Skip to main content

Advertisement

Utility of I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN nucleases in excising selectable marker genes from transgenic plants

Article metrics

Abstract

Objectives

Removal of selection marker genes from transgenic plants is highly desirable for their regulatory approval and public acceptance. This study evaluated the use of two nucleases, the yeast homing endonuclease, I-SceI, and the designed zinc finger nuclease, CCR5-ZFN, in excising marker genes from plants using rice and Arabidopsis as the models.

Results

In an in vitro culture assay, both nucleases were effective in precisely excising the DNA fragments marked by the nuclease target sites. However, rice cultures were found to be refractory to transformation with the I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN overexpressing constructs. The inducible I-SceI expression was also problematic in rice as the progeny of the transgenic lines expressing the heat-inducible I-SceI did not inherit the functional gene. On the other hand, heat-inducible I-SceI expression in Arabidopsis was effective in creating somatic excisions in transgenic plants but ineffective in generating heritable excisions. The inducible expression of CCR5-ZFN in rice, although transmitted stably to the progeny, appeared ineffective in creating detectable excisions. Therefore, toxicity of these nucleases in plant cells poses major bottleneck in their application in plant biotechnology, which could be avoided by expressing them transiently in cultures in vitro.

Introduction

Selection marker genes are indispensable tools in genetic engineering. Their presence in transgenic crops, however, could be detrimental [1], requiring methods for removing them from the plant. The most desirable outcome is to precisely delete the marker genes without creating off-target mutations. The Cre-lox site-specific recombination system is highly successful in achieving that goal [2,3,4], but it leaves a reactive footprint, the functional lox site, in the genome, rendering it non-reusable for the next round of transformation [5, 6].

The double-stranded break (DSB) repair mechanism has long been proposed as an alternative approach for excising marker genes, which can be repeatedly used in the same transgenic line as this mechanism destroys the target site by creating insertion–deletions (indels). Several nucleases, including meganucleases, ZFN, and CRISPR/Cas have been used for creating concomitant DSBs to achieve transgene deletions in the plant cells [7,8,9,10,11]. However, their applications in generating marker-free plants needs more investigation. This study evaluated the effectiveness of codon-optimized I-SceI [12] and CCR5-ZFN [13] in excising genes in rice and Arabidopsis using overexpression and inducible expression approaches. These two nucleases were chosen because they have been successfully used in plant genome engineering [10, 14,15,16].

In this study, the expression of I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN appeared to be deleterious as indicated by the failure to transform rice with the overexpression constructs, indicating their activity on non-canonical target sites. The inducible expression was ineffective in creating excisions in plants and/or transmitting them to the progeny. Retransformation approach, on the other hand, was successful in creating targeted excision in cultures in vitro. Therefore, the use of nucleases in plants is hampered by their genotoxic property and lower efficiencies, but retransformation of in vitro cultures could serve as a practical solution for creating targeted excisions, which could then be regenerated into plants. However, several ‘excision events’ will have to be screened for precise targeted excisions and the potential off-target mutations.

Main text

Methods

DNA constructs, plant transformation, and treatments

All constructs were prepared using the standard molecular biology techniques. The synthetic coding sequences of I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN were provided by Drs. Holger Puchta (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Joseph Petolino (Dow Agro Sciences, Inc.), respectively. Agrobacterium-mediated and biolistics-mediated rice (Nipponbare) transformations have been described earlier [9, 17]. Arabidopsis (Col-0) transformation was done using the floral-dip method [18]. Heat-shock treatments of rice in vitro cultures, cut leaves or the seedlings was done by placing the tissues in the petri-dish or wrapped in aluminum foil in an incubator maintained at 42 °C for 3 h, followed by 72 h of recovery before scarifying the tissue for DNA/RNA isolation. For Arabidopsis, seedlings in the germination media (MS media without sucrose) were placed in 40 °C for 3 h followed by 48 h of recovery.

Molecular analysis

The PCR primers were designed using Primer Blast tool and verified in the IDT oligo-analyzer for the hairpin, self and heterodimer structures. They were also checked by BLAST to look for any potential non-specific sites in the rice and Arabidopsis genomes. Primers used in the present study are given in Additional file 1: Table S1. PCR was performed at 94 °C for 4 min followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 58–60 °C and 1–2 min at 72 °C depending on the amplicon size (unless otherwise stated) using Emerald Amp PCR master mix (TaKaRa Inc.). All the PCR assays included the non-transformed rice or Arabidopsis genomic DNA as the negative control to screen for any non-specific amplification. For gene expression analysis, total RNA isolated using RNaesy kit (Qiagen Inc.) was subjected to real-time PCR using Super Script III one step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) using manufacturer’s instructions. Relative expression was calculated against wild-type using 2ΔΔCt method [19], and the Ct values were normalized against internal control, Ubiquitin or Phytoene desaturase genes. The purified PCR products were sequenced at Eurofin Genomics USA. Genomic DNA of selected lines were also analyzed on Southern blot using P32-labeled DNA probes.

Results

Expression of I-SceI and ZFN in rice

The overexpression constructs consisting of ZmUbi1 promoter for I-SceI or ZFN expression (Fig. 1a) were co-bombarded with hygromycin resistance gene (hygR) on the scutellar callus of rice cv. Nipponbare. The hygR gene consisted of hygromycin phosphotransferase gene driven by CaMV 35S promoter. No selectable clones were obtained with I-SceI overexpression construct in two different experiments, suggesting geno-toxicity of I-SceI in rice. With ZFN overexpression construct, 11 hygR lines were generated that were PCR-positive for ZFN gene. However, only 3 of these set a low number of seeds (10–30 seeds/line), indicating high rate of sterility in ZFN rice plants. The PCR analysis of the T1 plants from these three lines revealed lack of inheritance of the ZFN gene (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Therefore, strong expression of ZFN also generated toxicity in rice cells that severely hampered inheritance of the ZFN gene. The BLASTn analysis, (using default parameters—input: 33 or 18 bp; e-value threshold: 10; match/mismatch score: 1, − 3; gapopen: − 5 and gapextend: − 3) of 18 bp I-SceI and 33 bp CCR5 sites did not reveal match in the rice or Arabidopsis genome. The online tools for predicting off-target of I-SceI are lacking, but five I-SceI like sites [20] were also used in the BLASTn analysis, none of which found a 100% match in the rice or Arabidopsis genome. Off-target prediction of the CCR5-ZFN by Prognos tool [21] found 12 highly probable sites in the rice genome.

Fig. 1
figure1

Expression of I-SceI and ZFN in rice. a, b Overexpression and inducible constructs of I-SceI or ZFN contain ZmUbi1 for constitutive overexpression or GmHSP17.5E for HS-inducible expression with nos 3′ as transcription termination sequence. c, d Real-time quantitative PCR analysis on total RNA isolated from the rice lines expressing HS inducible I-SceI or ZFN gene. Relative expression against wild-type control is shown for each line. Bars show mean of two treatments with standard errors. Red and blue bars represent HS and room temperature (RT) samples, respectively. Note that ZFN expression at RT was close to the wild-type controls

Next, inducible expression constructs consisting of GmHSP17.5E gene promoter expressing I-SceI or ZFN (Fig. 1b) were co-transformed with hygR gene into Nipponbare callus. Seven I-SceI and 8 ZFN lines were recovered, indicating curbed toxicity of the inducible I-SceI and ZFN in rice. Expression analysis was conducted on heat-shock-treated (HS) cut leaves obtained from the greenhouse grown plants. Five HS–ISceI lines and seven HS–ZFN lines showed several fold increase in the expression with respect to the untreated control, confirming proper regulation of these nucleases in the rice plant (Fig. 1c, d). The HS–ZFN lines showed normal growth and fertility, and transmitted ZFN activity to the progeny. The HS–ISceI lines, on the other hand, did not transmit I-SceI gene to the progeny and showed poor growth and high sterility, indicating toxicity of the basal expression of the inducible I-SceI gene to the somatic and germ cells.

Characterization of inducible ZFN activity in excising marker gene in rice plants

While the experiments with HS–ISceI had to be discontinued due to problematic heritability of I-SceI gene, HS–ZFN lines were cross-pollinated with CCR5 target lines developed by transformation of Nipponbare rice with pBP5 that contains three gene cassettes, GFP, HPT and NPT, with a pair of 33 bp CCR5 sites flanking the HPT cassette (Fig. 2a). Targeting of CCR5 sites by ZFN could lead to the excision of HPT and fusion of the distal ends creating indels at the targeted sites (Fig. 2b). Five healthy F1 plants representing three different ZFN lines (lines #3, #6, #7; Fig. 1b) and two different CCR5-target lines (Fig. 2c) were heat-shocked and grown to maturity in the greenhouse. All F1 plants expressed GFP and the HS-induced ZFN activity, confirming the presence of CCR5 target and ZFN constructs; however, excision of the HPT cassette was undetectable by PCR across CCR5 sites (data not shown). Several F2 seedlings that were positive for GFP and ZFN were also heat-shocked and sacrificed for DNA isolation, but none showed the excision site (≤ 1.3 kb) in the PCR, while the presence of intact target site (3.5 kb) was evident in a number of them (Fig. 2d). Hence, HS-induced ZFN activity appeared suboptimal in creating detectable excisions in rice. This observation corroborates with that of Lu et al. [22], who reported low frequency targeting by heat-inducible ZFN in poplar.

Fig. 2
figure2

Characterization of HSP–ZFN in rice. a The CCR5-target construct in pPZP200 binary vector contains GFP, HPT and NPT genes. Each of which is controlled by 35S promoter and nos 3′ terminator. The HPT gene is flanked by 33 bp CCR5 sequences (gray bars). Location of EcoR1 (E) sites and the fragment sizes are shown. b Predicted structure of ZFN-induced precise excision of HPT cassette with indels in between (dotted bar). PCR primer positions and predicted fragment sizes (in kb) are shown below each structure. c Southern blot analysis of rice lines transformed with pBP5. Genomic DNA was cut with EcoRI and hybridized with P32 labeled GFP or NPT probes. Fragment sizes are given in kb. d PCR analysis using primers located in CCR5-target sites (GFPNPT) or ZFN gene (HSP–ZFN) on genomic DNA isolated from F2 plants derived from crosses between CCR5-target lines and HSP–ZFN lines. F1 parent, and CCR5-target and ZFN lines are also shown. e PCR across CCR5 sites in the retransformed callus clones and the regenerated plants obtained by retransformation of HS–ZFN line #7 (Fig. 1d) with pBP5. The room temperature (RT) or heat-shocked (HS) samples of the selected calli clones (1–4) are shown with the regenerated plants obtained from them. ZFN line #7 serves as the negative control. f PCR across CCR5 sites in the retransformed clones derived from the retransformation of CCR5-target lines with pHSP:ZFN construct. Target line and wild-type (WT) are included as controls. g Depiction of indels created by targeting of the two CCR5 sites in the target site as determined by aligning the DNA sequences of selected ≤ 1.3 kb bands with pBP5 reference. Deletions sizes are given in each diagram

Targeted excisions by retransformation

The failure in scoring targeted excisions in the F1 hybrids and their progeny derived from the crosses between HS–ZFN and CCR5-target lines raised questions whether ZFN expression was sufficient and the target locus was accessible to ZFN activity. To address these questions, reciprocal transformations were done, i.e., transformation of ZFN-expressing line with pBP5, and transformation of CCR5-target lines with pHS:ZFN. Retransformation of HS–ZFN line #7 with pBP5 generated 19 geneticin-resistant calli events that expressed GFP, indicating stable integration of the target construct in the genome. PCR across CCR5 sites found that 17 of these lines showed both full-length HPT cassette (3.5 kb) and the excision site (≤ 1.3 kb) in the room temperature (RT) samples, 4 of which showed strong presence of excision site in the heat-shock (HS) samples (Fig. 2e). These data suggest that basal ZFN activity from HS:ZFN gene could induce targeting at CCR5 sites but the targeting efficiency increased upon HS treatment. Four regenerated plants were obtained from these callus lines that also showed the ~ 1.3 kb excision site (Fig. 2e). Similarly, transformation of the CCR5-target lines with pHS:ZFN vector, produced 9 calli events, 4 of which showed ~ 1.3 kb excision band in HS-treated calli (Fig. 2f). Sequencing of five excision sites (≤ 1.3 kb) from these experiments found complete or partial excision of HPT cassette with large indels (> 1.5 kb) spreading into the adjacent sequences (Fig. 2g). In summary, HS-induced ZFN activity is capable of creating targeted excisions in rice cultures in vitro.

Inducible I-SceI mediated marker excision in Arabidopsis

Since I-SceI expression was highly toxic in rice, further experiments with inducible I-SceI were carried out in Arabidopsis. For this purpose, pEP4b construct was developed that contains a pair of I-SceI target sites flanking the GFP cassette, the kanamycin resistance (NPT) cassette, and the HS-inducible I-SceI expression cassette (Fig. 3a). The excision of the GFP cassette in this construct would result in fusion of I-SceI and NPT cassette with indels in between (Fig. 3b). Transformation of Arabidopsis Col-0 with pEP4b generated 11 kanamycin resistant T1 lines that contained a full-length integration of pEP4b construct in the PCR assay (Fig. 3c). Fertility in these T1 plants was substantially low, indicating I-SceI toxicity in the germline (≤ 10× lower compared to that of the healthy Arabidopsis plants). Germination of T2 seedlings on kanamycin-containing (50 mg/l) media displayed gradual lethality and receding GFP expression in all lines; however, seedlings could be rescued on a kanamycin-free medium and grown to maturity. This indicates that large indels possibly occurred at the target sites, eliminating NPT and GFP activity. The rescued T2 seedlings were analyzed by PCR to determine the target and excision sites, indicated by 3.0 and 1.2 kb products, respectively (Fig. 3a, b). The majority of T2 progeny either failed to show these PCR products or showed their weak presence, indicating large indels at the target site in the majority of the tissue. Two T2 lines showed strong presence of ~ 1.2 kb band (Fig. 3d: white arrows), which was sequenced and found to contain the near-precise excision of GFP cassette with very small indels at the target sites (Fig. 3e). The analysis of T3 seedlings, however, suggested that the observed excision site in the T2 parents was not transmitted to the progeny as none showed the 1.2 kb band (Fig. 3d). In summary, HS–ISceI was able to generate targeted excisions in the Arabidopsis seedlings, but inheritance of the excision site was questionable.

Fig. 3
figure3

Characterization of HS-inducible I-SceI in Arabidopsis. a I-SceI target construct, pEP4b, in pPZP200 binary vector contains HS-inducible I-SceI, GFP, and NPT expression units with 18 bp I-SceI target sites (gray bars) flanking the GFP cassette. b Predicted structure of the target site upon precise excision of GFP cassette with indels at the targeted site (dotted bar). PCR primer positions and the fragment sizes are shown by blue arrows. c PCR analysis of the first generation transgenic (T1) lines using primers located in I-SceI and NPT cassettes with pEP4b and wild-type Col-0 as controls. d PCR analysis of three generations: T1 parents, T2, and T3 progeny to detect excision of GFP cassette. White arrows indicate bands that were purified and subjected to Sanger sequencing. e DNA sequences of ~ 1.2 kb predicted excision bands were aligned with the pEP4b reference to determine indels at the targeted sites. Red and blue fonts represent the two I-SceI sites with predicted breakpoints (^). Dotted lines indicate deletions and green small letters show insertions

Conclusions

Potential genotoxicity of I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN appears to be a major bottleneck in their application in plant biotechnology. However, retransformation of in vitro cultures could be used as an effective approach for excising of marker genes and regenerating the marker-free plants.

Limitations

The main limitation of this study is that rice and Arabidopsis genomes could contain off-target sites of I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN nucleases that would prohibit the application of these nucleases in these plant species. A larger set of nucleases, e.g., newly designed ZFNs or TALENs should be tested to determine if other nucleases can be used successfully in achieving marker excision in these plant species.

Availability of data and materials

The vectors generated in this study can be requested from the corresponding author. All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional information.

Abbreviations

Indels:

insertions–deletions

ZFN:

zinc finger nuclease

GFP:

green fluorescent protein

HPT:

hygromycin phosphotransferase

NPT:

neomycin phosphotransferase

GmHSP17.5E:

glycine max heat-shock protein 17.5E

ZmUbi1:

Zea mays ubiquitin 1

35S:

cauliflower mosaic virus 35S RNA gene promoter

nos 3′:

agrobacterium tumefaciens nopaline synthase 3′ transcription termination sequence

HS:

heat-shock

CCR5:

C–C motif chemokine receptor 5 (from human genome)

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. 1.

    Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EM. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(6):567–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0602-567.

  2. 2.

    Gidoni D, Srivastava V, Carmi N. Site-specific excisional recombination strategies for elimination of undesirable transgenes from crop plants. In vitro cell. Dev Biol Plant. 2008;44:457–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-008-9140-3.

  3. 3.

    Gilbertson L. Cre-lox recombination: Cre-ative tools for plant biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21(12):550–5.

  4. 4.

    Ow DW. The long road to recombinase-mediated plant transformation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14:441–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12472.

  5. 5.

    Srivastava V, Thomson J. Gene stacking by recombinases. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14:471–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12459.

  6. 6.

    Srivastava V. Gene stacking in plants through the application of site-specific recombination and nuclease activity. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1864:267–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8778-8-18.

  7. 7.

    Antunes MS, Smith JJ, Jantz D, Medford JI. Targeted DNA excision in Arabidopsis by a re-engineered homing endonuclease. BMC Biotechnol. 2012;12:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-12-86.

  8. 8.

    Fauser F, Roth N, Pacher M, Ilg G, Sánchez-Fernández R, Biesgen C, Puchta H. In planta gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(19):7535–40. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202191109.

  9. 9.

    Nandy S, Zhao S, Pathak B, Manoharan M, Srivastava V. Gene stacking in plant cell using recombinases for gene integration and nucleases for marker gene deletion. BMC Biotechnol. 2015;15:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-015-0212-2.

  10. 10.

    Petolino JF, Worden A, Curlee K, Connell J, Strange Moynahan TL, Larsen C, Russell S. Zinc finger nuclease-mediated transgene deletion. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;73:617–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-010-9641-4.

  11. 11.

    Srivastava V, Zhao S, Underwood J. Dual-targeting by CRISPR/Cas9 for precise excision of transgenes from rice genome. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. 2017;129:153–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1166-3.

  12. 12.

    Hlubek A, Biesgen C, Höffken H-W. Chimeric endonucleases and uses therefore. 2011. Patent WO 2011/064750.

  13. 13.

    Perez EE, Wang J, Miller JC, Jouvenot Y, Kim KA, Liu O, et al. Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD4+ T cells by genome editing using zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(7):808–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1410.

  14. 14.

    Ainley WM, Sastry-Dent L, Welter ME, Murray MG, Zeitler B, Amora R, et al. Trait stacking via targeted genome editing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11:1126–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12107.

  15. 15.

    D’Halluin K, Vanderstraeten C, Van Hulle J, Rosolowska J, Van Den Brande I, Pennewaert A, et al. Targeted molecular trait stacking in cotton through targeted double-strand break induction. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11:933–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12085.

  16. 16.

    Watanabe K, Breier U, Hensel G, Kumlehn J, Schubert I, Reiss B. Stable gene replacement in barley by targeted double-strand break induction. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(5):1433–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv537.

  17. 17.

    Nishimura A, Aichi I, Matsuoka M. A protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(6):2796. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.469.

  18. 18.

    Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43.

  19. 19.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

  20. 20.

    Petek LM, Russell DW, Miller DG. Frequent endonuclease cleavage at off-target locations in vivo. Mol Ther. 2010;18(5):983–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2010.35.

  21. 21.

    Fine EJ, Cradick TJ, Zhao CL, Lin Y, Bao G. An online bioinformatics tool predicts zinc finger and TALE nuclease off-target cleavage. Nucl Acids Res. 2013;42(6):e42. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1326.

  22. 22.

    Lu H, Klocko A, Dow M, Ma C, Amarasinghe V, Strauss SH. Low frequency of zinc-finger nuclease-induced mutagenesis in Populus. Mol Breed. 2016;36(9):121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0546-z.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Drs. Holger Puchta and Joseph Petolino for providing I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN gene constructs. Authors are also grateful to Soumen Nandy, Jamie Underwood, Shan Zhao, and Jessica Kivett for their technical and greenhouse support.

Funding

Funding from Arkansas Bioscience Institute, Arkansas NASA-EPSCoR, and USDA-NIFA 2014-02849 supported the project activities. The funding agencies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

VS designed the research. BP and VS analyzed data and wrote the paper. BP conducted most experiments, EP generated Arabidopsis transgenic lines, HG analyzed I-SceI rice lines and conducted rice crosses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Vibha Srivastava.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

13104_2019_4304_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Additional file 1: Table S1. Primers used in this study.

13104_2019_4304_MOESM2_ESM.pptx

Additional file 2: Figure S1. Molecular analysis of rice lines transformed with ZFN overexpression construct. (a) ZFN overexpression construct containing maize Ubiquitin-1 (ZmUbi) promoter, ZFN coding region and nopaline synthase (nos) 3’ transcription terminator. Primer positions and their product size are shown. (b) PCR analysis of 13 primary transgenic plants (T0) representing 11 transgenic events. (c) PCR analysis of T1 progeny from three T0 plants # 1, 2-1 and 3. d, e PCR analysis of additional T1 progeny from line #3. Product sizes are shown. Arrows indicate expected products in each gel. The PCR conditions for Figures (b–d) are mentioned in the main text. The PCR for 0.09 kb product (Figure e) was performed at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pathak, B.P., Pruett, E., Guan, H. et al. Utility of I-SceI and CCR5-ZFN nucleases in excising selectable marker genes from transgenic plants. BMC Res Notes 12, 272 (2019) doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4304-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Meganuclease
  • I-SceI
  • Zinc finger nuclease
  • Targeted excision
  • Genetic engineering