Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Effects of oxygen on the antigenic landscape of prostate cancer cells

  • 1,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 5,
  • 5,
  • 2,
  • 4, 6, 7 and
  • 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7Email author
BMC Research Notes20158:687

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1633-7

  • Received: 27 May 2015
  • Accepted: 26 October 2015
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Use of allogeneic cancer cells-based immunotherapy for treatment of established prostate cancer (PCa) has only been marginally effective. One reason for failure could stem from the mismatch of antigenic signatures of vaccine cells and cancer in situ. Hence, it is possible that vaccine cells expressed antigens differently than tumor cells in situ. We hypothesized that cells grown in vitro at low oxygen tension (pO2) provide a better antigen match to tumors in situ and could reveal a more relevant antigenic landscape than cells grown in atmospheric pO2.

Methods

We tested this hypothesis by comparing PCa cells propagated at pO2 = 2 kPa and 20 kPa. To identify potential tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), we prepared PCa cell lysates, resolved them by two-dimensional electrophoresis and immunoblotting using spontaneous antibodies from plasma derived from PCa patients and control subjects. Antibody-labeled spots were analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and validated by ELISA. We selected hypoxia-regulated HSP70 and hnRNP L and hypoxia-independent HSP60 and determined the frequency of plasma samples reacting with these molecules.

Results

Frequency of HSP60-reactive plasma was low in healthy controls [1.3 % (1/76)], while it was elevated in PCa patients [13.0 % (7/54); p < 0.05]. These data suggest a humoral immune response to HSP60 in PCa. Levels of autoantibodies to HSP70 did not differ from healthy controls [3.7 % (2/54)] in PCa patients [5.3 % (2/38)]. Similarly, hnRNP L autoantibodies did no differ between healthy controls [6.1 % (3/49)] and PCa patients [5.3 % (2/38)].

Conclusions

Overall our results suggest the value of hypoxia as a modifier of the cellular and antigenic landscape of PCa cells. By modifying the immune reactivity of PCa cells in culture, manipulation of pO2 can be proposed as a new avenue for improving diagnosis, prognosis and immunotherapy for PCa.

Keywords

  • Tumor-associated antigens
  • Prostate cancer
  • Hypoxia
  • HSP60
  • HSP70
  • hnRNP L

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide [1]. Metastatic PCa is not curable by surgery and is resistant to chemotherapy and ionizing radiation [2] eventually leading to death [3]. Similarly to most solid tumors, PCa tissues are characterized by low oxygen tension–hypoxia–that in PCa is a marker of poor clinical prognosis [4].

It has been generally accepted that microenvironmental hypoxia is among the reasons for resistance to treatment; it reduces the rate of cell proliferation and modulates numerous properties of cells known to promote resistance to chemotherapy and radiation [57]. In addition, hypoxia is associated with increased chromosomal instability, gene amplification, down-regulation of DNA damage repair pathways, and altered sensitivity to DNA damaging agents [8, 9] contributing thus to cancer phenotype.

Hypoxia triggers mechanisms that tend to reinstate oxygen homeostasis by changes in gene expression mediated mainly by the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). HIFs are heterodimeric proteins, each composed of one of the three α subunits and the single β subunit resulting in HIF-1, HIF-2 and HIF-3 [10]. In hypoxia, HIF-1 and HIF-2 rapidly accumulate and translocate to the nucleus [11] to activate genes involved in endothelial cell proliferation, migration, permeability, survival, and response to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [1215].

Changes in oxygen tension (pO2) modulate innate and adaptive immunity as well [16, 17], but it is less clear whether hypoxia contributes to the difficulties in developing effective cancer immunotherapy [18]. While most immunotherapy studies have focused onto boosting immunity (in the face of cancer–associated immunosuppression [1921]), comparatively less attention has been paid to the role of hypoxia in modulating the expression of tumor–associated antigens (TAAs); this could be particularly germane for the vaccines consisting of whole cancer cells hitherto commonly prepared under standard (normoxic) tissue culture conditions [22]. Since pO2 values at standard culture conditions are much higher than those in hypoxic tumors, current normoxically cultured cell-based vaccines express antigens of unknown relevance to tumors in situ.

It has been reported recently that TAAs in human hypoxic glioma cells were more akin to TAAs in tumors in situ than to TAAs in cells cultured in air [23, 24]. The relevance of pO2 in modulation of immunogenicity of PCa cells is unknown; hence, we studied whether the TAAs in hypoxic PCa cells are different from normoxic PCa cells. Revealing oxygen-sensitive PCa-specific antigens could have important implications for development of better biomarkers and more effective immunotherapy for PCa.

Methods

Patients and plasma

All samples were collected retrospectively in the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA and the University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA. The study protocol is in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the corresponding Institutional Review Boards. Following surgical resection or donation, sample aliquots were prepared, immediately frozen at −80 °C, and stored until use. For identification of PCa-associated antigens in hypoxic PCa cell lysates and patient immune reactivity by 2-DE Western blot experiments, plasma from 25 early-stage PCa patients was utilized. Clinicopathological characteristics of PCa patients utilized in those experiments are summarized in Table 1. For the constitution of control groups, plasma provided by collaborators at Mayo Clinic, Rochester was obtained from 20 healthy age-matched volunteers, patients suffering from colon cancer (n = 10), lung cancer (n = 10), or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 20). For 2-DE Western blot protocols, pools (n = 5) of plasma samples were prepared and tested for nonspecific binding to the nitrocellulose membrane. To evaluate levels of autoantibodies specific for TAAs in human plasma by ELISA, additional plasma samples from healthy controls (n = 56) and patients with PCa (n = 29), obtained from the University of Mississippi Medical Center were included among the specimens described above. A group of plasma samples from 20 renal cell carcinoma patients, provided by collaborators at Mayo Clinic, Rochester was utilized as an additional control group. For ELISA protocols, plasma samples were individually assayed.
Table 1

Clinicopathological characteristics of prostate cancer patients utilized in 2-DE Western blot experiments

Age at surgery

 Number of cases

25

 Mean (SD)

61.5 (4.58)

 Median age, years (range)

61.0

 Q1, Q3

58.0, 65.0

 Range

(55.0–72.0)

Pre-op PSA

 Mean (SD)

5.8 (3.91)

 Median age, years (range)

5.0

 Q1, Q3

4.0, 6.3

 Range

(1.7–20.5)

Clinical grade (GLEASON)

 Missing

0 (%)

 6

24 (96 %)

 7

1 (4 %)

 8

0 (%)

 9

0 (%)

Clinical T-stage, 1997 TNM

 Missing

0 (%)

 T1C

16 (64 %)

 T2a

9 (36 %)

 T2b

0 (%)

 T34

0 (%)

Pathologic grade (GLEASON)

 Missing

0 (%)

 6

25 (100 %)

 7

0 (%)

 8

0 (%)

 9

0 (%)

Pathologic stage, 1997 TNM

 Missing

0 (%)

 T2aN0

8 (32 %)

 T2bN0

17 (68 %)

 T3aN0

0 (%)

 TxN+

0 (%)

Treatment-prior to surgery

 Missing

0 (%)

 No

25 (100 %)

Cell culture

Cultured human PCa cell lines designated VCaP, LNCaP (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA), and C4-2B (Characterized Cell Line Core Facility, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center) were seeded into T25 or T75 flasks (BD Falcon, Bedford, MA). LNCaP cells originate from a lymph node metastasis [25]. VCaP cells were generated from a vertebral metastatic lesion and harbor the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion (present in 40–60 % of PCa patients) [26, 27]. C4-2B cells represent a human bone metastatic PCa and are a derivative of LNCaP cells with more aggressive characteristics [28]. The interest in those cell lines is also based on their ample use by PCa researchers and the utilization of immortalized cells lines as components of heterologous whole cell PCa vaccines [29]. Cells were maintained in phenol-red supplemented RPMI-1640 (LNCaP and C4-2B) and DMEM (VCaP) medium containing 10 % heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Cellgro, Manassas, VA, USA) at 37 °C in humidified air enriched with 5 % CO2 and with O2 content either 20 % (approximately 20 kPa, normoxic), 2 % (approximately 2 kPa, hypoxic), or 1 % in some cases in a CO2 incubator (Binder, Germany). The cells were trypsinized at 80–90 % confluence and plated at the density of 25,000 cells/cm2 (LNCaP and VCaP) or 12,000 cells/cm2 (C4-2B). The medium was not refreshed during the course of the experiments. To evaluate cell viability, cells excluding trypan blue were counted by the aid of a hemocytometer.

