Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Screening for chronic kidney disease in rural Malawi: results from a diabetic clinic

BMC Research Notes201912:375

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4415-9

  • Received: 18 March 2019
  • Accepted: 26 June 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

Patients with diabetes are at high risk of developing renal insufficiency and chronic kidney disease (CKD). As a result, screening for CKD is essential in diabetic patients as part of their care. This study investigated the prevalence of renal insufficiency, CKD, and correlates of CKD in diabetic patients attending Integrated Chronic Care Clinics in Neno District, Malawi.

Results

Of 203 diabetic patients, 148 (73%) were screened for CKD by measurement of serum creatinine and urinary protein between April 2016 and January 2019. 39.2% (n = 58) of the patients had abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as estimated by CKD Epidemiology Collaboration formula and/or ≥ 2+ urine protein. 13.5% (95% CI 8.4–20.0%, 20/148) of the patients had renal insufficiency based on eGFR of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. 8.8% (95% CI 4.8–14.6%, 13/148) had CKD based on eGFR of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 measured twice at least 3 months apart. In bivariate analysis, CKD was associated with older age, high systolic blood pressure and lower fasting blood sugar. Despite the low sample size, the study showed a moderately high prevalence of renal insufficiency and CKD in a rural cohort of diabetic patients in Malawi.

Keywords

  • Renal impairment
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Diabetes
  • Non-communicable disease
  • Malawi

Introduction

The burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in Africa, in part due to the increased burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), in addition to the existing high burden of communicable diseases [1, 2]. Although the prevalence of CKD in the general population in Africa has recently been reported to be as high as 15%, the prevalence of CKD in diabetes mellitus patients is higher than in the general population; in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, it is reported to be as high as 33% [3].

Due to differences in geographical areas, study population, definitions of CKD, and laboratory measurements, the prevalence and correlates of CKD in diabetic patients in sub-Saharan Africa varies widely between studies [2, 3]. For example, studies in Tanzania, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Botswana have reported CKD prevalence among patients with diabetes of 83.7%, 18.5%, 18%, 27% and 8.5% respectively [48].

In Malawi, the burden of NCDs continues to increase, with the prevalence of diabetes estimated to be as high as 6% in adults aged 15–64 years old [9, 10]. Despite evidence that diabetes is one of the main risk factors of CKD, there is paucity of data on CKD in diabetic patients in Malawi.

Routine screening for CKD in diabetic patients is a cost effective way of detecting CKD early [11], allowing for improved patient management, which may reduce the early onset of complications of CKD [12]. Additionally, screening prevents excessive costs when managing CKD complications [11]. Hence, screening for CKD was included in the package of interventions for NCD management in Malawi [13, 14]. However, most NCD clinics, especially in rural areas, do not provide CKD screening as they the lack necessary supplies and equipment [15, 16].

Due to differences in prevalence and correlates of CKD in other settings, it is important to investigate prevalence of CKD in Malawi, especially in rural Malawi where no data exists [17]. To fill this gap, this study reports on the prevalence of renal impairment, CKD, and correlates of CKD among patient with diabetes attending an NCD clinic in Neno District, Malawi between 2016 and 2019.

Main text

Setting

This study is a retrospective audit of diabetic patients enrolled in an Integrated Chronic Care clinic in Neno District, Malawi. Neno, located in the southwest zone of Malawi, is a rural and impoverished district, with a population of about 138,000 in 2018 [17]. Medical records of all diabetes mellitus patients aged 18 years and above who were screened for CKD at least once between April 2016 and January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.

The Integrated Chronic Care clinic manages patients with HIV and/or a chronic NCD(s) (mainly: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy and chronic respiratory disease), and is currently providing services in all 14 health facilities in Neno District. The clinics, managed by the Ministry of Health with support from a Non-Governmental Organisation called Partners In Health, are free-of-charge for all patients. Patients are followed every 1–3 months by a multidisciplinary team of midlevel providers, nurses and support staff [18]. By January 2019, the clinic had enrolled 8432 HIV and 3792 NCD patients, including 203 patients with diabetes (Partners In health internal data).

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All diabetes mellitus patients aged 18 years and above, enrolled in care for at least 3 months, with at least one visit in 2018, and at least one serum creatinine and/or urine protein result were included. Patients with a pre-existing diagnosis of CKD were excluded from the study.

Data collection and laboratory measurements

Data was extracted from Neno District’s electronic medical record (EMR), which services all chronic conditions including HIV and NCDs. Clinic encounters in the Integrated Chronic Care Clinic are recorded on the Malawi Ministry of Health hypertension/diabetic master card, a standardised paper-based patient chart. At Neno the clinical information is replicated in the EMR.

All clinical and demographic measurements in the Integrated Chronic Care Clinic are protocol based, and these protocols are explained elsewhere [19]. For serum creatinine (in mg/dl), at-least 1 ml of venous blood was collected in heparinised bottles and analysis was done immediately with I-STAT point of care chemistry machine (Abbott, USA) using chem8+ cartridges. Where I-STAT machine were not available, the samples were immediately transported to Neno District Hospital laboratory and analysed using Mindray BS 120 machine. For urine dipstick, Test-10 It (Life assay diagnostics limited) urine test strips were used on freshly collected urine and the results read within 1 min. Urine protein results were coded as negative, trace, +1, +2 and +3.

Measurements and outcomes

CKD was defined using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or urinary protein 2+ or more, measured on two occasions at least 3 months apart. Renal insufficiency was defined as eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 measured on one occasion only. The eGFR was estimated based on serum creatinine using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula without using the factor of race. This formula was chosen as it has demonstrated better prediction of eGFR in Malawian adults in comparison to CKD-EPI with factor of race, Cockcroft-Gault, and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4 formulas [20]. EGFR was classified as normal (eGFR > 90 and/or urinary protein normal or less than 2+) or abnormal (stage 0, 1, 2, 3a, 4a, and 5) based on KDIGO guidelines [21].

Several other variables included in our analysis were extracted from routine patient encounters. These variable included:
  • Demographic characteristics Age (years) and gender (male and female).

  • History and clinical encounter measurements Type of diabetes (type 1 or type 2), number of years with diabetes and duration in clinic (< 1 year, 1–2 years, > 2 years), most recent fasting blood glucose (FBG) (in mg/dl), diabetes mellitus patients with good FBG (strict control: < 126 mg/dl, reasonable control: 126–180 mg/dl and poor control: over 180 mg/dl), most recent body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), most recent diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressures (SBP) (mmHg).

  • Diabetes mellitus co-morbidities Current treatment for hypertension.

Some variables in our intended analysis had a high degree of missing data and variables that were missing in more than 90% of the participants were not included in the analysis; and these variables included history of smoking and alcohol intake and rare complications like stroke and cardiovascular diseases.

Statistical analysis

All data were extracted to Microsoft Excel 2013 and exported to Stata version 14 for data cleaning and analysis. Missing data were re-collected using both electronic and physical patient charts.

Descriptive statistics were used to describe all the variables. Bivariate analysis was used to show differences between patients with and without CKD. For categorical variables, Chi2 test or Fishers exact test were used as appropriate. For continuous variables, t-test were used for normally distributed data and the Mann–Whitney test for non-normally distributed variables. p < 0.05 showed statistical significance.

Results

A total of 148 diabetic patients, 16.9% type 1 (n = 25) and 83.1% type 2 (n = 123), were screened for CKD. This represented 73% of the 203 diabetic patients enrolled in care by January 2019 (Table 1). The mean age was 54 years, and about two-thirds of the patients (n = 77, 66.4%) were female. The majority of the patients had lived with diabetes and had attended the clinic for over 2 years (about 60.8% and 43.7% respectively).
Table 1

Characteristics of patients with diabetes

 

All diabetic patients

(N, %)

CKD

(N/%)

No CKD

(N/%)

Total patients screened

148

13 (8.8)

135 (91.2)

Demographic characteristics

 Age (mean, sd)a-years

53.8 (13.7)

63.9 (9.7)

52.8 (13.6)

 Gender

   

  Female

98

8 (8.2)

90 (91.8)

Diabetes type

 Type 1 diabetes

25

2 (8.0)

23 (92.0)

 Type 2 diabetes

123

11 (8.9)

112 (91.1)

Years since diagnosis of diabetes

 Less than 1 year

29

1 (3.4)

28 (96.6)

 1–2 years

20

3 (15.0)

17 (85.0)

 Over 2 years

76

7 (9.2)

69 (90.8)

Duration in clinic

 Less than 1 year

44

3 (6.8)

41 (93.2)

 1–2 years

36

6 (16.7)

30 (83.3)

 Over 2 years

62

4 (6.4)

58 (93.6)

Most recent fasting blood glucose (median, IQR)a-mg/dl

156.6 (115.2–234)

130.6 (99.9–151.1)

160.2 (121.0–249.0)

Patients with good glucose control (< 126 mg/dl)

39

5 (12.8)

34 (87.2)

Patients with reasonable glucose control (128 to < 180 mg/dl)

42

6 (14.3)

36 (85.7)

Initial creatinine (median, IQR)-mg/dl

0.7 (0.6–0.9)

1.4 (1.2–2)

0.7 (0.6–0.9)

Risk factors

 BMI (median, IQR)-kg/m2

26.5 (22.5–30)

26.5 (25.6–29.2)

26.5 (22.3–30.1)

 BMI over 25 (median, IQR)-kg/m2

29.1 (27.3–32.9)

27.8 (26.0–31.6)

29.3 (27.3–33.2)

 Most recent systolic blood pressure (median, IQR)a-mmHg

130 (117–145)

135 (132–154)

129 (116–142)

 Most recent diastolic blood pressure (median, IQR)-mmHg

83 (77–89)

91 (81–97)

83 (77–88)

Diabetic co-morbidities and complications

 Hypertension

103

12 (11.7)

91 (88.3)

CKD chronic kidney disease, % percentage, Sd standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, BMI body mass index

aSignificant difference between CKD and no CKD group

The majority of the patients were overweight (median BMI 26.5 kg/m2), had a mean most recent FBG of 156.6 mg/dl, and median most recent SBP and DBP of 130 mmHg and 83 mmHg respectively. 32.1% (n = 42) and 29.8% (n = 39) had reasonable and strict blood glucose control respectively. Hypertension was the main co-morbidity (n = 103, 69.6%).

The initial median creatinine and eGFR were 0.7 mg/dl (IQR 0.6–0.9) and 96.9 (IQR 77.1–110.5) respectively. 60.8% of patients (n = 90) had normal eGFR, 1.4% (n = 2) had stage G1, 25.7% (n = 38) had stage G2, and 12.3% (n = 18) had eGFR stage G3a to stage G5 (Table 2). 13.5% (95% CI 8.4–20.0%, n = 20) of the patients had renal impairment. After a minimum of 3 months, creatinine was repeated in 14 of the 20 patients with renal impairment. Only one patient had eGFR that had normalized, and 13 patients had eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. The remaining six patients could not be located. The prevalence of CKD in this cohort was 8.8% (CI 4.8–14.6%).
Table 2

Estimated GFR (eGFR) stages in all diabetic patients

Stages of eGFR

eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

N (%)

Normal EGFRa

≥ 90

90 (60.8)

G1 (normal and urine protein 2+ or more)

≥ 90

2 (1.4)

G2 (mildly decreased)

60–89

38 (25.7)

G3a (mildly to moderately decreased)

45–59

9 (6.1)

G3b (moderately to severely decreased)

30–44

6 (4.1)

G4 (severely decreased)

15–29

2 (1.4)

G5 (kidney failure)

< 15

1 (0.7)

Total

 

148 (100)

aPatients in this category had eGFR over 90 and protein less than 2+

There were significant differences in age, most recent SBP, and most recent FBG between diabetic patients with CKD and without CKD. Diabetic patients with CKD were older (63.9 years versus 52.8 years, p = 0.005), and had higher most recent SBP (135 versus 129 mmHg, p = 0.004). However, patients with CKD had a lower most recent FBG than patients without CKD (130.6 vs. 160.2 mg/dl, p = 0.04). Although not statistically significant, most recent DBP and hypertension diagnosis were higher in the CKD group in comparison to those without CKD. No differences in the other risk factors were observed between the groups.

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate renal insufficiency and CKD in a cohort of diabetic patients attending NCD clinics in rural Malawi. Almost two-thirds of the patients were females and this pattern of higher health service utilization by women is common in Malawi [22]. In Malawi, most of the studies evaluating renal impairment and CKD were done in the context of HIV, patients acutely admitted in hospitals, and in urban centers [2328]. In this study, about 40% of the diabetic patients had abnormal eGFR, demonstrating the importance of CKD screening. Identifying these patients can potentially improve management by promoting strategies that will ensure protection of the kidneys, avoiding drugs that may cause further kidney damage and reduce progression of CKD and ultimately end stage renal disease. More importantly, screening allowed health care providers to target patients who needed repeat testing to monitor their kidney function and diagnose CKD.

The prevalence of CKD in diabetic patients was about 9%, lower than some recent estimates in Africa. Two recent systematic reviews and meta-analysis report the prevalence of CKD in diabetic patients at 22% and 25% in Africa [2, 3]. However, a study in Botswana found a similarly lower prevalence of CKD in diabetic patients (8.4%) [29]. The lower prevalence may be due to the use of KDIGO guidelines, which require two measurements at least 3 months apart.

In this study, increased age and higher SBP were associated with CKD. Other studies have found similar associations with CKD [8, 29, 30]. However, lower FBG was associated with CKD. Although this needs further investigation and was in a small sample size, we speculate that this may be the case as FBG varies on a day to day basis in comparison to glycosylated hemoglobin. Glycosylated hemoglobin may have been a good measure of control in this study.

The study has research and clinical implications. Neno District plans to continue screening for CKD and patients with severe CKD are now enrolled in an advanced NCD clinic for care. Based on findings of this study, diabetes clinics should invest in screening for CKD. Finally, we propose a repeat of the study in rural and urban sites with larger patient cohort to further inform clinical practice and policy.

Conclusion

Although the sample size was small, we found moderately high renal insufficiency and CKD, 13.5% and a minimum of 8.9% respectively, in a diabetic cohort attending Integrated Chronic Care clinics in rural Malawi. In bivariate analysis, CKD was associated with older age, high SBP and lower FBG.

Limitations

As a facility-based clinical audit that used routinely collected data;
  • The study excluded all diabetic patients younger than 18 years, patients that were lost to follow up, and patients that have diabetes and are not getting care in Neno, Malawi.

  • The data quality depended on how accurately the data was recorded in the chart.

  • The study may not be representative of communities in Neno District and other districts of Malawi.

  • The Correlates of CKD chosen for this study depended on the available data and may have excluded other risk factors.

  • The study does not establish the temporal sequence between CKD and diabetes or any of the risk factors.

Abbreviations

CKD: 

chronic kidney disease

NCD: 

non communicable diseases

KDIGO: 

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes

EGFR: 

estimated glomerular filtration rate

CKD EPI: 

chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration

BMI: 

body mass index

CI: 

confidence interval

EMR: 

electronic medical records

FBG: 

fasting blood glucose

SBP: 

systolic blood pressure

DBP: 

diastolic blood pressure

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all staff that worked in Integrated Chronic Care clinic; their efforts contributed to improved care to all NCD patients. In addition, the authors would like to thank all staff working for the Ministry of Health and Partners in Health in Neno district hospital, Malawi.

Funding

None.

Authors’ contributions

CK, RK, EN, LN, EBW and GCT conceptualized the study. Data curation was done by LT, GCT and RK. CK performed data analysis and wrote the first draft. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Since the study was a retrospective review and used archival medical records, informed consent was not obtained. All data was de-identified and was available to the co-authors only. The study received ethical approval from National Health Sciences Research and Ethics Committee in Malawi protocol number 1216.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Partners In Health, Post Office Box 56, Neno, Malawi
(2)
Ministry of Health, Neno, Malawi

References

  1. Stanifer JW, Jing B, Tolan S, Helmke N, Mukerjee R, Naicker S, et al. The epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. Stanifer et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND; 2014;2:e174–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70002-6.
  2. Abd Elhafeez S, Bolignano D, D’Arrigo G, Dounousi E, Tripepi G, Zoccali C. Prevalence and burden of chronic kidney disease among the general population and high-risk groups in Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e015069.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaze AD, Ilori T, Jaar BG, Echouffo-tcheugui JB. Burden of chronic kidney disease on the African continent: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19:125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Janmohamed MN, Kalluvya SE, Mueller A, Kabangila R, Smart LR, Downs JA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in diabetic adult out-patients in Tanzania. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:183.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Feteh VF, Choukem S, Kengne A, Nebongo DN, Ngowe-Ngowe M. Anemia in type 2 diabetic patients and correlation with kidney function in a tertiary care sub-Saharan African hospital: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-016-0247-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiseha T, Kassim M, Yemane T. Chronic kidney disease and underdiagnosis of renal insufficiency among diabetic patients attending a hospital in Southern Ethiopia. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:198.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ephraim RKD, Biekpe S, Sakyi SA, Adoba P, Agbodjakey H, Antoh EO. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease among the high risk population in South-Western Ghana; a cross sectional study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2015;2:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40697-015-0076-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Rwegerera G, Bayani M, Taolo E, Habte D. The prevalence of chronic kidney disease and associated factors among patients admitted at Princess Marina Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(3):313–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Msyamboza KP, Mvula CJ, Kathyola D. Prevalence and correlates of diabetes mellitus in Malawi: population-based national NCD STEPS survey. BMC Endocr Disord. 2014;14(41):2–7.Google Scholar
  10. Malawi Government. Health Sector Strategic plan II 2017-2022, Towards Universal Health Coverage. 2017. Available from: http://www.nationalplanningcycles.org/sites/default/files/planning_cycle_repository/malawi/health_sector_strategic_plan_ii_030417_smt_dps.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
  11. Perico N, Remuzzi G. Prevention programs for chronic kidney disease in low-income countries. Intern Emerg Med. 2016;11:385–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. George C, Mogueo A, Okpechi I, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Kengne AP. Chronic kidney disease in low-income to middle-income countries: the case for increased screening. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000256. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000256.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Package of essential noncommunicable (PEN) disease interventions for primary health care in low-resource settings. 2010.Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Health [Malawi]. National Action plan for prevention and management of non-communicable diseases in Malawi (2012–2106). 2013.Google Scholar
  15. Chikowe I, Mwapasa V, Kengne AP. Analysis of rural health centres preparedness for the management of diabetic patients in Malawi. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3369-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wood R, Viljoen V, Van Der Merwe L, Mash R. Quality of care for patients with non-communicable diseases in the Dedza District, Malawi. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2015;7(1):1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. National Statistical Office. 2018 Malawi population and housing cencus-preliminary report. 2018.Google Scholar
  18. Wroe EB, Kalanga N, Mailosi B, Mwalwanda S, Kachimanga C, Nyangulu K, et al. Leveraging HIV platforms to work toward comprehensive primary care in rural Malawi: the Integrated Chronic Care Clinic. Healthcare. 2015;3(4):270–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Partners In Health. Integrated Care Cascade Toolkit: an implementation to guide screening, treatment & follow-up for HIV and NCDs. 2017. https://www.pih.org/practitioner-resource/integrated-care-cascade-toolkit. Accessed 1 June 2017.
  20. Glaser N, Deckert A, Phiri S, Rothenbacher D, Neuhann F. Comparison of various equations for estimating GFR in Malawi: how to determine renal function in resource limited settings? PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):1–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW, Coresh J, De Francisco ALM, De Jong PE, Winearls, CG. Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) CKD work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):1–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2012.73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeatman S, Chamberlin S, Dovel K. Women’s (health) work: a population-based, cross-sectional study of gender differences in time spent seeking health care in Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0209586.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson DC, Chasela C, Maliwichi M, Mwafongo A, Akinkuotu A, Moses A, et al. Tenofovir use and renal insufficiency among pregnant and general adult population of HIV-infected, ART-naïve individuals in Lilongwe, Malawi. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooke WR, Hemmilä UK, Craik AL, Mandula CJ, Mvula P, Msusa A, et al. Incidence, aetiology and outcomes of obstetric-related acute kidney injury in Malawi: a prospective observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mwanza ZV, McCulloch M, Drayson M, Plant T, Milford DV, Dreyer G. Proteinuric kidney disease in children at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Malawi. MC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):1–8.Google Scholar
  26. Glaser N, Phiri S, Bruckner T, Nsona D, Tweya H, Ahrenshop N, et al. The prevalence of renal impairment in individuals seeking HIV testing in Urban Malawi. BMC Nephrol. 2016;17(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-016-0403-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans R, Rudd P, Hemmila U, Dobbie H, Dreyer G. Deficiencies in education and experience in the management of acute kidney injury among Malawian healthcare workers. Malawi Med J. 2015;27(3):101–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans RDR, Hemmilä U, Craik A, Mtekateka M, Hamilton F, Kawale Z, et al. Incidence, aetiology and outcome of community-acquired acute kidney injury in medical admissions in Malawi. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18(1):1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Mutashambara GR, Molefe-Baikai OJ, Masaka A, Shimwela M, Rivera YP, Taibat AO, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease using estimated glomerular filtration rate among diabetes patients attending a tertiary clinic in Botswana. Hosp Pract. 2018;46(4):214–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodel NC, Hamad A, Praehauser C, Mwangoka G, Kasella M, Reither K, et al. The epidemiology of chronic kidney disease and the association with non-communicable and communicable disorders in a population of sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(10):1–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement