Treatment Response in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Major Depression from 2007.

Results

A sample of 628 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was taken from a specialized diabetes outpatient clinic. In a univariate analysis: women’s glycohemoglobin mean levels were 8.99% whereas men’s were 8.41% and the difference was statistically significant. The proportion of women (34.3%) with pathological levels of depression (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale score ≥ 8) was significantly higher than men’s (15.2%). A linear regression analysis performed by sex and controlling for demographic, clinical and psychological variables, showed poorer metabolic control in women with depressive symptoms. No association was observed in men. These results support depression as a predictor for poor metabolic control in women and the need for detecting depressive symptoms when glycemic levels deteriorate.

Keywords

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Depression
  • Glycemic control
  • Sex

Introduction

Comorbidity between diabetes and depression is common [1] and sex differences in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been reported frequently [2].

A recent prevalence study of the Portuguese population demonstrated that the proportion of undiagnosed T2DM patients is 43.6% with a point prevalence of 11.7% with a significant difference between men (14.2%) and women (9.5%) [3]. Another recent epidemiological survey found a prevalence of depression disorders in Portugal around 7.9%, women being at a higher risk of developing depression than men (OR = 2.30) [4]. There are no studies reporting the prevalence of diabetes and depression comorbidity in the Portuguese population.

Although estrogens lower the risk of coronary heart disease, diabetes eliminates that protective effect on women [5]. Estrogen replacement therapy showed a preventive effect on T2DM incidence in postmenopausal women [6] and was also associated with a decrease in depressive symptoms in perimenopausal women [7].

Negative coping strategies such as resignation, protest and isolation, were reported to be more prevalent in women with T2DM when compared to men [8]. Women also presented more difficulty on diet management and self-monitoring of blood glucose. They experienced their disease as an unforeseeable setback [9, 10] thus being less likely to reach glycemic goals with insulin treatment [11].

In women without diabetes, depressive symptoms are associated with a higher risk for metabolic syndrome. A greater waist circumference, higher fasting blood glucose, higher diastolic blood pressure, lower HDL-cholesterol and higher salivary cortisol were observed in women with depressive symptoms. No similar pattern was observed in men [1214].

The few studies evaluating depressive symptoms by sex as associated with poorer glycemic control in T2DM showed conflicting results [1518]. The finding of a sex difference would translate into better-adapted approaches, such as emphasizing the regular screening for depression in women with diabetes [19].

The present study aimed at detecting whether the presence of depressive symptoms was associated with poor glycemic control according to sex in a population with T2DM from a Portuguese diabetes clinic.

Main text

Methods

Patients

A screening protocol to detect depression and anxiety states in patients with T2DM was undertaken at the Portuguese Diabetes Association (APDP) and included in a multicenter screening study whose results were published elsewhere [20]. This protocol aimed to provide and evaluate specific clinical care for the comorbidity T2DM and depression. Inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 65 years; at least 6 months of T2DM diagnosis (type 1 diabetes (T1DM) was excluded); at least a 3 months’ follow-up at APDP; regular hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing; and ability to understand and fill up questionnaires.

Portugal is a small southern European country with 10 million inhabitants. APDP is a private social solidarity institution, specialized in outpatient diabetes treating, founded in 1926 in Lisbon, and to where several general practitioners from southern Portugal sent patients regularly. More than 15,000 persons with T2DM and 4,000 with T1DM are yearly followed up at APDP. It also provides regular training on diabetes and patient education to nurses and medical doctors.

Methods

While waiting for their diabetes consultation, patients were approached and selected by trained clinical psychologists taking into account the inclusion criteria. Eligible patients were consecutively invited to participate and those who accepted were given a brief explanation about the negative influence of the comorbidity between diabetes and depression on health outcomes. Socio-demographic and clinical data, namely body mass index (BMI), HbA1c level, diabetes type, therapy and antidepressant medication, were collected. Chronic complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular) due to diabetes were identified from the patient’s medical history, physical findings and automated laboratory data.

Patients filled up the Portuguese version of the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) [21, 22]. HADS is a self-report Likert scale (0–3) used in previous studies for detection of depression and anxiety symptoms, consisting of 14 questions, 7 for anxiety and 7 for depression. Each sub-scale score ranges from 0 to 21, higher scores representing more severe symptoms. A score ≥ 8 on any of the sub-scales is considered pathological [22]. Only the depression symptoms sub-scale of HADS was used in the present study.

The HbA1c levels were determined at the APDP using an ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography in a BIO-RAD Variant II turbo kit. According to the manufacturing data, normal range is 4.9–6.2% (30–44 mmol/mol).

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or as a percent as appropriate. Results between groups were compared using the Student’s t test or the Chi squared test. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was conducted to verify the normal distribution of the continuous variables. Prior to further analysis, non-normal distributed variables were log-transformed.

Linear regressions analyses were performed separately by sex with a model with all predictors entered concurrently. HbA1c was used as the dependent variable. Independent variables were the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as depression and anxiety symptoms. To avoid multicollinearity, the only antidiabetic treatment variables considered were the combination therapy with oral antidiabetic agents (OAA) and insulin [23].

Results were considered statistically relevant when the p-value was < 0.05 using a 95% confidence interval. SPSS 21.0 was used to carry out statistical analysis (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

Results

Total sample

From July 2007 to July 2009 a total of 656 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. From these, 15 refused to participate (response rate = 97.7%). Their demographic features were not different from those included in the study. Due to missing data, 13 patients were further eliminated. Therefore, this study comprised a clinic-based convenience sample of 628 persons with T2DM, men representing 52.4%, aged 57.69 ± 5.55 (range 36–65 years) (Table 1).
Table 1

Data displayed represent the mean values ± standard deviation

 

Total

Men

Women

p-value

N = 628

N = 329

N = 299

Age (yrs)

57.69 ± 5.55

57.86 ± 5.34

57.50 ± 5.77

0.385

Education level (yrs)

6.57 ± 3.87

6.84 ± 3.93

6.27 ± 3.78

0.035

BMI (kg/m2)

29.99 ± 4.90

29.34 ± 4.55

30.70 ± 5.18

0.001

Years from diagnosis

13.89 ± 7.59

13.56 ± 7.59

14.26 ± 7.59

0.089

≥ 2 chr complications

162 (25.8)

102 (31.0)

60 (20.1)

0.002

≥ 1 comorbidities

84 (13.4)

37 (11.2)

47 (15.7)

0.102

OAA alone

259 (40.9)

157 (47.7)

100 (33.4)

< 0.001

Insulin alone

139 (22.1)

70 (21.3)

69 (23.1)

0.632

OAA and insulin

230 (36.6)

102 (31)

130 (43.5)

0.001

Antidepressant

64 (10.2)

17 (5.2)

47 (15.7)

< 0.001

HbA1c

8.69 ± 1.66

8.41 ± 1.48

8.99 ± 1.79

< 0.001

HbA1c < 7

84 (13.4)

55 (16.7)

29 (9.7)

0.010

HADS depression

5.16 ± 3.93

4.18 ± 3.29

6.25 ± 4.27

< 0.001

HADS depression ≥ 8

153 (24.4)

50 (15.2)

103 (34.4)

< 0.001

The respective percentage of the sample (global, men and women) is displayed between parentheses. Chi square and Student’s t-tests were used to compare each parameter between men and women. p-values are italic formatted when significance level is < 0.05. Chronic complications: retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular

HADS The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, BMI body mass index, OAA oral antidiabetic agent, HbA1c hemoglobin A1c

Patients treated with insulin represented 58.7% of the sample, and 36.6% were also taking an OAA. The mean HbA1c level was 8.69% (50 mmol/mol) (SD = 1.66). Only 13.4% of the patients had an HbA1c level below 7% (53 mmol/mol). Depressive symptoms above the score threshold were present in 24.4%.

Sex differences

Women had significantly higher HbA1c values [mean = 8.99% (75 mmol/mol), SD = 1.79] than men [mean = 8.41% (69 mmol/mol), SD = 1.48] with a p-value = 0.0019. More men (16.7% men vs. 9.7% women, p = 0.010) reached significantly the therapeutic goal of HbA1c < 7% (53 mmol/mol). Women had significantly more depressive symptoms above the cut-off point (34.4% women vs. 15.2% men, p < 0.001). They are also three times more likely to take antidepressants than men (15.7% women vs. 5.2% men, significant p < 0.001). Men (31%) had more multiple (≥ 2) chronic complications than women (20.1%, significant p = 0.002). Women (43.5% vs. 31% men, p = 0.001) used significantly more combined therapy (OAA and insulin).

Depressive symptoms and other predictors of metabolic control by sex

Glycemic control was positively associated with depressive symptoms (standard beta = 0.12, significant p = 0.031) and negatively associated with comorbidities (standard beta = − 0.13, significant p = 0.020) in women. A positive significant association with higher HbA1c was found with combined treatment with OAA and insulin (standard beta = 0.16, p = 0.003) in men. A younger age was significantly associated with poorer glycemic control both in men (standard beta = − 0.24, p = < 0.001) and women (standard beta = − 0.19, p = 0.002) (Table 2).
Table 2

Multiple linear regressions analyses: associations of glycemic control and demographic, clinical and psychometric variables

 

Men

Women

Beta-S

t

p-value

Beta-S

t

p-value

Age (yrs)

− 0.24

− 4.28

0.001

− 0.19

− 3.20

0.002

Education level (yrs)

− 0.03

− 0.62

0.534

− 0.08

− 1.38

0.170

BMI (kg/m2)

− 0.07

− 1.32

0.187

− 0.01

0.13

0.896

Years from diagnosis

0.07

1.11

0.268

0.04

0.60

0.550

≥ 2 chr complications

0.11

1.97

0.050

0.02

0.40

0.687

≥ 1 comorbidities

0.10

1.90

0.059

− 0.13

− 2.33

0.020

OAA and insulin

0.16

3.14

0.003

0.10

1.75

0.081

Antidepressant

0.02

0.86

0.776

− 0.07

− 1.17

0.241

HADS depression

− 0.01

− 0.11

0.985

0.12

1.77

0.031

Adjusted R2

0.079

  

0.065

  

F-change

4.119

  

3.289

  

p-value (F-change)

< 0.001

  

0.001

  

Beta-S: Beta standard regression coefficients. Statistically significant results with p-values < 0.05 are highlighted in italics. Chronic complications: retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular

HADS The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, BMI body mass index, OAA oral antidiabetic agent

Discussion

This cross-sectional study evaluated the association of depressive symptoms and glycemic control by sex, adjusting for possible confounders, in a sample of patients with T2DM.

Globally participants had extremely poor glycemic control. The relatively low education level of the sample could account for this result. In a study by Mezuk et al. [24], subjects with major depressive disorder and low educational attainment had a higher risk of T2DM. However, in our study, neither in men nor in women was detected any association between education level and glycemic control. As socioeconomic status usually encompasses educational attainment and can be associated with suboptimal preventive care and unhealthy lifestyle, if we had evaluated other features like income maybe we would have found an association with poorer glycemic control [25].

In our sample, women had poorer glycemic control than men as reported in previous studies [9]. Nonetheless, other studies describe similar HbA1c values in T2DM patients between sexes [9, 12, 15].

In our study, a statistically significant association was found in women between depressive symptoms and poor glycemic control, adjusting for age and education level, diabetes duration, chronic complications, comorbidities, combined antidiabetic therapy and antidepressant use. No similar association was found for men.

Combined therapy was more often used in women, but was independently associated with poor glycemic control only in men. These findings could suggest that women were more responsive to combined treatment although their poor glycemic control.

Women were three times more likely to take antidepressants than men, but only half (15.7%) of the women diagnosed with depression were taking antidepressants. Some studies suggest that half of the T2DM patients are not accurately diagnosed for depressive symptoms [17, 26]. In a study by Katon et al., only a third of the patients with depression had been adequately treated with an anti-depressant for at least 3 months [17].

Prevalence of undiagnosed depression in both sexes may arise at least partly from the effects of depression on how people perceive their health. Li et al. found that patients who reported poor or fair health had 2.8-fold greater likelihood of having undiagnosed depression [26].

Moreover, undiagnosed depression may be indirectly attributable to inability to correctly identify cases of depression as a function of sex. In a study based on a large British survey, men were more likely than women to misidentify depression in other men [27]. Beliefs such as hegemonic masculinity may affect men ability to self-report depression, leading them to report less symptoms overall than women. Nevertheless, one study found that men with higher adherence to masculine norms report more symptoms on measures of depression [28]. Another study showed that more than 20% of men who described themselves as depressed would not receive a diagnosis of depression by current criteria standards [29] suggesting the need for discussing traditional depression symptoms in what concern men.

In our study, similar to others results [15, 17, 18], men were less than half as likely to be depressed as women (34.4% women vs. 15.2% men, p < 0.001). The lower prevalence of depression in men may be attributable to underdiagnosis but we do not have any measure to declare or refute it.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that it may be clinically relevant to conduct a systematic screening for depressive symptoms in T2DM patients. Women who are under an optimized antidiabetic therapy and still have HbA1c values above the control cut-off point need to be systematically checked for depression. Treating depressive symptoms, especially in middle-aged women, enables better hyperglycemic control and avoids metabolic deterioration.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. Firstly, potential biological or psychological processes, link depression and T2DM. Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, the innate immune response and the autonomic nervous system, and the burden with diabetes and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, such as diet, physical activity and smoking [30], were not evaluated in our study. Secondly, the cross-sectional nature of the study does not allow for causality inferences. Chronic hyperglycemia can also affect depressive symptoms rather than vice versa, namely by the increase of diabetes burden [31]. Only with a longitudinal design would it be possible to determine the associative direction between hyperglycemia and depressive symptoms. Thirdly, depressive symptoms were analyzed with a Likert scale, but a psychiatric interview remains the gold standard for depression diagnosis in clinical practice.

Lastly, this represents a convenience sample from a single diabetes clinic with a population with poor glycemic control and low education level. Our findings may or may not be generalizable to other settings or patient populations.

Nevertheless, the large sample size is one of the study’s strengths. As far as we know, this is the first report to analyze the relationship between depressive symptoms and glycemic control in a Portuguese population with T2DM.

Abbreviations

T2DM: 

type 2 diabetes mellitus

T1DM: 

type 1 diabetes mellitus

HbA1c: 

hemoglobin A1c

APDP: 

Portuguese Diabetes Association

BMI: 

body mass index

HADS: 

Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale

OAA: 

oral antidiabetic agents

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

CG made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and has been involved in drafting the manuscript. JFR analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the diabetes clinical evaluation. IC has been involved in collecting the patient data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. TAD has been involved in analysis and interpretation of data as well as in critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. SP has been involved in critically revising the manuscript. AB has been involved in the conception and design of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Portuguese Diabetes Association but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Portuguese Diabetes Association.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Portuguese Diabetes Association on 29 March of 2007. Informed signed consent was obtained from all eligible participants who accepted to participate. The authors declare that the procedures followed the regulations established by the local Ethics Committee of the Portuguese Diabetes Association and the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Serviço de Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental do Hospital de Santa Maria–Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
(2)
Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal
(3)
Associação Protectora dos Diabéticos de Portugal (APDP), R. Rodrigo da Fonseca 1, 1250-189 Lisbon, Portugal
(4)
NOVA Medical School-Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Campo Mártires da Pátria 130, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal

References

  1. Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142(S1):S8–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnetz L, Ekberg NR, Alvarsson M. Sex differences in type 2 diabetes: focus on disease course and outcomes. Diabetes Metab Synd Obes. 2014;7:409–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gardete-Correia L, Boavida JM, Raposo JF, Mesquita AC, Fona C, Carvalho R, et al. First diabetes prevalence study in Portugal: PREVADIAB study. Diabet Med. 2010;27:879–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldas de Almeida JM, Xavier M. Estudo Epidemiológico Nacional de Saúde Mental-1 relatório: FCM-UNL; 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M. Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2006;332:73–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Margolis KL, Bonds DE, Rodabough RJ. Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Trial. Diabetologia. 2004;47:1175–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR. Sex hormones and mood in the perimenopause. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2009;1179:70–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Gafvels C, Wändell PE. Coping strategies in men and women with type 2 diabetes in Swedish primary care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;71:280–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kacerovsky-Bielesz G, Lienhardt S, Hagenhofer M. Sex-related effects on metabolic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2009;52:781–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Misra R, Lager L. Ethnic and gender differences in psychosocial factors, glycemic control, and quality of life among adult type 2 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complicat. 2009;23:54–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McGill JB, Vlajnic A, Knutsen PG. Effect of gender on treatment outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;102:167–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinder S, Carnethon MR, Palaniappan LP. Depression and the metabolic syndrome in young adults: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:316–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Muhtz C, Zyriax BC, Kla T. Depression symptoms and metabolic risk: effects of cortisol and gender. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:1004–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Toker S, Shirom A, Melamed S. Depression and the metabolic syndrome: gender-dependent associations. Depress Anxiety. 2008;25:661–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cherrington A, Wallston KA, Rothman RL. Exploring the relationship between diabetes self-efficacy, depression symptoms, and glycemic control among men and women with type 2 diabetes. J Behav Med. 2014;33:81–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lloyd CE, Dyert PH, Barnett AH. Prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety in a diabetes clinic consultation. Diabet Med. 2000;17:198–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Katon WJ, Simon G, Russo J, Bush T, Korff Von, Lin EHB, et al. Quality of depression care in a population-based sample of patients with diabetes and major depression. Med Care. 2004;42:1222–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Power F, Snoeck FJ. Association between symptoms of depression and glycaemic control may be unstable across gender. Diabet Med. 2001;18:595–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Legato MJ, Gelzer A, Goland R. The writing group for the partnership for gender-specific medicine. gender-specific care of the patient with diabetes: review and recommendations. Gend Med. 2007;3(2):131–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gois C, Dias VV, Carmo I, Duarte R, Barbosa A. Treatment response in type 2 diabetes patients with major depression. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014;21(1):39–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pais-Ribeiro J, Silva I, Ferreira T. Validation study of a Portuguese version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Psychol Health Med. 2007;12(2):225–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz M. Multivariable analysis. A practical guide for clinicians. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  24. Mezuk B, Eaton W, Golden SH, Ding Y. The influence of educational attainment on depression and risk of type 2 diabetes. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1480–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Chan J, Nan H, Ting H. Depression and Diabetes: Socio-demographic and Cultural Aspects and Public Health Implications. In: Katon W, Maj M, Sartorius N, editors. Diabetes and depression. New York: Wiley; 2010. p. 143–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Li C, Ford ES, Zhao G, Mokdad A. Prevalence and correlates of undiagnosed depression among US adults with diabetes: the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;83:268–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Swami V. Mental health literacy of depression: gender differences and attitudinal antecedents in a representative British sample. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e49779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049779.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Berger JL, Addis ME, Reilly ED, Syzdek MR, Green JD. Effects of gender, diagnostic labels, and causal theories on willingness to report symptoms of depression. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2012;31(5):439–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Nadeau MM, Balsan MJ, Rochlen AB. Men’s depression: endorsed experiences and expressions. Psychol Men Masc. 2016;17(4):328–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ismail K. Unraveling the pathogenesis of the depression-diabetes link. In: Katon W, Maj M, Sartorius N, editors. Diabetes and depression. New York: Wiley; 2010. p. 30–61.Google Scholar
  31. Rubin RR. Stress and depression in diabetes, Clinical diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2006;21:269–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement