Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research note
  • Open Access

Tuberculosis knowledge, misconceptions/myths in adults: findings from Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia and Zambia Demographic Health Surveys (2013–2016)

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Research Notes201811:778

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3884-6

  • Received: 29 August 2018
  • Accepted: 25 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Objective

To determine TB knowledge and misconceptions/myths amongst HIV positive and negative adults using Demographic Health Survey data from Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia and Zambia.

Results

Overall 97% (n = 58,107) of both male and female respondents irrespective of their HIV status had heard of tuberculosis out of whom 82.6% knew that it can be cured. Knowledge that TB is spread in air when coughing or sneezing was 73.8%. Significantly higher proportions of HIV positive men and women than their HIV negative counterparts, had ever heard about TB, knew that it is transmitted through air when coughing and sneezing and also that it can be cured. However interestingly, significantly higher proportions of HIV positive men and women, than their HIV negative counterparts, had the misconception that TB is spread through sharing utensils or would overall say they did not know how it is spread. TB knowledge was significantly higher among individuals who are less than 26 years of age compared to those who were older.

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis
  • HIV
  • Community
  • Knowledge
  • Attitudes
  • Lesotho
  • Malawi
  • Myths
  • Namibia
  • Zambia
  • Demographic and Health Surveys

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global public health challenge despite a notable decline in the incidence and mortality rates worldwide [1]. In 2016, 10, 4 million cases of TB were recorded worldwide. Africa bears the highest global TB/HIV burden. Of the 1.4 million new cases of TB reported in 2016, amongst people who were HIV-positive, 74% were in Africa [2]. A significant proportion of those infected with TB may not be aware of their status or get a late diagnosis while those who initiate treatment seldom complete the course [3]. The combined effect of late treatment and non-adherence to treatment severely undermine efforts to curb the TB disease burden. This calls for increased efforts to understand the causal factors. TB remains the leading cause of death among all infectious diseases with a case fatality ratio of 16% [1]. Approximately 1.3 million TB deaths were recorded in 2016 among HIV negative people, with an additional 374,000 deaths recorded among HIV-positive people, globally. Out of the four countries discussed in this paper, Lesotho had the highest TB mortality rate (HIV + TB only) estimated to be 238 per 100,000 population followed by Mozambique, Zambia and Namibia at 114, 74 and 35 per 100,000 population respectively [1]. In the absence of early diagnosis and treatment, the combined effect of HIV and TB drastically shorten human life expectancy.

On the one hand HIV accelerates the progression from latent to active TB and to development of TB disease while on the other hand HIV weakens the immune system, increasing the risk of TB in people with HIV. Evidence has shown that the risk of developing TB is estimated to be 16–27 times greater in HIV positive people compared to those without the infection [4].

Key interventions for TB control have focused intensified case finding of smear positive TB among patients presenting with cough and early initiation of treatment HIV testing and counselling, early initiation on ART, isoniazid preventive treatment in people living with HIV, [5, 6]. Early initiation on ART in TB and HIV co-infected patients on TB treatment improves uptake and continuation on ART [7]. Approximately 53 million deaths were averted by TB treatment between 2000 and 2016, with 17% deaths averted from HIV positive people on ART. A total of 11 million deaths were averted in Africa due to TB control [1]. The direct observed treatment short (DOTS) is one of the best means of increasing adherence among TB infected patients on treatment. However, it relies on passive presentation of patients hence its success or failure depends on the prevailing perceptions of the community about TB, stigma, awareness of early signs as well as access to health services. These factors may influence individuals and community level health seeking behavior.

In this paper we analyzed data from Demographic Health Surveys from four countries in Southern Africa to understand knowledge and myths/perceptions of TB among HIV infected people. The analysis provides baseline data on evaluating whether reducing myths/misconceptions stigma and increasing TB knowledge in the community improves early diagnosis and patient outcomes among HIV positive people.

Main text

Methods

Study area and data sources

The study area was Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia and Zambia, four countries in southern Africa with very high TB notification rates.1 This study used secondary data from the most recent demographic and health surveys conducted in the participating countries during the period 2013–2016.

Participant sampling

Study participants were enrolled into the surveys using a two-stage sampling procedure to identify eligible households and participants [8]. This study uses data from a total of 2526 enumeration areas (EAs). Data from 57,697 survey participants aged 15–54 years was used in this analysis. Data was from 30,906 women and 26,791 men across the four countries. In all the study countries anonymous HIV testing was implemented with informed consent obtained for every sampled individual. Additionally, consent was obtained from a parent or guardian on behalf of any participants under the age of 16. HIV screening and confirmatory testing was conducted using the appropriate national HIV testing algorithm of each study country [8].

Statistical analysis

We used STATA Version 15.1, Texas USA to conduct our statistical analysis. Variables used were age, gender, highest level of education attained, marital status, religion, type of residence (urban/rural), wealth index, and exposure to mass media (frequency of reading newspaper/magazine, listening to radio, and watching television).

We first present the demographic characteristics of the combined participants from the four countries using simple proportions. We also conducted Chi square test to determine the association between TB knowledge, myths/misconceptions and HIV positivity split by gender. There after we calculated adjusted and non-adjusted odds ratios for determinants of TB misconceptions.

Results

Sample description

The combined sample used in this analysis was 58,107 out of which 42% were aged between 15 and 24 years, see Table 1 below. The majority (62%) lived in rural area. Close to half had attained either primary or secondary education, 45 and 42% respectively. Half of the women were married while the combined weighted HIV prevalence was 14% for the four southern Africa countries.
Table 1

Weighted baseline characteristics of the combined DHS sample from Lesotho 2014, Malawi 2015, Namibia 2013 and Zambia 2014

Variable

Frequency n (%)

N = 58,107

Age group in years

 15–19

12,989 (23)

 20–24

10,474 (19)

 25–29

8682 (15)

 30–34

7710 (14)

 35–39

6563 (11)

 40–44

5014 (9)

 45–49

3747 (6)

 50–54

1637 (2)

 55–59

954 (1)

 60–64

337 (0)

Gender

 Female

31,451 (53)

 Male

26,656 (47)

Type of residence

 Urban

22,637 (38)

 Rural

35,470 (62)

Highest education level

 None

4185 (7)

 Primary

26,233 (45)

 Secondary

24,399 (42)

 Higher

3272 (6)

Marital status

 Never in Union

21,453 (37)

 Married

29,406 (51)

 Living with partner

2255 (4)

 Widowed

1475 (2)

 Divorced

2003 (3)

 Separated

1515 (3)

Religion

 No religion

574 (1)

 Other

2897 (6)

 Other christian

8984 (17)

 Pentecostal

1315 (3)

 Protestant or anglican or methodist

24,344 (47)

 Roman catholic

13,902 (27)

HIV status

 Negative

50,269 (86)

 Positive

7838 (14)

Knowledge of TB and misconceptions among participants

Overall 97% (n = 58,107) of both male and female respondents irrespective of their HIV status had heard of tuberculosis out of which 82.6% knew that it can be cured, see Table 2 below.
Table 2

Percentage of adult men and women from Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia and Zambia responses to TB knowledge related questions by HIV status

Variable

Female HIV+

Female HIV−

P-value

Male HIV+

Male HIV−

P-value

Overall

Ever hear of TB

97.6

96.4

< 0.001

98.5

97.3

< 0.001

97.0

TB spread by air when coughing or sneezing

78.8

70.7

<0.001

81.4

75.2

<0.001

73.8

TB spread through sharing utensils

20.4

15.7

< 0.001

24.5

18.7

< 0.001

17.8

TB spread through touching a person with TB

3.5

3.1

0.253

4.0

3.7

0.407

3.4

TB spread through sharing food

3.9

3.8

0.735

5.4

4.9

0.258

4.3

TB spread through sexual contact

3.5

4.0

0.210

3.5

3.4

0.831

3.8

TB spread through mosquito bite

0.1

0.3

0.104

0.2

0.2

0.612

0.2

TB spread through other means

4.0

2.7

< 0.001

7.4

7.2

0.737

4.9

Don’t Know how TB is spread

14.4

21.7

< 0.001

5.9

8.4

< 0.001

14.7

TB can be cured

90.2

79.4

< 0.001

91.8

83.3

< 0.001

82.6

Would keep it a secret if a family member get TB

38.8

40.1

0.269

31.3

31.8

0.620

36.1

Knowledge that TB is spread in air when coughing or sneezing was 73.8%. There were varying levels of misconception about modes of TB transmission ranging from a mere 0.2% who said it is spread through mosquito bite to a high of 17.8% who said it can be spread through sharing utensils.

Significantly higher proportions of HIV positive men and women had ever heard about TB, knew that it is transmitted through air when coughing and sneezing and also that it can be cured. However interestingly, significantly higher proportions of HIV positive men and women had the misconception that TB is spread through sharing utensils or would overall say they did not know how it is spread.

We calculated unadjusted and adjusted odd ratios and their 95% confidence interval for determinate of correct knowledge of TB without misconception, see Table 3. We found significantly correct knowledge for those individuals who are less than 26 years compared to those who are above 40 years, females compared to males those with basic education compared to those without, the married compared to those who were never in union, the Pentecostal compared to people of no religion, those who read newspapers or magazines at least once a week compared to those who don’t, those who listen to the radio at least once a week or almost every day compared to those who don’t, those belonging to the rich wealth quintiles compared to the poorest.
Table 3

Determinants of correct knowledge about tuberculosis transmission among participants by univariate and multivariable analyses

Variable

Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

P-value

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P-value

Age

 > 40

1

 

1

 

 > 25–40

1.10 (1.04–1.16)

< 0.001

1.04 (0.98–1.11)

0.186

 ≤ 25

1.16 (1.09–1.22)

< 0.001

1.08 (1.00–1.16)

0.045

Gender

 Female

1

   

 Male

1.11 (1.08–0.16)

< 0.001

1.19 (1.14–1.25)

< 0.001

Residence

 Urban

1

   

 Rural

0.86 (0.82–0.89)

< 0.001

1.23 (1.16–1.31)

< 0.001

Highest education level

 None

1

   

 Primary

1.31 (1.21–1.42)

< 0.001

1.26 (1.15–1.37)

< 0.001

 Secondary

1.86 (1.72–2.02)

< 0.001

1.74 (1.58–1.92)

< 0.001

 Higher

2.43 (2.16–2.73)

< 0.001

2.03 (1.77–2.34)

< 0.001

Marital status

 Never in Union

1

   

 Married

0.96 (0.92–1.00)

0.059

1.08 (1.02–1.15)

0.01

 Living with partner

0.90 (0.81–1.00)

0.055

0.96 (0.83–1.09)

0.505

 Widowed

1.01 (0.88–1.16)

0.908

1.12 (0.96–1.31)

0.151

 Divorced

0.88 (0.79–0.99)

0.031

1.06 (0.93–1.20)

0.406

 Separated

0.90 (0.79–1.02)

0.102

0.99 (0.85–1.14)

0.851

Religion

 No religion

1

   

 Other

0.90 (0.71–1.13)

0.354

0.72 (0.56–0.91)

0.006

 Other christian

1.02 (0.82–1.27)

0.877

0.79 (0.63–0.99)

0.043

 Pentecostal

1.77 (1.37–2.27)

0.000

1.30 (1.00–1.69)

0.049

 Protestant or anglican or methodist

0.76 (0.61–0.94)

0.010

0.58 (0.46–0.73)

< 0.000

 Roman catholic

0.94 (0.75–1.16)

0.553

0.71 (0.57–0.89)

0.003

Frequency of reading newspaper or magazine

 Not at all

1

   

 Less than once a week

1.27 (1.20–1.34)

< 0.001

1.05 (0.99–1.12)

0.096

 At least once a week

1.34 (1.26–1.42)

< 0.001

1.08 (1.00–1.15)

0.042

 Almost everyday

1.28 (1.17–1.41)

< 0.001

1.10 (0.99–1.22)

0.078

Frequency of listening to the radio

 Not at all

1

   

 Less than once a week

1.10 (1.04–1.17)

< 0.001

1.04 (0.97–1.11)

0.278

 At least once a week

1.38 (1.31–1.45)

< 0.001

1.19 (1.12–1.26)

< 0.000

 Almost everyday

1.18 (1.11–1.25)

< 0.001

1.15 (1.07–1.23)

< 0.000

Frequency of watching television

 Not at all

1

   

 Less than once a week

1.18 (1.11–1.25)

< 0.001

1.04 (0.97–1.12)

0.258

 At least once a week

1.41 (1.33–1.50)

< 0.001

1.05 (0.98–1.14)

0.178

 Almost everyday

1.19 (1.12–1.27)

< 0.001

0.91 (0.83–0.99)

0.033

SES

 Poorest

1

   

 Poorer

1.27 (1.19–1.35)

< 0.001

1.20 (1.12–1.29)

< 0.001

 Middle

1.38 (1.29–1.47)

< 0.001

1.30 (1.21–1.39)

< 0.001

 Richer

1.53 (1.43–1.63)

< 0.001

1.43 (1.32–1.54)

< 0.001

 Richest

2.00 (1.87–2.13)

< 0.001

1.74 (1.58–1.91)

< 0.001

Discussion

Researchers have increasingly focused on the factors that impact on prevention and treatment of HIV and TB because of the interplay between the two. Most studies conducted in Africa and Asia have focused on disease-specific knowledge and stigma [3, 9, 10]. Both HIV and TB cause severe illness and are transmissible diseases, hence are highly stigmatized. TB stigma has been found to be one of the social determinants that negatively affect the success of the tuberculosis control and treatment interventions [11]. One of the negative effects of stigma is that it may lead to isolation and discrimination and instills fear to seek appropriate medical attention. Knowledge of facts on TB could therefore be an essential determinant of health-seeking behavior and adherence to both prevention and treatment efforts.

The current study findings show that communities in the four SADC countries are highly accommodative of TB patients. This high acceptance of people with TB has been demonstrated across the various socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents such as age, sex, highest levels of education attained and religious affiliation. However, our study also showed the existence of myths which may fuel stigmatization of the affected individuals as well as negatively affect the implementation and ultimately, the success of national TB programmes.

Patients with good knowledge of TB are likely to seek treatment early and adhere to treatment thus reducing ongoing transmission in the community. All the programs need to develop information for dissemination to help patients understand the facts on about TB transmission and control and reduce the risk of development of tuberculosis drug resistance and delayed diagnosis/treatment leading to enhanced disease transmissions and increased severity respectively.

Southern African Development Community tuberculosis programmes should enhance investments in qualitative studies, inorder to isolate the key drivers of myths and misconceptions in our communities and individuals at large and distil these findings into appropriate actionable policy level interventions.

Limitations

Demographic Health Survey are cross-sectional studies, which do not provide the causal relationships between variables analyzed. Additionally, by design, the surveys only interview women age 15–49 years and men age 15–54 years and adolescence less than 15 who might also have inadequate knowledge and or myths/misconceptions are not included in the individuals who responded to the questionnaire.

Footnotes
1

World TB report, 2017.

 

Abbreviations

EA: 

enumeration areas

ELISA: 

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

HIV: 

human immunosuppression virus

DHS: 

Demographic Health Survey

SADC: 

Southern African Development Community

TB: 

tuberculosis

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All authors (GM, FM, MM, IC and VT) conceived the study. GM and MM carried out the statistical analysis. All authors (GM, FM, MM, IC and VT) participated in the drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be available upon request from the corresponding author. The full datasets are available from: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Procedures and questionnaires for all the Demographic Health Surveys conducted in the four countries were reviewed and approved by the following country Institutional Review Boards (IRB), the Lesotho Ministry of Health Research Ethics Committee, the National Health Sciences Research Committee in Malawi, the Namibian Ministry of Health Social Services Biomedical Research Committee and the Tropical Disease Research Centre IRB in Zambia.

Funding

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
ICAP at Columbia University, Harare, Zimbabwe
(2)
Ark Foundation, Harare, Zimbabwe
(3)
Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe

References

  1. WHO. Global tuberculosis report, 2017. Geneva: WHO; 2017.Google Scholar
  2. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis. Accessed 24 Sept 2018.
  3. Kaona FA, Tuba M, Siziya S, Sikaona L. An assessment of factors contributing to treatment adherence and knowledge of TB transmission among patients on TB treatment. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/tb/en/. Accessed 24 Sept 2018.
  5. Granich R, Akolo C, Gunneberg C, Getahun H, Williams P, Williams B. Prevention of tuberculosis in people living with HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(Suppl 3):S215–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Howard AA, El-Sadr WM. Integration of tuberculosis and HIV services in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(Suppl 3):S238–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. van Lettow M, Chan AK, Ginsburg AS, Tweya H, Gareta D, Njala J, Kanyerere H, Phiri S, Idana I. Timing and uptake of ART during treatment for active tuberculosis in HIV co-infected adults in Malawi. Public Health Action. 2011;1(1):6–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. What we do. https://dhsprogram.com/What-We-Do/Methodology.cfm. Accessed 24 Sept 2018.
  9. van Rie A, Sengupta S, Pungrassami P, Balthip Q, Choonuan S. Measuring stigma associated with tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS in southern Thailand: exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of two new scales. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:21–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Royce RA, Colson PW, Woodsong C, Swinson-Evans T, Walton W, Maiuri A, DeLuca N. Tuberculosis knowledge, awareness, and stigma among African–Americans in three southeastern counties in the USA: a qualitative study of community perspectives. J Racial Ethnic Health Disparities. 2017;4(1):47–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Edginton ME, Sekatane CS, Goldstein SJ. Patients’ beliefs: do they affect tuberculosis control? A study in a rural district of South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002;6(12):1075–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement