Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Socio-demographic characteristics and the utilization of HIV testing and counselling services among the key populations at the Bhutanese Refugees Camps in Eastern Nepal

  • 1,
  • 2Email author,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 6 and
  • 2
Contributed equally
BMC Research Notes201811:535

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3657-2

  • Received: 11 May 2018
  • Accepted: 27 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objectives

This cross-sectional study was conducted to describe the socio-demographic characteristics, assess the utilization of HIV testing and counselling services, and to explore the reasons for the non-utilization of HIV testing and counselling services among the key populations at the Bhutanese refugee camps in eastern Nepal.

Results

The HIV testing and counselling services are utilized by less than a third (29%) of the key population among the Bhutanese Refugees. The prime source of information about the HIV testing and counselling sites has been health workers followed by peer/outreach educators and neighbors. Common self-reported barriers for utilization of HIV testing and counselling services by the Bhutanese refugees were self-perceived stigma about HIV, the fear of being discriminated and the lack of knowledge about HIV testing and counselling services. There is a need to analyze the gap between availability and utilization through more qualitative approaches in order to identify interventions to increase the uptake of the HIV testing and counselling services.

Keywords

  • HIV testing and counselling
  • Refugees in Nepal
  • Utilization of HIV testing and counselling services
  • Bhutanese refugees

Introduction

HIV remains a major public health problem worldwide. Almost 78 million people have been infected and about 39 million have died because of HIV infection since the beginning of the epidemic. As of 2016, there were an estimated 36.7 million (34.0 million–39.8 million) people living with HIV (PLHIV) globally, including almost 1% of adults aged 15–49 years [1]. While HIV epidemiological trends have begun to reverse in the Southeast Asian region, the HIV prevalence has remained constant at < 0.1% [2].

Refugees are at risk of contracting HIV due to the extended displacement and associated disruption to their lives. Although HIV services exist, several challenges limit access of refugees to services [3]. Refugees are often accused of importing HIV to the countries of asylum, thus discriminated [4]. Refugee women are forced to engage in commercial sex for food, shelter material and other basic commodities [5], whilst refugee men who leave their partners behind often engage with commercial sex workers, both inside or outside refugee camps, and are therefore placed at risk of HIV infection [6, 7].

HIV testing and counselling (HTC) is an evidence-based, cost-effective intervention to prevent HIV infection [8]. HTC motivates people to modify behaviors in order to prevent HIV infection or transmission [9, 10]. HIV/AIDS is also a priority sector in the new Sustainable Development Goal 3 [11] and HTC services have been widely promoted in low-middle income countries, as part of their primary health care [12, 13], and can help government in HIV policy making [14]. The success of the intervention hinges upon access and utilization of the HTC services [8, 15, 16].

The relationships between population migration and situations that can increase the risk of HIV infection are well documented [17]. HIV testing is lesser a priority compared to the needs of meeting the daily survival needs among refugees in Uganda [18]. As the HTC services are made available through a HIV section in the health center of each Bhutanese refugee camp [19], it is also very crucial to make sure they are utilized [18].

HIV positivity among the Bhutanese refugees varied from 0.23% in 2009 and 0.03% in 2010 to 0.12% in 2011 [20]. Health services along with HTC services are delivered through a permanent clinic based unit in the primary health center of the Bhutanese refugee camp in Nepal [21, 22]. Understanding the individual, local and socio-cultural aspect of HTC services utilization is useful for the programs in similar settings. It is imperative to explore the utilization of HTC among such vulnerable population [23]. Utilization of HTC services by the key population of the Bhutanese refugee camps is an important step in prevention and control HIV among these populations. As the Bhutanese refugees have been migrating to many countries around the world [17], it is crucial to have a strong HIV control program with high uptake of HTC services in Nepal.

With limited availability of HTC utilization literatures regarding the refugee and displaced population from around the world and no literature found from Nepal, this study could provide basic information on the HTC utilization among the Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. The evidence generated from this study will be useful for HIV programs in refugee settings Nepal and also around the world. This study thus aims to describe the socio-demographic characteristics, assess the utilization of HTC services, and explore the reasons for the non-utilization of HTC services among the key populations at the Bhutanese refugee camps in eastern Nepal.