ELISA measurement of cytokines and autoantibodies

Concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a marker of hypoxia, were measured in conditioned culture media by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Levels of autoantibodies specific for heat-shock protein (HSP) 60 and HSP70 in human plasma were measured using IgG/A/M ELISA kits for HSP60 and HSP70, respectively (Enzo Life Sciences, Plymounth Meeting, PA, USA). Provided recombinant antigens were used as standards. Autoantibodies for heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L (hnRNP L) were assayed using the pertinent ELISA kit (CUSABIO, Wuhan, China). The assays were conducted according to manufacturers’ guidelines. Plasma from healthy volunteers and patients with PCa, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or rheumatoid arthritis were diluted thousand-fold. The cutoff reactivity for disease was defined as any value that was higher than the mean of the value plus twofold of standard deviation observed in normal plasma.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total mRNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions: One µg RNA was reversely transcribed using SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). Subsequently, quantitative PCR was performed with a LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche, Madison, WI). Levels of mRNA were normalized relative to the levels of control ribosomal protein S28 (RPS28) mRNA [30]. Data were analyzed by the Delta Delta Ct (2−∆∆CT) method using Excel program. Primer sequences used were (forward/reverse): VEGF-α: agtccaacatcaccatgcag/ttccctttcctcgaactgattt; and RPS28: ttttggagtcagagcgagaag/agcatctcagttacgtgtgg.

Cell lysate preparation and labeling

LNCaP and VCaP cells grown in T75 flasks for four days and seven days, respectively, were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), scraped and centrifuged in PBS at 380×g for 5 min at 4 °C. Cells from up to 3 T75 flasks were resuspended in 1 mL PBS and centrifuged at 16,000×g for 1 min. To the pellet, 1.5 volume of 2D lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4 % w/v CHAPS and 40 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 1 × nuclease mix; GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA) was added together with 1x protease inhibitor cocktail set III (per mL of 2D lysis buffer containing 10 µL of 100x protease inhibitor cocktail set III; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were sonicated on ice for 30 min followed by continuous shaking for 45 min at 4 °C. Lysates were centrifuged at 24,000×g for 10 min. Supernatants were collected and saved at −80 °C. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using bovine γ-globulin (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) as standard. Prior to 2-DE, 50 µg of lysate protein was labeled with 400 pM of differential in-gel electrophoresis (DIGE) fluor Cy5 minimal dye (GE Healthcare). Lysates were incubated with dyes for 30 min on ice in the dark. Labeling reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 μL of 10 mM lysine and incubation for 10 min on ice in the dark.

Two dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) and silver staining

Fifty µg protein per sample was diluted in 2D lysis buffer (without inhibitors) containing 30 mM DTT, 1 % 3–10 Pharmalyte ampholyte mixture and 0.25 % 3–10 non-linear (NL) immobilization pH gradient (IPG) buffer (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). After shaking for 30 min, the samples were dispensed into the isoelectric focusing tray, overlaid with 11 cm 3-10NL IPG strips and mineral oil, passively rehydrated for 11 h, and focused for a total of 35,000 Vh (Protean IEF Cell, Bio-Rad). After isoelectric focusing, the strips were immersed in equilibration buffer containing 1 % DTT for 10 min, followed by equilibration buffer with 2 % iodoacetamide for 15 min. The second dimension was carried out on Criterion 10 % gels (Bio-Rad) for 10 min at 140 V, followed by 1 h at 200 V. To detect the fluor Cy5–stained spots, the gel was placed directly between glass plates in a Typhoon 9410 variable mode imager (GE Healthcare) using 633-nm excitation and 670-nm emission wavelengths (optimal for detection of DIGE fluor Cy5). Additionally, electrophoresed proteins were visualized by silver staining. Images were analyzed and stained spots identified using PDQuest sofware (Bio-Rad) according to manufacturer’s protocols.

2D Western blotting

To identify PCa-associated autoantibodies, plasma samples were electrophoresed as described. Electrophoresed proteins were electro-transferred from the gel to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) and blocked with pooled patient or normal plasma diluted 1/300 in blocking buffer. Subsequently the membrane was incubated with chicken anti-human IgG conjugated with HRP (diluted 1/3000 in blocking buffer; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). After the addition of a chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL), membranes were immediately exposed on a CL-Xposure film (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and scanned with an Epson Perfection 4490 Photo scanner (Long Beach, CA, USA) for detection of spots.

Protein digestion and mass spectrometry

Spots of interest identified by PDQuest were excised from gels, destained with 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate in 30 % acetonitrile until transparent and dried in a vacuum centrifuge. Proteins were proteolyzed with 25 ng of modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 37 °C overnight. Peptides were precipitated with 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid and 60 % acetonitrile, vacuum-dried and analyzed by Ultraflex II MALDI-TOF system (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Spectra were analyzed by Biotools MS software (Bruker Daltonics) to perform peptide mass fingerprinting. We identified the proteins in the SwissProt database for Homo sapiens using carbamidomethyl on cystein as the fixed modification and methionine oxidation as variable modification.

SDS-PAGE and Western blot of tumor tissue lysates

Protein extracts were prepared from frozen prostate tissue obtained from PCa patients (n = 8) and cystoprostatectomy patients (n = 4; used as control). Cysprostatectomy is a surgical procedure in which the urinary bladder and prostate gland are removed. The procedure combines cystectomy and prostatectomy and occurred in our situation for bladder cancer tumors. Tissues were homogenized in an IKA Work tissue homogenizer (Wilmington, NC, USA). Proteins were extracted from the homogenate with the AllPrep DNA/RNA/Protein Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) according to manufacturer’s guidelines. Thirty µg protein were resolved in a 10.5–14 % SDS-PAGE gradient gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and incubated with blocking buffer containing primary antibodies specific for HSP60 (diluted 1/250; Abcam), hnRNP L (1/5000; Abcam), and β-actin (1/5000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Bound primary antibodies were visualized with HRP-conjugated antibodies specific for human IgG (diluted 1/1000–5000 in blocking buffer; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). After addition of a chemiluminescent substrate SuperSignal West Pico (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), the membrane was immediately exposed on a CL-Xposure film (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and scanned with an Epson Perfection 4490 Photo scanner to detect bands. Relative intensities of the bands were quantified using Image J Software (NIH online; Bethesda, MD); recorded values were normalized to the intensity of the respective β-actin signal.

Statistics

All reported values represent three independent experiments expressed as mean ± SEM. Data for cell proliferation, VEGF release, and mRNA expression were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (pO2 vs. day), followed by a post hoc Student–Newman–Keuls multiple-comparisons test. Difference in HSP60 and hnRNP L proteins between tumor and normal tissue lysates were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test. Comparisons of plasma autoantibody levels for HSP60, HSP70 and hnRNP L among different patient groups were done using one-way ANOVA, followed by a post hoc Student–Newman–Keuls multiple-comparisons test (HSP60 and HSP70) or one-tailed t test (hnRNP L). A difference was considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results

PCa cells differ in sensitivity to hypoxia

To explore the effect of pO2 on cell viability of PCa cells, we exposed them to pO2 = 20 kPa or 2 kPa. Cells were counted as a function of time. The selection of cell lines utilized in this study is based on their distinct origin [2527], representation of particular patients spectrum [2527], and involvement as components PCa vaccines [29]. VCaP cells (Fig. 1a) showed a slow increase in cell numbers with significant increase from basal levels at day 7 (p < 0.05). Evaluation at day 11 evidenced twofold higher cell numbers in cells growing under hypoxia, relative to cells cultured in normoxic conditions (p < 0.05). Relative to VCaP cells, LNCaP cells (Fig. 1b) had a faster growth kinetics. Under normoxia, cells reached maximum numbers at day 4. At that time point, however, cells cultured in hypoxia had only close to a third of numbers relative those cultured in normoxic conditions (p < 0.05). Cell numbers did not experience further variation in LNCaP cultures under hypoxia. Similarly, C4-2B cells, the subline derived from LNCaP cells, had reduced viability when grown in pO2 = 2 kPa relative to that observed in cells growing at 20 kPa. Independently of oxygen levels, the maximum number of C4-2B cells in cultures cells was reached at day 4 (Fig. 1c). At that point, however, cells cultured in normoxic conditions had 2.3-fold more cells when compared to cells growing in hypoxia (p < 0.05). Cell numbers under normoxia and hypoxia did not experience further variation (compared to that observed at day 4) until completion of the experiment (day 10; p < 0.05).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Effect of hypoxia on PCa cells. Effects on cell viability: VCaP (a), LNCaP (b) and C4-2B (c) cells were cultured at pO2 = 1 or 2 kPa (filled circle) or 20 kPa (circle). Alive cells were counted in triplicate flasks using trypan blue exclusion to differentiate dead cells. Effects on VEGF production: Rates of VEGF release in conditioned culture media were measured by ELISA for VCaP (d), LNCaP (e) and C4-2B (f) cells. Assessment of VEGF transcripts: mRNA levels of VEGF were analyzed in VCaP (g), LNCaP (h) and C4-2B (i) cells by qRT-PCR. *p < 0.05 when data at hypoxia is compared to values at normoxia O2 at the same time point; # p < 0.05 when data at hypoxia or normoxia is compared to a previous time point within the same pO2; & p < 0.05 when a specific data point is compared to the point at day 0 within the same pO2

VEGF is a hypoxia-inducible gene associated with the growth, aggressiveness and down-modulation of anti-tumoral immunity [31]. Assessment of the release rate of this pro-angiogenic factor to the conditioned media revealed distinct patterns of induction in PCa cells growing under hypoxia. VCaP cells (Fig. 1d) secreted VEGF at observable rates on day 3 (p < 0.05) reaching the maximum rate on day 5. This release rate was maintained up to day 11. In contrast, LNCaP cells cultured under low oxygen (Fig. 1e) had a steady increase of VEGF release rate until day 6. At that time point, a tenfold increase (p < 0.05) was observed relative to the values at day 0. Measured release of VEGF decreased to 7.5-fold at day 8. C4-2B cells cultured under normoxia (Fig. 1f) did not release VEGF until day 6. At that time point, nearly 2.5 pg/cell/day (p < 0.05) VEGF was released; that rate remained constant until day 8. Cells growing at pO2 = 2 kPa, however, released higher VEGF faster relative to their counterparts growing at pO2 = 20 kPa (p < 0.05). A maximum (8 pg/cell/day) was reached at day 6 (p < 0.05) and maintained at day 8 (p < 0.05). To assess the effect of transcriptional regulation on the observed release of VEGF, qRT-PCR was performed. Early induction of VEGF transcripts, nearly 45-fold in VCaP (Fig. 1g) and LNCaP (Fig. 1h) cells (at 2 days) and 60-fold in C4-2B (Fig. 1i) cells (p < 0.05), was observed in all cell lines when cultured under hypoxia. In cells growing under normoxia, VEGF transcripts were also induced (nearly tenfold in LNCaP and C4-2B cells, p < 0.05). The induction of VEGF in cells growing in normoxia, however, was observed at later time points and at a lesser extent in comparison to cells cultured under hypoxia. All together, these results indicate that, in accordance to reported findings [32, 33], PCa cells exposed to low levels of oxygen exhibit increased viability and elevated expression of the angiogenic factor, VEGF.

Effects of hypoxia on immune reactivity of PCa cells

To determine if pO2 modifies the reactivity of autoantibodies in CaP patient plasma, following published protocols [34] we harvested the cells at their highest reached cell density (VCaP, day 7; LNCaP, day 4), prepared lysates and resolved them by 2DGE. One of the two identical gels was silver-stained and the other blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. As antibodies reactive with tumors are commonly found in patient plasma [35], we pooled the plasma from PCa patients (n = 5/pool) and reacted it with the blotted proteins. For controls, plasma from healthy individuals, patients suffering from lung cancer, colon cancer or rheumatoid arthritis was used, n = 5/pool. We found that PCa-patient plasma consistently bound to more spots of VCaP (Fig. 2) and LNCaP (Fig. 3) cells than did control plasmas. In some cases, the size of spots differed significantly when PCa plasma or healthy control plasma was used. To assess the molecular identity of the spots reacted with PCa plasma only, we excised the selected spots, digested them by trypsin, and analyzed then by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Use of DIGE fluor Cy5 minimal dye facilitated alignment of the silver-stained gel and the blotted membrane for spots selection. In VCaP cells we identified heat shock 70 kDa protein (HSP70), heat shock 60 kDa protein (HSP60), protein disulfide isomerase A3 (PDIA3), nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP L), and leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 47 (LRRC47) (Table 2). In LNCaP cells we identified HSP70, HSP60, hnRNP L, glucose-6-phosphate-1-dehydrogenase (G6PD), and dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (DLD) (Table 3).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Identification of PCa-associated antigens in hypoxic VCaP cell lysates and patient plasma immune reactivity. VCaP cells were cultured at pO2 = 2 kPa and 20 kPa conditions for 7 days. Cell lysates were prepared and 50 μg proteins were loaded on pH 3–10 NL IPG strips for 2DGE. One set of gels was silver stained and other set was transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (a), incubated with pooled plasma from patients with PCa, colon cancer, lung cancer, rheumatoid arthritis (an autoimmune disease), and age matched healthy controls. Following incubation with chicken anti-human IgG-HRP, spots were identified by chemiluminescence (b). The arrowheads indicate protein spots of interest

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Identification of PCa-associated antigens in hypoxic LNCaP cell lysates and patient plasma immune reactivity. LNCaP cells were cultured at pO2 = 2 kPa and 20 kPa conditions for 4 days. Cell lysates were prepared and 50 μg proteins were loaded on pH 3–10 NL IPG strips for 2DGE. One set of gels was silver stained and other set was transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (a), incubated with pooled plasma from patients with PCa, colon cancer, lung cancer, rheumatoid arthritis (an autoimmune disease), and age matched healthy controls. Following incubation with chicken anti-human IgG-HRP, spots were identified by chemiluminescence (b). The arrowheads indicate protein spots of interest

Table 2

Potential PCa-associated antigens identified in VCaP cells

Protein name

FASTA accession number

MW (kDa)

Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4 (HSP70)

P34932

94.3

60 kDa heat shock protein (HSP60)

P10809

61.3

Protein disulfide isomerase A3 (PDIA3)

P30101

56.8

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L (hnRNP L)

P14866

64.1

Leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 47 (LRRC47)

Q8N1G4

63.5

Table 3

Potential PCa-associated antigens identified in LNCaP cells

Protein name

FASTA accession number

MW (kDa)

Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4

P34932

94.3

60 kDa heat shock protein (HSP60)

P10809

61.3

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L (hnRNP L)

P14866

64.1

Glucose-6-phosphate-1-dehydrogenase (G6PD)

P11413

59.2

Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (DLD)

P09622

54.1

For independent confirmation we focused on three antigens, HSP60, HSP70, and hnRNP L. Regardless of the cell line used as source of antigens, healthy plasma reacted with normoxic lysates weakly and only faint spots or no spots for all three antigens was observed. The reactivity to PCa plasma was increased, particularly for HSP60 and hnRNP L, relative to healthy control plasma. Remarkably for all three analyzed antigens, interaction with hypoxic PCa cell lysates increased reactivity relative to that observed against normoxic cell lysates. For example (Figs. 2, 3), plasma reactivity for HSP60 was augmented 2 and eightfold in VCaP and LNCaP cells, respectively. Reactivity of PCa plasma to HSP70 using lysates obtained from VCaP cells grown pO2 = 20 kPa was not observed, but it was noted when lysates from cells grown at pO2 = 2 kPa were used as source of antigens. Similarly, a sevenfold increase in immune reactivity to HSP70 was observed in lysates from hypoxically-expanded LNCaP cells when compared to that noted for cells expanded under normoxia. hnRNP L (7 and twofold in VCaP and LNCaP cells, respectively), had increased reactivity to PCa plasma when hypoxic cell lysates were used.

