Open Access

Ethnobotanical perspective of antimalarial plants: traditional knowledge based study

BMC Research Notes20169:67

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1827-z

Received: 19 September 2014

Accepted: 21 December 2015

Published: 4 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Considering the demand of antimalarial plants it has become essential to find and locate them for their optimal extraction. The work aims to find plants with antimalarial activities which were used by the local people; to raise the value of traditional knowledge system (TKS) prevalent in the study region; to compile characteristics of local plants used in malaria treatment (referred as antimalarial plants) and to have its spatial distribution analysis to establish a concept of geographical health.

Methods

Antimalarial plants are listed based on literature survey and field data collected during rainy season, from 85 respondents comprised of different ethnic groups. Ethno-medicinal utilities of plants was extracted; botanical name, family, local name, part used, folklore, geographical location and image of plants were recorded after cross validating with existing literatures. The interview was trifurcated in field, Vaidya/Hakims and house to house. Graphical analysis was done for major plants families, plant part used, response of people and patients and folklore. Mathematical analysis was done for interviewee’s response, methods of plant identification and people’s preferences of TKS through three plant indices.

Results

Fifty-one plants belonging to 27 families were reported with its geographical attributes. It is found plant root (31.75 %) is used mostly for malaria treatment and administration mode is decoction (41.2 %) mainly. The study area has dominance of plants of family Fabaceae (7), Asteraceae (4), Acanthaceae (4) and Amaranthaceae (4). Most popular plants found are Adhatoda vasica, Cassia fistula and Swertia chirata while  % usage of TKS is 82.0 % for malaria cure.

Conclusion

The research findings can be used by both scientific community and common rural people for bio-discovery of these natural resources sustainably. The former can extract the tables to obtain a suitable plant towards finding a suitable lead molecule in a drug discovery project; while the latter can meet their local demands of malaria, scientifically.

Keywords

Antimalarial plants Ethnobotany Ethnoecology Geographical health Medicinal plants Plant indices Traditional knowledge system

Background

Traditional medicine plays a pivotal role in the economy and sustainable growth of developing nations especially for poor countries like India. The preventive health measures have still not been able to penetrate the economically downtrodden societies including typical rural and schedule tribe areas. Their life is purely dependent on traditional knowledge system (TKS) of herbal plants for medicinal cure purposes. The native people are exploiting a variety of herbals for effective curing of various ailments and most widely malaria. Such herbal plants possess potential remedy even for some incurable diseases as well. The plant parts used, preparation method of medicine from it, and its administration as drug varies geographically [1]. However, the knowledge of herbal medicines is gradually perishing, although some of the traditional herbal men like Vaidyas and Hakims are still practicing the art of herbal healing effectively in such regions. Ethno-medicinal and ethno-botanical studies have offered immense scope and opportunities for the development and synthesis of new drugs. Modern drugs have been deducted from folklore and traditional medicines [2].

Malaria is a culprit that has victimized almost half of the modern civilization and it is endemic across more than 100 countries [3]. Malaria is a major public health problem in India, 40 million people are suffering from this single celled Plasmodium, a protozoan parasite and more than 1.5 million confirmed cases are reported annually by the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), New Delhi of which 40–50 % is due to Plasmodium falciparum (Pf). However, in the study area malaria is only due to Plasmodium vivax as Pf count was found to be zero [4]. Malaria can be considered as poor man’s disease and hence it requires focussed planning both at the level of government and at the community level.

In the Tarai regions of Eastern Uttar Pradesh (UP) the spreading of vector borne diseases becomes uncontrolled especially during rainy seasons [4]. In recent studies, chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum malaria has been observed with increasing incidence in the whole country, while it was effective for treating nearly all cases of malaria in the past. P. falciparum has become drug resistant now. The continued treatment of such cases with chloroquine is probably one of the factors responsible for the increased proportion of P. falciparum cases relative to P. vivax [5]. The current malaria therapies include methods such as passive surveillance of malaria, use of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) and introduction of intervention like rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for malaria cure [6]. The commercial industry on antimalarial drug is facing huge a challenge primarily due to development of drug resistance of malarial parasites. And, hence bio-discovery of antimalarial plants has become inevitable towards discovering a novel plant in order to find a lead compound towards malaria medication efforts. It is very likely that in times to come sustainable harvesting of this natural wealth needs to be done to meet the public health demands.

In this circumstance, ethnobotanical and ethnoecological study of antimalarial plants in three districts of Eastern UP was carried out. The native communities have been using their unique traditional knowledge (TK) system, culture, indigenous skills and expertise since the ancient times towards the disease control. TK refers to the ancient and non-conventional practices towards disease control mechanism. Local knowledge of a community is spread across various diseases and masses from developing countries utterly rely on the herbal treatment methods. India has witnessed its legacy from the times of Charaka and Susruta for traditional knowledge for antimalarial activities of various medicinal plants [7]. Considering the high time demand of antimalarial plant it has become inevitable to find and locate them for its optimal extraction for antimalarial actions.

A series of similar work has been done by many people in the country including Verma et al. [2] that has found 72 plant species in campus of Banares Hindu University, Varanasi, UP and has compiled the traditional uses by the local inhabitants. Ethnobotanical work has also been done for the Gorakhpur regions [8, 9] while Kumar and Akhtar [10] have worked on ethanomedicinal solanaceous plants of eastern UP and have found 14 species of medicinal angiosperms. Qayum et al. [1] has done geographic information system based study for antimalarial plants in three districts of UP to highlight geographical attributes of these plants. Tomar [11] has worked on folk medicinal uses of plant roots of Meerut city and has found 39 medicinal plant species belonging to 39 genera and 28 families which are used by rural and common people for various diseases. Srivastava [12] has done ethnobotanical exploration with respect to food values of 27 underutilized edible fruits consumed by ethnic people of north-eastern terai region of UP and have established database of these fruits which is useful in bio-discovery projects for achieving food security and environmental sustainability. Shankar et al. [13] have listed all the antimalarial plants of north east India and has emphasized the need for an alternative drug for malaria for developing new antimalarial plants from the indigenous plants.

Panda et al. [14] have documented phyto-therapeutical practices in Mayurbhanj district of Orissa, eastern India and has described 112 plants from 62 families which are therapeutically used against different ailments including malaria. Bahekar and Kale [15] on “Herbal Plants Used for the Treatment of Malaria” have highlighted many plants which are used since ancient times for the treatment of malaria and have established pharmacotherapy is the most common treatment strategy for the disease. Sampath et al. [16] have described Swertia chirata as a traditional herb and has found it is used as a preventative measure for malaria during epidemics. Kamaraj et al. [17] has done an ethno-pharmacological investigation on antimalarial activities of medicinal plants traditionally used in the villages of Dharmapuri regions of south India and has identified 24 such plants.

The research objectives are to find all possible plants in the study area with antimalarial activities which were used by the local people and the tribes. This was intended to know and appreciate the TK system based medication prevalent in the region. Therefore, it is aimed to compile and list characteristics of antimalarial plants prevalent in three districts of Kushinagar, Maharajganj and Gorakhpur of eastern UP and to show the distribution of antimalarial in various geographical regions. Further, the scope of present work has been extended to find out geographical health (GH) of antimalarial plants. GH refers to the state of plant presence in the study area. It is found that many plants are at the verge of either extinction, critically endangered or vulnerable [18]. Hence, immediate attention is highly expected from policy makers to safeguard the interest of people at large and some immediate action is needed from the government bodies to safeguard the current bio-diversity and medicinal plant richness of the region.

The current work is a fine mixture of literature survey and supplemented with collected information through interviews and field visits after cross validating the study area findings from Vaidyas/Hakims, and native rural people. The TK skills and practices thus developed are freely exchanged, cared for and nourished as a common property of the communities [19]. The current work has also highlighted the geographical location of antimalarial plants along with listing them with its family name, folklore, and image of plant in its natural habitat and geographical health has also been explored. It is anticipated that with these observations; traditional method of malaria cure can be accelerated especially for the low socio-economic regions where modern health measures are nearly absent.

Methods

Study area

The study area lies in the north-eastern corner of the most populous state of UP, India. It comprises a large stretch lying to the north of the river Rapti tributary to the Gandak river and also surrounded by Rohini river at northern side which is the major source of water in the region. The area comprised of three district of UP viz. Gorakhpur, Kushinagar and Maharajganj (Fig. 1). It has total area of 9291 Km2 (3.82 % of the state). This much of land area is home to people of countries like, Greece, Portugal, Sweden, etc. It also shares international borders with Nepal. The study area is one among highly dense region of the country (average density around 1210 people per Km2) and is home to more than 10.67 million Indian population [20]. The region is one among several vector borne diseases sensitive zones especially for Japanese encephalitis and malaria.
Fig. 1

Location of study area

The study region is home to Tharu, Buksa, Raji and Jaunsari tribes (114,876 people) which are 1.075 % of total population. Two religious communities Hindus (82 %) and Muslims (15 %) find dominance while Buddhists and others constitute 3 % population of the study area. The economics is primarily based on agriculture (97.48 %) with 87,400 main industry working and to some extent on tourism because of presence of Kushinagar Baudh temple (one of the main attraction for the Buddhists). As per the recent census (2011) of UP, India [20] total Population of study area is 10,690,142 (Table 1) with 48.60 % female population and 1,680,587 as total house hold of which 87.98 % is rural house hold. The rural people migrate to big cities for work very often. Entire study area happens to be least developed part of one of the poorest State in India. It makes low socio-economic profile for the region with 3,462,855 total work participation (female: 28.3 %) and 1,708,932 main work participation (female: 19.1 %) and 1,753,923 marginal worker (female: 37.3 %) (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Socio-economic profile of the study area

District name

Population type

Total house hold

Total population

Total male

Total female

Gorakhpur

Rural

554,999

3,604,766

1,838,726

1,766,040

Urban

137,961

836,129

439,051

397,078

Total

692,960

4,440,895

2,277,777

2,163,118

Kushinagar

Rural

533,834

3,396,437

1,730,377

1,666,060

Urban

27,228

168,107

87,678

80,429

Total

561,062

3,564,544

1,818,055

1,746,489

Maharajganj

Rural

175,359

1,101,460

564,281

537,179

Urban

7497

45,201

23,349

21,852

Total

182,856

1,146,661

587,630

559,031

Source: census of India, 2011

Methodology

The work has been carried out as per the schematic flowchart (Fig. 2) and its various dimensions are
Fig. 2

Schematic flowchart for the identification of antimalarial plants

Pre-ethnobotanical surveys

Before conducting actual ethnobotanical survey pre-ethnobotanical survey was conducted to set the standard goal targets. It began with extraction of ethno-medicinal utilities of plants extracted from the relevant literature available in journals and books and cross examined with accessing traditional knowledge (TK) available with local community including tribal. Numerous related publications of different journals, accepted literature from books like Flora of upper Gangetic Plains [21], Flora Gorakhpurensis [22], Herbal Medicines [23] were searched and cross examined with databases like PubMed Central (PMC) and finally this collected information was compared with the field data collected.

Ethnobotanical survey setup

Survey was conducted in the study area based on the interviews of respondents chosen on criteria discussed below. The interview was trifurcated with respect to field, Vaidya/Hakims and house to house (Table 2). Total of 51 plants (Table 3) were recorded and tabulated. Interview was conducted to find out number of positive cases (n) towards malaria treatment for a particular plant of the region.
Table 2

Methods of plant identification and people’s preferences

Plant species

Families

Method of interview

Positive response (n)

PK (%)

PR

PIa

Field (√)

Vaidya/hakim (*)

House to house (#)

Abrus precatorius Linn.

Fabaceae

  

#

26

30.6

3

Fair

Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd.

Fabaceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Achyranthes aspera Linn.

Amaranthaceae

*

 

30

35.1

1

Fair

Adhatoda vasica Nees

Acanthaceae

*

#

49

57.3

1

Good

Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. ex Schult.

Amaranthaceae

 

#

6

7.1

2

Poor

Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br.

Apocyanaceae

 

*

 

29

34.1

1

Fair

Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R.Br. exDC.

Amaranthaceae

  

#

6

7.1

2

Poor

Amaranthus spinosus Linn.

Amaranthaceae

  

4

4.7

3

Poor

Ammannia baccifera Linn.

Lythraceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Andrographis paniculata Wall. ex Nees

Acanthaceae

*

#

46

53.8

1

Good

Asteracantha longifolia (L.) Nees

Acanthaceae

  

#

8

9.4

3

Poor

Azardirachta indica A.Juss

Meliaceae

 

#

27

31.8

1

Fair

Barleria prionitis Linn.

Acanthaceae

  

#

12

14.1

2

Poor

Bauhinia variegata Linn.

Fabaceae

*

#

43

50.3

1

Good

Boerhaavia diffusa L.nom.cons.

Nyctaginaceae

 

*

 

26

30.6

1

Fair

Caesalpinia crista (Linn.)

Fabaceae

 

*

 

28

32.9

2

Fair

Carica papaya Linn.

Caricaceae

*

#

45

52.7

1

Good

Cassia fistula Linn.

Fabaceae

*

#

51

59.7

1

Good

Cissampelos pareira Linn.

Menispermaceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Citrus medica Linn.

Rutaceae

  

#

11

12.9

2

Poor

Clerodendron infortunatum Linn.

Verbenaceae

 

#

9

10.6

2

Poor

Cosmos sulphureus Cav.

Asteraceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Cuscuta reflexa Roxb.

Convolvulaceae

 

*

 

32

37.6

1

Fair

Cyperus scariosus Br.

Cyperaceae

 

*

 

28

32.9

2

Fair

Datura metel Linn.

Solanaceae

  

11

12.9

2

Poor

Eclipta prostrata (Linn.)Linn

Asteraceae

 

#

17

20.0

1

Poor

Erythrina variegata Linn.

Fabaceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Jatropha gossypifolia Linn.

Euphorbiaceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Lantana camara Linn

Verbenaceae

 

#

13

15.3

1

Poor

Leucas aspera (Willd.) Link.

Lamiaceae

  

#

26

30.6

2

Fair

Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) P.H. Raven

Onagraceae

  

#

7

8.2

3

Poor

Magnolia grandiflora Linn.

Magnoliaceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Momordica charantia Linn.

Cucurbitaceae

  

#

3

3.5

3

Poor

Murraya koenigii (L.) Sprengel

Rutaceae

  

8

9.4

2

Poor

Nyctanthes arbor-tristis Linn.

Oleaceae

 

*

 

10

11.8

1

Poor

Ocimum sanctum Linn.

Lamiaceae

  

#

28

32.9

1

Fair

Oenanthe javanica (BL.) DC.

Apiaceae

 

#

13

15.3

2

Poor

Piper longum Linn.

Piperaceae

 

*

#

30

35.1

1

Fair

Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre

Fabaceae

 

*

#

45

52.7

1

Good

Putranjiva roxburghii (Wall.)

Euphorbiaceae

 

#

27

31.8

2

Fair

Rauvolfia serpentine (Linn.) Benth.

Apocynaceae

  

4

4.7

3

Poor

Scoparia dulcis Linn.

Scrophulariaceae

  

0

0

2

Unknown

Sida rhombifolia Linn.

Malvaceae

 

#

5

5.9

2

Poor

Solanum indicum Linn.

Solanaceae

*

 

12

14.1

1

Poor

Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Miers

Menispermaceae

  

3

3.5

3

Poor

Streblus asper Lour.

Moraceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Swertia chirata Buch.Ham

Gentianaceae

*

#

48

56.2

1

Good

Tinospora cordifolia (Thunb.) Miers.

Menispermaceae

*

#

43

50.3

1

Good

Vandellia sessiliflora Benth.

Scrophulariaceae

  

0

0

3

Unknown

Vernonia cinerea (Linn.) Less.

Asteraceae

 

#

0

0

3

Unknown

Xanthium strumarium Linn.

Asteraceae

*

 

20

23.5

2

Poor

aPI is ‘Good’ if PK ≥ 50 %, ‘Fair’ if 30 % ≤ PK < 50 %, ‘Poor’ if 0 < PK < 30 %, and ‘Unknown’ if PK = 0 %

Table 3

List of plants used for malaria treatment in the study region

S.no

Botanical name (Voucher no)

Family

Vernacular/local name

Part used

Method used for cure

Plant location

Reference

Plant image

1.

Abrus precatorius Linn.

10787

Fabaceae

Ratti, Ghumchi

Whole plant

Two spoonful decoction of plant is taken orally twice a day for 3 days

Fruit orchard and climbing over trees

[14], [22]: p. 89

2.

Acacia farnesiana

(L.) Willd.

10788

Fabaceae

Tarua kadam (Ass)

Bark

aDecoction of bark is used

Found wild in wastelands, cultivated in gardens

[13], [22]: p. 125, [25]

3.

Achyranthes aspera Linn.

10789

Amaranthaceae

Chirchita/

Apamarga/ Chitchita

Roots

With kali mirch used for intermittent fever and malaria

Roadsides, hills up to 900 m, Railway lines, wastelands

[22]: p. 271, [26]: p. 39, [27]: p. 2066

4.

Adhatoda vasica Nees

10790

Acanthaceae

Arusa/

Vasaka

Roots

Powdered roots are used by native doctors for malaria

Cultivated lands, Waste places and Railway tracks

[22]: p. 240, [27]:

p. 1899

5.

Aerva lanata (L.) Juss. ex Schult.

10791

Amaranthaceae

Gorakhganja/ Bhadra

Whole

plant

Plant is grinded and mixed with water and given to patient

Weed of crop fields, in fruit orchards

[2], [22]: p. 271, [26]: p. 67

6.

Alstonia scholaris

(L.) R.Br.

10792

Apocyanaceae

Saptaparna/ Saptachada/ chatiyan

Leaves,

Bark and

Flower

Decoction is prepared and 2 teaspoon is given twice a day with honey

Planted as roadside tree and also found wild

[2], [22]: p. 192, [26]: p. 111

7.

Alternanthera sessilis

(L.) R.Br. ex DC.

10793

Amaranthaceae

Gudrisag/ Matsyaksi

Leaves and

Stems

Decoction of leaf is given

Weed of cultivated field and in moist waste places

[1], [22]: p. 273, [26]: p. 118

8.

Amaranthus

spinosus Linn.

10794

Amaranthaceae

Chaulai Bhaji, Cholai

Roots

Juice obtained from squeezed roots is mixed with powdered rice and taken with water till cure

Along roads, canals, railway tracks and a weed of cultivated fields

[22]: p. 274, [28]

9.

Ammannia baccifera

Linn.

10795

Lythraceae

Dadamari

Leaves

Leaves are used in fever

Marshy lands, Paddy fields, moist places

[22]: p. 136, [26]: p. 125, [35]

10.

Andrographis paniculata

Wall. ex Nees

10796

Acanthaceae

Kalmegh

Leaves

Decoction of leaves is taken orally for twice a day with half glass of milk

Shady waste grounds

[14], [22]: p. 241

11.

Asteracantha longifolia

(L.) Nees

10797

Acanthaceae

Talmakhana

Whole

plant

Juice of whole plant is given to patients

Shallow ditches along roads

[4], [22]: p. 244

12.

Azardirachta indica

A.Juss

10798

Meliaceae

Neem

Leaves and

Fruits

Decoction of leaves and fruits is given

Planted in gardens and near temples

[2], [22]: p. 70, [26]: p. 227

13.

Barleria prionitis Linn.

10799

Acanthaceae

Kastira,

Bajradanti

Leaves

Decoction of leaf is given with honey for 7 days

Waste ground, planted as border plant

[14], [22]: p. 242

14.

Bauhinia variegata Linn.

10800

Fabaceae

Kachnar

Bark,

Root and

Leaves

Decoction of bark, root and/or leaves is used

Planted in gardens and as roadside tree

[2], [22]: p. 115, [26]: p. 256

15.

Boerhaavia diffusa

L.nom.cons.

10801

Nyctaginaceae

Gadapurna / Punarnava

Roots

Drink this herb root paste for malaria treatment

Elevated lands, roadsides, railway tracks, waste places, crevices of walls and fruit orchards

[22]: p. 269, [26]: p. 281, [29]

16.

Caesalpinia crista

(Linn.)

10802

Fabaceae

Kat-karanj, Karanju

Roots

and

Seeds

Prepared in form of dry powder in dose of ½ gm with honey

Open wastelands and along Nallas

[2], [22]: p. 115, [26]: p. 320

17.

Carica papaya Linn.

10803

Caricaceae

Papita

Leaves

Decoction of leaves is used

Cultivated around bungalows and gardens

[22]: p. 143, [25]

18.

Cassia fistula Linn.

10804

Fabaceae

Amaltas

Fruits

and

Buds

Decoction of fruits and buds are used

Deciduous tree Planted roadside and in gardens

[22]: p. 118, [30]: p. 856

19.

Cissampelos pareira Linn.

10805

Menisperma-ceae

Harjuri, Bharat-buti

Root

Juice of the root is administered

Fruit orchard, and as hedges of parks and gardens

[22]: p. 34,

20.

Citrus medica Linn.

10806

Rutaceae

Jameri-nimbu

Fruit

Juice is of fruit is used

Planted in Gardens, Lahladpur area

[22]: p. 67, [25]

21.

Clerodendron infortunatum Linn.

10807

Verbenaceae

Bhat

Root

and

Leaves

One tea spoonful leaf juice is taken 3 times daily for a week

Under shades of trees, fruit orchards

[22]: p. 254, [28], [31]

22.

Cosmos sulphureus Cav.

10808

Asteraceae

Cosmos 

Leaves

Leaves and aerial are part used in intermittent fever

Throughout study area

[9]

23.

Cuscuta reflexa Roxb.

10809

Convolvulaceae

Amarbel

Stem

Paste of about 10 gm stem and 7 black pepper seeds is taken with water

Twining upon Adhatoda vasica, near Surajkund, Tiwaripur region

[14], [22]: p. 216

24.

Cyperus scariosus Br.

10810

Cyperaceae

Nagarmotha/ Chakranksha

Roots

Decoction of root is used

Shallow water bodies of study area

[22], [32]: p. 2637

25.

Datura metel Linn.

10811

Solanaceae

Dhatura

Seed, Leaves, and

Roots

Administered as decoction of plant parts

Frequently in waste places

[22]: p. 219, [33]

26.

Eclipta prostrata (Linn.)Linn

10812

Asteraceae

Bhangraiya, Bhringaraj

Whole plant,

Root and

Leaves

Plant and its parts are grinded and mixed with water and given to patient

Open pastures, wet regions, along water canals

[2], [22]: p. 175

27.

Erythrina

variegata Linn.

10813

Fabaceae

Pangara

Bark

Bark paste is made in to pills and are taken till cure

Moderate sized deciduous tree planted in gardens, Near Ramgarh tal

[22]: p. 99, [28]

28.

Jatropha gossypifolia Linn.

10814

Euphorbiaceae

Bhakrend

Seeds

Seeds are taken with water

Roadside weed and found at other waste ground

[22]: p. 296, [28]

29.

Lantana camara Linn

10815

Verbenaceae

Ghaneri

Whole plant

Plant decoction is given

Roadsides, Wild, Wastelands and Railway colony

[22]: p. 256, [34]

30.

Leucas aspera (Willd.) Link.

10816

Lamiaceae

Gopha, Drona pushpi

Leaves

Leaves used as mosquito repellent by the rural people

Weed of crop field, waste places, dry open sandy soil, Bhathat region

[14], [22]: p. 263, [41]

31.

Ludwigia octovalvis

(Jacq.) P.H. Raven

10817

Onagraceae

Panijalokia

Leaves

Leaf juice is used in intermittent fever

Wet places, sides of tanks

[22]: p. 141, [35]

32.

Magnolia grandiflora Linn.

10818

Magnoliaceae

Andachampa

Bark

Bark is boiled in water and remaining water is given to patient

Planted in gardens, Gorakhnath temple area

[22]: p. 31

33.

Momordica charantia Linn.

10819

Cucurbitaceae

Kathnim, Karavellaka

Roots

and

Fruits

Decoction of roots and fruits is used

Cultivated, found wild, climbing on hedges

[2], [22]: p. 149

34.

Murraya koenigii

(L.) Sprengel

10820

Rutaceae

Bursunga/ Gandhla

Roots

Juice of roots is given in malaria

Deciduous shrub on waste grounds along water bodies, planted in gardens

[2], [22]: p. 69, [36]: p. 472

35.

Nyctanthes arbor-tristis Linn.

10821

Oleaceae

Harsingar

Leaves

250 gm leaf is boiled in ½ lit water and mix with leaf juice of Ocium tenuiflorium. Mix with honey, 50 ml of this for 3 days

Gardens, Bungalow, Temple and Railway colonies

[14], [22]: p. 191, [40]

36.

Ocimum

sanctum

Linn.

10822

Lamiaceae

Tulsi

Roots

decoction of roots given as

diaphoretic in malarial fever

Found as an escape from cultivation in moist places

[9], [22]: p. 267

37.

Oenanthe javanica

(BL.) DC.

10823

Apiaceae

Pan tarori

Whole Plant

Plant extract is used in mild fever

Weed in moist waste places, fruit orchards, along water channels

[32]: p. 156, [35]

38.

Piper longum Linn.

10824

Piperaceae

Peeper, Peepramool

Fruits

and

Roots

Plant part is grinded, mixed with water and administered orally

Forest Zone of whole study area and hotter regions

[27]: p. 2128

39.

Pongamia pinnata

(L.) Pierre

10825

Fabaceae

Karanja

Fruit

Fruit is boiled in water and administered as decoction

Roadside, near Canals, Wasteland, Moist regions, Pharenda and Ramgarh forest

[22]: p. 108

40.

Putranjiva roxburghii (Wall.)

10826

Euphorbiaceae

Putjev, Jiaputa, Putrajiva

Leaves

Leaves and stones given in decoction for cold fever

Wild, tropical and cultivated, hedge plants in gardens

[9], [27]: p. 2237, [22]: p. 299.

41.

Rauvolfia serpentine (Linn.) Benth.

10827

Apocynaceae

Dhamarharua

Roots

A paste of root and black pepper is administered

Damp places, wild in forests

[14], [22]: p. 196, [28]

42.

Scoparia

dulcis Linn.

10828

Scrophularia-ceae

Mithi patti

Leaves

Two teaspoonful of leaf juice is taken twice a day

Waste places and a weed of crop fields

[22]: p. 231, [28]

43.

Sida rhombifolia Linn.

10829

Malvaceae

Bariara

Roots

Boiled extract is given

Shady waste places near tals (water bodies), hedges

[22]: p. 55, [37]

44.

Solanum indicum Linn.

10830

Solanaceae

Lapta Brihatti, Banbhanta

Fruits

Burnt fruits are consumed

Found as wild in whole study area

[22]: p. 222, [25]

45.

Stephania japonica (Thunb.) Miers

10831

Menispermaceae

Rajpatha

Roots

Sun-dried roots powder is given orally with boiled water twice a day

Hedges on moist ground

[2]: p. 36

46.

Streblus asper Lour.

10832

Moraceae

Singhor

Bark

Juice obtained from squeezed bark is taken till cure

Small evergreen tree found throughout the study area

[22]: p. 308, [28]

47.

Swertia chirata Buch.Ham

10833

Gentianaceae

Chiraita,

Charayatah

Kirata tikta

Whole plant

Plant part is boiled in water till 75 % is evaporated and it is drink like tea

Temperate Himalayas, 4000-10000 ft, Paniara region

[27]: p. 1664

48.

Tinospora cordifolia (Thunb.) Miers.

10834

Menisperma-ceae

Gurch,

Giloe

Stems

and

Roots

Decoction of roots is given for malaria

On hedges and trees, tropical regions of study area

[2], [22]: p. 35, [36]: p. 77

49.

Vandellia sessiliflora

Benth.

10835

Scrophularia-ceae

Lindernia sp.Indian

Whole plant

Decoction of whole plant is used

Damp and shady places, grows with grasses

[22]: p. 229, [38]

50.

Vernonia cinerea

(Linn.) Less.

10836

Asteraceae

Sahdevi

Whole

plant

Decoction is prepared and 2 tea spoonful is given twice a day

Weed of crop field and waste grounds

[2], [22]: p. 181

51.

Xanthium strumarium Linn.

10837

Asteraceae

Lapetua

Roots

Decoction is prepared of roots of Lapetua

Waste places, long railway tracks and roadsides

[2], [22]: p. 183

Beverage is also plant extract based drink which usually have low concentration than decoction

aDecoction is an extraction method by boiling of dissolved chemicals of medicinal plant or plant parts

Sampling method

The survey was conducted during rainy (July–October 2013) months (Malaria epidemic season). Local population based survey sampling relying on TK system was followed. Survey locality chosen based on the study of API (Annual parasitic index) of Malaria obtained from District Malaria Office. All those areas with relatively high API were selected for the survey while respondents were chosen based on their interface with TK System and this information was obtained from a local survey while herbalists (Vaidya/Hakim) of the locality were given precedence. In total 85 independent respondents were chosen from Gorakhpur (22), Kushinagar (38) and Maharajganj (35) districts (Table 4).
Table 4

Mathematical analysis of interviewee’s response

Location

Total interviewees (M/F)

Occupation

Literacya (M/F)

Mean ageb (years)

Monthly incomec,d (INR)e

Agri

Non-agri

Gorakhpur

22 (18/4)

74 %

26 %

74.5 (79/54)  %

52.7

4915.0

Kushinagar

38 (27/11)

78 %

22 %

63.7 (68/53)  %

55.0

3887.0

Maharajganj

35 (28/7)

82 %

18 %

67.2 (72/48)  %

48.4

4093.0

Totalf

85 (63/22)

78 %

22 %

68.5 (73/52)  %

52.0

4298.3

Details of plants

 Surveyed plants

51

 Most commonly used plants

3

 Number of families of surveyed plants

27

 Number of families with two or more plants

12

Major plant families

 Fabaceae

7

 Asteraceae

4

 Acanthaceae

4

 Amaranthaceae

4

 Menispermaceae

3

Most popular plants (With PK ≥ 55 %)

 Adhatoda vasica Nees

 Cassia fistula Linn.

 Swertia chirata Buch.Ham

Geographical profileg

 Average annual rainfall

1148.3 mm

 Average relative humidity

68.33 %

 Average high temperature

30.92 °C

 Average low temperature

19.58 °C

 Average Mean Temperature

25.25 °C

 Average no of days with precipitation

44.88

Frequency of usage of traditional knowledge

Yes (%)

No (%)

70 (82 %)

15 (18 %)

aCalculated on weighted mean %, M males, F females

bMean of ages of M and F

cBased on India census 2011

dEconomics and Statistics Division, Govt. of Uttar Pradesh, India

e1 USD 61.11 INR

fCalculated on arithmetic mean  %

gBased on satellite imagery and Climate Research Unit (CRU) UK

Identification of plants

Ethnobotanical data collected was observed by expert taxonomist and botanist Dr. H.B. Naithani (Senior Scientist, FRI University Dehradun, India) and taxonomic details were ascertained (Table 3). Botanical names of plants and authority were established and cross. The data obtained from ecological sampling was used to determine geographical health of any plant in terms of vulnerable, nearly extinct or under threat. This was specified in terms of PK (percentage known) = 0 or PI (plant impression) as ‘unknown’.

Ethics statement and consent

This is to declare that the work has no completing interest. All respondents actively participated and the survey was purely participative and voluntarily in nature. Participants provided verbal informed consent to participate in this study. They were free to withdraw their information at any point of time. Participant consent was recorded on the designed sheet. The authors adhered with ISE 2006 and 2008 guidelines and all the principles laid down were followed. The entire voucher numbers of specimen collected were deposited in Forest Research Institute, Dehradun herbarium (Voucher Number 10787–10837). The work did not involve any protected area (National Park, Wildlife Sanctuary or Private Plantation). It was done on the land which can be easily accessed by the public and hence no such permission was required. The field studies did not involve any endangered or protected species. GPS co-ordinates for the study region are: Gorakhpur (Lat. 26°13′N to 27°29′N and Long. 83°05′E to 83°56′E), Kushinagar (Lat. 26°39′N to 27°15′N and Long. 83°38′E to 84°15′E) and Maharajganj (Lat. 26°59′N to 27°19′N and Long. 83°09′E to 83°45′E).

Interview details and criteria

Eighty-five respondents from all ethnic groups comprising Tharu tribes, Hindus, Muslims were interviewed against designed format of set of questions like collection date, local name, plant image, plant location/region, plant description, method of usage of plant in malarial cases. There were 63 male and 22 female respondents from all three major localities (Table 4). No pre-test was conducted as the obtained information was cross validated with the existing TK system in literature databases (PMC etc.). Elderly (as they are TK rich) people above 50 years (mean age 52.0 years) and mainly males (74.12 %) were interviewed because of their easy availability. Samples were collected throughout the study area making each geographical representation possible (such as people residing in the area of forest, near water bodies, urban areas and rural areas). Participants were chosen based on their experience and as well as age. Plant images have been taken from the plant’s natural habitat to build digital database to facilitate the easy recognition of plant by the local people and later it is integrated with the known traditional applications of these plants as antimalarial plants. The interview was done in three modes of field, Vaidya/Hakims and house to house to strengthen the data collection process and at the finally it was cross checked.

Data collection

Data on ethno-medicinal applications of plants are collected in the sequences of: Serial number, botanical name, family, vernacular/local name, part used, methodology used, plant location, and plant image. Later, collected data was referenced using surveyed literature and databases. Demographic and socio-economic survey was also done to find correlation with malaria epidemic with these factors. Additional information (Additional file 1) like age of respondents, education background, monthly income and occupation was also recorded (Table 4). It was also queried for how frequent people use TK system for malaria cure.

Data analysis

Data obtained through ethnobotanical survey was analyses through following parameters:
  1. 1.

    Percentage known (PK): This is  % of people who have knowledge of usage of plant species for malaria treatment and calculated as: PK = [n/m] × 100; n = total number of positive responses and m = total number of respondents.

     
  2. 2.

    Preference ranking (PR): It is similar to the rank system used by Asase et al. [24]. Here, plants were ranked as per their effectiveness towards treatment. Rank 1, 2 and 3 were assigned where rank 1 means highly effective in treatment while rank 3 means least effective.

     
  3. 3.

    Plant impression (PI): It is the index indicating how a plant is perceived in the locality. PI is comprised of four categories as good, fair, poor and unknown. PI is ‘Good’ if PK ≥ 50 %; ‘Fair’ if 30 ≤ PK < 50 %; ‘Poor’ if 0 < PK < 30 %; and ‘Unknown’ if PK = 0 %. PK = 0 means plant is unknown among community people but found in the field and also available in the literatures.

     
  4. 4.

    Graphical analysis: Pie charts have been drawn to assess the most frequent part of plant usage in TK system of antimalarial plants (Graph 1), major plant families (Graph 2), response of people and patients (Graph 3) and folklore (Graph 4).

     
  5. 5.

    Analysis of the interviewee response [17] has been presented (Tables 2 and 4) to include observations related to geographical profile of study area, literacy, monthly income, occupation etc.

     

Results

Traditional knowledge system of antimalarial plants: Compilation of all antimalarial plants prevalent in the region (Table 3).

Graphical analysis (Fig. 3): Four pie charts are drawn and results are:
Fig. 3

Graphical analysis

  • Roots are mainly (31.8 %) used towards malaria cure (Graph1).

  • As many as 12 plant families have more than one plant in the region (Graph 2) and Fabaceae family makes highest influence of 7 plants in the list (Table 3).

  • Response of people and patients was analysed. It was found that 41.2 % responses are ‘poor’ while 19.6 % people are unknown for any TK Based system in the region (Graph 3).

  • In 41.2 % cases plant part used as decoction followed by plant usage as juices or in some form of beverage# (27.5 %) and plants are also used as mosquito repellent (2 %) (Graph 4).

Plant identification and people’s preferences:
  • Considering people’s perception there are 11 plants reported to be ‘unknown’ to the community people against malaria treatment while 8 plants are ‘Good’, 12 plants are ‘Fair’ and 21 plants are ‘Poor’ in their efficacy.

  • Only 7 plants were reported during all three modes of interview conducted.

  • Cassia fistula has got highest number of positive response (n = 51) among community people, followed by Adhatoda vasica (n = 49) and Swertia chirata (n = 48). All these plants are most popular antimalarial plants.

Socio-economic and ethnographic results:
  • 97.48 % population is agrarian, mean age of respondents is 52.0 years, total literacy is 68.5 %, monthly income is 4298.3 INR (~70.3 USD), and Gender (M/F) respondents were (78/22) %. TK system usage is among 82 % of population but they also rely on modern method of allopathic treatment when TKS becomes ineffective.

Discussion

In the study area two species namely Nagarmotha (Cyperus scariosus) and Goma or Drona pushpi (Leucas aspera) are at the verge of extinction mainly due to the change in water reservoir structure i.e. because of loss of water bodies like ponds and other reservoirs for the former and because of change in land-use pattern for the latter. The ethnoecology of the study region does not produce the scintillating picture. Further, due to ruthless exploitation, many important medicinal plants species are becoming rare and some of them are critically endangered as per the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural resource), Switzerland red list criteria. It is estimated that 10 % of all plant species are currently endangered in India [39].

It is found that 51 plant species out of various plants studied in the region belong to 27 families are used by native people malaria treatment (Table 3) and out of these families studied certain family of plants like, Fabaceae (7), Acanthaceae (4), Amaranthaceae (4), Asteraceae (4), and Menispermaceae (3) are prevalent in the region. A commendable work has been done by Duthie for the flora of Flora of Upper Gangetic Plains [21] and by Srivastava for the Flora Gorakhpurensis [22]. Some plants like Cosmos sulphurous, Piper longum and Swertia chirata were found in the study area which missed its place in the Srivasatava’s work and also these are not listed in Duthie’s work. These plants might have grown up in the area during the recent decades or may have come through migrations.

Spatial distribution of antimalarial plants found in the study area including types of habitat is supplied in Table 3. Plant diaspora usually found in the tree/forest, open pastures, river and water body regions; while some are found in some specific locations like Lahladpur, Surajkund, Tiwaripur, Ramgarh Tal, Gorakhnath Temple, Pharenda (forest), Ramgarh (forest), Paniara, Bhathat areas whereas and some are found vaguely throughout the region. Further, there are few plants which are found in fruit orchards, waste/open areas and along railway tracks. Some are distributed in moist waste places, crop fields and along roadside and some are in marshy lands, moist places, garden and temples (in settlements) and near nallas/canals.

The region falls in low socio economic zones with monthly income ~70.3 USD while population is agrarian (97.48 %) and hence their obvious dependency for malaria cure is TKS. It is also found that malaria incidences are relatively higher in the socio-economic inferior regions. There are sizeable amount of Vaidya/Hakims (Experts in TKS based applications) who derive their raw material from nearby forests, railway tracks, fruit orchards or from target plantations. The region has 1,436,878 as total households in which 87.98 % is rural while merely 12.02 % is urban and demographic divide lies with 51.25 % males while 48.75 % females in the entire study area [20].

In drawing Pie Chart for plant parts used; rationale used is total number of plants with a particular plant part used is divided by total plants in the study area and multiplied by 100 to compute its  %. It is found that among collected plants mostly (31.75 %) roots are used for malaria treatment followed by leaf (25.40 %) and the least used part of plant is stem (3.17 %) preceded by seeds (4.76 %) (Graph 1). Details of most widely plant parts used is necessary to ascertain the significance of that particular part and to establish the coherence of the work with other similar works e.g. for the medicinal plants of BHU region of Varanasi UP [2]. It has been established that for that given region 30 % of preparations are derived from roots which is maximum in plant parts used. In another similar work of Shankar et al. [13] on antimalarial plants of northeast India, frequently used plant parts were roots (31 %), after leaves (33 %). It can be established that in most of the cases root is most frequently used towards medicinal purposes and in some cases leaves are also widely used. Thus, there is a need of expertise for extraction of artemisinin or quinine alkaloid compounds preferably from the roots and leaves.

There are 12 plant families including Acanthaceae, Amaranthaceae, Apocyanaceae, Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Lamiaceae, Menispermaceae, Rutaceae, Scrophulariaceae, Solanaceae and Verbenaceae that have more than one plant in the region (Graph 2) while Fabaceae makes highest contribution of 7 plants namely Abrus precatorius, Acacia farnesiana, Bauhinia variegate, Caesalpinia crista, Cassia fistula, Erythrina variegate and Pongamia pinnata (Table 3). Response of these plants among people and patients was upright and it had been acting as good alternative to modern means of medication and had been catering to the need of millions from the ancient times. Folklore (mode of administration) of plant parts is decoction (41.2 %) where plant parts are boiled in water and water is evaporated to extend that plant part makes thick syrupy liquid. It is an excellent way to prepare herb with an awful taste. Decoctions of roots and barks are very often prepared while decoctions of leaves, flowers, or seeds are rarely prepared.

The interview was trifurcated in three categories of field, Vaidya/Hakims and house to house to understand the method of plant identification and people perception (Table 2). It was found that as many as seven plants were obtained through all three interview modes. Three indices PK, PR and PI are used to understand perception of plants among community people. Total number of positive responses (n) were collected and combined for all 51 reported plants. PK signifies popularity of a plant as antimalarial. If PK > 55 %; such plants are considered as most popular plants. For 11 plants, PK = 0 was reported that signifies plant is unknown in the locality among people, during field survey they were found and such plants also found space in literature and journals. Plants with PK = 0 are highly important and further work has to be done to enhance its PI which will lead to increased plant’s medicinal utility. These are the plants which have least importance among communities and these are ecologically available for future potential application. These plants are not known due to over-dependence on plants with PK > 55, in the study area.

PR has been assigned to each plant either as 1, 2 or 3 depending on people perception as well as research findings. 1 signifies for highly effective in treatment while 3 for least effective in treatment. There are 19 plants with PR as 1 i.e. They are rated as effective in malaria treatment. It is observed that indices like PR and PI are in resonance for most of the plants; higher is PR (PR = 1) higher is PI (Good) and vice versa and runs parallel. 21 plants have ‘Poor’ PI (41.2 %). It is because of its inefficacy towards fever, intermittent fever or malaria cure and hence these plants are least preferred by the local communities. IUCN status of plants with ‘fair’ and ‘good’ impression (PK > 30 %) towards malaria cure is tabulated to understand geographical health of the plant as per the red list criteria (Table 5).
Table 5

IUCN status for frequently used plants towards malaria cure

S. no

Plant species

IUCN status

S. no

Plant species

IUCN status

1

Abrus precatorius

Not threatened

11

Cassia fistula Linn

Not yet been assessed

2

Achyranthes aspera

Not yet assessed

12

Cuscuta reflexa Roxb

Not yet been assessed

3

Adhatoda vasica

Not yet assessed

13

Cyperus scariosus

Not yet been assessed

4

Alstonia scholaris

Least concerned

14

Leucas aspera

Not yet been assessed

5

Andrographis paniculata

Not yet assessed

15

Ocimum sanctum

Not yet been assessed

6

Azardirachta indica

Not yet assessed

16

Piper longum

Not yet been assessed

7

Bauhinia variegata

Not yet assessed

17

Pongamia pinnata

Least concerned

8

Boerhaavia diffusa

Not yet assessed

18

Putranjiva roxburghii

Not yet been assessed

9

Caesalpinia crista

Not Threatened

19

Swertia chirata

Not yet been assessed

10

Carica papaya

Not yet assessed

20

Tinospora cordifolia

Not yet been assessed

Based on IUCN red list criteria

Having life in close vicinity of the nature, traditional societies have acquired unique knowledge about the use of flora and fauna in wild, most of which are still unknown to the common masses. The research findings can be used by both scientific community and common rural/tribal people for bio-prospecting of these natural resources sustainably. The former can extract the tables obtained in the research work to obtain a suitable plant for finding a lead molecule towards a drug discovery project; while the latter can use Table 3 information to meet the local demand for malaria cure. Plant image, methodology and plant location can be seen together to bring malaria cure measures in friendly manner for local communities at their door step. This will be much useful for the developing countries like India where the modern medical facilities have still not penetrated down deeper. It provides sustainable alternate to the existing system of malaria medication. Findings of such works should be made open and unrestricted for its elaborated application to benefit the public at large. The work has also included many plants that are not widely used and are not popular in the study area. This widens the scope of extraction of other non-traditional plants in cases of poor ethnoecology especially during extinction or vulnerability of the traditional plants because of over harvesting and over exploitation of these medicinal plants.

Conclusion

The study region has monsoonal rainfall with numerous rivers emanating from Himalayas and low gradient leads to stagnation of water that makes it favourable for vector borne diseases. TK coupled with information technology makes the study highly useful for basic amenity stressed population. The lack of ecology-related knowledge and awareness which is evident from low socio-economic profile of the study region gives signs of over harvesting of plants. This is reinforced by the observed poor geographical health of plants as some plants are found vulnerable; some has become rare, while some are nearly extinct. It further widens the horizon of socio-economic based utility of this kind of research work. The research work fully addresses the issue of making public the availability of information of antimalarial plants for its cheapest and sustainable harvesting for malaria cure locally and it opens gates for numerous opportunities of public health at large.

The work carried out revealed the plants recorded are highly valuable for antimalarial application and in future, bio-prospecting projects can be further initiated for sustainable harvesting towards developing antimalarial drug for curing malaria at large. It would help researchers to find out suitable lead molecules with antimalarial activity towards drug discovery. The study provides ample ground to believe that the traditional medicinal system practice using native medicinal plants is alive and well functioning in the selected area. Many communities use antimalarial plant parts and whole plant for their primary healthcare. It is primarily due to lack of modern medicines, medications, self-reliance on herbs, poor economic condition and more importantly faiths in TK System. The treatment of malaria with plants and plant parts causes little or no side effects and also it is very cheap and affordable. Some plants are nearly extinct in the region, the reason being change in land use pattern and shrinking of water bodies along with over harvesting of herbs. The bio-depletion of these antimalarial plants is due to the burgeoning population and unscientific management of the natural resources.

The work has highlighted the fact that some species with medicinal applications are not ethnoecologically rich. People residing in the study area are not aware that some of the medicinal plants are becoming extinct gradually. The current work of listing these antimalarial plants would assist people in identifying ecologically sensitive species and hence adoption of regeneration technique for that particular plant species, thus it supports health and economy of the community. There exists alarming need to conserve and protect these important species for sustainable harvesting. A serious endeavour has to be taken to save these natural resources for the generations to come. Study area in the work happens to be least developed part of one of the poorest State in India. Thus, working for low socio-economic profile region will certainly be useful at larger scale and will bear extended benefits when the work will be thoroughly evaluated.

Future work

Exhaustive research should be done on comparative analysis of different antimalarial plants to comprehend if the local evaluation of the effectiveness of the different species can be scientifically authenticated. Listed medicinal plants can be potentially used for extracting antimalarial plants content for further chemical extraction and its analysis as a potential constituent of malaria drug can be established. The plants can be further studied across its family to establish antimalarial activity relationship of various families and correlation based study can also be done to generate coefficient of correlation for a particular plant family as an antimalarial. The present findings can be extended to chalk out a complete roadmap of geographical health of antimalarial plants in terms of IUCN criteria of red list and for detailed ethnoecology work.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AQ proposed the idea, made analysis, drafted the manuscript and implemented the idea. AML channelized the work, made critical evaluation and provided continuous feedbacks. RA was responsible for socio-economic evaluation and ethnoecology and was responsible for carrying theoretical work related to the manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the manuscript and designed the overall architecture of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors express our deepest regards to Vaidyas/Hakims, herbalists, traditional healers and various rural people, who provided lot of information on TK system of the study area. We also acknowledge the computer laboratory facility at SCIS and CSRD, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi for the essential support in carrying out this work. We are highly indebted to the CSIR for providing financial assistance rendered which kept constant motivation throughout the work. The author is also grateful to Dr. HB Naithani and Dr. Vinay Kant Misra, IFS for plant verification and cross validating the authority of botanical names and is equally indebted to the Ministry of Environment and Forest, MoEF Govt. of India for its continuous support towards making this work plausible. Further, author is grateful to IGNFA, Dehradun for its constant motivation and encouragements.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Biology and Bioinformatics, School of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University
(2)
Centre for the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University
(3)
Indira Gandhi National Forest Academy

References

  1. Qayum A, Lynn A, Arya R. Traditional knowledge system based GIS mapping of antimalarial plants: spatial distribution analysis. J Geogr Inf Syst. 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2014.65041.Google Scholar
  2. Verma AK, Kumar M, Bussmann RW. Medicinal plants in an urban environment: the medicinal flora of Banares Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:35.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme: Malaria situation in India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Delhi. Govt. of India. http://www.nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/malaria1.pdf.
  4. Qayum A, Lynn AM, Arya R, Jaiswal SK. GIS integrated epidemiological indices for risk area identification towards malaria control measures. IJEAT. 2013;2(6):376–81.Google Scholar
  5. National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme: Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of malaria in India 2009.Google Scholar
  6. Qayum A, Arya R, Kumar P, Lynn AM. Socio-economic, epidemiological and geographic features based GIS-integrated mapping to identify malarial hotspot. Malaria J. 2015;14:192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0685-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta A, Singh AK, Qayum A. Evaluating ancient Indian history and culture towards malaria control measures based on traditional knowledge system. Int J Interdiscip Multidiscip Stud. 2014;1(8):181–90.Google Scholar
  8. Pandey AK, Tripathi NN. Aromatic plants of Gorakhpur division: their anti-mycotic properties and medicinal value. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2011;7(2):142–7.Google Scholar
  9. Pandey AK, Tripathi NN. Diversity and distribution of aromatic plants in forests of Gorakhpur division, U.P., India. Biol Forum Int J. 2010;2(2):25–33.Google Scholar
  10. Kumar V, Akhtar M. Ethanomedicinal solanaceous plants of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Ind J Life Sci. 2013;2(2):95–8.Google Scholar
  11. Tomar A. Folk medicinal uses of plant roots from Meerut district, Uttar Pradesh. Ind J Tradit Knowl. 2009;8(2):298–301.Google Scholar
  12. Srivastava R. Underutilised fruits: a potential of local food resource. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2013;4(3):1301–5.Google Scholar
  13. Shankar R, Deb S, Sharma BK. Antimalarial plants of northeast India: an overview. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2011;3(1):10–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Pandal SK, Rout SD, Mishra N, Panda T. Phytotherapy and traditional knowledge of tribal communities of Mayurbhanj Orissa India. J Pharmacognosy Phytother. 2011;3(7):101–13.Google Scholar
  15. Bahekar S, Kale R. Herbal plants used for the treatment of malaria—a literature review. J Pharmacognosy Phytochem. 2013;1(6):141–6.Google Scholar
  16. Kumar KS, Bhowmik D, Chandira M. Swertia chirayita: a traditional herb and its medicinal uses. J Chem Pharm Res. 2010;2(1):262–6.Google Scholar
  17. Kamaraj C, Kaushik NK, Rahuman AA, Mohanakrishnan D, Bagavan A, Elango G, et al. Antimalarial activities of medicinal plants traditionally used in the villages of Dharmapuri regions of South India. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;141:796–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Prakash A. Uses of some threatened and potential ethnomedicinal plants among the tribals of Uttar Pradesh and Uttrakhand in India. In: National Conference on Forest Biodiversity—Earth’s Living Treasure. 2011:93-99.Google Scholar
  19. Pushpangadan P, Kumar B. Ethnobotany, CBD, WTO and the Biodiversity Act of India. Ethnobotany. 2005;17:2–12.Google Scholar
  20. Directorate of Census Operations UP: Census of India 2011. Uttar Pradesh administrative atlas. 2012.Google Scholar
  21. Duthie JF. Flora of upper gangetic plains, vol I and II. Botanical Survey of India.1960.Google Scholar
  22. Srivastava TN. Flora Gorakhpurensis. New Delhi: Today and tomorrow’s print and Publ; 1976.Google Scholar
  23. Zulfeqar AM. Herbal Medicine. New Delhi:APH Publications;2008. p. 31-56.Google Scholar
  24. Asase A, Oteng-Yeboah AA, Odamtten GT, Simmonds MS. Ethnobotanical study of some Ghanaian anti-malarial plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;99:273–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma UK. Medicinal plant of Assam. Dehradun: Bishen Shingh Mahendra Pal Singh Publisher; 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Vaidyaratnam PS Varier’s, Arya Vaidya Sala: Indian medicinal plants. Vol I, Orient Longman, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. Kitikar KR, Basu BD: Indian Medicinal Plants, vol III. Periodical experts Delhi;1975.Google Scholar
  28. Rahmatullah M, Hossan S, Khatun A, Seraj A, Jahan R. Medicinal plants used by various tribes of Bangladesh for treatment of malaria. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Malaria Research and Treatment;2012.Google Scholar
  29. Bhowmik D, Sampath KKP, Srivastava S, Paswan S, Sankar A. Traditional Indian herbs Punarnava and its medicinal importance. J Pharmacognosy Phytochem. 2012;1(1):52–8.Google Scholar
  30. Kitikar KR, Basu BD. Indian medicinal plants, vol II.. Periodical Experts Delhi;1975.Google Scholar
  31. Kohli YP, Mibang T, Chaudhuri SK. Ethnomedicines of the tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. Itanagar: Himalayan publishers; 2003.Google Scholar
  32. Kitikar KR, Basu BD. Indian Medicinal Plants, vol IV. Periodical Experts Delhi; 1975.Google Scholar
  33. Mahanti N. Tribal ethno-botany of Mizoram, tribal studies of India. New Delhi: Inter India Publications; 1994.Google Scholar
  34. Mishra SB, Dwivedi S, Shashi A, Prajapati K. Ethnomedicinal uses of some plant species by ethnic and rural peoples of the Salem district of Tamilnadu with special reference to the conservation of vanishing species. Ethnobot Leaflets. 2008;12:873–87.Google Scholar
  35. Gond DK, Kumar S, Samuel CO, Saini DC, Kulshreshtha K, Abbasi P. Ethano-Medicinal Plants on Indigenous Wetland Plants of Mau District of Uttar Pradesh. Uttar Pradesh: Biodiversity and Conservation India, National conference on climate change; 2012. p. 33–8.Google Scholar
  36. Kitikar KR, Basu BD. Indian medicinal plants, vol I. Periodical Experts Delhi;1975.Google Scholar
  37. Purkayastha P, Dutta M, Nath SC. Ethno-medicinal plants from Dibru-Saikhowa biosphere reserve Assam. Ind J Trad Knowl. 2007;6:477–80.Google Scholar
  38. Shankar R, Rawat MS. Medicinal plants vis a vis forest management in Arunachal Pradesh: ayurveda and drugs for all. New Delhi : Himalayan Publisher; 2007. p. 110–8.Google Scholar
  39. Pandey AK, Patra AK, Shukla PH. Medicinal plants in Satpura Plateau of Madhya Pradesh: current status and future prospects. Ind Forester. 2005;131(7):857–83.Google Scholar
  40. Puri A, Saxena R, Saxena RP, Saxena KC, Srivastava V, Tandon JS. Immuno stimulant activity of Nyctanthes arbor-tristis L. J Ethnopharmacol. 1994;42(1):31–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Maheswaran R, Sathish S, Ignacimuthu S. Larvicidal activity of Leucas Aspera (Willd.) against larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus Say. and Aedes aegypti L. Int J Integr Biol. 2008;2(3):214–7.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Qayum et al. 2016

Advertisement