Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Localization and dimer stability of a newly identified microbial rhodopsin from a polar, non-motile green algae

BMC Research Notes201811:65

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3181-4

  • Received: 21 November 2017
  • Accepted: 16 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

The eukaryotic plasma membrane localized light-gated proton-pumping rhodopsins possesses great optogenetic applications for repolarization (silencing) of the neuronal activity simply by light illumination. Very few plasma membrane localized proton-pumping rhodopsins of a eukaryotic origin are known that have optogenetic potential. Our objective was to identify and characterize microbial rhodopsin of an eukaryotic origin that expresses on plasma membrane. The plasma membrane localized light-gated proton pump of an eukaryotic origin hold great promise to be used as an optogenetic tools for the neurobiology.

Results

Here, we had characterized the cellular expression and membrane localization of a new rhodopsin in Antarctican algae Coccomyxa subellipsoidea. It is the first algal ion pumping rhodopsin that localizes to the plasma membrane of the eukaryotic cells. Coccomyxa subellipsoidea rhodopsin exists in the monomeric and dimeric state both the in vivo and in vitro. The dimeric form of the Coccomyxa subellipsoidea rhodopsin is resistant to heat and detergent denaturants.

Keywords

  • Coccomyxa subellipsoidea
  • Proton-pumping rhodopsin
  • Optogenetics
  • Localization of the microbial rhodopsin in eukaryotes
  • Chlorella vulgaris

Introduction

Microbial type rhodopsins are sub-grouped as light sensitive proton pumps, such as bacteriorhodopsin (BR) [1], chloride pump as halorhodopsin (HR) [2] light sensitive signal transducers as the sensory rhodopsins SRI, SRII and ASR [3, 4], and light-gated ion channel, the Channelrhodopsins (ChRs) [5, 6]. Light-gated ion channels like Channelrhodopsins that are involved in phototaxis of Chlamydomonas [7] also excite neurons by light when heterologously expressed in it and hence used as an optogenetic tools in the neurobiology extensively. Light-gated proton pumps generated electrochemical gradient across the membrane that leads to ATP synthesis [8]. Proton pumping rhodopsins were also found in Leptosphaeria maculans, the benthic alga Acetabularia [9], and in marine eukaryotes Oxyrrhis marina [10]. The molecular function of an Acetabularia origin rhodopsin has been investigated by applying electrophysiology and spectroscopy, although their physiological roles and in vivo localization remained unclear [911]. Similarly, a sodium pump that is a long searched tool for neurobiology, has also been identified from a marine flavobacteria K. eikastus [12], but with limited success in optogenetics.

Recently, we had identified a rhodopsin sequence, CsR (Coccomyxa subellipsoidea rhodopsin) from the genome database of an unicellular green alga Coccomyxa subellipsoidea C-169 [13]. CsR generated photocurrent in oocyte was significantly higher than that of other canonical proton pumping opsins and paved the way for identification of core conserved residues responsible for maintaining directionality of pump activity [14]. In this report, we had investigated the cellular expression, location and oligomeric characterization of this proton-pumping rhodopsin in C. subellipsoidea. C. subellipsoidea was originally isolated from Antarctica region from extremely harsh climate, low temperature, high winds and alternating long day and night [15]. The importance of microbial rhodopsin identification from extremophiles and other drastic environmental conditions like deep seabed has been discussed in detail earlier [13]. The organisms living in harsh condition have to face low oxygen tension in surroundings. This makes difficult to the organism to maintain their cellular ATP requirement. To generate ATP, they require high membrane potential and hence proton-pumping rhodopsin with high quantum efficiency and robust plasma membrane expression can help in survival. These two features are also desirable properties of the rhodopsin to be used as an optogenetic tools. In brief, microbial rhodopsin isolated from the extremely harsh environmental condition may have better quantum efficiency and cellular expression in eukaryotes [13]. The plasma membrane expression and localization of the CsR provides a potential clue for the viability of an eukaryotic proton pumping microbial rhodopsins as a neural silencing optogenetic tool [13, 14].