Reactivity was also studied in other tumors. In particular, antibodies specific for HSP70 and hnRNP L were detected in the plasma of lung cancer patients only when reacting with VCaP cell lysates obtained from cells grown at pO2 = 2 kPa. Antibodies against HSP60, in a pO2 independent manner, were detected in the plasma of colon cancer patients (Fig. 2b). Autoantibodies specific for hnRNP L were detected at fourfold higher level in lung cancer plasma reacting with hypoxic LNCaP cell lysates, relative to the level found with normoxic lysates (Fig. 3b). Independent of the cell line used as source of antigens, plasma from rheumatoid arthritis patients did not have reactivity for the three analyzed antigens when cells were cultured under normal oxygen. Hypoxia, interestingly, allowed reactivity of rheumatoid arthritis patients’ plasma against HSP70 when lysates obtained from VCaP cells provided antigens. These results suggest that hypoxia increased reactivity of PCa cell lysates to patient plasma.

Evaluation of plasma autoantibody levels of HSP60, HSP70, and hnRNP L

Next, we set out to determine, at the individual patient level, the frequency of autoantibodies for HSP60, HSP70, and hnRNP L. For this purpose we performed ELISA tests. The assay allows for reproducible, accurate, and precise determination of IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies (total) in plasma. Recombinant human protein (e.g. HSP60, HSP70, and hnRNP L) were bound to the wells of the plate to bind anti-human antibodies for the analyte of interest present in plasma. The captured anti-human antibodies were detected with a HRP conjugated goat polyclonal antibody specific for human IgG, IgA, and IgM molecules. The frequency of HSP60 autoantibodies (Fig. 4a; Table 4) was 13.0 % (7/54) in PCa, 1.3 % (1/76) in healthy controls, 7.14 % (1/14) in colorectal cancer, 10.0 % (1/10) in lung cancer, 5.0 % (1/20) in renal cell carcinoma, and 0 % (0/17) in rheumatoid arthritis. Statistic difference was found only between PCa and healthy control groups (p < 0.05). These data suggest elevated HSP60 autoantibody levels in the plasma from PCa patients. The frequency of HSP70 autoantibodies (Fig. 4b; Table 4) was 5.3 % (2/38) in PCa, 3.7 % (2/54) in healthy controls, 7.14 % (0/10) in colorectal cancer, 20.0 % (2/10) in lung cancer, 5.0 % (1/20) in renal cell carcinoma, and 17.6 % (3/17) in rheumatoid arthritis. No statistic difference was found between control group and any cancer- or non-cancer group. The frequency of hnRNP L autoantibodies was 5.3 % (2/38) in PCa and 6.1 % (3/49) in healthy controls (Fig. 4c; Table 4). We did not evaluate hnRNP L autoantibodies in other diseases.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Levels of Hsp60, Hsp70 and hnRNP L autoantibody in human plasma. Autoantibodies to HSP60 (a), HSP70 (b) and hnRNP L (c) were quantitated in plasma by ELISA using recombinant antigens as standards. Healthy controls (filled circle) and patients with PCa (filled square), colorectal cancer (filled triangle), lung cancer (filled inverted triangle), renal cell carcinoma (filled diamond), and rheumatoid arthritis (circle). Plasma samples were diluted to 1/1000. The cutoff of reactivity was defined as the mean of sample plus twofolds of standard deviation from normal plasma. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 between healthy control and PCa groups

Table 4

Frequency of HSP60, HSP70 and hnRNP L autoantibodies in human plasma

Human plasma

HSP60

HSP70

HnRNP L

N

mg/ml (mean ± SD)

Positive cases (% of total cases)

N

mg/ml (mean ± SD)

Positive cases (% of total cases)

N

OD (mean ± SD)

Positive cases (% of total cases)

Prostate cancer

54

34.7 ± 43.9

7 (13 %); P < 0.05 compared to healthy controls

38

21.8 ± 13.1

2 (5.3 %)

38

0.267 ± 0.168

2 (5.3 %)

Healthy control

76

23.0 ± 25.8

1 (1.3 %)

54

21.1 ± 11.8

2 (3.7 %)

49

0.248 ± 0.117

3 (6.1 %)

Colorectal cancer

14

28.7 ± 25.5

1 (7.1 %)

10

19.0 ± 8.8

0 (0 %)

Lung cancer

10

29.7 ± 34.4

1 (10.0 %)

10

34.9 ± 42.2

2 (20 %)

Renal cell carcinoma

20

33.8 ± 24.2

1 (5.0 %)

20

26.4 ± 19.0

1 (5.0 %)

Rheumatoid arthritis

17

21.5 ± 11.9

0 (0 %)

17

61.5 ± 116.3

3 (17.6 %)

Higher levels of hnRNP-L proteins in PCa tissues

To test the possibility that the immune reactivity of selected PCa-associated antigens in plasma was due to elevated expression of PCa-specific antigens in tumor tissues, we analyzed levels of HSP60 and hnRNP L in tumor tissue lysates using Western blot. Protein lysates were prepared from prostate tissues obtained from patients suffering PCa or cystoprostatectomy (controls). Separated proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and blotted against anti-human HSP60 and hnRNP L monoclonal antibodies. The level of HSP60 (Fig. 5a) and hnRNP L (Fig. 5b) proteins in PCa tumor tissues was close to twofold higher (p < 0.05), compared to control prostate tissue. These data suggest that protein expression for the selected potential PCa-associated antigens can be elevated in PCa tumors at the protein level.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Expression of HSP60 (a) and hnRNP L (b) proteins in PCa tissues. Protein lysates extracted from frozen prostate tissues (8 samples from PCa patients and 4 samples from cytoprostatectomy patients) were separated by SDS-PAGE. HSP60 and hnRNP L levels in the samples were identified by Western blot as described in the “Methods”. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 between PCa and cytoprostatectomy samples

Discussion

We investigated the effect of hypoxia on the antigenic landscape in commonly used human PCa cell lines. As expected, hypoxia modified cell viability and promoted the release of the pro-angiogenic factor, VEGF. Use of a serologic approach and combined 2DGE expression profiling of PCa cells and Western blot with PCa patient plasma allowed identification of autoantibodies to PCa-associated antigens. Hypoxia increased the immune reactivity of plasma to PCa cell lysates. Some of these, hypoxia-reactive, TAAs were identified. In particular, we identified HSP60 as a valuable TAA with potential as a tumor marker in PCa tissues. Overall, our studies suggest that tumor–associated hypoxia is a relevant determinant of tumor antigenicity.

Low pO2 is commonly associated with tumor aggressiveness. For instance, hypoxia impacts the proliferation of rapidly-growing malignant tumors in vivo [36] and in vitro [37]. Although there were no effects on cell viability during the first 4 days in LNCaP and its derivative, the subline C4-2B, the cells in the hypoxic condition grew slower than the corresponding cells under normoxia (Fig. 1b, c). The result is consistent with previous reports in literature showing that LNCaP and PC-2 cells are less viable under hypoxia in comparison to normoxia [38, 39]. VCaP cells (Fig. 1a), on the contrary had higher cell numbers relative to cells cultured under normoxia. To date, no evaluation of the effects of low oxygen on the proliferation of VCaP has been reported. Our results therefore, are the first to suggest that hypoxia confers a survival advantage to the vertebral bone metastasis-derived, VCaP cells. In additional experiments (data not shown), when cultured in low oxygen, the brain metastasis-derived DU145 [40] and SV40-immortalized prostatic epithelial, P4E6 cells, derived from a primary prostate cancer biopsy [41], had reduced viability relative to cells growing in normoxia. On the contrary (data not shown), OnyCap23 cells, a subclone of the established prostate cell line PNT2-C2 [42] that was originally derived from a biopsy of a normal prostate gland, showed increased viability when cultured in hypoxic conditions. Of note, P4E6, OnyCaP23 and LNCaP cells have been previously utilized as components of an allogeneic whole cell PCa vaccine, partially successful in suppressing progression of the disease [22]. One limitation of our study is the unavailability of data generated using other cell lines besides those from prostatic carcinoma origin as positive of negative controls for hypoxia induction. Inclusion of these cell lines would allow assessment of relevant aspects such as the relative extent of the response to oxygen in PCa cells and the disease-related specificity of our results. These differences, attributed to cell-specific manners to respond to changes in metabolism and survival environment, should be considered when seeking improvement of allogeneic PCa vaccines.

As a critical component of the response of cancer cells to hypoxia, we analyzed the expression of VEGF, involved in the tumor growth and progression [43]. Low oxygen within the tumor microenvironment upregulates VEGF [44], and therefore this pro-angiogenic factor can be used as a marker of hypoxia. Particularly, in PCa cells, VEGF is reported to be expressed and secreted at high levels under hypoxic conditions [33, 45, 46]. In consistency with these previous reports, our results showed that, independent of the cell line used as source of VEGF, hypoxia enhanced VEGF release in PCa cells. This change, related to sustained increase >40–60 fold VEGF mRNA expression over basal levels (Fig. 1g–i), reflects the described [33, 45, 46] transcriptionally driven, induction of this pro-angiogenic factor under hypoxia. Similarly to VEGF, transcripts for hypoxia-inducible enzyme carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9), overexpressed in cancer cells [47] and proposed as a useful marker for hypoxic exposure and tumor aggressiveness [48] were assessed by us (data not shown). When measured, the transcripts of CA9 were 150- and fivefold higher in hypoxic compared to normoxic VCaP cells and LNCaP, respectively. Altogether, our findings indicate that, in accordance to reported findings [49], PCa cells exposed to low levels of oxygen exhibit features associated with increased aggressiveness.

2DGE in combination with Western blot is a well-established method to identify antigens [50]. In the present study, we used this approach to separate and identify potential PCa-TAAs in whole cell lysates. As shown in Tables 2 and 3, the screening method demonstrated several protein spots that were specifically revealed by antibodies present in plasma from PCa patients. These proteins can be divided into two main categories based on their functions, i.e., metabolic enzymes (G6PD, and DLD) and molecular chaperones (HSP60, HSP70). Other candidate antigens included PDIA3 and hnRNP L. The metabolic requirements of cancer cells differ from that of their normal counterparts. To support their growth and proliferation, cancer cells adapt their metabolic processes to drive macromolecular biosynthesis [51, 52]. Therefore it is not surprising to see immune reactivity to metabolic enzymes in cancer patients. For example, higher level of G6PD [53] have been reported in sera and/or tumor tissues from several cancer patients. Further, these metabolic enzymes have been recognized as markers for TAA [5458]. In all, our findings add to the reported findings and support the relevance of metabolic enzymes as members of the tumor-specific antigenic landscape. PDIA3 catalyzes oxidative protein folding and has a variety of effects on the yield of native lysozyme during the oxidative refolding of the reduced, denatured protein [59, 60]. Although up-regulation of PDIA3 was reported in breast cancer [34, 61] and hepatocellular carcinoma [62] tissues, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first time for detection of PDIA3 antibodies in plasma from PCa patients.

Among the identified TAAs, HSP60 and HSP70 were expressed in the studied PCa cell lines. HSPs are a group of highly evolutionary conserved proteins, including constitutively and inducible protein chaperones [63]. Mammalian cells express HSPs in response to heat as well as many other stress stimuli, including hypoxia [64]. Because HSPs play essential roles in tissue homeostasis [65], it has been postulated that they contribute to the development of many diseases, including tumors [6668]. Up-regulated expression of HSPs has been reported in several cancers, including PCa [6975]. Consistent with 2DGE and Western blot analysis, ELISA showed a higher level of anti-HSP60 IgG/A/M in plasma from PCa patients than that from healthy controls (Fig. 4a; Table 4). These results suggest that HSP60 is a TAA in PCa and are in agreement with reported findings showing HSP60 autoantibodies in sera from patients with breast cancer [34], colorectal cancer [76], and osteosarcoma [77]. Our data represent the first ones to suggest a specific humoral response against HSP60 in CaP. Further data analysis in an independent validation group is needed to evaluate the performance and diagnostic value of HSP60 autoantibodies.

HSP70 is expressed only at low or undetectable levels in most normal cells and tissues, but its expression is rapidly elevated by a variety of physical and chemical stressors [78]. Although there are many publications regarding the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive implications of HSP70 in breast and several other cancers, its role in PCa remains unclear [79]. The value of HSP70 as PCa-associated antigen was suggested by our TAA screening, but it was not successfully validated by ELISA. This result contrasts with previous findings suggesting HSP70 as a potential TAA in esophageal carcinoma [80] and hepatocellular carcinoma [62, 81]. In our hands, just like in the findings from Cornford and collaborators [74], HSP70 was unaltered in the plasma of early stage PCa patients when compared with nonneoplastic prostatic epithelium. Regardless of these results, the authors indeed reported diminished expression of HSP70 in morphologically advanced cancers. Our report adds to the published information [74] suggesting that patterns of HSP70 are not significantly altered in early stage PCa patients (used in our studies) and may be, therefore, differentially modulated as a function of disease progression.

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L is an abundant RNA-binding protein implicated in many bioprocesses [82], including those related to control of the expression of hypoxia-associated genes. For example, a specific interaction of hnRNP L with VEGF mRNA is thought to play an important role in hypoxia-induced post-transcriptional regulation of human VEGF mRNA stability [83]. Several lines of evidence show that hnRNP L is involved in tumorigenesis. For instance, phosphorylated hnRNP L promotes expression of the antiapoptotic form of caspase-9 (an initiator caspase) and thereby contributes to tumorigenesis [84, 85]. In PCa cells hnRNP L acts in mitosis as a src-associated 68 kDa (Sam68)-interacting protein and regulates splicing in response to signaling cascades [86]. In the present study, autoantibodies specific for hnRNP L were detected in PCa plasma reacting both with VCaP (Fig. 2) and LNCaP (Fig. 3) cell lysates. ELISA analysis, however, did not reveal difference in plasma hnRNP L autoantibody levels between PCa and the healthy control groups (Fig. 4c; Table 4). Regardless of these results, evaluation of the levels of hnRNP L in tumor tissue lysates using Western blot revealed that along with HSP60, protein level of hnRNP L in a small number of PCa tumor tissues was twofold higher compared to control prostate tissue (Fig. 5). These data trace back to tumor expression of HSP60, the TAA validated in plasma. Additionally, the results suggest that, despite the lack of relevant immune plasma reactivity, protein expression of hnRNP L in the tumor holds potential as marker and tumorigenic factor in PCa. Furthermore, this finding illustrates the importance of validation in the assessment of tumor markers. Since selection of proper relevant antigens is key for the generation of target-specific cancer vaccines, we think our results suggest that hn-RNP L may not be a good antigen to further pursue. Additional work, however is needed to settle the discussion.

Our analysis consistently revealed increased plasma reactivity when lysates from PCa cells cultured under hypoxia were used as source of antigens. These findings, despite of the limitation of lacking control lysates obtained from cells from non-prostatic origin, underscore relevant concepts. On one side, they sustain the reported immunogenic nature of PCa tumors [87] initiators, in this case of autoimmune responses against prostate antigens. On the other side, the results suggest a role of hypoxia as an immunostimulatory factor with potential to expand the antigenic landscape of clinically relevant TAAs for diagnosis and treatment of PCa. In this study, plasma of early stage, newly diagnosed PCa patients was utilized as source of TAAs. This was done in order to avoid confounding effects of advanced disease or treatments on immune reactivity [88]. As source of antigens we used cell lines of metastatic origin. It is certainly possible that those cell lines provided an antigenic landscape that may be different from that recognizable in plasma from newly diagnosed patients. This is another limitation of our experimental approach. Future studies should be focused on validating the potential of the identified TAAs. This should be done in scenarios including disease progression and/or established or experimental therapeutic modalities. Critical questions needing answer in terms of determinants of tumor immunogenicity, or the ability of the immune system to induce adaptive responses to tumors, pertain to the upstream tumor specific mediators that initiate the cascade of events that lead to immunosuppression [89]. Tumor hypoxia, represents an important impediment to immune-mediated control of tumor growth [5]. Our results indicate that hypoxia increases detection of humoral autoimmune responses. The involvement of hypoxia in actively eliciting tumor immunity or playing and adjuvant role to elicit more effective immune responses is, however, unknown. In favor of this role, recent characterization of the immune responses in a murine model of glioma, led to the identification of oxygen as an “immunologic switch” affecting both cell-mediated and humoral immune responses elicited by tumor cell lysates [23]. These data, further validated using tumor lysates from patients obtained under hypoxic culture as source of the antigenic repertoire [24], demonstrate the ability of low oxygen to enhance immunogenicity. Our results, supported by the reported findings [23, 24], allow us to propose that PCa vaccines made by expansion of primary tumor cells in low oxygen will enhance cell-based therapeutic vaccines for PCa. This premise deserves further investigation. Utilization of three dimensional culture systems such as matrigel or spheroids [33] and patient-derived primary PCa tumors as source of antigens, or implementation of an animal model to evaluate immune responses in vivo are necessary to validate our proposal. Use of a 2-dimensional culture system is a limitation of our study. Certainly the use of microenvironment-relevant experimental conditions would allow improvement in the identification hypoxia-specific tumor-associated antigens. We focused our studies in PCa cell lines and use of 2-dimensional cultures because those conditions have been utilized previously to generate allogeneic PCa vaccines with limited beneficial effects in patients [18, 22, 41]. This decision was based on the rationale of providing the scientific community with the proof of principle directing future studies geared into the improvement of current vaccines. Nevertheless, the tumor microenvironment-dependency of our findings is to be proven in future studies. Use of relevant experimental setups will allow us to demonstrate the ability of low oxygen to enhance immunogenicity or its ability to enhance cell-based therapeutic vaccines for PCa.

LNCaP and VCaP cells showed differences in expression of PCa-associated antigens. For instance, while HSP70, HSP60, hnRNP L and snRNP70 antigens were detected in both hypoxic cell lines, PDIA3 and LRRC47 antigens were found only in hypoxic VCaP cells. Likewise G6PD, PHGDH, ALA and DLD were specifically detected in hypoxic LNCaP cells. The origin of these findings is based on the distinct nature of the cell lines utilized in our studies; LNCaP cells are originated from a lymph node metastasis [25] and VCaP cells are generated from a vertebral metastatic lesion and harbor the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion (present in 40–60 % of PCa patients) [26, 27]. Our results implicate that the cell-specific spectrum of PCa-associated antigens may be relevant for development of more effective individualized prognostication and allogeneic cell-based immunotherapy. This statement is particularly relevant in the light of the high complexity, heterogeneity, and immune escape inherent to PCa [90].

Conclusions

The role of pO2 in tumor biology has been unappreciated. Recently, tumor–associated hypoxia has been associated with malignant progression, metastasis, resistance to therapy, and poor clinical outcome. Our results validate the relevance of tumor-associated hypoxia in CaP immune-reactivity. More importantly, our findings define the potential of hypoxia as a tool in the development of markers and immunotherapeutic targets for PCa.

Abbreviations

CA9: 

carbonic anhydrase 9

DLD: 

dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase

G6PD: 

glucose-6-phosphate-1-dehydrogenase

HSP: 

heat-shock protein

hnRNP L: 

heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L

HIFs: 

hypoxia-inducible factors

LRRC47: 

leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 47

PO2

oxygen tension

PCa: 

prostate cancer

PDIA3: 

protein disulfide isomerase A3

TAAs: 

tumor-associated antigens

2DGE: 

two dimensional gel electrophoresis

VEGF: 

vascular endothelial growth factor

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

TMA carried out the cell culture, ELISA studies and drafted the manuscript. CAS carried out cell culture and collected plasma samples. GJK contributed to experimental design and carried out 2DGE protocols. AEK assisted with experimental design and data analysis. MJS analyzed and interpreted the data. MH analyzed and interpreted the data and helped to draft the manuscript. MCC assisted with the experimental design, performed 2DGE studies and mass spectrometry sample preparation. BM performed protein digestion and mass spectrometry. XZ contributed to experimental design, provided plasma samples, analyzed and interpreted the data. SVP participated in study design and helped to draft the manuscript. CRG conceived the study, participated in general coordination, accrued patient specimens, performed cell culture experiments, and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Merry Lindsay and John Ma for critical reading of the manuscript. Financial support: DOD PC094680 (CRG) and PCF Creativity Award (CRG). The funding sources had no involvement, in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cancer Institute, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
(2)
Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
(3)
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
(4)
Stem Cell Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
(5)
Proteomics Research Center, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
(6)
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
(7)
Division of Preventive and Occupational Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Miki J, Rhim JS. Prostate cell cultures as in vitro models for the study of normal stem cells and cancer stem cells. Prost Cancer Prostat Dis. 2008;11(1):32–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Longley DB, Johnston PG. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. J Pathol. 2005;205(2):275–92. doi:10.1002/path.1706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Turaka A, Buyyounouski MK, Hanlon AL, Horwitz EM, Greenberg RE, Movsas B. Hypoxic prostate/muscle PO2 ratio predicts for outcome in patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(3):e433–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tredan O, Galmarini CM, Patel K, Tannock IF. Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99(19):1441–54. doi:10.1093/jnci/djm135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wouters A, Pauwels B, Lardon F, Vermorken JB. Review: implications of in vitro research on the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy under hypoxic conditions. Oncologist. 2007;12(6):690–712. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-6-690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Westhoff MA, Kandenwein JA, Karl S, Vellanki SH, Braun V, Eramo A, et al. The pyridinylfuranopyrimidine inhibitor, PI-103, chemosensitizes glioblastoma cells for apoptosis by inhibiting DNA repair. Oncogene. 2009;28(40):3586–96. doi:10.1038/onc.2009.215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Taiakina D, Pra AD, Bristow RG. Intratumoral hypoxia as the genesis of genetic instability and clinical prognosis in prostate cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;772:189–204. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5915-6_9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Vaupel P, Kelleher DK, Hockel M. Oxygen status of malignant tumors: pathogenesis of hypoxia and significance for tumor therapy. Semin Oncol. 2001;28(2 Suppl 8):29–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Reisz-Porszasz S, Probst MR, Fukunaga BN, Hankinson O. Identification of functional domains of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein (ARNT). Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(9):6075–86.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Patel SA, Simon MC. Biology of hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha in development and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15(4):628–34. doi:10.1038/cdd.2008.17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang GL, Jiang BH, Rue EA, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(12):5510–4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaur B, Khwaja FW, Severson EA, Matheny SL, Brat DJ, Van Meir EG. Hypoxia and the hypoxia-inducible-factor pathway in glioma growth and angiogenesis. Neuro-Oncol. 2005;7(2):134–53. doi:10.1215/S1152851704001115.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McCormick R, Buffa FM, Ragoussis J, Harris AL. The role of hypoxia regulated microRNAs in cancer. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;345:47–70. doi:10.1007/82_2010_76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghattass K, Assah R, El-Sabban M, Gali-Muhtasib H. Targeting hypoxia for sensitization of tumors to radio- and chemotherapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13(6):670–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bosco MC, Puppo M, Santangelo C, Anfosso L, Pfeffer U, Fardin P, et al. Hypoxia modifies the transcriptome of primary human monocytes: modulation of novel immune-related genes and identification of CC-chemokine ligand 20 as a new hypoxia-inducible gene. J Immunol. 2006;177(3):1941–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Imtiyaz HZ, Simon MC. Hypoxia-inducible factors as essential regulators of inflammation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;345:105–20. doi:10.1007/82_2010_74.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vuk-Pavlovic S. Rebuilding immunity in cancer patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2008;40(1):94–100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Motz GT, Coukos G. Deciphering and reversing tumor immune suppression. Immunity. 2013;39(1):61–73. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zou W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(4):263–74. doi:10.1038/nrc1586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rabinovich GA, Gabrilovich D, Sotomayor EM. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:267–96. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141609.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Michael A, Ball G, Quatan N, Wushishi F, Russell N, Whelan J, et al. Delayed disease progression after allogeneic cell vaccination in hormone-resistant prostate cancer and correlation with immunologic variables. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(12):4469–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Olin MR, Andersen BM, Zellmer DM, Grogan PT, Popescu FE, Xiong Z, et al. Superior efficacy of tumor cell vaccines grown in physiologic oxygen. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(19):4800–8. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1572.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Olin MR, Andersen BM, Litterman AJ, Grogan PT, Sarver AL, Robertson PT, et al. Oxygen is a master regulator of the immunogenicity of primary human glioma cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71(21):6583–9. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1166.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Horoszewicz JS, Leong SS, Kawinski E, Karr JP, Rosenthal H, Chu TM, et al. LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1983;43(4):1809–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar-Sinha C, Tomlins SA, Chinnaiyan AM. Recurrent gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(7):497–511.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark JP, Cooper CS. ETS gene fusions in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2009;6(8):429–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu TT, Sikes RA, Cui Q, Thalmann GN, Kao C, Murphy CF, et al. Establishing human prostate cancer cell xenografts in bone: induction of osteoblastic reaction by prostate-specific antigen-producing tumors in athymic and SCID/bg mice using LNCaP and lineage-derived metastatic sublines. Int J Cancer. 1998;77(6):887–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerritsen WR. The evolving role of immunotherapy in prostate cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. 2012;23(Suppl 8):822–7. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds259.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Karnes RJ, Cheville JC, Ida CM, Sebo TJ, Nair AA, Tang H, et al. The ability of biomarkers to predict systemic progression in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated surgically is dependent on ERG status. Cancer Res. 2010;70(22):8994–9002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson BF, Clay TM, Hobeika AC, Lyerly HK, Morse MA. Vascular endothelial growth factor and immunosuppression in cancer: current knowledge and potential for new therapy. Exp Opin Biol Therap. 2007;7(4):449–60. doi:10.1517/14712598.7.4.449.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Vaupel P. Hypoxia and aggressive tumor phenotype: implications for therapy and prognosis. Oncologist. 2008;13(Suppl 3):21–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bao B, Ahmad A, Kong D, Ali S, Azmi AS, Li Y, et al. Hypoxia induced aggressiveness of prostate cancer cells is linked with deregulated expression of VEGF, IL-6 and miRNAs that are attenuated by CDF. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43726. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043726.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Desmetz C, Bibeau F, Boissiere F, Bellet V, Rouanet P, Maudelonde T, et al. Proteomics-based identification of HSP60 as a tumor-associated antigen in early stage breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. J Proteome Res. 2008;7(9):3830–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Reuschenbach M, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Wentzensen N. A systematic review of humoral immune responses against tumor antigens. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009;58(10):1535–44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kunz M, Ibrahim SM. Molecular responses to hypoxia in tumor cells. Mol Cancer. 2003;2:23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao T, Zhang CP, Liu ZH, Wu LY, Huang X, Wu HT, et al. Hypoxia-driven proliferation of embryonic neural stem/progenitor cells–role of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1alpha. FEBS J. 2008;275(8):1824–34. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06340.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamasaki M, Nomura T, Sato F, Mimata H. Metallothionein is up-regulated under hypoxia and promotes the survival of human prostate cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2007;18(5):1145–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Dai ZJ, Gao J, Ma XB, Yan K, Liu XX, Kang HF, et al. Up-regulation of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha by cobalt chloride correlates with proliferation and apoptosis in PC-2 cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res CR. 2012;31:28. doi:10.1186/1756-9966-31-28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stone KR, Mickey DD, Wunderli H, Mickey GH, Paulson DF. Isolation of a human prostate carcinoma cell line (DU 145). Int J Cancer. 1978;21(3):274–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Maitland NJ, Macintosh CA, Hall J, Sharrard M, Quinn G, Lang S. In vitro models to study cellular differentiation and function in human prostate cancers. Radiat Res. 2001;155(1 Pt 2):133–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lang SH, Stower M, Maitland NJ. In vitro modelling of epithelial and stromal interactions in non-malignant and malignant prostates. Br J Cancer. 2000;82(4):990–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moreira IS, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition–a critical review. Anti Cancer Agents Med Chem. 2007;7(2):223–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Fukumura D, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. Microvasc Res. 2007;74(2–3):72–84. doi:10.1016/j.mvr.2007.05.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Higgins LH, Withers HG, Garbens A, Love HD, Magnoni L, Hayward SW, et al. Hypoxia and the metabolic phenotype of prostate cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1787(12):1433–43. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.06.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rathinavelu A, Narasimhan M, Muthumani P. A novel regulation of VEGF expression by HIF-1alpha and STAT3 in HDM2 transfected prostate cancer cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16(8):1750–7. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01472.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ivanov S, Liao SY, Ivanova A, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Tarasova N, Weirich G, et al. Expression of hypoxia-inducible cell-surface transmembrane carbonic anhydrases in human cancer. Am J Pathol. 2001;158(3):905–19. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64038-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wind TC, Messenger MP, Thompson D, Selby PJ, Banks RE. Measuring carbonic anhydrase IX as a hypoxia biomarker: differences in concentrations in serum and plasma using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay due to influences of metal ions. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48(Pt 2):112–20. doi:10.1258/acb.2010.010240.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Danza G, Di Serio C, Ambrosio MR, Sturli N, Lonetto G, Rosati F, et al. Notch3 is activated by chronic hypoxia and contributes to the progression of human prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(11):2577–86. doi:10.1002/ijc.28293.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Katsuumi K, Ito M, Kazama T, Sato Y. Two-dimensional electrophoretic analysis of human hair keratins, especially hair matrix proteins. Arch Dermatol Res. 1989;281(7):495–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sampson N, Koziel R, Zenzmaier C, Bubendorf L, Plas E, Jansen-Durr P, et al. ROS signaling by NOX4 drives fibroblast-to-myofibroblast differentiation in the diseased prostatic stroma. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25(3):503–15. doi:10.1210/me.2010-0340.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hsu PP, Sabatini DM. Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell. 2008;134(5):703–7. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomaino B, Cappello P, Capello M, Fredolini C, Ponzetto A, Novarino A, et al. Autoantibody signature in human ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Proteome Res. 2007;6(10):4025–31. doi:10.1021/pr070281a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Jankowska R, Witkowska D, Porebska I, Kuropatwa M, Kurowska E, Gorczyca WA. Serum antibodies to retinal antigens in lung cancer and sarcoidosis. Pathobiol J Immunopathol Mol Cell Biol. 2004;71(6):323–8. doi:10.1159/000081728.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Li C, Xiao Z, Chen Z, Zhang X, Li J, Wu X, et al. Proteome analysis of human lung squamous carcinoma. Proteomics. 2006;6(2):547–58. doi:10.1002/pmic.200500256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Chang GC, Liu KJ, Hsieh CL, Hu TS, Charoenfuprasert S, Liu HK, et al. Identification of alpha-enolase as an autoantigen in lung cancer: its overexpression is associated with clinical outcomes. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(19):5746–54. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0324.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Mullarky E, Mattaini KR, Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Locasale JW. PHGDH amplification and altered glucose metabolism in human melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011;24(6):1112–5. doi:10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00919.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Luo J. Cancer’s sweet tooth for serine. Breast Cancer Res BCR. 2011;13(6):317. doi:10.1186/bcr2932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Noiva R, Lennarz WJ. Protein disulfide isomerase. A multifunctional protein resident in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(6):3553–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Freedman RB. Protein disulfide isomerase: multiple roles in the modification of nascent secretory proteins. Cell. 1989;57(7):1069–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Song MN, Moon PG, Lee JE, Na M, Kang W, Chae YS, et al. Proteomic analysis of breast cancer tissues to identify biomarker candidates by gel-assisted digestion and label-free quantification methods using LC-MS/MS. Arch Pharmacal Res. 2012;35(10):1839–47. doi:10.1007/s12272-012-1018-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Looi KS, Nakayasu ES, Diaz RA, Tan EM, Almeida IC, Zhang JY. Using proteomic approach to identify tumor-associated antigens as markers in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Proteome Res. 2008;7(9):4004–12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Feder ME, Hofmann GE. Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999;61:243–82. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lindquist S, Craig EA. The heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:631–77. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.003215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Macario AJ. Conway de Macario E. Sick chaperones, cellular stress, and disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(14):1489–501. doi:10.1056/NEJMra050111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Campanella C, Bucchieri F, Ardizzone NM, Marino Gammazza A, Montalbano A, Ribbene A, et al. Upon oxidative stress, the antiapoptotic Hsp60/procaspase-3 complex persists in mucoepidermoid carcinoma cells. Eur J Histochem EJH. 2008;52(4):221–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Cappello F, Ribbene A, Campanella C, Czarnecka AM, Anzalone R, Bucchieri F, et al. The value of immunohistochemical research on PCNA, p53 and heat shock proteins in prostate cancer management: a review. Eur J Histochem EJH. 2006;50(1):25–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Merendino AM, Bucchieri F, Campanella C, Marciano V, Ribbene A, David S, et al. Hsp60 is actively secreted by human tumor cells. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9247. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009247.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Fuller KJ, Issels RD, Slosman DO, Guillet JG, Soussi T, Polla BS. Cancer and the heat shock response. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(12):1884–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Lebret T, Watson RW, Molinie V, O’Neill A, Gabriel C, Fitzpatrick JM, et al. Heat shock proteins HSP27, HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90: expression in bladder carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;98(5):970–7. doi:10.1002/cncr.11594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Jolly C, Morimoto RI. Role of the heat shock response and molecular chaperones in oncogenesis and cell death. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(19):1564–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Lim SO, Park SG, Yoo JH, Park YM, Kim HJ, Jang KT, et al. Expression of heat shock proteins (HSP27, HSP60, HSP70, HSP90, GRP78, GRP94) in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2005;11(14):2072–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Castilla C, Congregado B, Conde JM, Medina R, Torrubia FJ, Japon MA, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of Hsp60 correlates with tumor progression and hormone resistance in prostate cancer. Urology. 2010;76(4):10176e1–6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Cornford PA, Dodson AR, Parsons KF, Desmond AD, Woolfenden A, Fordham M, et al. Heat shock protein expression independently predicts clinical outcome in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60(24):7099–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Cappello F, Rappa F, David S, Anzalone R, Zummo G. Immunohistochemical evaluation of PCNA, p53, HSP60, HSP10 and MUC-2 presence and expression in prostate carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res. 2003;23(2B):1325–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. He Y, Wu Y, Mou Z, Li W, Zou L, Fu T, et al. Proteomics-based identification of HSP60 as a tumor-associated antigen in colorectal cancer. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2007;1(3):336–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Trieb K, Gerth R, Windhager R, Grohs JG, Holzer G, Berger P, et al. Serum antibodies against the heat shock protein 60 are elevated in patients with osteosarcoma. Immunobiology. 2000;201(3–4):368–76. doi:10.1016/S0171-2985(00)80091-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Rohde M, Daugaard M, Jensen MH, Helin K, Nylandsted J, Jaattela M. Members of the heat-shock protein 70 family promote cancer cell growth by distinct mechanisms. Genes Dev. 2005;19(5):570–82. doi:10.1101/gad.305405.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Ciocca DR, Calderwood SK. Heat shock proteins in cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and treatment implications. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2005;10(2):86–103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhang J, Wang K, Zhang J, Liu SS, Dai L, Zhang JY. Using proteomic approach to identify tumor-associated proteins as biomarkers in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Proteome Res. [Epub ahead of print], PMID:21517111. 2011.Google Scholar
  81. Takashima M, Kuramitsu Y, Yokoyama Y, Iizuka N, Harada T, Fujimoto M, et al. Proteomic analysis of autoantibodies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Proteomics. 2006;6(13):3894–900.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhang W, Zeng F, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Lv H, Niu L, et al. Crystal structures and RNA-binding properties of the RNA recognition motifs of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L: insights into its roles in alternative splicing regulation. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(31):22636–49. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.463901.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Shih SC, Claffey KP. Regulation of human vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA stability in hypoxia by heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(3):1359–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Shankarling G, Lynch KW. Living or dying by RNA processing: caspase expression in NSCLC. J Clin Investig. 2010;120(11):3798–801. doi:10.1172/JCI45037.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Goehe RW, Shultz JC, Murudkar C, Usanovic S, Lamour NF, Massey DH, et al. hnRNP L regulates the tumorigenic capacity of lung cancer xenografts in mice via caspase-9 pre-mRNA processing. J Clin Investig. 2010;120(11):3923–39. doi:10.1172/JCI43552.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Rajan P, Dalgliesh C, Bourgeois CF, Heiner M, Emami K, Clark EL, et al. Proteomic identification of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L as a novel component of SLM/Sam68 nuclear bodies. BMC cell biology. 2009;10:82. doi:10.1186/1471-2121-10-82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Westdorp H, Skold AE, Snijer BA, Franik S, Mulder SF, Major PP, et al. Immunotherapy for prostate cancer: lessons from responses to tumor-associated antigens. Front Immunol. 2014;5:191. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2014.00191.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Vinay DS, Ryan EP, Pawelec G, Talib WH, Stagg J, Elkord E, et al. Immune evasion in cancer: Mechanistic basis and therapeutic strategies. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Blankenstein T, Coulie PG, Gilboa E, Jaffee EM. The determinants of tumour immunogenicity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):307–13. doi:10.1038/nrc3246.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Fox BA, Schendel DJ, Butterfield LH, Aamdal S, Allison JP, Ascierto PA, et al. Defining the critical hurdles in cancer immunotherapy. J Translat Med. 2011;9:214. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-9-214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement