Skip to main content

Potential of selected lactic acid bacteria from Theobroma cacao fermented fruit juice and cell-free supernatants from cultures as inhibitors of Helicobacter pylori and as good probiotic



The present study was designed to evaluate the inhibitory effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolates from the fermented cocoa juice and their cell-free culture supernatants (CFS) against Helicobacter pylori strains and their potential as good probiotic. Isolation of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was performed by culture and subculture of sample on MRS agar. Morphological characteristics, Gram staining and catalase reaction were used to identify the isolates. The antagonistic activity of LAB was tested using the agar spot-on-lawn method and the inhibitory effect of CFS using well diffusion assay. Acid tolerance and resistance to antibiotics tests were used to evaluate the probiotic potential of LAB isolates.


Antagonistic effect was observed in 65.52% of isolated LAB. Isolate LAB19 showed the broader spectrum of antagonistic effect. The overall inhibitory activity was two to three folds reduced when CFSs were used instead of LAB isolates themselves. Our data showed that LAB19 controlled H. pylori growth using bacteriocins and that LAB4′, LAB8, LAB11′, LAB12, LAB13′, LAB15, LAB16 and LAB17 were through organic acids. LAB9, LAB11′ and LAB12 showed properties of probiotic tested. In this study, nine LAB isolates were found to possess anti-Helicobacter activity and some preliminary probiotic properties.


Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common agent implicated in bacterial infection worldwide [1]. The presence of H. pylori in the gastric lining causes gastritis which might lead to more disastrous ulceration or malignant tumors [1]. Treatment options for curing H. pylori infection included, triple therapy which consist of an acid suppressor with clarithromycin, amoxicillin, or nitroimidazolic compounds, taken over a period of 7–14 days [2]. In case the triple therapy failure, the quadruple therapy is administered [3]. Despite this fact, it has been noticed that the eradication rate of this micro-organism varies from 65 to 80%. Factors such as; disrespect of the medical prescription, bacterial resistance and adverse antibiotics effects are responsible for this treatment failure [4, 5]. In a bid to improve the treatment tolerability and eradication rate of this infection, several strategies are needed [6], among which the use of the probiotics [2]. Most probiotics inhibit the growth of pathogens and produce beneficial fermentation products such as short chain fatty acids [7, 8]. Many probiotic species produce vitamins and useful enzymes and help to maintain gut health. A few probiotic strains have immune, neurological effects. Various probiotic mixtures have been evaluated for their efficacy in improving the treatment of H. pylori infection and preventing side effects from treatment [9,10,11,12,13] and the results are variable [14]. In this work, we focused on the inhibitory effects of a collection of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from fermented cocoa juice and their metabolites against H. pylori strains. The potential of active LAB isolates as good probiotic were also evaluated.

Main text


Bacterial strains tested for inhibition

Eight H. pylori clinical strains (Hp0011, Hp0012, Hp0013, Hp0014, Hp0015, Hp0016, Hp00116 and HP00117) were used in this study. The strains were isolated from patients with gastro duodenal disorders requiring gastroendoscopic examination at Laquintinie Hospital, Douala, Cameroon. All H. pylori strains were grown at 37 °C on supplemented Columbia agar (Columbia agar + 5% (v/v) lacked horse blood and 1% (v/v) Vitox) for 48 to 72 h under microaerophilic conditions.

Sample collection

The source of lactic acid bacteria used were fermented cocoa juice. Cocoa pods were collected from cocoa plantation in the Littoral region of Cameroon. The contain of cocoa pods were aseptically remove and kept in sterile plastic jar for 48 h at room temperature for fermentation.

Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)

Ten g of the sample was inserted into a 90 ml sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS 0.1 M, 0.8% NaCl, pH- 7.2) and homogenized. After this, 0.1 ml of the sixth tenfold serial dilutions of homogenized samples were spread on MRS agar and incubated at two different temperatures, 30 °C and 37 °C for 48 h under anaerobic conditions [15]. The colonies gotten from this were then sub-cultured trice on a new MRS agar in order to have single pure colonies [16]. The purified single colonies were then selected at randomly and cultured in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 h in aerobiosis. The next step was the morphological characterization (size, color, edge form and texture of the colony), Gram staining and catalase reaction for the identification of the isolates [17, 18]. Purified lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were those that were both positive to the Gram staining technique but negative to the catalase reaction. Pellets from the MRS broth LAB cultures were re-suspended in broth containing 15% glycerol, and aliquots were frozen for further use.