Main text

Materials and methods

Identification, bioinformatic analysis of CsR, and C. subellipsoidea sub culturing

Search on JGI genome portal (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov) of C. subellipsoidea for microbial rhodopsin retrieved the sequence of CsR. Alignment was performed on ClustalW [16] platform using Bioedit. Transmembrane helices of the CsR was predicted on web based DAS transmembrane prediction tool and confirmed with other web-based tools [17]. Localization of the CsR was predicted with Plant-mPLoc [18]. Evolutionary analysis of the rhodopsins was performed using protein sequences. Sequence alignment of the rhodopsin domains was done with Clustal X 2.0. The alignment file was subjected to phylogenetic analysis by Neighbour-joining (NJ) method on MEGA 5.0 with 1000-bootstrap value [19]. Generated phylogenetic tree was also verified by maximum likelihood ML method on MEGA5 and topology was viewed by tree view [20].

Coccomyxa subellipsoidea C-169 culture was obtained from NIES, Japan. Related strains of Chlorella vulgaris (C-11 and C-12b) were procured from SAG culture collection, Germany. Cells were grown in Kuhl media under a continuous cool white light of intensity 33 µmol m−2s−1 and temperature (22 °C).

Heterologous expression antibody generation, immunoblotting and immunolocalization of the CsR

Human codon-adapted CsR gene synthesized by GeneArt, Germany for expression in mammalian cell-lines [14], was cloned into EcoRI and XhoI sites of pET21a expression vector using forward primer 5′-GCTGAATTCATGGCTGTGCACCAGATTGG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-TTGCTCGAGCACTTCAGCAGCTGTAGCTGG- to construct CsR-pET21a. All constructs were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing and standard protocol was adapted for expression of the CsR in BL-21 strain of E. coli (Additional file 1) [2123].

Antibody was generated against a peptide (KALVSNPDGN) of the CsR. The immunoinformatics of the selected region was performed on IEDB resource, USA (http://www.iedb.org) [24]. Synthesized CsR-peptide was KLH conjugated and injected into the rabbit for raising polyclonal antibody using Merck, India. Total cell lysate (TCL) of C. subellipsoidea, Chlorella vulgaris C-11b and C12 were prepared as described elsewhere [21]. Cells in early exponential growth phase were harvested by centrifugation and cell pellets were re-suspended in PBS (PBS; 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate, and pH 7.2) in the presence of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, USA). Cells were lysed by sonication (8 s on and off pulse for 8–10 times). Samples were solubilized by mixing cell lysate for different time and temperature as mentioned in the result section and in figure legend. TCL was separated on 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane for immunoprobing. Protein blotted membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk powder in PBST (PBS + 0.1% tween-20; Sigma USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Blocked membrane was incubated with CsR antibody (1:3000) dilutions. Immunolabelling was done using horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Sigma, USA 1:5000) and visualized by the standard ECL method.

Immunolocalization of the CsR in C. subellipsoidea was performed as described earlier [21, 23]. A 150 µl of cell suspension was seeded on poly-l-Lysine (Sigma, USA) coated coverslip and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma, USA) in PBS. Cells on the coverslips were permeabilized with chilled 100% ethanol for 10 min at − 20 °C. Permeablized cells were washed with PBS + 0.25 M NaCl for 10 min, followed by PBS for 5 min at room temperature. After brief washings with PBS containing 0.5% triton X-100 (PBST), cells were incubated with freshly diluted anti-CsR antiserum (1:1500) or KLH antiserum or pre-immune serum for overnight at 4 °C. After 3X washing with PBST, samples were incubated with Fluorescein Iso-thiocynate conjugated (FITC) secondary antibody (Sigma, USA. 1:2500) for 1 h at room temperature. Followed by brief washings, anti-fade reagent (slow fade gold, molecular probes) was applied on coverslips before mounting of the slides. Plasma membrane was labeled by tracker dye FM 4-64Fx (Invitrogen, USA) at concentration 5 µg/ml [23]. Images were captured with Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope at central instrument facility, UDSC, New Delhi, India.

Results

CsR is closely related to algal light-gated proton pump

Database search of the C. subellipsoidea on JGI (V 2.0) and phytozome portal for the rhodopsins revealed the presence of a new microbial type rhodopsin. Identified CsR rhodopsin showed homology with bacteriorhodopsin and Acetabularia rhodopsin [9]. Transmembrane helices were analyzed by transmembrane prediction from different web-tools. More than 40% homology was observed for CsR with that of the known bacteriorhodopsin and Acetabularia rhodopsin. Retinal binding lysine motif (red star marked in Fig. 1, adapted from [14] was found to be conserved in the seventh helix. The residues involved in proton transport pathway of the BR were also conserved in CsR (#, Fig. 1). Aspartic acid residues, which act as proton acceptor and donor respectively, were well conserved (quadrilateral) in CsR, which suggested that CsR is a putative light-gated proton pump. An m-locP [18] predicted CsR localization on the plasma membrane (data not shown).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Comparative sequence analysis of the CsR with other proton-pumping rhodopsins. The green and purple background depicts the identical and similar residues, respectively. Black bar below alignment depicts the predicted transmembrane regions. The red star depicts the conserved lysine residue and #depicts the conserved proton transport pathway of the CsR

CsR stayed in monomeric and dimeric form in vivo and in vitro

Epitope prediction, antigenicity and surface accessibility of the CsR protein was performed using IEDB (http://www.iedb.org), the ten amino acid long epitope (KALVSNPDGN) was selected for raising antibody. Pre-immune serum, anti-KLH Ab (Abcam, UK) and Penta His Ab (Qiagen, UK) was used as control. The cross reactivity of Pre-immune serum was checked with TCL of C-169, C-11b, and C-12. On western blotting, no protein band was detected in TCL of C-169, C-11b, and C-12 by pre-immune serum (Fig. 2a). The TCL of C-169, C-11b, and C-12 along with KLH protein (Pierce, USA) was also probed with KLH antibody, a strong band of KLH protein was observed with KLH protein and no protein band was detected in TCLs (Fig. 2b). Anti-CsRAb and anti-Penta-His Ab detected the similar band pattern with recombinant CsR (Additional file 1). The anti-CsR antibody detected two protein bands of apparent monomer and dimer of CsR (35 and 70 kDa) in TCL of C. subellipsoidea (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Presence of the CsR protein and cellular expression in C. subellipsoidae C-169. The TCL of C. subellipsoidea and two other closely related Chlorella vulgaris strain were probed with a pre-immune serum (Dilution; 1:3500), b KLH antibody (Dilution; 1:6000), with KLH protein loaded with TCLs, c western blot profile of TCL of C-169 probed with CsR antibody (Dilution; 1:3500). d Dimer profiling of CsR in C. ellipsoidea. The sample prepared in three denaturing reagents (SDS, DTT, βME) and incubated at three different temperatures and probed with anti CsRAb without denaturant (lane 1–3), with SDS (lane 4–6), with SDS and DTT (lane 7–9) and with SDS, DTT and βME (lane 10–12). The immunoblots are representative image of three different experimental sets

The role of temperature and denaturant on monomeric and dimeric state of CsR was studied at different temperatures (25, 65 and 95 °C) without any detergent (SDS) and with DTT and bME. Under non-denaturing and non-reducing condition (i.e., without SDS, DTT, and bME) and at temperature (25 and 65 °C), CsR was present in dimeric form (Fig. 2d; Lane 1, 2). The monomer and dimer were  observed in sample prepared at 95 °C non-denaturing conditions. The dimer and monomer bands were also prominent in all other conditions (Fig. 2d; lane 3–12). CsR mostly stayed in dimeric form that was mostly stable in denaturing conditions and no complete loss of dimer was observed. Dimer was prominent with recombinant protein sample and not enough protein was produced to purify in the native form (Additional file 1). Presented results suggested that dimer of CsR was present both in TCL of C-169 and bacterial total lysate expressing CsR.

CsR localizes onto plasma membrane

Immunolocalization of the CsR using anti-CsR antibody confirmed the plasma membrane localization of the CsR (Fig. 3). CsR signal was present on the periphery of the cells and co-localized with plasma membrane tracker red dye FM4-64Fx. No signal was observed when cells were probed with the anti-KLH antibody and pre-immune serum (Fig. 3), respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Plasma membrane localization of the CsR in C. subellipsoidea cells. a Cells probed with anti-CsR shows plasma membrane localization in the green channel. Plasma membrane (PM) specific FM4-64Fx dye is shown in the red channel. Cells are shown in DIC image. b Magnified view of the few cells from in the microcopy same field, to show detailed localization pattern of the CsR. c No signal was observed when these cells were probed with KLH antibody. Cells were marked by autofluorescence (AF) and DIC. d No signal was observed with pre-immune serum as well. Cells are shown by autofluorescence (AF) and DIC

Discussion

CsR is the first light-gated proton pump found in the fresh water, unicellular, non-flagellate, green algae. The retinal chromophore-binding signature was conserved in CsR (Fig. 1). The genome database mining for enzymes involved in retinal metabolism pathway were also present in the genome database of C. ellipsoidea (Beta, beta-carotene 15,15-dioxygenase, retinol dehydrogenase), which supports existence of the retinal binding protein in this organism. Archaeal rhodopsin sequences are known in archaea, eubacteria and lower eukaryotes [25]. Two light-gated proton pumps were characterized from marine alga Acetabularia. This report describes the characterization of light-driven proton pumping rhodopsin from a unicellular, non-motile freshwater alga. Phyletic relatedness analysis showed that BR and proteorhodopsin were the next closest rhodopsins to CsR (Additional File 2; highlighted in blue and pink). CsR stayed in dimer form both in vivo and in vitro (Fig. 2). The CsR was localized on the plasma membrane (Fig. 2). Plasma membrane localization may help in the maintenance of the membrane voltage under certain conditions. It would be interesting to know the physiological significance of the oligomer of the CsR and its localization on plasma membrane of the green algal cells.

The light-gated ion pumps are used to hyperpolarize the membrane of the electrically excitable cells that leads to shut down the depolarization evoked by complimentary light-gated channels like Channelrhodopsin leading to precise on and off control of cellular system through optogenetics [26, 27]. Few rhodopsins (halorhodopsin or archaerhodopsin-3) are capable of silencing the neural excitabilities by a hyper-polarization of the membrane upon illumination [28]. The membrane targeting of the Ar-3 or HR is poor due to lower expression, poor trafficking of a prokaryotic protein in the eukaryotic system or lack of signal target sequence [13]. The expression level and localization are the important parameters for ion pumping rhodopsin due to their fixed stoichiometric of one charge transferred per absorbed photon. The strong signal peptide sequence of 28 amino acids was predicted for the CsR that can be tested for the effective membrane localization of the CsR and other archaeal rhodopsins as well in the target mammalian system. Localization of the CsR in the plasma membrane of Coccomyxa suggests that it might be a useful optogenetic tools for the silencing of the excitable cells. Moreover, mutational analysis of the CsR helped in the elucidation of of basic mechanism and role of amino acids involved in the proton pumping activity. CsR also elucidated the amino acid residues involved in conversion of pump to Channelrhodopsin [14].

Limitations

Poor expression and plasma membrane localization of an archaeal rhodopsin in mammalian system poses great challenge for optogenetic tools. Further, investigations are required to characterize the link of dimerization of CsR with its light-gated ion conductivity or signaling state.

Abbreviations

ASR: 

anabaena sensory rhodopsin

BR: 

bacteriorhodopsin

ChRs: 

Channelrhodopsins

CsR: 

Coccomyxa subellipsoidea rhodopsin

FITC: 

Fluorescein Iso-thiocynate

HR: 

halorhodopsin

KLH: 

keyhole limpet hemocyanin

ML: 

maximum likelihood

NJ: 

neighbour joining

PBS: 

phosphate buffer saline

SRI & SRII: 

sensory rhodopsin I & II

TCL: 

total cell lysate

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SK and PR designed the experiment. PR performed the experiment. SK and PR analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The CIF, UDSC facility is acknowledged for the technical support. We are thankful to Peter Hegemann for his scientific support.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The reagents used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

PR was supported with fellowship from University Grant Commission (UGC) Government of India.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry, University of Delhi South Campus, Benito Juarez Road, New Delhi, 110021, India
(2)
Present address: Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
(3)
Present address: School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India

References

  1. Oesterhelt D, Stoeckenius W. Functions of a new photoreceptor membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70(10):2853–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Schobert B, Lanyi JK. Halorhodopsin is a light-driven chloride pump. J Biol Chem. 1982;257(17):10306–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bogomolni RA, Spudich JL. Identification of a third rhodopsin-like pigment in phototactic Halobacterium halobium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79(20):6250–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Jung KH, Trivedi VD, Spudich JL. Demonstration of a sensory rhodopsin in eubacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2003;47(6):1513–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nagel G, Ollig D, Fuhrmann M, Kateriya S, Musti AM, Bamberg E, Hegemann P. Channelrhodopsin-1: a light-gated proton channel in green algae. Science. 2002;296(5577):2395–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nagel G, Szellas T, Huhn W, Kateriya S, Adeishvili N, Berthold P, Ollig D, Hegemann P, Bamberg E. Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(24):13940–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Berthold P, Tsunoda SP, Ernst OP, Mages W, Gradmann D, Hegemann P. Channelrhodopsin-1 initiates phototaxis and photophobic responses in chlamydomonas by immediate light-induced depolarization. Plant Cell. 2008;20(6):1665–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. DeLong EF, Beja O. The light-driven proton pump proteorhodopsin enhances bacterial survival during tough times. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(4):e1000359.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Tsunoda SP, Ewers D, Gazzarrini S, Moroni A, Gradmann D, Hegemann P. H+ -pumping rhodopsin from the marine alga Acetabularia. Biophys J. 2006;91(4):1471–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Slamovits CH, Okamoto N, Burri L, James ER, Keeling PJ. A bacterial proteorhodopsin proton pump in marine eukaryotes. Nat Commun. 2011;2:183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Waschuk SA, Bezerra AG Jr, Shi L, Brown LS. Leptosphaeria rhodopsin: bacteriorhodopsin-like proton pump from a eukaryote. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(19):6879–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Inoue K, Ono H, Abe-Yoshizumi R, Yoshizawa S, Ito H, Kogure K, Kandori H. A light-driven sodium ion pump in marine bacteria. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1678.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang F, Vierock J, Yizhar O, Fenno LE, Tsunoda S, Kianianmomeni A, Prigge M, Berndt A, Cushman J, Polle J, et al. The microbial opsin family of optogenetic tools. Cell. 2011;147(7):1446–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Vogt A, Guo Y, Tsunoda SP, Kateriya S, Elstner M, Hegemann P. Conversion of a light-driven proton pump into a light-gated ion channel. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16450.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Blanc G, Agarkova I, Grimwood J, Kuo A, Brueggeman A, Dunigan DD, Gurnon J, Ladunga I, Lindquist E, Lucas S, et al. The genome of the polar eukaryotic microalgae Coccomyxa subellipsoidea reveals traits of cold adaptation. Genome Biol. 2012;13(5):R39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cserzo M, Eisenhaber F, Eisenhaber B, Simon I. On filtering false positive transmembrane protein predictions. Protein Eng. 2002;15(9):745–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chou KC, Shen HB. Plant-mPLoc: a top-down strategy to augment the power for predicting plant protein subcellular localization. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(6):e11335.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Page RD. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996;12(4):357–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Awasthi M, Ranjan P, Sharma K, Veetil SK, Kateriya S. The trafficking of bacterial type rhodopsins into the Chlamydomonas eyespot and flagella is IFT mediated. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34646.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Awasthi M, Batra J, Kateriya S. Disulphide bridges of phospholipase C of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii modulates lipid interaction and dimer stability. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39258.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Ranjan P, Kashyap RS, Goel M, Veetil SK, Kateriya S. Cellular organelles facilitate dimerization of a newly identified Arf from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Phycol. 2014;50(6):1137–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolaskar AS, Tongaonkar PC. A semi-empirical method for prediction of antigenic determinants on protein antigens. FEBS Lett. 1990;276(1–2):172–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruiz-Gonzalez MX, Marin I. New insights into the evolutionary history of type 1 rhodopsins. J Mol Evol. 2004;58(3):348–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stefanik MT, Moussawi K, Kupchik YM, Smith KC, Miller RL, Huff ML, Deisseroth K, Kalivas PW, LaLumiere RT. Optogenetic inhibition of cocaine seeking in rats. Addict Biol. 2012;18(1):50–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams SC, Deisseroth K. Optogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(41):16287.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunaydin LA, Yizhar O, Berndt A, Sohal VS, Deisseroth K, Hegemann P. Ultrafast optogenetic control. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(3):387–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement