Skip to main content

Six-year trend and risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Thai Community Hospital

Abstract

Objective

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Despite efforts to eliminate TB in Thailand, the incidence rate has declined slowly. This study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment (failed, died and loss-to- follow up) in a community hospital in Chachoengsao Province, Thailand from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2019.

Results

A total of 487 patients were eligible for the study. The incidence of unsuccessful treatment was 21.67/100 population person year. Risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment were unemployment (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 3.12, 95%CI 1.41–6.86), HIV co-infection (AHR 2.85, 95%CI 1.25–6.46), previous history of TB (AHR 2.00, 95%CI 1.04–3.81), positive sputum AFB at the end of the intensive phase (AHR 5.66, 95%CI 2.33–13.74), and sputum AFB was not performed at the end of the intensive phase (AHR 18.40, 95%CI 9.85–34.35). This study can be utilized to improve prevention and intervention of TB treatment by strengthening public health system on treatment quality especially TB patient monitoring tools or methods easy for accessing to patients in communities.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem worldwide [1, 2]. Most cases were in South-East Asia, Africa, and West Pacific [1]. Despite the decline of TB incidence in recent years, the progression was unable to achieve the goal of World Health Organization (WHO) End TB Strategy by 2020 [2].

In Thailand, community hospitals are frontiers in combating TB in rural areas. Community hospitals are public hospitals that emphasize primary and secondary health care [3]. Thus, most of patients’ health care in rural areas of Thailand relies on these hospitals. Challenges in TB treatment in these settings included patient’s poor TB perception and knowledge [4, 5], low socioeconomic status [4], and case management by non-physician health-care providers [6].

Studies of risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment were scarce in community hospitals. This study aimed to identify incidence and risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment outcomes in Thai community hospital setting.

Main texts

Method

Study population and setting

This study included pulmonary TB patients receiving treatment at outpatient department (OPD) of a community hospital in Chachoengsao Province, Thailand from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2019. Patients were followed from the date they initiated on TB treatment. This study included only adult patients (age ≥ 18 years at the start of TB treatment) andexcluded patients with extrapulmonary TB without pulmonary TB involvement, latent TB, died from causes other than TB and TB-related illness during TB treatment and transferred to other treatment units. The exclusion of extrapulmonary TB without co-existing pulmonary TB was due to limited cases. The studied hospital was F1 grade, defined by Health Administration Division as a large-sized community hospital with 120 beds with both general practitioner physicians or family physicians and specialists from at least one major specialty.

Study design

Retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2019 to identify incidence and risk factors for unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment.

Data collection

Data stored in tuberculosis treatment card and online registration platform from 2013 to 2019 were retrieved. To counter file lost and incompleteness and verifying number of files against cases notified, data were retrieved from both treatment cards and online platform which were identical. The data were registered into electronic platform and confirmed by double-checking on both sources, patients’ OPD cards and records of chest radiograph. They included baseline characteristics (gender, age, occupation, history of imprisonment and history of TB contact), medical history (co-morbid illnesses, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, history of previous TB, history of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination), courses of TB treatment (date of treatment initiation and completion of current TB episode, sputum acid-fast bacilli (AFB) at the start of treatment and end of intensive phase, chest radiographs when treatment was initiated, case status, and hepatotoxic side effect following the treatment) and treatment outcomes (cured, completed, failed, died, and loss-to-follow up).

Operational definitions

Pulmonary TB is a case of TB involving lung parenchyma [7, 8]. Treatment outcomes can be classified as cured, completed, failed, died, loss-to-follow up, and transferred [8]. Patients are cured when their sputum AFB smear or culture is negative at the end of treatment if their sputum AFB is positive at the start of treatment. Patients are registered completed when their treatment ended without sputum AFB smear or culture results in the last month of treatment result, but the latest sputum smear is negative. Treatment failure is considered when patients’ sputum AFB at the 5th month or later is positive. Patients are classified ‘die’ when they die before treatment completed regardless of causes. Loss-to-follow up is defined as interrupted treatment for at least 2 consecutive months. Patients with cure and complete treatments were grouped as successful treatment. Patients who failed, died and loss-to-follow up were classified as unsuccessful treatment. Definitions of cases and hepatotoxicity were described in Additional file 1.

Statistical analysis

This study used STATA 15.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) for analyzing incidence and risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment (failed, died and loss-to-follow up). Incidence was calculated using person-time function. The incidence rate was per 100 person-year (PY). Risk factors were calculated by Cox proportional hazard model. Univariate cox proportional hazard model was used for analyze risk factors of unsuccessful treatment outcomes. Factors which were significant or had p-value < 0.20 in univariate analysis or significant in previous studies were recruited for multivariate cox proportional hazard model. Factors with p-value ≤ 0.05 were statistically significant.

Ethical consideration

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board Royal Thai Army Medical Department. The study number was R054h/62_Exp. Written informed consents were obtained from all participants when they started TB treatment at the treatment site.

Results

From 519 TB patients, 3 were dropped out due to incomplete treatment initiation or completion dates. Nine were excluded due to extrapulmonary TB without pulmonary TB involvement. Eight had latent TB. Four died or loss-to-follow up before initiation of treatment. Six died from causes other than TB and TB-related illness. Two were transferred to other treatment units. Consequently, 487 patients were enabled for this study.

Baseline characteristics

From 2013 to 2019, least patients (2.87%) were registered in 2013 and most (19.10%) were registered in 2016. Majority of the population were male (67.69%), age ≤ 45 (35.99%), and were laborers (64.42%). Patients with HIV, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and extrapulmonary TB were 5.12%, 10.86%, 4.92% and 10.02%, respectively. Patients with previous history of TB and history of TB contact were 85.28% and 72.19%, respectively. Most were new cases (87.53%), smeared positive TB (70.76%) and had reticulonodular infiltration (81.39%). The results were stratified in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

Treatment follow-up results and outcomes

Following the initiation of TB treatment, patients affected by hepatotoxic side-effect of TB treatment were 10.84%. At the end of the intensive phase, 6.34% of the patients had positive sputum AFB. Two (0.41%) patients were transferred out. Total successful treatment cases were 88.09% which can be classified as 55.03% cured and 33.06% completed. The results were shown in Table 2. Unsuccessful treatment outcome has been declining from 21.43% in 2013 to 9.38% in 2019. Additional file 2: Figure S1 displayed trend of unsuccessful treatment outcomes.

Table 2 Treatment follow-up results and outcomes

Incidence of unsuccessful treatment outcome

Overall 58 cases were identified after the total follows up time of 267.68 PY which resulted in a cumulative incidence of 21.67 per 100 PY. Incidence rates were high among patients age ≥ 61 (30.96 per 100 PY), unemployed (49.97 per 100 PY), having HIV co-infection (76.95 per 100 PY), had previous the history of TB (47.18 per 100 PY), affected by hepatotoxic anti-TB drug regimen (63.23 per 100 PY) and sputum AFB at end of intensive phase (197.20 per 100 PY). Incidence rates of unsuccessful treatment were highest in 2013 (46.31 per 100 PY) and decreased significantly (p = 0.001) to 15.21 per 100 PY in 2019. Incidence rates and trend of unsuccessful treatment were depicted in Table 3 and Additional file 3: Figure S2 respectively.

Table 3 Incidence rates and risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment outcomes in community hospital, 2013–2019

Risk factors of unsuccessful treatment outcome

Unemployment (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 3.12, 95%CI 1.41–6.86, p = 0.005), HIV co-infection (AHR = 2.85, 95%CI 1.25–6.46, p = 0.012)previous history of TB (AHR = 2.00, 95%CI 1.04–3.81, p = 0.036), sputum AFB positive at end of intensive phase (AHR = 5.66, 95%CI 2.33–13.74, p < 0.001) and did not received sputum AFB examination at end of intensive phase (AHR = 18.40, 95%CI 9.85–34.35, p < 0.001) were risk factors of unsuccessful treatment.

Discussion

This study addressed incidence and risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment in a community hospital during 2013–2019 which synchronous with WHO End TB 2020 milestone [9].

This study showed decreasing incidence of unsuccessful treatment outcomes. The success rate of this study was similar to the national success rate reported by WHO [1]. By 2019, the successful treatment rate of this study was at 90.63% which was higher than the overall treatment success rate of Thailand [9]. At this percentage, the successful treatment outcome has exceeded the target expected in 2022 by End TB strategy [9]. This could be attributed to the introduction of effective directly observed treatment, short-course (DOTS) and holistic care to patients [10, 11].

It was observed that in 2013, there were few TB cases, but had highest incidence of unsuccessful treatment due to founding phase of TB clinic. The situation improved in the following years from effective patient monitoring. In this setting, involving health-care volunteers, trained individuals to oversee communities’ health welfare, were employed for DOTS at home, as well as health education for communities. Video-call DOTS were employed in patients who were not convenient in visiting hospitals or living far from the communities. Health-care providers (usually TB clinic nurses) would video-call to these patients in specific time of the day to observe them taking drugs.

This study showed that unemployment was the risk of unsuccessful TB treatment as in previous studies [12, 13]. Unemployment had roles in delayed and interrupted treatment [14, 15]. Patients with unemployment were more likely to have low socioeconomic status and thus, had difficulty accessing TB treatment [16]. Unemployment also linked to homelessness which related to unsatisfied TB treatment outcomes [14, 17].

This study demonstrated HIV co-infection as the risk factor of poor TB treatment outcome as explained in various studies [18,19,20]. This study also showed that incidence of unsuccessful treatment was high among HIV co-infected patients which could be resulted from high mortality rates as 20.00% of TB-HIV patients died, slightly higher than national mortality rate [1, 8, 21]. Thailand aimed on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) elimination by 2030. The plan included easy access to health care services, HIV screening, antiretroviral therapy (ART) and retaining patients in treatment system. The outcome was to make 90% of HIV patients realize they carry the disease, received ART and able to suppress viral load. The outcomes were satisfying in combating HIV, resulting in fewer cases and thus, reducing the chance of opportunistic infections which included TB [22].

Sputum AFB follows up, especially at the end of intensive phase, are important predictor of treatment outcome [23, 24]. This study used follow up of sputum AFB at the end of the intensive phase to identify risk of unsuccessful treatment. Positive sputum AFB during follow up could indicate various factors such as patients’ poor compliance and drug-resistance TB [23, 24]. This study also found that patients who did not received sputum AFB follow up, which contradicted to Thai TB treatment guideline [8], were at risk as well. It could be hypothesized that patients who did not receive proper follow up were either having poor treatment compliance, receiving out-of-track management or missing cases follow-up by health care providers. Out-of-track management and cases missing can be improved by recruiting public health volunteers. Knowledge implementation about case detection and patient monitoring for these volunteers is required to serve health care to communities and reduce workloads on health care providers.

In previous studies, previous treatment of TB was associated with unsuccessful treatment outcomes [6, 25, 26]. Unfavorable previous treatment outcomes are predictive for development of drug-resistance TB in the current treatment [27, 28]. Patients who were loss-to-followed up in previous treatment episodes were more likely to be loss-to-followed up as well in the current treatment (29).

This study highlighted possibility of effective measures to increase yield in the treatment success rate by enforcing networks of the public health care system on TB treatment quality, especially patients monitoring. Active TB case monitoring by local health sectors is the crucial point for encouraging patients to follow and maintain in the treatment system. Developments of methods, tools or technology for active case monitoring and easy to access patients in the communities are requirements which will bring convenience for both patients and health-care workers.

Limitations

Limitations included registration of tobacco and alcohol consumption in only yes/no form instead of consumption amount and pack-years used Second, the sample size of this study was small due to limited number of patients. Third, this study did not include information on antiretroviral therapy, which would be important predictors of poor TB treatment outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Sanam Chai Kate Hospital and Division of Tuberculosis, Ministry of Public Health but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Sanam Chai Kate Hospital and Division of Tuberculosis, Ministry of Public Health.

Abbreviations

TB:

Tuberculosis

AFB:

Acid-fast bacilli

HR:

Hazard ratio

AHR:

Adjusted hazard ratio

OPD:

Outpatient department

WHO:

World Health Organization

BCG:

Bacillus Calmette–Guérin

PY:

Person-year

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

DOTS:

Directly observed treatment, short-course

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AIDS:

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

References

  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    MacNeil A, Glaziou P, Sismanidis C, Maloney S, Floyd K. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis and progress toward achieving global targets—2017. Morb Mortal Weekly Rep. 2019;68(11):263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Classification Criteria for Healthcare Center Under Ministry of Public Health Levels According to Geographic Information System (GIS): Thai Health Coding Center.

  4. 4.

    Kaji A, Thi SS, Smith T, Charunwatthana P, Nosten FH. Challenges in tackling tuberculosis on the Thai-Myanmar border: findings from a qualitative study with health professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Courtwright A, Turner AN. Tuberculosis and stigmatization: pathways and interventions. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(4):34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Charoensakulchai S, Limsakul M, Saengungsumalee I, Usawachoke S, Udomdech A, Pongsaboripat A, et al. Characteristics of poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Community Hospitals of Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;102(3):553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    World Health Organization. Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.

  8. 8.

    National tuberculosis control programme guideline, Thailand, 2018. Bangkok: Bureau of Tuberculosis, Ministry of Public Health.

  9. 9.

    The End TB Strategy. Geneva: World Health Organization.

  10. 10.

    Rattanasuwan P, Yuanlae C, Daewa P, Imduang K. 12-year treatment outcomes of tuberculosis patients: a full-scale non-family DOT model in Thailand. Walailak J Sci & Tech. 2015;12(7):587–93.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    An Activist’s Guide to Fighting Tuberculosis. . Boston: Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School.

  12. 12.

    El-Shabrawy M, El-Shafei DA. Evaluation of treatment failure outcome and its predictors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Sharkia Governorate, 2013–2014. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2017;66(1):145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jalal TMT, Abdullah S, Wahab FA, Dir S, Naing NN. Prevalence and factors associated with tuberculosis treatment success among TB/HIV co-infection in North-East Malaysia. Malays J Med Sci. 2017;24(6):75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Przybylski G, Dąbrowska A, Pilaczyńska-Cemel M, Krawiecka D. Unemployment in TB patients–ten-year observation at regional center of pulmonology in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Med Sci Mon Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2014;20:2125.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Machado A, Steffen RE, Oxlade O, Menzies D, Kritski A, Trajman A. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Brazil J Bras Pneumol. 2011;37(4):512–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Greene JA. An ethnography of nonadherence: culture, poverty, and tuberculosis in urban Bolivia. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2004;28(3):401–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jakubowiak W, Bogorodskaya E, Borisov E, Danilova D, Kourbatova E. Risk factors associated with default among new pulmonary TB patients and social support in six Russian regions. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007;11(1):46–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Amante TD, Ahemed TA. Risk factors for unsuccessful tuberculosis treatment outcome (failure, default and death) in public health institutions. Eastern Ethiopia Pan Afr Med J. 2015;20:58.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Albuquerque M, Ximenes RA, Lucena-Silva N, Souza WV, Dantas AT, Dantas OMS, et al. Factors associated with treatment failure, dropout, and death in a cohort of tuberculosis patients in Recife, Pernambuco State Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2007;23:1573–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wood R, Lawn SD, Johnstone-Robertson S, Bekker L-G. Tuberculosis control has failed in South Africa–time to reappraise strategy. S Afr Med J. 2011;101(2):111–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zumla A, Malon P, Henderson J, Grange JM. Impact of HIV infection on tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(895):259–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Guideline on Differentiated Care for Antiretroviral Treatment Service Delivery for Stable People Living with HIV in Thai Health Care Setting. Bangkok: Bureau of AIDS and Sexual-Transmitted Diseases, Ministry of Public Health.

  23. 23.

    Scheelbeek PF, Wirix AJ, Hatta M, Usman R, Bakker MI. Risk factors for poor tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Makassar, Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2014;45(4):853.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Muñoz-Sellart M, Cuevas L, Tumato M, Merid Y, Yassin M. Factors associated with poor tuberculosis treatment outcome in the Southern Region of Ethiopia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14(8):973–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Berhe G, Enquselassie F, Aseffa A. Treatment outcome of smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Anunnatsiri S, Chetchotisakd P, Wanke C. Factors associated with treatment outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis in northeastern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36(2):324–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kritski AL, de Jesus LSR, Werneck-Barroso E, Vieira MAMS, Andrade MK, et al. Retreatment tuberculosis cases: factors associated with drug resistance and adverse outcomes. Chest. 1997;111(5):1162–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rifat M, Hall J, Oldmeadow C, Husain A, Hinderaker SG, et al. Factors related to previous tuberculosis treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Bangladesh. BMJ open. 2015;5(9):e008273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dooley KE, Lahlou O, Knudsen J, Elmessaoudi MD, Cherkaoui I, et al. Risk factors for tuberculosis treatment failure, default, or relapse and outcomes of retreatment in Morocco. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Den Boon S, Van Lill S, Borgdorff M, Verver S, Bateman E, Lombard C, et al. Association between smoking and tuberculosis infection: a population survey in a high tuberculosis incidence area. Thorax. 2005;60(7):555–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our special thanks to staffs of Sanam Chai Kate Hospitals for providing data and resources in our study.

Funding

This study was funded by the Phramongkutklao College of Medicine Fund which covered data collection.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SC designed the work, collected data, analyzed and interpret data and drafted the article. CL collected data. CA collected data. PT collected data. BS critically revised the article. RR, MM critically revised the article. PP designed the work, analyzed and interpret data, critically revised the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phunlerd Piyaraj.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Royal Thai Army Medical Department. The study number was R054h/62_Exp. The written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Operational definitions (TB management, hepatotoxicity, and case definition).

Additional file 2.

Figure S1 Unsuccessful treatment outcomes of pulmonary TB treatment in the community hospital, 2013–2019.

Additional file 3.

Figure S2 Incidence rates of unsuccessful pulmonary TB treatment in the community hospital, 2013–2019.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Charoensakulchai, S., Lertpheantum, C., Aksornpusitpong, C. et al. Six-year trend and risk factors of unsuccessful pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Thai Community Hospital. BMC Res Notes 14, 89 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05504-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Risk factors
  • Pulmonary tuberculosis
  • Rural health
  • Treatment
\