Antagonistic activity of LAB isolates

In order to determine the antagonistic activity we used the agar spot-on-lawn method where the isolated LAB was tested against H. pylori [19]. An aliquot (2 µl) of an overnight LAB culture was spotted onto MRS agar plates and incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 48 h. Control plates were prepared with MRS agar only. The plates were subsequently overlaid with soft supplemented Columbia Agar containing 2% H. pylori strains. Plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. The susceptibility of the same pathogenic strains to a range of antibiotics used as positive control was reported in our previous study [20]. The test was done in triplicate. After incubation, the inhibition zone around the LAB spot was noticed and the results were expressed as a mean inhibition zone and standard error.

Test of cell-free supernatants (CFS) inhibitory effect

Preparation of CFSs

Only LAB isolates showing antagonistic effect against Helicobacter pylori strains tested were selected. They were grown individually in 20 ml MRS broth and incubating anaerobically at 37 °C for 15 h. The supernatant was recovered by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 1 h. The cell free supernatants (CFSs) were obtained by passing the supernatants through 0.4 μm pore size filters.

Test of CFS inhibitory effect: well diffusion assay

Helicobacter. pylori cultures were plated on fresh supplemented Colombia agar plates (107 CFU per plate), and wells were drilled into the agar. 50 µl aliquots of each native cell-free culture supernatants were suspended in the agar wells. 50 µl of MRS broth (pH 6.0) were also suspended in the agar wells and taken as control wells. The test was done in triplicate. Plates were incubated for 48 to 72 h under microaerophilic conditions at 37 °C, the diameters of inhibition zones around the wells were measured and expressed as mean diameter and standard error.

Characterization of active components of CFCs

Cell-free culture supernatant treatment

Native active CFSs were subjected to three treatments before evaluating their inhibitory activity against H. pylori using well diffusion assay as described above. Heat treatment and pH adjustment to determine respectively if protein or acid component was required for their bactericidal activity and to both pH adjustment and heat treatment for confirmation. For this purpose, an individual portion of each supernatant was adjusted to pH 6.5–6.8 with NaOH, heat-treated (100 °C for 1 h) and both boiled for 1 h and adjusted to pH 6.5–6.8 with NaOH.

Evaluation of probiotic potential of active LAB isolates

Acid tolerance

The previously described technique was used to find out the resistance of the isolated LAB to the acidic gastric pH [21]. Pure isolates were inoculated in MRS broth and incubated at 37 for 18 h. The 18 h bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 20 min and the pellets were washed in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (0.1 M phosphate buffer, 0.8% NaCl, pH- 7.2) and resuspended in 1 ml of PBS (pH- 7.2). From this, 0.1 ml was added to 10 ml of MRS whose pH had been adjusted to 2 or 7 using 1 N HCl or NaOH. Bacterial growth was monitored by determination of optical density at 620 nm after 0, 3, 6 and 24 h incubation period at 37 °C. The surviving percent was calculated as follows:

$$ {\text{Surviving}}\left( \% \right) = \frac{{\Delta {\text{DO pH }}7 - \Delta {\text{DO pH }}2}}{{\Delta {\text{DO pH }}7}} \times { 1}00 $$

(∆DO pH7), (∆DO pH2): optical density at pH 7.0 and pH 2. An isolate with a surviving percent up to 50% was considered as surviving. They were then classified as excellent if the isolate survived at pH 2 after 24 h; very good after 6 h; good after 3 h and poor before 3 h.

Resistance to antibiotics

The agar overlay diffusion method [22] was used to find out the susceptibility of the selected LAB isolates against amoxicillin (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg) and imipenem (10 µg). The diameter of inhibition was noticed and the LAB isolates were further categorized as resistance, intermediate or susceptible [23, 24].


Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)

Fifty strains were purified from the above fermented food and 29 (58%) were characterized as LAB.