Main text

Methods

We conducted a cross sectional study using quantitative methods in Beldangi and Sanischare refugee camps in eastern Nepal from August to December 2015.

As of August 2015, the total number of refugees from Bhutan living in Beldangi and Sanischare camps was 20,051 [21]. Using a snowball sampling technique [24], 323 respondents were identified as key populations at risk of HIV infection. All 323 key population identified in the study were approached for the study and all of them agreed to participate, giving a response rate of 100% in this study. A semi structured questionnaire was prepared adapting the tool from the previous study [3].

Having ever accessed HTC services and completed a session was considered a positive response for utilization. The interviews were carried out in Nepali by the research team. Bivariate analysis was done using Chi square test for the associated factors, and Odds ratio was calculated along with its 95% confidence interval. Multivariate analysis was done further for the associated factors with p-value < 0.25 in bivariate analysis, using binomial logistic regression analysis, for adjusted odd’s ratio and the confidence interval. The p-value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The key population included, the primary target population including migrant workers (36.5%), intravenous drug user (11.1%), client of sex worker (10.5%), female sex workers (7.1%) and men having sex with men (2.8%); and the secondary target population including spouse of primary target population (31.9%).

Almost all (99%) lived within 30 min walk of the HTC center. The study found the utilization of HTC services was 29%. The bivariate analysis showed significant association of utilization of HTC services with the age and literacy status (Table 1). Sex, religion, marital status and employment status were not found to be associated significantly.
Table 1

Respondent characteristics associated with the utilization of HTC services

Socio-demographic characteristics

Utilization of HTC services

Unadjusted odds ratio

Yes (%)

No (%)

OR

95% CI (lower)

95% CI (upper)

p-value*

Age (years)

 < 25

54 (25.4)

159 (74.6)

1

1.06

2.86

0.026

 ≥ 25

41 (37.3)

69 (62.7)

1.74

Sex

 Female

36 (25.7)

104 (74.3)

1

0.84

2.24

0.248

 Male

59 (32.2)

124 (67.8)

1.37

Religion

 Hindu

33 (33.3)

66 (66.7)

1

  

0.453

 Buddhist

27 (28.7)

67 (71.3)

0.80

0.43

1.48

 Christian

11 (24.4)

34 (75.6)

0.64

0.29

1.43

 Kirat

20 (25.6)

58 (74.4)

0.68

0.35

1.33

 No religion

4 (57.1)

3 (42.9)

2.66

0.56

12.61

Marital status

 Married

42 (27.3)

112 (72.7)

1

0.75

1.97

0.495

 Single

53 (31.4)

116 (68.6)

1.21

Literacy status

 Literate

75 (25.9)

215 (74.1)

1

2.01

9.03

<0.001

 Illiterate

20 (60.6)

13 (39.4)

4.41

Employment status

 Unemployed

51 (26.3)

143 (73.7)

1

0.89

2.35

0.166

 Employed

44 (34.1)

85 (65.9)

1.45

Type of key population

 Primary

66 (30.0)

154 (70.0)

1

0.54

1.53

0.734

 Secondary

29 (28.2)

74 (71.8)

0.91

* Calculated using χ2 test

All the variables which were found to be associated with 25% significance (p ≤ 0.25) in bivariate analysis were taken for multivariate analysis. Age, sex, literacy and employment status were considered for multivariate analysis (Table 2). Literacy status was found to be significantly associated with HTC utilization even after adjusting for other confounders (p < 0.001).
Table 2

Multivariate analysis of characteristics associated with utilization of HTC services

Characteristics

Category

Beta-coefficient

p-value

Adjusted odds

95% CI for adjusted odds

Lower

Upper

Age (years)

< 25

1

    

≥ 25

0.225

0.416

1.252

0.728

2.153

Sex

Female

1

    

Male

0.275

0.296

1.316

0.786

2.205

Literacy status

Literate

1

    

Illiterate

1.462

0.000

4.316

1.951

9.549

Employment status

Unemployed

1

    

Employed

0.375

0.160

1.455

0.863

2.455

Constant

 

− 1.449

0.000

0.235

  

Among 323 respondents, 228 (70%) knew about the HTC services. The sources of information about the HTC services among them were health workers at the camps (51.7%), peer/outreach educators (44.6%), neighbors, mass media including radio/television (16.4%), family/friends (14.6%) and community education sessions (14.6%).

Self-perceived stigma about HIV was the most frequently reported reason (55%) for not visiting the HTC center. Respondents believed that visiting the center would foster and communicate negative images about them in the community. Other reasons given for not visiting the HTC center are listed in Table 3.
Table 3

Reasons for not visiting the HTC center (n = 228)

Reasonsa

% of respondents

Self-perceived stigma about HIV

55

Fear of discrimination

54

Lack of knowledge about HTC services

47

Perception of being at low or no risk

43

Fear of rejection by spouse/family members

34

Fear of HIV positive test result

30

Fear of violence if tested HIV positive

23

Fear of community people finding out

17

Not believing that testing will help

10

Fear of delay in resettlement process if found positive

7

Fear of needles

6

Not accepting that HIV as a disease exists

6

Not having the patience to wait for the results

5

Inconvenient testing hours

4

The perception that the test is expensive

3

Perceived long waiting time

3

Inconvenient location of HTC center

2

aThe responses were not mutually exclusive

Discussion

HTC services allow people to assess their risk behaviors, identify their HIV status and discuss HIV related issues with skilled counsellors. Refugees are particularly vulnerable to HIV infection as conflicts, insecurity, and poverty offer a fertile ground for HIV transmission [25]. Utilization of existing HTC services by the refugees provides benefits for the refugee community, as well as the host population in Nepal and the resettled population around the world.

The HTC services were utilized by only a little over a quarter of the key populations (29%) identified in this study. The utilization of HTC services varied among different population groups around the world. Utilization of HTC services was 94% among health workers in Zimbabwe [26], 32–63% among university students in Kenya [27, 28], and 87% among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Nepal [29]. However, utilization data among refugees from elsewhere were not found. Interventions to increase the utilization of HTC services among key populations among the Bhutanese refugees may need further exploration. People who are younger than 25 years use the HTC center at the camps less than those who are 25 years and older. This shows a need for target programs to meet the needs of young refugees. Education was the only socio-demographic characteristic that was significant in the multivariate analysis. It was notable that illiterate rather than literate refugees used HTC services within the camps more frequently. The findings corroborates with the findings from findings from key populations in South Africa [30], where the illiterate people were more likely to utilize the HTC services. The underlying reasons for this phenomenon may need further exploration, perhaps using qualitative methods.

Health workers and outreach educators were the major source of information about the HTC services. A third of the respondents were not aware of the services, highlights the needs for further exploration to expand awareness programs. A fifth of respondents learnt about HTC through mass media such as television and radio. However, in Ghana, 2/3rd of respondents learnt about similar services through these channels [31]. While in Nepal there is a frequent radio show embedded in the HIV program for Bhutanese refugees, its role delivering HTC-related information seems modest [32].

Stigma, discrimination and the issues reported as barriers demand clear addressing [14, 23]. Identifying the socio-cultural dimensions of HIV as a disease and its treatment as perceived by the Bhutanese refugees remains to be explored. The stigma surrounding HIV and the people living with HIV serves as an additional barrier, affecting the acceptability of testing [33, 34] and the extent of social support [35]. Many people fear the psychosocial consequences of testing positive for HIV, particularly when it may lead to loss of social status, discrimination [3638], domestic violence or even abandonment [39]. Fear of being HIV-positive and the perception of being at low risk are areas that are linked with awareness and the knowledge about HIV and its transmission. These are also the reasons for self-stigma. The findings from this study resonate with previous research [31, 40]. A study from 2016 reports family planning service provided by health centers to the Bhutanese refugees to have a good uptake along with the refuges being well informed about the family planning services [22]. The enabling factors from the family planning services could be further explored to find ways to promote the HTC services among the refugee population.

Barriers to utilization of HTC services may be related to lack of knowledge and awareness of issues related to the prevention and management of HIV. Newer ways to educate the people may be needed. The concern of confidentiality of the information, i.e. fear of rejection if spouse finds out and the fear of discrimination is community people find out reported in this study matches with the findings from another study [14] in Nepal. Confidentiality concern is a perceived barrier for the uptake of HTC services in other settings as well [41]. HTC staff is important to build the client confidence for HIV testing and counselling and they could play a greater role in minimizing the stigma. The quality of counselling by the counsellors as well as adherence to the principles of confidentiality may need to be further explored [23]. Long waiting time and fear of people finding out about their status were perceived reasons for not utilizing the HTC services in this study [40, 42]. The health service barriers could have strong influence on the utilization of HTC services as reported in other studies [40]. There could be possibilities of incorporating mobile clinic based HTC services [43], however, further research and consultation may be required.

The perceived fear that their resettlement process will be interrupted if tested positive, may be an important reason for Bhutanese refugees. The third country resettlement for Bhutanese refugees is ongoing since 2007 and the HIV testing was a routine before departure. However, in the recent years, the testing is voluntary and refugees are not stopped on the grounds of being HIV positive [44]. The policy on HIV testing for resettlement also may discourages compulsory testing and mandates the use of standard HTC services for any refugees opting for resettlement [45]. Apparently, there seems a communication gap about this information to the refugee community.

Conclusion

The utilization of HTC services was low. Culturally appropriate interventions may be needed to address the perceived stigma and discrimination of HIV among refugees. Comprehensive communication strategies may be developed to disseminate information about HIV testing optimally with the outreach and peer educators as a key source of information and facilitators of communication.

Limitations

Snowball sampling may have introduced community bias. The potential key population member that are not connected to local peers may have been missed out as the sample recruitment in snowball sampling is strongly respondent driven. The cross-sectional nature of the study also fails to provide the casual relationship between factors and the utilization of HTC services. The use of open questions has pointed out the reasons for not using the services; however, a robust qualitative design in the future may provide in-depth understanding.

Notes

Abbreviations

HTC: 

HIV testing and counselling

PLHIV: 

people living with HIV

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SK was involved in conception and designing of the study, data collection, revising preliminary and the final drafts for publication. SSB was involved in designing of the research, interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript and revising it for intellectual content and preparing the final version for publication. KB was involved in conceptualization and designing of the research, data analysis, manuscript editing and finalizing the manuscript for publication. RT was involved in conceptualizing the research, manuscript revision and preparing the final version for publication. LPB was involved in conceptualizing the research, interpretation of data, preparing draft and finalizing the draft. BB was involved in conceptualizing the study, data interpretation, revising the draft and finalizing the draft. NJ was involved in designing the method, interpretation of data, revising the draft manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank UNHCR, for support to conduct the research among the Bhutanese Refugees. We acknowledge the Association of Medical Doctors of Asia Primary Health Care Project for Bhutanese Refugees (AMDA PHCP for BR) for the co-operation during the study. Most importantly, we thank the participants of the study. We appreciate the inputs received from Dr. Jeevan Thapa, Dr. Meika Bhattachan and Dr. Avinash Kumar Sunny from B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (BPKIHS) during the preparation of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Enrique Castro-Sanchez for proof reading our manuscript. The statements in this publication are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or the views of UNHCR, AMDA or BPKIHS.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials section

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was taken from Institutional Review Committee of B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences (Ref: 304/071/072-IRC). Written informed consent was taken from the participants before data collection.

Funding

None.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Sub-Office, Damak, Nepal
(2)
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
(3)
Local Action for Global Health and Environment (LAGHE)-Nepal, Dhangadhi 5, Kailali, Nepal
(4)
AMDA Nepal Primary Health Care Project for Bhutanese Refugees, Damak, Nepal
(5)
Association of Medical Doctors of Asia-HIV/AIDS for Migrants (AMDA-HAMI), Kathmandu, Nepal
(6)
Birat Health College and Research Center, Biratnagar, Nepal

References

  1. UNAIDS. Global AIDS Update 2016. Geneva; 2016. p. 1–13. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/global-AIDS-update-2016_en.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2016.
  2. WHO-SEARO. Health situation and trend assessment | MDG6: HIV/AIDS. 2015. http://www.searo.who.int/entity/health_situation_trends/data/mdg/hiv_prevalence/en/. Accessed 10 Oct 2015.
  3. Mujyambere P. Barriers to HIV voluntary counselling and testing among refugees and asylum seekers from African Great Lakes region living in Durban. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch; 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Iboko N. Blaming the others: refugee men and HIV risk in Cape Town. Cape Town: University of Western Cape; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. McKinley JC Jr. AIDS prolongs war devastation in rural rwanda. N Y Times. 1998;28:A3.Google Scholar
  6. Haour-Knipe M, Leshabari MK, Wihula GL. Interventions for workers away from their families. In: Gibney L, DiClimente RJ, Vermung SH, editors. Preventing HIV in developing countries: biomedical and behavioral approaches. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. p. 257–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zwi AB, Cabral AJR. Identifying “high risk situations” for preventing AIDS. Br Med J. 1991;303(December):1527–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Holtgrave D, McGuire J. Impact of counseling in voluntary counseling and testing programs for persons at risk for or living with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(Supplement 4):S240–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Denison JA, O’Reilly KR, Schmid GP, Kennedy CE, Sweat MD. HIV voluntary counseling and testing and behavioral risk reduction in developing countries: a meta-analysis, 1990–2005. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(3):363–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. UNAIDS. The impact of voluntary counselling and testing: a global review of the benefits and challenges. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2001.Google Scholar
  11. De Andrade LOM, Filho AP, Solar O, Rígoli F, De Salazar LM, Serrate PCF, et al. Social determinants of health, universal health coverage, and sustainable development: case studies from Latin American countries. Lancet. 2015;385(9975):1343–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coovadia HM. Access to voluntary counseling and testing for HIV in developing countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;918:57–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Peck R, Fitzgerald DW, Liautaud B, Deschamps MM, Verdier RI, Beaulieu ME, et al. The feasibility, demand, and effect of integrating primary care services wth HIV voluntary counseling and testing: evaluation of a 15-year experience in Haiti, 1985–2000. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33:470–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahato PK, Bi P, Burgess T. Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) services and its role in HIV/AIDS prevention and management in Nepal. South East Asia J Public Health. 2013;3(1):10–6.Google Scholar
  15. De Cock KM, Fowler MG, Mercier E, de Vincenzi I, Saba J, Hoff E, et al. Prevention of mother-to-child hiv transmission in resource-poor countries. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(9):1175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. WHO. WHO | Mother to child transmission of HIV. HIV/AIDS. 2015. http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/mtct/en/. Accessed 8 Oct 2015.
  17. UNHCR-IOM. UNHCR-IOM Joint Press Release: 90,000 refugees from Bhutan resettled. Press release. 2014. p. 1. http://un.org.np/sites/default/files/2014-05-21-resettlement.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.
  18. O’Laughlin KN, Rouhani S, Faustin ZM, Ware NC. Testing experiences of HIV positive refugees in Nakivale Refugee Settlement in Uganda: informing interventions to encourage priority shifting. Confl Health. 2013;7(1):2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. UNHCR, WFP. UNHCR/WFP joint assessment mission report assistance to the refugees from Bhutan in Nepal. Kathmandu: UNHCR, WFP; 2012.Google Scholar
  20. AMDA PHCP for BR. Annual Report | Association of Medical Doctors of Asia Primary Health Care Project for Bhutanese Refugees (AMDA PHCP for BR). Damak; 2011.Google Scholar
  21. UNHCR. UNHCR Nepal Fact sheet. Kathmandu; 2015. p. 1–2. http://un.info.np/Net/NeoDocs/View/2482. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  22. Rayamajhi RB, Budhathoki SS, Ghimire A, Neupane B, Paudel A, Paudel KM, Pokharel PK. A descriptive study on use of family planning methods by married reproductive aged women in Bhutanese Refugee camps of eastern Nepal. J Chitwan Med Coll. 2016;6(16):44–8.Google Scholar
  23. Obermeyer CM, Osborn M. The utilization of testing and counseling for HIV: a review of the social and behavioral evidence. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1762–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Oregon State University. Snowball sampling. 2017. http://research.oregonstate.edu/irb/policies-and-guidance-investigators/guidance/snowball-sampling. Accessed 16 Mar 2016.
  25. Spiegel PB, Nankoe A. UNHCR, HIV/AIDS and refugees: lessons learned. Forced Migr Rev. 2004;19:21–4.Google Scholar
  26. Nyahwa N. Reasons contributing to low uptake of HIV testing and counselling services by health workers in Masvingo urban district. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 2013.Google Scholar
  27. Othero DM, Aduma P, Opil CO. Knowledge, attitudes and sexual practices of university students for advancing peer HIV education. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(1):11–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. EAC/AMREF LAKE Victoria Partnership Programme. Kisumu: Lake Victoria Basin Commission. HIV and AIDS Baseline Sero-behavioural Study in Six Universities in Kenya. 2010.Google Scholar
  29. Shrestha R. Determinants of voluntary HIV counseling and testing (VCT) uptake among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Nepal. Bergen: University of Bergen; 2015.Google Scholar
  30. Stephenson R, Rentsch C, Sullivan PA. High levels of acceptability of couples-based HIV testing among MSM in South Africa. AIDS Care. 2012;24(4):529–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Apasera E, Laar A. Utilization of HIV testing and counseling services by Men in the Bolgatanga Municipality. Int J Trop Dis Health. 2015;5(3):209–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. AMDA Nepal. HIV annual report AMDA 2012. Damak: AMDA; 2013.Google Scholar
  33. Kipp W, Kabagambe G, Konde-Lule J. HIV counselling and testing in rural Uganda: communities’ attitudes and perceptions towards an HIV counselling and testing programme. AIDS Care. 2002;14(5):699–706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Leta TH, Sandøy IF, Fylkesnes K. Factors affecting voluntary HIV counselling and testing among men in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:438.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Stein JA, Nyamathi A. Gender differences in behavioural and psychosocial predictors of HIV testing and return for test results in a high-risk population. AIDS Care. 2000;12(3):343–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Brown L, Macintyre K, Trujillo L. Interventions to reduce HIV/AIDS stigma: what have we learned? AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15(1):49–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker R, Aggleton P. HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: a conceptual framework and implications for action. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(1):13–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. UNAIDS. Fact sheet: stigma and discrimination. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2003. p. 1–3. http://data.unaids.org/Publications/Fact-Sheets03/fs_stigma_discrimination_en.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  39. Maman S, Mbwambo J, Hogan NM, Kilonzo GP, Sweat M. Women’s barriers to HIV-1 testing and disclosure: challenges for HIV-1 voluntary counselling and testing. AIDS Care. 2001;13(5):595–603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kwapong GD, Boateng D, Agyei-Baffour P, Addy EA. Health service barriers to HIV testing and counseling among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:267.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohlabane N, Tutshana B, Peltzer K, Mwisongo A. Barriers and facilitators associated with HIV testing uptake in South African health facilities offering HIV Counselling and Testing. Heal SA Gesondheid. 2016;21:86–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Meremo A, Mboya B, Ngilangwa D, Dulle R, Tarimo E, Urassa D, et al. Barriers to accessibility and utilization of HIV testing and counseling services in Tanzania: experience from Angaza Zaidi programme. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;23:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mabuto T, Latka MH, Kuwane B, Churchyard GJ, Charalambous S, Hoffmann CJ. Four models of HIV counseling and testing: Utilization and test results in South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102267.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bhutanese refugee health profile. Atlanta; 2014. p. 1–21. https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/pdf/bhutanese-health-profile.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2017.
  45. UNHCR, WHO, UNAIDS. Policy statement on HIV testing and counselling in health facilities for refugees, internally displaced persons and other persons of concern to UNHCR. Geneva: UNHCR; 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement