Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

The C313Y Piedmontese mutation decreases myostatin covalent dimerisation and stability

BMC Research Notes20114:442

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-442

©  Sutherland-Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

  • Received: 2 August 2011
  • Accepted: 24 October 2011
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Myostatin is a key negative regulator of muscle growth and development, whose activity has important implications for the treatment of muscle wastage disorders. Piedmontese cattle display a double-muscled phenotype associated with the expression of C313Y mutant myostatin. In vivo, C313Y myostatin is proteolytically processed, exported and circulated extracellularly but fails to correctly regulate muscle growth. The C313Y mutation removes the C313-containing disulphide bond, an integral part of the characteristic TGF-β cystine-knot structural motif.

Results

Here we present in vitro analysis of the structure and stability of the C313Y myostatin protein that reveals significantly decreased covalent dimerisation for C313Y myostatin accompanied by a loss of structural stability compared to wild type. The C313Y myostatin growth factor, processed from full length precursor protein, fails to inhibit C2C12 myoblast proliferation in contrast to wild type myostatin. Although structural modeling shows the substitution of tyrosine causes structural perturbation, biochemical analysis of additional disulphide mutants, C313A and C374A, indicates that an intact cystine-knot motif is a major determinant in myostatin growth factor stability and covalent dimerisation.

Conclusions

This research shows that the cystine-knot structure is important for myostatin dimerisation and stability, and that disruption of this structural motif perturbs myostatin signaling.

Keywords

  • Circular Dichroism
  • Disulphide Bond
  • Myostatin Protein
  • Thermal Shift Assay
  • Growth Factor Domain

Background

Myostatin is a member of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily of growth and differentiation factors, acting as a primary negative regulator of muscle development and growth [1, 2]. Myostatin over expression in animal models induces profound muscle and fat loss analogous to that seen in human cachexia syndromes [3, 4]. Myostatin signaling can have negative consequences in a diseased background such as the muscular dystrophies [5] and may contribute to cachexia associated with many chronic disease states [3] including HIV [6] and cancer [7]. Hence myostatin has been suggested to hold exciting potential for inhibitory targeting in a wide range of muscle wastage diseases [8, 9].

Similar to other TGF-β family members myostatin is translated as a precursor protein (MstnPP) consisting of an N-terminal signal sequence, a propeptide domain (residues 21-266) and a growth factor domain (MstnGF, residues 267-374) that contains the characteristic cystine-knot motif [10, 11] and dimerises at the C-terminus via an intermolecular disulfide bond [12–14]. The propeptide region plays a chaperone role assisting folding of the growth factor region [15, 16] before furin proteolysis at a conserved RSRR sequence [1, 14]. The propeptide remains non-covalently associated with the mature dimer regulating its activity and targeting in the latent complex [14, 17]. Myostatin remains latent until a second activating cleavage event in the propeptide region that disrupts the association [18, 19].

A number of myostatin null mutations that result in a double-muscled phenotype have been documented. In one human case a child has increased muscle mass, is unusually strong and does not show any negative effects from the mutation [20]. Myostatin null mutations have also been identified in Texel sheep [1] and racing whippets [21]. Double-muscled cattle breeds such as the Belgian Blue have been recognized for almost 200 years [1]. The majority of myostatin null phenotypes result from premature stop codons and the ensuing absence of myostatin protein [22, 23]. In contrast, Piedmontese cattle have the myostatin missense mutation G938A that translates to C313Y myostatin protein with the consequent loss of one of the disulphide bonds (C313-C374) involved in the characteristic TGF-β family cystine-knot structural motif. Compared to wild type, Piedmontese cattle skeletal muscle C313Y myostatin precursor protein (C313Y-MstnPP) is translated at greatly elevated levels (> 10-fold) but the C313Y mature growth factor (C313Y-MstnGF) is detected at significantly reduced levels in skeletal muscle while circulating levels are similar [10]. Refolded E. coli expressed C313Y-MstnGF failed to inhibit muscle cell proliferation and acted as a dominant negative inhibitor of wild type (WT) myostatin [10].

The MstnGF monomer contains four disulphide bonds (Figure 1, yellow), three of which are involved in an intricate cystine-knot motif (C281-C340, C309-C372 and C313-C374); C339 forms the intermolecular dimerisation disulphide bond. We have investigated the in vitro structure and stability of C313Y-MstnPP and additional disulphide mutant proteins C313A-MstnPP and C374A-MstnPP. C313Y recapitulates the mutation found in Piedmontese myostatin, C313A disrupts the C313-C374 disulphide bond without introducing a large tyrosine residue minimizing steric interference and C374A removes the same disulphide bond through mutation of the partner cysteine residue. The results presented here show a significant decrease in C313Y myostatin covalent disulphide linked dimerisation, lowered thermal stability and a failure to inhibit myoblast proliferation relative to WT. This research indicates that myostatin structural stability and covalent dimerisation are maintained by the cystine-knot and suggests that this structural motif is required for receptor-mediated signaling by the myostatin growth factor in vivo, with its absence leading to a double-muscled phenotype.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The myostatin growth factor primary structure. Disulphide bonds are shown in yellow; C313 is highlighted in blue, C374 in red and the dimerisation C339 is boxed. Sequence numbering for the full-length precursor myostatin (MstnPP) and processed myostatin growth factor alone (MstnGF) are shown. MstnPP numbering is used throughout this paper.

Results

C313 mutations decrease myostatin disulphide-linked covalent dimerisation

All C313 mutant myostatin proteins could be refolded and purified using the WT protocol of heparin affinity chromatography followed by gel filtration chromatography [24]. Disulphide-linked dimerisation is significantly decreased in the mutant proteins, as seen by SDS-PAGE densitometric analysis (Figure 2A). A proportion of the C313 myostatin mutants eluted as dimer during gel filtration chromatography (Figure 2B, peak D) but they are not disulphide linked, owing to their monomeric Mw displayed on non-reducing SDS-PAGE. In addition, gel filtration chromatograms highlight increased aggregation during refolding for all mutant proteins (Figure 2B, peaks A1 and A2) compared to WT [24].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Mutations in the myostatin precursor protein inhibit covalent dimerisation and increase aggregation during refolding. A. (i) Reducing (R) versus non-reducing (NR) SDS-PAGE (12%) analysis of dimer (D) and monomer (M) ratios for purified precursor protein dimers after gel filtration chromatography; (ii) Quantitative densitometry analysis of relative proportions of monomer and dimer for each protein. Percentages are calculated relative to the fully reduced monomer. Statistical significance was calculated using a paired Student's t-test where * is P < 0.0001 for monomers relative to the WT monomer and **<0.0001 for dimers relative to the WT dimer. B. Gel filtration chromatography of (i) C313Y-MstnPP; (i) C313A-MstnPP and (iii) C374A-MstnPP. Peaks are labeled as follows: A1, void volume aggregates; A2, lower molecular weight aggregates; D, dimer.

C313 mutant myostatin precursor protein structures are similar to WT but show decreased stability

The circular dichroism (CD) spectra of C313Y-MstnPP, C313A-MstnPP and C374A-MstnPP are broadly comparable to that of MstnPP (Figure 3A), but show decreased absorption at 217 nm indicating that disruption of the C313-C374 disulphide bond by mutation of C313 or C374 compromises the integrity of β-sheet structures. The overall similarity of the MstnPP C313 mutants' CD spectra to WT and other TGF-β family propeptide and precursor protein spectra [25, 26] indicates refolding was successful. Sypro Orange fluorescence thermal shift assays [27] show that C313Y-, C313A- and C374A-MstnPP all have reduced thermal stability with major unfolding transitions approximately 20°C lower than the 86°C of MstnPP, at 66, 67 and 67°C respectively (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Myostatin precursor protein disulphide mutants are structurally similar to the WT but have decreased thermal stability. A. Circular dichroism spectra from 195 to 240 nm of MstnPP (green), C313Y-MstnPP (blue), C313A-MstnPP (black) and C374A-MstnPP (red). B. Fluorescence-based thermal shift assay; MstnPP (green); C313Y-MstnPP (blue); C313A-MstnPP (black); C374A-MstnPP (red); and buffer only control (orange).

Structural modeling and tryptic digestion of C313Y-myostatin precursor protein suggest structural perturbation

In addition to disruption of the cystine-knot motif the C313Y substitution will perturb myostatin structure. Modeling the C313Y-MstnGF structure by directly substituting a tyrosine sidechain for cysteine at position 313 in the MstnGF crystal structure [11] using Coot [28] showed that all energetically favoured tyrosine side chain rotamers cannot occur without significant structural rearrangement owing to steric interference with nearby regions of the structure (Figure 4A). The location of 313 in combination with disruption of the cystine knot suggests an increase in structural flexibility on removal of disulphide bond induced structural constraints. The resistance of C313Y-MstnPP to limited proteolysis was investigated by incubation with trypsin at 37°C followed by analysis using reducing (R) and non-reducing (NR) SDS-PAGE. The C313Y-MstnPP tryptic product pattern is very similar to WT indicative of a similar overall fold [24]. However, the rate of C313Y-MstnPP proteolysis is increased relative to MstnPP consistent with improved protease accessibility owing to decreased structural compactness and/or increased structural flexibility in combination with decreased dimerisation (Figure 4B). The C313Y substitution disrupts the cystine-knot motif leading to improved protease accessibility. The MstnGF proteolytic product is not observed as trypsin fails to cleave at the RSRR furin site (unpublished results).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Structural modeling and tryptic digestion of C313Y-MstnPP suggest structural perturbation. A. Orthogonal structural representations of the environment of residue 313 within: (i) The MstnGF crystal structure (green ribbons) highlighting the native C313-C374 disulphide bond (boxed, C313 red; C374 green stick representation) (ii) The modeled C313Y-MstnGF structure with C313 replaced by Tyr showing a superposition of the Tyr sidechain favoured rotamers (Chi 1 angles -60°, 180°, 60°). The intermolecular disulphide (C339-C339') is shown in blue stick representation. The right-hand view is rotated ~90° around the X-axis relative to the left-hand view. B. (i) Limited tryptic proteolysis of C313Y-MstnPP. Reducing (R) and non-reducing (NR) SDS-PAGE showing bands as indicated: M, monomer; D, dimer. Tryptic digestion was performed at 37°C with a myostatin:trypsin ratio of 100:1(w/w) and samples were taken at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 18 hour time points. (ii) Quantification of trypsin proteolysis of C313Y-MstnPP and MstnPP [24], as a function of time, normalised to the concentration at time zero.

Furin processing and secondary structure of C313Y-myostatin are maintained

In vivo, MstnPP is processed to give the propeptide/growth factor dimer latent complex for export. In vitro incubation of MstnPP and C313Y-MstnPP with furin resulted in proteolytic processing of the proprotein to the mature growth factor for both WT and C313Y myostatin as evident by the monomeric growth factor product band at 12 kDa under reducing conditions. As expected MstnGF is a disulphide-linked dimer of 25 kDa under non-reducing SDS-PAGE conditions but the C313Y growth factor fails to form a disulphide-linked dimer and exhibits increased mobility on SDS-PAGE (Figure 5A). The failure of C313Y-MstnGF to covalently dimerise is consistent with results observed for C313Y-MstnPP (Figure 1A). CD analysis shows that the furin processing of C313Y-MstnPP to C313Y latent complex (C313Y-MstnLC) increases the proportion of β-sheet secondary structure (Figure 5B (i)) inferring some structural rearrangement upon proteolytic processing. This β-sheet increase is a reversal of the decrease seen for C313Y-MstnPP compared to MstnPP (Figure 3A). The secondary structure of C313Y-MstnLC is more similar to WT MstnLC than to C313Y-MstnPP from which it was processed (Figure 5B (ii)). In contrast the spectra of WT MstnPP and MstnLC are largely similar (Figure 5B (iii)). Comparison of CD thermal melting curves for C313Y-MstnPP and MstnPP showed no distinctive differences in unfolding behaviour except at high temperature (Figure 6A). The CD melting curves are representative of a complex (i.e. not two-state, or single intermediate) unfolding mechanism [29], as expected for myostatin that aggregates and forms amyloid at elevated temperatures [24]. CD thermal unfolding of WT and C313Y-MstnLC suggests that the mutant latent complex has decreased stability compared to the WT (Figure 6B) though the differences are not as large as observed in Sypro Orange assays that reports on hydrophobic core solvent accessibility (Figure 3B).
Figure 5
Figure 5

Furin proteolytic processing of C313Y-MstnPP and C313Y-MstnGF secondary structure is maintained. A. Analysis of (i) WT and (ii) C313Y precursor protein furin cleavage products by reducing (R) and non-reducing (NR) 15% SDS-PAGE. WT growth factor dimer (**) and C313Y growth factor monomer (*) under non-reducing conditions are indicated. B. Circular dichroism analysis of MstnLC and C313Y-MstnLC from 195 to 240 nm. (i) Comparison of C313Y-MstnPP (blue) and C313Y-MstnLC (black). (ii) Comparison of WT MstnPP (green) and MstnLC (red). (iii) Comparison of C313Y-MstnLC (black) and MstnLC (red).

Figure 6
Figure 6

Thermal unfolding of WT and C313Y myostatin followed by CD suggests similar behavior at high temperatures and decreased latent complex stability. A. Myostatin precursor protein circular dichroism thermal unfolding spectra (i) MstnPP and (ii) C313Y-MstnPP. Normalised unfolding analysis for MstnPP (blue) and C313Y-MstnPP (green) at (iii) 209 nm and (iv) 217 nm. B. Myostatin latent complex circular dichroism thermal unfolding spectra (i) MstnLC and (ii) C313Y-MstnLC. Normalised unfolding analysis for MstnLC (red) and C313Y-MstnLC (black) at (iii) 209 nm and (iv) 217 nm.

C313Y myostatin growth factor proteolytically processed from C313Y-MstnPP fails to inhibit myoblast proliferation

C313Y myostatin activity was measured by C2C12 myoblast proliferation assays [30–32]. Growth factor was obtained by cleavage of MstnPP and C313Y-MstnPP with furin convertase and acid-induced dissociation [19] of the propeptide-growth factor latent complex. C313Y-MstnGF, C313Y-MstnPP and C313Y-MstnLC do not inhibit myoblast proliferation (Figure 7). These observations are consistent with studies of bovine C313Y myostatin growth factor also expressed in E. coli but refolded directly as the mature growth factor protein [10]. Positive control MstnGF inhibits C2C12 myoblast proliferation compared to cells only, buffer only, MstnPP and MstnLC controls (Figure 7). Wild type inhibition was less dramatic than that seen in assays performed previously [10] owing to incomplete acid-induced dissociation of the propeptide in the latent complex [19].
Figure 7
Figure 7

C313Y-MstnGF is unable to inhibit the proliferation of C2C12 myoblasts. The difference in absorbance at 450 and 630 nm correlates to cell density after incubation with WT or C313Y myostatin growth factor, precursor protein or latent complex. Cells incubated in media in the absence of protein but with buffer (Buffer only) or without buffer (Cells only) were used as controls. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean for triplicate samples from three independent experiments for WT samples and two independent experiments for C313Y. Statistical significance was calculated using a paired Student's t-test where ** P < 0.05.

Discussion

Myostatin contains the canonical cystine-knot motif and dimerises via an intermolecular disulphide bond as found for nearly all TGF-β family members. Even though the overall structures of the myostatin C313 mutants are broadly similar to WT there is significantly less covalently linked dimeric C313 mutant myostatin. Gel filtration chromatography shows that C313 mutant myostatin dimerisation can occur, but it is not mediated by an intermolecular disulphide bond but occurs, presumably, via interactions at the hydrophobic dimerisation interface [11]. The C313 mutation site is structurally adjacent to the inter-molecular disulphide bond and increased structural flexibility or rearrangement in the absence of the C313-C374 disulphide will lead to structural distortion in the growth factor domain affecting disulphide-linked dimerisation. This structural distortion may interfere with interactions between the myostatin growth factor domain and the propeptide domain and/or with its receptor. This analysis with purified recombinant myostatin is consistent with results showing reduced levels of dimeric myostatin in Piedmontese cattle skeletal muscle compared to WT controls even in the context of a greatly elevated mutant precursor myostatin concentration [10]. The chaperone-like role of the myostatin propeptide region for correct folding of the growth factor motif [15, 16] means that recombinant C313Y-MstnGF prepared from furin cleavage of C313Y-MstnPP more closely mimics in vivo production of C313Y-MstnGF than refolding of recombinant growth factor domain expressed in isolation. The absence of signaling activity of C313Y-MstnGF, derived from proteolytically processed C313Y-MstnPP, causing no effect on C2C12 myoblast proliferation, confirms the importance of the cystine knot motif for myostatin function. All the disulphide mutants, C313Y-MstnPP, C313A-MstnPP and C374A-MstnPP, exhibit reduced thermal stability and have an increased propensity to aggregate. These results are consistent with the cystine-knot being required for the high stability of myostatin as observed for other members of this growth factor super family [33, 34]. Removal of the myostatin C313-C374 disulphide leads to an increase in susceptibility of C313Y myostatin to proteolysis, through decreased β-sheet structure and presumed increased flexibility. Examination of the structural environment around residue 313 reveals that perturbations in the WT myostatin structure are required to accommodate the larger C313Y tyrosine. Analysis of C313A and C374A mutations confirms that it is disruption of the cystine-knot by removal of the C13-C374 disulphide bond and not by the introduction of the tyrosine that is the dominant factor in the decreased stability and reduced disulphide-linked dimerisation of C313Y myostatin. Myostatin elicits cell signaling via type I and type II Ser/Thr kinase transmembrane receptors [1]. C313 is localized near the concave surface of myostatin, close to the type I receptor binding site [35] (Figure 8). It is not possible to exactly predict the structural consequences of the C313Y mutation; disruption of the cystine-knot and decreased covalent dimerisation likely results in a less compact structure that is then unsuitable for receptor activation. Alternative possible mechanisms for the loss of C313Y myostatin function are that structural alterations owing to the C313Y mutation result in increased binding to myostatin negative regulators such as follistatin or decorin [14, 36], or altered targeting [17].
Figure 8
Figure 8

The MstnGF structure showing the proximity of the C313Y mutation site to the putative Type I receptor binding site. The C313Y site is shown in one monomer only for clarity. Disulphide bonds are shown in yellow and the modeled C313Y in red. Receptor binding is modeled by homology with interactions documented for the TGF-β growth factors [11].

Conclusion

In summary, in vitro characterization of C313Y myostatin shows that removal of the C313-C374 disulphide bond by site-directed mutagenesis decreases myostatin covalent dimerisation with subsequent loss of activity and lowered stability. An intact cystine-knot structural motif is essential for myostatin dimerisation and function.

Methods

Production of C313Y, C313A and C374A myostatin proteins

Mutant MstnPP expression constructs were prepared by PCR from the WT myostatin construct described previously [24]. PCR fragments were cloned into a modified pET vector via BamHI and XhoI restriction sites and constructs confirmed by sequencing. The E. coli BL21 (DE3) expression, refolding and purification of the mutant proteins was conducted using the procedure previously described for WT myostatin [24].

Analysis of disulphide-linked dimerisation by reducing and non-reducing SDS-PAGE

Intermolecular disulphide formation was analysed by visualising purified myostatin (1 mg/ml) on reducing (R) versus non-reducing (NR) SDS-PAGE. All conditions were identical except for the presence (R) or absence (NR) of reducing agent (β-mercaptoethanol, 1.4 M) in the SDS sample buffer. Band densities were quantified with a correction for background staining using gel densitometry. The Student's t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc) using triplicate gels.

Circular dichroism spectroscopy and thermal denaturation

CD spectra in the far-UV region (195-240 nm) were measured for myostatin (1 mg/mL) with a Chirascan CD spectrometer (Applied Biophysics) using a 0.1 mm cell at 4°C. For each sample 20 spectra of 1 nm interval were collected every 2.5 seconds, followed by baseline subtraction, averaging and smoothing. For CD thermal denaturation, 1 nm/2.5 second readings were taken at every 5°C (precursor protein) or 10°C (latent complex) increase in temperature from 5 - 90°C with a 30 second equilibration time at each temperature and a tolerance level of 0.2°C. The change in C313Y-MstnPP CD signal was normalized by the decreased initial proportion of β-sheet for, relative to MstnPP, before thermally-induced denaturation (Figure 3A).

Fluorescence-based thermal shift assays

Sypro Orange (Sigma) was diluted 100x according to manufacturer's instructions in milliQ H2O with 2 μL then added to 18 μL myostatin (1 mg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.5). Negative controls contained buffer and dye only. A Rotor-Gene 6000 thermocycler (Corbett) was used for analysis with excitation at 470 nm and fluorescence emission measured at 555 nm over increasing temperature from 30 to 95°C in 1°C increments. Melting temperatures were calculated with the Rotor-Gene 6000 software.

Structural modeling

The myostatin coordinates from the myostatin/follistatin complex structure (PDB code: 3HH2) were used to model the C313Y, C313A and C374A mutations with the amino acid substitution and rotamer tools in Coot [28]. Structural figures were prepared with PyMol [37].

Protease resistance analysis

Protease resistance was assayed by incubating C313Y-MstnPP at a w/w ratio of 100:1 trypsin (bovine pancreas, Sigma) at either 4°C, room temperature or 37°C. Samples were taken after 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 18 hours (overnight), denatured, and then analysed by reducing and non-reducing SDS-PAGE. The decrease in concentration of full-length C313Y-MstnPP compared to MstnPP [24] as a function of time, normalised to the concentration at time zero, was quantified by gel densitometry using Image-J software [38] Owing to the different relative proportions of MstnPP and C313Y-MstnPP monomer and dimer under non-reducing conditions, the reduced SDS-PAGE monomer bands were quantified enabling direct comparison between the two proteins.

Furin cleavage

Purified myostatin precursor protein dimer, in HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl buffer, was concentrated to 10 mg/mL and furin cleavage buffer (50 mM HEPES pH7.5 and 1 mM CaCl2) was added to a final volume of 250 μL per 1 mg of protein. Human furin convertase (Sigma, 2 U/μL) was added at a ratio of 1 μL furin to 100 μg protein. The reaction was incubated at 30°C for 64 hours and subsequently centrifuged at 17,000 × g, 4°C for 5 minutes to remove precipitated protein.

C2C12 myoblast proliferation myostatin activity assay

C2C12 mouse myoblasts were cultured in Advanced Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (4.5 g/L D-glucose and 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate; Gibco, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum, 4 mM L-glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified environment and passaged at 80-90% confluency. Cells were plated in fresh medium in optical bottom 96-well plates at a density of 1,000 cells/well. After 24 hours, media was removed and 100 μL/well fresh media containing myostatin (10 μg/mL) was added. Equivalent concentrations of the untreated furin digest and MstnPP were used. Activation of the MstnGF was performed by acid treatment as described previously [19]. Cells were incubated with protein for 72 hours and cell growth was measured using the WST-1 Cell Proliferation Assay (Roche). WST-1 (10 μL) was added to each well and incubated for a further 3 hours. Absorbance at 450 nm and 630 nm was measured in a PowerWave XS 96-well plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc). Cells incubated in media only and media containing furin cleavage buffer only were used as negative controls. Three independent experiments each with triplicate wells were used for each condition for WT; two independent experiments were conducted in triplicate for C313Y. The Student's t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism (v5.04, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission Top Achiever Doctoral and New Zealand Neuromuscular Alliance Henry Kelsey scholarships awarded to CSS, and grants from the Sir Thomas and Lady Duncan Trust, Massey University Research Fund and the Palmerston North Medical Research Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Molecular BioSciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, 4442, New Zealand
(2)
The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada

References

  1. Lee SJ: Regulation of Muscle Mass by Myostatin. Annual Reviews in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2004, 20: 61-86. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.012103.135836.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. McPherron AC, Lawler AM, Lee SJ: Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Mice by a New TGF-β Superfamily Member. Nature. 1997, 387 (6628): 83-90. 10.1038/387083a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zimmers TA, Davies MV, Koniaris LG, Haynes P, Esquela AF, Tomkinson KN, McPherron AC, Wolfman NM, Lee SJ: Induction of Cachexia in Mice by Systemically Administered Myostatin. Science. 2002, 296: 1486-1488. 10.1126/science.1069525.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Durieux AC, Amirouche A, Banzet S, Koulmann N, Bonnefoy R, Pasdeloup M, Mouret C, Bigard X, Peinnequin A, Freyssenet D: Ectopic expression of myostatin induces atrophy of adult skeletal muscle by decreasing muscle gene expression. Endocrinology. 2007, 148 (7): 3140-3147. 10.1210/en.2006-1500.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wagner KR, McPherron AC, Winik N, Lee SJ: Loss of Myostatin Attenuates Severity of Muscular Dystrophy in mdx Mice. Annals of Neurology. 2002, 52: 832-836. 10.1002/ana.10385.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Taylor W, Yarasheski K, Sinha-Hikim I, Ma K, Ezzat S, Shen R, Lalani R, Asa S, Mamita M, et al: Organization of the Human Myostatin Gene and Expression in Healthy Men and HIV-Infected Men with Muscle Wasting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1998, 95: 14938-14943. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14938.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Costelli P, Muscaritoli M, Bonetto A, Penna F, Reffo P, Bossola M, Bonelli G, Doglietto GB, Baccino FM, Fanelli FR: Muscle Myostatin Signalling is Enhanced in Experimental Cancer Cachexia. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2008, 38 (7): 531-538. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2008.01970.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Patel K, Amthor H: The Function of Myostatin and Strategies of Myostatin Blockade - New Hope for Therapies Aimed at Promoting Growth of Skeletal Muscle. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2005, 15: 117-126. 10.1016/j.nmd.2004.10.018.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tobin JF, Celeste AJ: Myostatin, a Negative Regulator of Muscle Mass: Implications for Muscle Degenerative Diseases. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 2005, 5: 328-332. 10.1016/j.coph.2005.01.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry C, Thomas M, Langley B, Sharma M, Kambadur R: Single Cysteine to Tyrosine Transition Inactivates the Growth Inhibitory Function of Piedmontese Myostatin. American Journal of Physiology. 2002, 283: 135-141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Cash JN, Rejon CA, McPherron AC, Bernard DJ, Thompson TB: The Structure of Myostatin:Follistatin 288: Insights into Receptor Utilization and Heparin Binding. The EMBO Journal. 2009, 28 (17): 2662-2676. 10.1038/emboj.2009.205.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill JJ, Davies MV, Pearson AA, Wang JH, Hewick RM, Wolfman NM, Qiu Y: The Myostatin Propeptide and the Follistatin-Related Gene Are Inhibitory Binding Proteins of Myostatin in Normal Serum. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002, 277 (43): 40735-40741. 10.1074/jbc.M206379200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang M, Liang L, Wang S, Ratovitski T, Holmstrom J, Barker C, Stotish R: Characterization and Identification of the Inhibitory Domain of GDF-8 Propeptide. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2004, 315: 525-531. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.01.085.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee SJ, McPherron AC: Regulation of Myostatin Activity and Muscle Growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001, 98: 9306-9311. 10.1073/pnas.151270098.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Funkenstein B, Rebhan Y: Expression, Purification, Renaturation and Activation of Fish Myostatin Expressed in Escherichia coli: Facilitation of Refolding and Activity Inhibitation by Myostatin Prodomain. Protein Expression and Purification. 2007, 54 (1): 54-65. 10.1016/j.pep.2007.02.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jin HJ, Dunn MA, Borthakur D, Kim YS: Refolding and Purification of Unprocessed Porcine Myostatin Expressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Expression and Purification. 2004, 35: 1-10. 10.1016/j.pep.2004.01.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Sengle G, Ono RN, Sasaki T, Sakai LY: Prodomains of Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) Superfamily Members Specify Different Functions. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2011, 286 (7): 5087-5099. 10.1074/jbc.M110.188615.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee SJ: Genetic Analysis of the Role of Proteolysis in the Activation of Latent Myostatin. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (2): e1628-10.1371/journal.pone.0001628.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolfman NM, McPherron AC, Pappano WN, Davies MV, Song K, Tomkinson KN, Wright JF, Zhao L, Sebald SM, Greenspan DS, et al: Activation of Latent Myostatin by the BMP-1/Tolloid Family of Metalloproteinases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003, 100 (26): 15842-15846. 10.1073/pnas.2534946100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Schuelke M, Wagner KR, Stolz LE, Hubner C, Riebel T, Komen W, Braun T, Tobin JF, Lee SJ: Myostatin Mutation Associated with Gross Muscle Hypertrophy in a Child. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004, 350 (26): 2682-2688. 10.1056/NEJMoa040933.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mosher DS, Quignon P, Bustamante CD, Sutter NB, Mellersh CS, Parker HG, Ostrander EA: A Mutation in the Myostatin Gene Increases Muscle Mass and Enhances Racing Performance in Heterozygote Dogs. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3 (5): e79-10.1371/journal.pgen.0030079.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kambadur R, Sharma M, Smith TPL, Bass JJ: Mutations in Myostatin (GDF8) in Double-Muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese Cattle. Genome Research. 1997, 7: 910-915.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McPherron AC, Lee SJ: Double Muscling in Cattle Due to Mutations in the Myostatin Gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1997, 94: 12457-12461. 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12457.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Starck CS, Sutherland-Smith AJ: Cytotoxic Aggregation and Amyloid Formation by the Myostatin Precursor Protein. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5 (2): e9170-10.1371/journal.pone.0009170.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillger F, Herr G, Rudolph R, Schwarz E: Biophysical Comparison of BMP-2, ProBMP2, and the Free Pro-peptide Reveals Stabilization of the Pro-peptide by the Mature Growth Factor. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005, 280 (15): 14974-14980. 10.1074/jbc.M414413200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. McMahon GA, Dignam JD, Gentry LE: Structural Characterization of the Latent Complex Between Transforming Growth Factor β1 and β1-Latency-Associated Peptide. Biochemical Journal. 1996, 313: 343-351.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Geerlof A, Brown J, Coutard B, Egloff MP, Enguita FJ, Fogg MJ, Gilbert RJC, Groves MR, Haouz A, Nettleship JE, et al: The Impact of Protein Characterization in Structural Proteomics. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 2006, 62: 1125-1136.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Emsley P, Cowtan K: Coot: Model-Building Tools for Molecular Graphics. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 2004, 60: 2126-2132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Benjwal S, Verma S, Rohm KH, Gursky O: Monitoring Protein Aggregation During Thermal Unfolding in Circular Dichroism Experiments. Protein Science. 2006, 15 (3): 635-639. 10.1110/ps.051917406.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Joulia D, Bernardi H, Garandel V, Rabenoelina F, Vernus B, Cabello G: Mechanisms Involved in the Inhibition of Myoblast Proliferation and Differentiation by Myostatin. Experimental Cell Research. 2003, 286: 263-275. 10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00074-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor WE, Bhasin S, Artaza J, Byhower F, Azam M, Willard DH, Kull FC, Gonzalez-Cadavid N: Myostatin Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Protein Synthesis in C2C12 Muscle Cells. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2001, 280: 221-228.Google Scholar
  32. Thomas M, Langley B, Berry C, Sharma M, Kirk S, Bass J, Kambadur R: Myostatin, a Negative Regulator of Muscle Growth, Functions by Inhibiting Myoblast Proliferation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000, 275: 40235-40243. 10.1074/jbc.M004356200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Brunner AM, Lioubin MN, Marquardt H, Malacko AR, Wang WC, Shapiro RA, Neubauer M, Cook J, Madisen L, Purchio AF: Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Glycosylation Sites in the Transforming Growth Factorβ1 (TGFβ1) and TGFβ2 (414) Precursors and of Cysteine residues Within Mature TGFβ1: Effects on Secretion and Activity. Molecular Endocrinology. 1992, 6 (10): 1691-1700. 10.1210/me.6.10.1691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Muller Y, Heiring C: The Cysteine Knot Promotes Folding and Not Thermodynamic Stability in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002, 277 (45): 43410-43416. 10.1074/jbc.M206438200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson TB, Woodruff TK, Jardetzsky TS: Structures of an ActRIIB:Activin Complex Reveal a Novel Binding Mode for TGF-β Ligand-Receptor Interactions. The EMBO Journal. 2003, 22: 1555-1566. 10.1093/emboj/cdg156.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Miura T, Kishioka Y, Wakamatsu JI, Hattori A, Hennebry A, Berry CJ, Sharma M, Kambadur R, Nishimura T: Decorin Binds Myostatin and Modulates Its Activity to Muscle Cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2006, 340: 675-680. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.060.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. DeLano WL: The PyMOL User's Manual. 2002, DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  38. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ: Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004, 11 (7): 36-42.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Sutherland-Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us