Skip to main content
Download PDF

Green synthesis and characterization of iron-oxide nanoparticles using Moringa oleifera: a potential protocol for use in low and middle income countries

BMC Research Notes volume 15, Article number: 149 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Green synthesized iron(III) oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles are gaining appeal in targeted drug delivery systems because of their low cost, fast processing and nontoxicity. However, there is no known research work undertaken in the production of green synthesized nano-particles from the Ugandan grown Moringa Oleifera (MO). This study aims at exploring and developing an optimized protocol aimed at producing such nanoparticles from the Ugandan grown Moringa.

Results

While reducing ferric chloride solution with Moringa oleifera leaves, Iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4-NPs) were synthesized through an economical and completely green biosynthetic method. The structural properties of these Fe3O4-NPs were investigated by Ultra Violet–visible (UV–Vis) spectrophotometry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). These nanoparticles exhibited UV–visible absorption peaks at 225 nm (nm) for the sixth dilution and 228 nm for the fifth dilution which indicated that the nanoparticles were photosensitive and the SEM study confirmed the spherical nature of these nanoparticles. The total synthesis time was approximately 5 h after drying the moringa leaves, and the average particle size was approximately 16 nm. Such synthesized nanoparticles can potentially be useful for drug delivery, especially in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs).

Introduction

There are quite limited green synthesis studies of Fe3O4-NPs via biological routes and their use in the biomedical field, especially in LMICs [1]. Table 1 indicates the size and morphology of magnetite crystals which play an important role in influencing magnetite's properties [2]. Interestingly, Fe3O4-NPs are biocompatible, biodegradable, and potentially nontoxic to humans [3]. These properties contribute to the versatility of Fe3O4-NPs and show great potential in future biomedical applications such as targeted drug delivery, antibacterial, tissue engineering, and so on. In this regard, numerous Fe3O4-NP synthesis methods, for example, coprecipitation, the sol–gel method [4], hydrothermal synthesis [5], solid-state synthesis [6], flame spray synthesis [7], thermal decomposition [5], and solvothermal methods [8], have been adopted to produce nanoparticles with desired properties. However, such methods have had a number of limitations, including high production costs, toxic chemicals, and the production of hazardous byproducts [9,10,11,12]. This has necessitated research in green synthesis approaches in an effort to address the above issues caused by these conventional methods [13]. Green synthesis has many advantages, such as being simple, having fast manufacturing procedures, having lower production costs, and producing less waste [14].

Table 1 Different green synthesized plant parts with their corresponding morphologies
Full size table

Medicinal plants can easily be conjugated with Fe3O4-based nanoparticles to produce drug delivery applications [51]. This is because of their ability to produce excellent formulations that yield to multiple biological signaling pathways. Among the many plants that have inspired green synthesis is Moringa oleifera (MO) [52]. MO was initially used in the treatment of inflammation, cancer, bacterial/viral infections and hyperglycaemia because of its high bioactive and antioxidant compounds. MO is excellently rich in such polyphenols and provides a wonderful synthesis agent for the necessary nanoparticles [53]. Regarding anticancer potential, Moringa oleifera (MO) has the ability to fight various cancers [54]. However, it seems challenging to produce such Fe3O4-based nanoparticles using MO.

The aim of this study is therefore to develop an appropriate protocol for green biosynthesis and characterization of Fe3O4-NPs using MO leaves given the multiple drug delivery applications from such particles. It was hypothesized that such green synthesized nanoparticles may greatly be applicable in targeted drug delivery especially during cancer treatment. Based on the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first attempt to use Ugandan grown MO for green synthesis and characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles.

Main text

Materials

Ferrous iron (III) chloride (FeCl3) was of analytical grade and purchased from Smakk International Ltd., a laboratory supplies company in Kampala. This chloride was additionally used without further purification and was dissolved into deionized (DI) water for all the synthesis procedures. MO leaves were collected from a Moringa plantation found in Eastern Uganda.

Preparation of MO leaves into MO extract solution

MO leaves were hand sorted and dried under room temperature for 72 h as per Fig. 1. 30 g of the dried leaves were then measured using a sartorius measuring scale (Max 5200, Germany) and ground using a silver crest powder grinder (SC-1880) at a rotating speed of 28,000 revolutions per minute for 5 min. 10 g of Moringa powder was mixed with 100 ml of DI water in an Erlenmeyer flask and heated at 80 °C while stirring using a magnetic stirrer for 1 h at a rate of 200 revolutions/per minute. The heated moringa solution was allowed to cool for 3 h and then filtered initially using cotton wool and then nylon filter to obtain a fine moringa solution, as shown in Fig. 1f. All this work was done from the Research Center for Tropical Diseases and Vector Control (RTC) of Makerere University College of Veterinary, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The extraction process of moringa solution from moringa leaves a Sorting and cleaning b Weighing the sample c Grinded powder sample d Heating the sample e Cotton wool filtered MO extract f Nylon filtered MO extract g Fe3Cl4 solution h MO extract i MO-Fe3Cl4 solution

Full size image

Preparation of the Moringa oleifera-iron(III) chloride (MO-Fe3Cl4) solution

Following a protocol from Aisida et al. [55], 0.6 M of Iron(III) chloride solution was prepared by mixing ferrous Iron(III)chloride with 100 ml of DI water and shaken to fully dissolve for approximately 15 min. 80 ml of this iron(III)chloride solution was mixed with 20 ml of the MO solution to form the MO-Fe3Cl4 solution. Deviating a bit from this protocol, this solution was placed in a water bath at 60 °C and was allowed to run for 4 h to activate the phytochemicals. This solution was cooled for 2 h at room temperature and thereafter stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C for future use.

Preparation of Moringa oleifera-Iron(III)chloride (MO-Fe3Cl4) dilutions for UV–Vis analysis

Different MO-Fe3Cl4 solutions were prepared using a serial dilution procedure to clearly space and characterize the suspected particles using a UV–visible spectrometer [56, 57]. Six dilutions were obtained with the first one obtained by mixing 2 ml of DI water into 1 ml of MO-Fe3Cl4 solution. The second dilution was obtained by mixing 1 ml of the first dilution with 2 ml of DI water, the third was obtained by mixing 1 ml of the second dilution with 2 ml of DI water, the fourth was obtained by mixing 1 ml of the third dilution with 2 ml of DI water, the fifth was obtained by mixing 1 ml of the fourth dilution with 2 ml of DI water and finally the sixth was obtained by mixing 1 ml of the fifth dilution with 2 ml of DI water. The DI water graph was used as a control graph to clearly isolate the peaks obtained from this solvent in comparison with those obtained from the MO-Fe3Cl4 solution. Farther dilutions never showed any difference in the UV–Vis graph, hence ending with the fifth dilution.

Characterization of the nanoparticles

The synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by using a UV–Vis, XRD, SEM, and EDX. The optical properties of the synthesized nanoparticles were examined and confirmed using a double beam UV–Vis (Jenway 6715, UK) using a spectral range of 200–400 nm from Makerere University’s RTC lab. A powder XRD employing a Bruker AXS diffractometer, (Bruker, Germany) and fitted with Cu-Ka radiation (λKα1 = 1.5406 Å) from 2θ = 0.5°–130°, with increments of Δ2ϑ: (0.034°), voltage of 40 kV, current of 40 mA, power of 1.6KW, and counting time of 0.5 s/step was used to analyze approximately 500 mg of green synthesized Fe3O4-NPs powder. This was done from the Materials Research Department (MRD), iThemba LABs, Cape Town in South Africa. The generated data were analysed by OriginPro, and the resultant peaks and two theta values were compared with the standard Fe3O4-NP values from the International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database. The structural morphology of the prepared nanoparticles was determined by a ZEISS (Gemini 1, Germany) scanning electron microscope and EDX from Makerere University’s Mechanical Engineering Department at a working distance (WD) of 7.9 mm and an accelerating voltage of 10 kV under vacuum conditions.

Results and discussion

The results below indicate the characteristics of the produced nanoparticles.

UV–Vis analysis

The formation of nanoparticles was evidenced by the appearance of an instantaneous dark black color change from brown in the solution, as shown in Fig. 1i. This formation was due to a variety of plant biomolecules (polyphenols), which played a major role in the reduction of metal ions and sufficiently stabilized the Fe3O4-NPs. Phytochemicals bound to the surface of these nanoparticles are rich in hydrophilic hydroxyl groups that allow the NPs to disperse and distribute homogenously in aqueous solutions [58]. Thus, after the reaction, it can be seen that the UV spectra of the fabricated nanoparticles had absorption bands at lower concentrations than at higher concentrations.

The UV–Vis absorption peaks (225 nm and 297 nm) are also attributed to the presence of alkaloids, phenolic acids, flavonoids, tannins, terpenoids and carbohydrates in the MO aqueous extract. The DI water and the sixth dilution clearly indicate both peaks compared to other graphs [59]. This was evidenced by a 268 nm absorption peak that was produced by the DI water graph, confirming the occurrence of a synthesis process.

Additionally, the UV–Vis results showed a maximum absorption peak at 225 nm for the sixth dilution and 228 nm for the fifth dilution, followed by the peak at 297 nm for both dilutions. This could be due to the excitation of nanoparticles from the ground to the excited state [60]. The high concentration of leaf extract enhanced the phytochemical content of the extract, which reduced the precursor quickly, leading to rapid nanoparticle formation that enhanced the absorbance value, as shown in Fig. 2a [61]. Therefore, the UV–Vis analysis concluded that Fe3O4-NPs had an intense absorbance at ∼300 nm, hence indicating the photosensitivity of the synthesized particles in the UV region [62].

Fig. 2
figure 2

a UV–Vis graphs showing different dilutions b XRD graph for the Iron-oxide biosynthesized Fe3O4-NPs c SEM image for the iron (III) chloride precursor d XRD for the iron (III) chloride precursor e SEM image for the Iron-oxide biosynthesized Fe3O4-NPs f XRD for the Iron-oxide biosynthesized Fe3O4-NPs

Full size image

XRD analysis

XRD analysis generated ten peaks for the biosynthesized Fe3O4-NPs positioned at 2θ angles of 30.2°, 35.5°, 43.2°, 53.8°, 57.3°, 62.95°, 69.0°, 71.4°, 74.3°, and 78.1°. The observed lattice spacings at 30.2°, 35.5°, 43.2°, 53.8°, and 57.3° matched well with the (220), (311), (400), (422), and (511) planes of Fe3O4 crystals (Fig. 2b). The crystal structure data was in close agreement with the reported data and can be assigned to the magnetite phase of iron oxide [63]. This XRD pattern for magnetic nanoparticles is cross referenced with ICDD—International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) file number: 00–019-0629. The peak intensity ranged from 240 to 1,400 arbitrary units for the synthesized Fe3O4-NPs.

Scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray analysis

Figure 2c never indicated the synthesized Fe3O4-NPs as compared to Fig. 2e. This clearly confirmed that such nanoparticles were a reaction result between MO and Iron(III) chloride precursor. Fe3O4-NPs exhibited a granular, homogenous, spherical-shaped structure with an average diameter of approximately 16 nm. Given the unique atomic structure of each element, EDX was additionally used to provide information about the chemical composition of each element as it interacts between the X-rays and the compound being investigated. Therefore, when this analysis was carried out, the X-rays reflected off the iron compound to give peak amplitudes that helped to identify the elements present in the compound being studied. The peak amplitude of iron started from approximately 0.66 to 7 keV, as shown by Fig. 2d and f which confirmed the presence of the iron elements in the compounds using EDX [64]. The results also demonstrated the high percentage of iron present in the particles, as the EDX spectra revealed the presence of iron peaks in three different areas (0.66, 0.68 and 7.0). Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was also used to confirm iron oxide nanoparticle formation and obtain more structural details about the suspension. There were several peaks of Fe with other elements, such as sodium, aluminium and chlorine, thus indicating the ability for organic materials to be used as capping agents.

Energy dispersive X-ray analysis

EDX analysis further provided the qualitative and quantitative status of the elements, which may have affected the fabrication of the NPs. This analysis showed that the EDX spectrum contained intense peaks of Cl and Fe in addition to minor peaks of Na and Al. The Fe and Cl peaks might have originated from the FeCl3 precursors used in the fabrication of these nanoparticles. The Na and Al peaks could mainly have been due to the polyphenol groups or other sodium/aluminum-containing biomolecules present in the MO leaf extract. The higher percentages of Cl indicated the plant biomolecules presence in the metal ions reduction and stabilization of the nanoparticles. These values might also be helpful in observing the atomic content on the surface and near the surface region of the produced nanoparticles. Such nanoparticles can potentially be used in cancer [65], bacterial [66] and viral [67] treatment mechanisms that greatly affect LMICs.

Conclusion

A novel green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using Ugandan grown MO has been demonstrated. This first time trial of nanoparticle formulation has been confirmed by SEM to have a spherical shape with a 16 nm particle size. Given no requirements for extra surfactants or reductants, this method can serve as a simple and eco-friendly protocol for use in LMICs.

Limitations

The following studies would have confirmed our results better but could not be done due to limited resources: 1. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis of the nanoparticles, 2. Vibrating sample magnetometry studies, 3. Cancerous cell viability studies.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MO:

Moringa oleifera

LMICs:

Low- and middle-income countries

Fe3O4 :

Iron (III) Oxide

Fe3O4 :

NPs Iron (III) Oxide nanoparticles

UV–Vis:

Ultraviolet visible

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

EDX:

Energy dispersive X-ray

Fe3O4 :

Iron oxide

NPs:

Nanoparticles

DI:

Deionized

WD:

Working distance

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

RTC:

Research center for tropical diseases and vector control

ICDD:

International center for diffraction data

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared

nm:

Nanometers

References

  1. Jegadeesan GB, Srimathi K, Santosh Srinivas N, Manishkanna S, Vignesh D. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles using terminalia bellirica and moringa oleifera fruit and leaf extracts: antioxidant, antibacterial and thermoacoustic properties. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L, Dong WF, Sun HB. Multifunctional superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: design, synthesis and biomedical photonic applications, nanoscale. Royal Soc Chem. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr01616a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wahajuddin AS. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:3445–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemine OM, Omri K, Zhang B, El Mir L, Sajieddine M, Alyamani A, et al. Sol-gel synthesis of 8 nm magnetite (Fe 3O 4) nanoparticles and their magnetic properties. Superlattices Microstruct. 2012;52(4):793–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chin SF, Suh C, Pang C, Tan H. Green synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles (via thermal decomposition method) with controllable size and shape. Environ Sci. 2011;2(3):299–302.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li J, Zheng L, Cai H, Sun W, Shen M, Zhang G, et al. Polyethyleneimine—mediated synthesis of folic acid-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles for invivo tumor MR imaging. Biomaterials. 2013;34(33):8382–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paiva DL, Andrade AL, Pereira MC, Fabris JD, Domingues RZ, Alvarenga ME. Novel protocol for the solid–state synthesis of magnetite for medical practices. Hyperfine Interact. 2015;232(1–3):19–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo Y, Yang J, Yan Y, Li J, Shen M, Zhang G, et al. RGD-functionalized ultrasmall iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted T1-weighted MR imaging of gliomas. Nanoscale. 2015;7(34):14538–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jagwani D, Hari KP. Nature’s nano-assets: Green synthesis, characterization techniques and applications–a graphical review. Mater Today Proc. 2021;46:2307–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmed SF, Mofijur M, Rafa N, Chowdhury AT, Chowdhury S, Nahrin M, et al. Green approaches in synthesising nanomaterials for environmental nanobioremediation: technological advancements, applications, benefits and challenges. Environ Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111967.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yew YP, Shameli K, Miyake M, Ahmad Khairudin NBB, Mohamad SEB, Naiki T, et al. Green biosynthesis of superparamagnetic magnetite Fe3O4 nanoparticles and biomedical applications in targeted anticancer drug delivery system: a review. Arabian J Chem. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hao R, Li D, Zhang J. Green Synthesis of iron nanoparticles using green tea and its removal of hexavalent chromium. Nanomaterials. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11030650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mallapragada SK, Brenza TM, McMillan JEM, Narasimhan B, Sakaguchi DS, Sharma AD, et al. Enabling nanomaterial, nanofabrication and cellular technologies for nanoneuromedicines. Nanomedicine. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2014.12.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patra JK, Baek KH. Green nanobiotechnology: factors affecting synthesis and characterization techniques. J Nanomaterials. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/417305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Venkateswarlu S, Rao YS, Balaji T, Prathima B, Jyothi NVV. Biogenic synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles using plantain peel extract. Mater Lett. 2013;100:241–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkateswarlu S, Kumar BN, Prathima B, SubbaRao Y, Jyothi NVV. A novel green synthesis of Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanorods using punica granatum rind extract and its application for removal of Pb(II) from aqueous environment. Arab J Chem. 2019;12(4):588–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuvakkumar R, Hong SI. Green synthesis of spinel magnetite iron oxide nanoparticles. Adv Mat Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1051.39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Venkateswarlu S, Yoon M. Rapid removal of cadmium ions using green-synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles capped with diethyl-4-(4 amino-5-mercapto-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)phenyl phosphonate. RSC Adv. 2015;5(80):65444–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Venkateswarlu S, Yoon M. Surfactant-free green synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles capped with 3,4-dihydroxyphenethylcarbamodithioate: Stable recyclable magnetic nanoparticles for the rapid and efficient removal of Hg(II) ions from water. Dalt Trans. 2015;44(42):18427–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bano S, Nazir S, Nazir A, Munir S, Mahmood T, Afzal M, et al. Microwave-assisted green synthesis of superparamagnetic nanoparticles using fruit peel extracts: surface engineering, T2relaxometry, and photodynamic treatment potential. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;10(11):3833–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar B, Smita K, Cumbal L, Debut A. Biogenic synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles for 2-arylbenzimidazole fabrication. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2014;18(4):364–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed MJK, Ahmaruzzaman M, Bordoloi MH. Novel averrhoa carambola extract stabilized magnetite nanoparticles: a green synthesis route for the removal of chlorazol black e from wastewater. RSC Adv. 2015;5(91):74645–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bahadur A, Saeed A, Shoaib M, Iqbal S, Bashir MI, Waqas M, et al. Eco-friendly synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles with tunable size: dielectric, magnetic, thermal and optical studies. Mater Chem Phys. 2017;1(198):229–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sathishkumar G, Logeshwaran V, Sarathbabu S, Jha PK, Jeyaraj M, Rajkuberan C, et al. Green synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles using couroupita guianensis aubl. Fruit extract for their antibacterial and cytotoxicity activities. Artif cells, nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(3):589–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Awwad AM, Salem NM. A green and facile approach for synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles. Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.nn.20120206.09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Senthil M, Ramesh C. Biogenic Synthesis of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Using Tridax Procumbens Leaf Extract and Its Antibacterial Activity on Pseudomonas aeroginosa. Dig J Nanomater. Bios. 2012;7:1655-60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Basavegowda N, Somai Magar KB, Mishra K, Lee YR. Green fabrication of ferromagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their novel catalytic applications for the synthesis of biologically interesting benzoxazinone and benzthioxazinone derivatives. New J Chem. 2014;38(11):5415–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Latha N, Gowri M. Bio Synthesis and Characterisation of Fe 3 o 4 Nanoparticles using caricaya papaya leaves extract. International journal of science and research. www.ijsr.net. Accessed Jun 22 2021.

  29. Atarod M, Nasrollahzadeh M, Sajadi SM. Green synthesis of a Cu/reduced graphene oxide/Fe3O4 nanocomposite using Euphorbia wallichii leaf extract and its application as a recyclable and heterogeneous catalyst for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol and rhodamine B. RSC Adv. 2015;5(111):91532–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xiao L, Mertens M, Wortmann L, Kremer S, Valldor M, Lammers T, et al. Enhanced in vitro and in vivo cellular imaging with green tea coated water-soluble iron oxide nanocrystals. ACS appl mater interfaces. 2015;7(12):6530–40. https://doi.org/10.1021/am508404t.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Patra JK, Ali MS, Oh IG, Baek KH. Proteasome inhibitory, antioxidant, and synergistic antibacterial and anticandidal activity of green biosynthesized magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles using the aqueous extract of corn (Zea mays L.) ear leaves. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45(2):349–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rajendran SP, Sengodan K. Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles using sesbania grandiflora leaf extract as reducing agent. J Nanosci. 2017;2017:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar B, Garcia M, Murakami JL, Chen C-C. Exosome-mediated microenvironment dysregulation in leukemia. Biochim biophys acta mol cell res. 2016;1863(3):464–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sirdeshpande KD, Sridhar A, Cholkar KM, Selvaraj R. Structural characterization of mesoporous magnetite nanoparticles synthesized using the leaf extract of calliandra haematocephala and their photocatalytic degradation of malachite green dye. Appl Nanosci. 2018;8(4):675–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kanagasubbulakshmi S, Kadirvelu K. Green synthesis of Iron oxide nanoparticles using lagenaria siceraria and evaluation of its antimicrobial activity. Def Life Sci J. 2017;2(4):422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Narayanan S, Sathy BN, Mony U, Koyakutty M, Nair SV, Menon D. Biocompatible magnetite/gold nanohybrid contrast agents via green chemistry for MRI and CT bioimaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4(1):251–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Venkateswarlu S, Natesh Kumar B, Prasad CH, Venkateswarlu P, Jyothi NVV. Bio-inspired green synthesis of Fe3O4 spherical magnetic nanoparticles using syzygium cumini seed extract. Phys B Condens Matter. 2014;15(449):67–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cai Y, Shen Y, Xie A, Li S, Wang X. Green synthesis of soya bean sprouts-mediated superparamagnetic Fe 3O4 nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater. 2010;322(19):2938–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ngernpimai S, Thomas C, Maensiri S, Siri S. Stability and cytotoxicity of well–dispersed magnetite nanoparticles prepared by hydrothermal method. Adv Mat Res. 2012. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.506.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Phumying S, Labuayai S, Thomas C, Amornkitbamrung V, Swatsitang E, Maensiri S. Aloe vera plant–extracted solution hydrothermal synthesis and magnetic properties of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process. 2013;111(4):1187–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mahdavi M, Namvar F, Bin AM, Mohamad R. Green biosynthesis and characterization of magnetic iron oxide (Fe 3O4) nanoparticles using seaweed (Sargassum muticum) aqueous extract. Molecules. 2013;18(5):5954–64.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yew YP, Shameli K, Miyake M, Kuwano N, Bt Ahmad Khairudin NB, Bt Mohamad SE, et al. Green synthesis of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using seaweed extract. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1498-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. El-Kassas HY, Aly-Eldeen MA, Gharib SM. Green synthesis of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles using two selected brown seaweeds: characterization and application for lead bioremediation. Acta Oceanol Sin. 2016;35(8):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0880-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Niraimathee VA, Subha V, Ernest Ravindran RS, Renganathan S. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles from mimosa pudica root extract. Int J Environ Sustain Dev. 2016;15(3):227–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Buazar F, Baghlani-Nejazd MH, Badri M, Kashisaz M, Khaledi-Nasab A, Kroushawi F. Facile one-pot phytosynthesis of magnetic nanoparticles using potato extract and their catalytic activity. Starch–Stärke. 2016;68(7–8):796–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201500347.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lunge S, Singh S, Sinha A. Magnetic iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles from tea waste for arsenic removal. J Magn Magn Mater. 2014;1(356):21–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Khandanlou R, Bin Ahmad M, Shameli K, Kalantari K. Synthesis and characterization of rice straw/Fe3O4 nanocomposites by a quick precipitation method. Molecules. 2013;18(6):6597–607.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Khataee A, Kayan B, Kalderis D, Karimi A, Akay S, Konsolakis M. Ultrasound-assisted removal of Acid Red 17 using nanosized Fe3O4-loaded coffee waste hydrochar. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017;1(35):72–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Khan MY, Mangrich AS, Schultz J, Grasel FS, Mattoso N, Mosca DH. Green chemistry preparation of superparamagnetic nanoparticles containing Fe3O4 cores in biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2015;1(116):42–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Horst MF, Coral DF, Fernández van Raap MB, Alvarez M, Lassalle V. Hybrid nanomaterials based on gum Arabic and magnetite for hyperthermia treatments. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Anand K, Tiloke C, Phulukdaree A, Ranjan B, Chuturgoon A, Singh S, et al. Biosynthesis of palladium nanoparticles by using Moringa oleifera flower extract and their catalytic and biological properties. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2016;165:87–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Anwar F, Latif S, Ashraf M, Gilani AH. Moringa oleifera: A food plant with multiple medicinal uses. Phyther Res. 2007;21(1):17–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tiloke C, Anand K, Gengan RM, Chuturgoon AA. Moringa oleifera and their phytonanoparticles: potential antiproliferative agents against cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang J, Qian W, Wang L, Wu H, Zhou H, Wang AY, et al. Functionalized milk-protein-coated magnetic nanoparticles for MRI-monitored targeted therapy of pancreatic cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016;7(11):3087–99.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Aisida SO, Ugwu K, Akpa PA, Nwanya AC, Nwankwo U, Bashir AKH, et al. Synthesis and characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles capped with Moringa Oleifera: the mechanisms of formation effects on the optical, structural, magnetic and morphological properties. Mat Today Proc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ali I, Peng C, Naz I, Khan ZM, Sultan M, Islam T, et al. Phytogenic magnetic nanoparticles for wastewater treatment: a review. RSC Adv. 2017;7(64):40158–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Stephen Inbaraj B, Chen BH. Nanomaterial–based sensors for detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens and toxins as well as pork adulteration in meat products. J Food Drug Anal. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2015.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rochelle M. Cornell US. The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and uses, 2nd, completely revised and extended edition. 2006;703: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Iron+Oxides%3A+Structure%2C+Properties%2C+Reactions%2C+Occurrences+and+Uses%2C+2nd%2C+Completely+Revised+and+Extended+Edition-p-9783527606443%0A. https://www.wiley.com/en-in/The+Iron+Oxides:+Structure,+Properties,+Reactions

  59. Ahmad S, Riaz U, Kaushik A, Alam J. Soft template synthesis of super paramagnetic Fe 3O 4 nanoparticles a novel technique. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2009;19(3):355–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Al-Asmari AK, Albalawi SM, Athar MT, Khan AQ, Al-Shahrani H, Islam M. Moringa oleifera as an Anti-Cancer Agent against breast and colorectal cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0135814.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Isaac RSR, Sakthivel G, Murthy C. Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles using averrhoa bilimbi fruit extract. J Nanotechnol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/906592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Savi M, Rossi S, Bocchi L, Gennaccaro L, Cacciani F, Perotti A, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles promote arrhythmias via a direct interaction with rat cardiac tissue. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-014-0063-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Huang CC, Tsai CY, Sheu HS, Chuang KY, Su CH, Jeng US, et al. Enhancing transversal relaxation for magnetite nanoparticles in mr imaging using Gd3+-chelated mesoporous silica shells. ACS Nano. 2011;5(5):3905–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ebadi M, Saifullah B, Buskaran K, Hussein MZ, Fakurazi S. Synthesis and properties of magnetic nanotheranostics coated with polyethylene glycol/5-fluorouracil/layered double hydroxide. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:6661–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Attari E, Nosrati H, Danafar H, Kheiri MH. Methotrexate anticancer drug delivery to breast cancer cell lines by iron oxide magnetic based nanocarrier. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019;107(11):2492–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Javanbakht T, Laurent S, Stanicki D, Wilkinson KJ. Relating the surface properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONS) to their bactericidal effect towards a biofilm of streptococcus mutans. PLoS ONE. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Yildiz I, Shukla S, Steinmetz NF. Applications of viral nanoparticles in medicine. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Makerere’s Mechanical Engineering department, RTC lab in the Makerere’s College of Veterinary, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Materials Research Department (MRD), iThemba LABs, Cape Town in South Africa for granting access to the SEM-EDX, UV–Vis spectrophotometer and the XRD instruments, respectively.

Funding

We are grateful to the African Centre of Excellence in Materials, Product Development and Nanotechnology (MAPRONANO ACE) under Makerere University for funding this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Physiology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

    Henry Fenekansi Kiwumulo, Haruna Muwonge & Robert Tamale Ssekitoleko

  2. Department of Human Anatomy, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

    Charles Ibingira

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

    Michael Lubwama & John Baptist Kirabira

  4. Habib Medical School, Islamic University in Uganda (IUIU), Kampala, Uganda

    Haruna Muwonge

Authors
  1. Henry Fenekansi Kiwumulo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haruna Muwonge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles Ibingira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Lubwama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John Baptist Kirabira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robert Tamale Ssekitoleko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HFK performed the repeated rounds of synthesis and characterization testing, RTS and JBK designed, tailored and supervised the study, HM, ML and CI analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the draft and revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Tamale Ssekitoleko.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests of any sort.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiwumulo, H.F., Muwonge, H., Ibingira, C. et al. Green synthesis and characterization of iron-oxide nanoparticles using Moringa oleifera: a potential protocol for use in low and middle income countries. BMC Res Notes 15, 149 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06039-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06039-7

Keywords

  • Green synthesis
  • Bio-compatible
  • Iron oxide nanoparticles
  • Moringa oleifera
  • LMICs
  • UV–vis
  • X-ray diffraction
  • Scanning Electron Microscope
  • Energy Dispersive X-ray

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us