Antagonistic activity of isolated LAB

Antagonistic effect was noticed in 65.52% (19/29) of the tested LAB isolates with inhibition zones ranging from 6 to 30 mm (Table 1). The highest inhibition zone (30 mm) was obtained with isolates LAB4′, LAB6, LAB11 and LAB19 against 12.5 to 25% of the tested pathogen. The spectrum of inhibitory activity ranged from 50 to 100% with that of isolate BL19 as the broader one. The most susceptible pathogenic strain to LAB isolates detected was HP0014 whereas HP00117 was the most resistant.

Table 1 Antagonistic activity of isolated LAB (19) against H. pylori clinical strains (08) tested (mm)

Test for cell-free supernatants (CFS) inhibitory effect

The inhibitory activity of CFS from 47% (9/19) of the antagonistic LAB isolates were evaluated (Table 2). Our data show that the presence of these cell free culture supernatants reduced the viability of the pathogens strains. The overall inhibitory activity was two- to three folds reduced when CFSs were used instead of LAB isolates themselves (Fig. 1). The inhibition zone ranging from 5 to 10 mm with CFSs instead of 6 to 30 mm with LAB isolates. Similarly, the spectrum of inhibitory activity varying from 37.5 to 62.5% with CFSs instead of 62.5 to 100% with LAB isolates. Derived from active LAB; CFSs-LAB4′, -LAB8, -LAB9, -LAB12, -LAB13′, -LAB15, -LAB17 and -LAB19 did not show any inhibitory activity.

Table 2 Diameter of inhibitory effect of cell free culture supernatants (CFSs) from LAB isolates with broader spectrum of inhibitory activity (9) against H. pylori clinical strains (08) tested (mm)
Fig. 1

Spectrum of inhibitory activity of selected LAB and their corresponding cell free supernatant

Characterization of active component of cell-free supernatants (CFSs)

The pH of the native supernatants before pH adjustment were in the range of 4.5–4.8, with 3.8 as the average pH value, which was lower than fresh MRS broth (pH 6.0). Instead of the others CFSs, no significant difference was found between activity of the native and neutralized CFS from LAB19 cells (Additional file 1). Moreover, only CFS from BL19 lost its activity with heat treatment (Additional file 2). All the selected CFSs lost their bactericidal activity with pH adjustment and heat treatment (Additional file 3).

Probiotic potential of active LAB isolates

All the tested LAB isolates showed at least 50% cells survival at pH 2 after incubation up to 3 h. LAB9′ and LAB11 isolates demonstrated a tolerance to acidic pH after incubation for 6 h and up to 24 h for LAB12 (Additional file 4). They were also susceptible to antibiotics used with diameter of inhibition zones ranging from 23 to 44 mm (Additional file 5).


In this work, some isolated LAB showed an antagonistic effect against the tested pathogenic strains. Inhibitory effect was much stronger in LAB and H. pylori co-cultures rather than cell cultured free supernatants and H. pylori. Moreover, some CFSs derived from an active LAB isolate did not show any inhibitory activity, suggesting that the isolated bacteria itself displays killing activity. Enany et al. has demonstrated that in vitro, Lactobacillus acidophilus inhibits H. pylori growth [25]. In H. pylori colonized Mongolian gerbils, gastric perfusion with Lactobacillus strains clear H pylori colonization in their stomach with the clearance rate of about 60% [26]. Also, previous studies reported that the use of probiotics combined to standard therapy in H. pylori infected patients, increased the eradication rate of the organism and decreased the overall rate of adverse events [12, 27]. This antagonistic effect might be carried out through reduction in urease activity mediated by short-chain fatty acids produced by probiotics, an enhancement of the acidic environment of the stomach, damages of the cell wall of H. pylori strains, and inhibition of the colonization of H. pylori in the gastric mucosa [28,29,30]. In contrast, in a meta-analysis, different mixtures of probiotics species and strains didn’t improve eradication rates of H. pylori, but decrease the side effects resulting from therapy [31]. However, when examining Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 only, eradication rates and adverse symptoms were improved [32].

Our finding also showed that some LAB isolates secreted active compounds in the culture medium. It is reported that in an adequate broth medium, some LAB secrete organic acids, hydrogen peroxide, and bacteriocins to antagonize pathogen growth [33,34,35,36]. Further characterization showed that CFS from LAB 19 inhibits H. pylori growth through the production of bacteriocin, and that the other isolates act through the production of compounds such as organic acids [37, 38].

Our finding also revealed that LAB 9, LAB 11′ and LAB 12 isolate are potential probiotic since they are capable of withstanding at the low gastric pH [39] and may not serve as host of antibiotic resistance genes [40,41,42].


Further phenotypic and genotypic characterization of the isolated LAB as probiotic and anti-Helicobacter activity are necessary in order to elucidate their potential beneficial health effects.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Lactic acid bacteria


Cell-free cultured supernatant


Helicobacter pylori


  1. 1.

    Kouitcheu Mabeku LB, Eyoum Bille B, Tchouangueu TF, Nguepi E, Leundji H. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infected mice with Bryophyllum pinnatum, a medicinal plant with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, reduces bacterial load. Pharm Biol. 2017;55(1):603–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Heep M, Kist M, Strobel S, Beck D, Lehn N. Secondary resistance among 554 isolates of Helicobacter pylori after failure of therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:538–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hoffman JSC, Cave DR. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2001;17(1):30–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang WH, Wong BC, Mukhopadhyay AK, Berg DE, Cho CH, Lai KC, Hu WH, Fung FM, Hui WM, Lam SK. High prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection with dual resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin in Hong Kong. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:901–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gisbert JP, Morena F. Systematic review and meta-analysis: levofloxacin-based rescue regimens after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:35–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Saad RJ, Schoenfeld P, Kim HM, Chey WD. Levofloxacin-based triple therapy versus bismuth-based quadruple therapy for persistent Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:488–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani RB, Flint HJ, Salminen S, Calder PC. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association For Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(8):506–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Oelschlaeger TA. Mechanisms of probiotic actions—a review. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300(1):57–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lu M, Yu S, Deng J, Yan Q, Yang C, Xia G, Zhou X. Efficacy of probiotic supplementation therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0163743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    McFarland LV, Huang Y, Wang L, Malfer-theiner P. Systematic review and meta-analysis: multi-strain probiotics as adjunct therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication and prevention of adverse events. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(4):546–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lv Z, Wang B, Zhou X, Wang F, Xie Y, Zheng H, Lv N. Efficacy and safety of probiotics as adjuvant agents for Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9(3):707–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang MM, Qian W, Qin YY, He J, Zhou YH. Probiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(14):4345–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gong Y, Li Y, Sun Q. Probiotics improve efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):6530–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hamilton-Miller J. The role of probiotics in the treatment and prevention of Helicobacter pylori infection. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;22:360–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sengun IY, Nielsen DS, Karapinar M, Jakobsen M. Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tarhana, a traditional Turkish fermented food. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;135(2):105–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Allameh SK, Daud H, Yusoff FM, Saad CR, Ideris A. Isolation, identification and characterization of Leuconostoc mesenteroides as a new probiotic from intestine of snakehead fish (Channa striatus). Afr J Biotech. 2012;11(16):3810–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    MacFadden RR. Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Murray PR, Shea Y. Guide to clinical microbiology. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Geis A, Singh J, Teuber M. Potential of Lactic streptococci to produce bacteriocin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;45:205–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kouitcheu Mabeku LB, Eyoum Bille B, Tepap Zemnou C, Tali Nguefack LD, Leundji H. Broad spectrum resistance in Helicobacter pylori isolated from gastric biopsies of patients with dyspepsia in Cameroon and phenotypic detection of efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(880):3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gotcheva V, Hristozova E, Hristozova T, Guo M, Roshkova Z, Angelov A. Assessment of potential probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria and yeast strains. Food Biotechnol. 2002;16:211–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standard). Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing. 13th ed. Tentative Standards; 1993. p. M2–A5.

  23. 23.

    NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standard). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelfth Informational Supplement. 2002. p. M100–S12.

  24. 24.

    Vlkova E, Rada V, Popela´rˇova P, Trojanova I, Killer J. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bifidobacteria isolated from gastrointestinal tract of calves. Livestock Sci. 2006;105:253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Enany S, Abdalla S. In vitro antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus casei against Helicobacter pylori. Braz J Microbiol. 2015;46:1201–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ji W, Chen W-Q, Tian X. Efficacy of compound Lactobacillus acidophilus tablets combined with quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication and its correlation with pH value in the stomach: a study protocol of a randomised, assessor-blinded, single-centre study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e023131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Shi X, Zhang J, Mo L, Shi J, Qin M, Huang X. Efficacy and safety of probiotics in eradicating Helicobacter pylori: a network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(15):e15180.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    De Bortoli N, Leonardi G, Ciancia E, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized prospective stud y of triple therapy versus triple therapy plus lactoferrin and robiotics. Am J G astroenterol. 2007;102:951–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vijayaram S, Kannan S. Probiotics: the marvelous factor and health benefits. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2018;2:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mukai T, Asasaka T, Sato E, et al. Inhibition of binding of Helicobacter pylori to the glycolipid receptors by probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2002;32:105–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lu C, Sang J, He H, et al. Probiotic supplementation does not improve eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection compared to placebo based on standard therapy: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23522.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    McFarland LV, Malfertheiner P, Huang Y, Wang L. Meta-analysis of single strain probiotics for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and prevention of adverse events. World J Meta-Anal. 2015;3(2):97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Aktypis A, Kalantzopoulos G. Purification and characterization of thermophilin ST-1, a novel bacteriocin produced by Streptococcus thermophilus ACA-DC 0001. Lait. 2003;83:365–78.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    De Vuyst L, Leroy F. Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: production, purification, and food applications. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;13:194–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Atassi F, Servin AL. Individual and co-operative roles of lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide in the killing activity of enteric strain Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC933 and vaginal strain Lactobacillus gasseri KS120.1 against enteric, uropathogenic and vaginosis-associated pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;304:29–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    O’Shea EF, Cotter PD, Ross RP, Hill C. Strategies to improve the bacteriocin protection provided by lactic acid bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:130–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cleveland J, Montville TJ, Nes IF, Chikindas ML. Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;71:1–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP. Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:777–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Fernandez MF, Boris S, Barbes C. Probiotic properties of human lactobacilli strains to be used in the gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94:449–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Scott KP. The role of conjugative transposons in spreading antibiotic resistance between bacteria that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002;59:2071–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Temmerman R, Pot B, Huys G, Swings J. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from probiotic products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;81:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mathur S, Singh R. Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol Rev. 2005;105:281–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge Miss. FAUJO NINTEWOUE Ghislaine Florice for reading through the manuscript and editing it for language.


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information




This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author LBKM conceived the study, designed the experiments, supervised the work and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SN and IBN carried out the analysis for the study. HL participate in the isolation of the tested Helicobacter pylori strains from dyspeptic patients. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laure Brigitte Kouitcheu Mabeku.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The collection of biopsy specimen from dyspeptic patients was performed after obtaining an ethical approval from Laquintinie Hospital management board (Protocol number 425/AR/MINSANTE/HLD/SCM/CR) and from the National Ethical Committee on Human Health Research in Cameroon (Ethical clearance No. 2014/03/425/L/CNE SRH/SP). Participation was voluntary and each subject involved in the study gave a written consent.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Effect of pH adjustment on the inhibitory effect of cell free culture supernatants (CFSs) against H. pylori clinical strains (08) tested (mm).

Additional file 2.

Effect of heat treatment on the inhibitory effect of cell free culture supernatants (CFSs) against H. pylori clinical strains (08) tested (mm).

Additional file 3.

Effect of heat treatment and pH adjustment on the inhibitory effect of cell free culture supernatants (CFSs) against H. pylori clinical strains (08) tested (mm).

Additional file 4.

Resistance to acidic pH (pH = 2) of isolated lactic acid bacteria at different incubation times (3h, 6h and 24h).

Additional file 5.

Susceptibility of isolates to antibiotics.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kouitcheu Mabeku, L.B., Ngue, S., Bonsou Nguemo, I. et al. Potential of selected lactic acid bacteria from Theobroma cacao fermented fruit juice and cell-free supernatants from cultures as inhibitors of Helicobacter pylori and as good probiotic. BMC Res Notes 13, 64 (2020).

Download citation


  • Lactic acid bacteria
  • Theobroma cacao
  • Antimicrobial activity
  • Helicobacter pylori
  • Probiotic