Skip to main content

Knockout of a key gene of the nicotine biosynthetic pathway severely affects tobacco growth under field, but not greenhouse conditions



There is great interest in developing tobacco plants containing minimal amounts of the addictive compound nicotine. Quinolate phosphoribosyltransferase (QPT) is an important enzyme both for primary (NAD production) and secondary (pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis) metabolism in tobacco. The duplication of an ancestral QPT gene in Nicotiana species has resulted in two closely related QPT gene paralogs: QPT1 which is expressed at modest levels throughout the plant, and QPT2 which is coordinately regulated with genes dedicated to alkaloid biosynthesis. This study evaluated the utility of knocking out QPT2 function as a means for producing low alkaloid tobacco plants.


CRISPR/Cas9 vectors were developed to specifically mutate the tobacco QPT2 genes associated with alkaloid production. Greenhouse-grown qpt2 plants accumulated dramatically less nicotine than controls, while displaying only modest growth differences. In contrast, when qpt2 lines were transplanted to a field environment, plant growth and development was severely inhibited. Two conclusions can be inferred from this work: (1) QPT1 gene function alone appears to be inadequate for meeting the QPT demands of the plant for primary metabolism when grown in a field environment; and (2) the complete knockout of QPT2 function is not a viable strategy for producing agronomically useful, low nicotine tobaccos.


Nicotine is the most abundant alkaloid produced in tobacco plants, typically accounting for > 90% of the total alkaloid pool, and 2–6% of the leaf biomass (dry weight) when grown commercially. In recent years there has been increased interest in developing tobacco varieties that possess very low levels of nicotine while retaining acceptable agronomic qualities. Two of the motivating factors behind this interest include: (1) evidence from numerous clinical studies that have shown that smokers who switch to cigarettes containing nicotine levels below that capable of sustaining an addiction response will smoke less and/or find it easier to quit (reviewed in [1]); and (2) the possibility that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may mandate such reductions in future cigarette products [2]. From a plant genetic perspective, lowering the nicotine content of the leaf can be accomplished through the utilization of naturally occurring mutations, genetic engineering, and genome editing [3,4,5,6,7]. In the majority of cases reported to date, however, the genetic alterations of nicotine content do not decrease the nicotine levels below FDA’s target threshold to assure the failure to initiate or sustain an addiction response and/or are negatively associated with agronomic and quality traits [8]. Thus, there is a need to discover alternative genetic traits that can confer sufficiently low levels of nicotine while retaining agronomic acceptability.

Genes encoding the enzyme quinolate phosphoribosyltransferase (QPT) are intriguing targets for reducing nicotine in tobacco. Unlike most steps of the nicotine biosynthetic pathway that are dedicated solely to alkaloid production, QPT plays a critical role in primary metabolism as well, serving as the entry point into the pyridine nucleotide pathway responsible for production of the ubiquitous cellular co-factor NAD [9]. Characterization of the QPT gene family in Nicotiana revealed the presence of two closely-related paralogs: QPT1 which is constitutively expressed at a relatively low level throughout the plant, and QPT2 whose expression is induced at high levels in root tissue in response to stimuli known to activate alkaloid production [10, 11]. These distinct expression patterns led to the proposal that the ancient duplication of a housekeeping QPT gene resulted in the evolution of a paralog primarily dedicated to alkaloid biosynthesis (QPT2) while retaining a copy that could serve the needs for primary metabolism (QPT1) [10].

Because QPT1 and QPT2 share 94% nucleotide sequence identity, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to use techniques such as RNA interference (RNAi) or antisense-suppression to down regulate one paralog without simultaneously inhibiting the other. Indeed, when QPT gene function was suppressed using an RNAi construct driven by the CaMV 35S promoter, total QPT transcript reduction lead to severe stunting, abnormal leaf and flower morphologies, and photosynthetic deficiencies in lab and greenhouse grown plants [12]. When an anti-sense suppression strategy was used to down regulate QPT activity specifically within the root, however, low nicotine lines that were otherwise phenotypically normal were reported [3]. Because neither of these strategies would be predicted to uniquely repress a single QPT paralog, they could not address the issue of whether the targeted disruption of QPT2 alone represents a viable means for generating low nicotine tobaccos. In this study, genome editing was used to introduce frame-shift mutations in the QPT2 genes of two commercial tobacco varieties, and alkaloid profiles and growth characteristics were measured in plants grown in both a greenhouse and field environment.

Main text


Targeted mutagenesis of QPT2

The QPT2-specific sequence 5′-AGCCACCAAGAATACAAGAG-3′ was targeted by cloning complementary, annealed oligonucleotides into the BsaI-digested sgRNA cassette of the CRISPR/Cas9 vector pRGEB31 (Addgene) as previously described [13]. A map of pRGEB31 can be found at Off-target analysis was conducted using Cas-OFFinder ( as described [14]. The QPT2-targeting vector was transformed into tobacco varieties K326 and TN90 using Agrobacterium as previously described [15]. T0 plants were screened for mutations in QPT2_T, QPT2_S, QPT1_T and QPT1_S by PCR amplification using primers specific for each gene that flank the target site, followed by DNA sequence analysis by Sanger sequencing, using the forward or reverse primers as sequencing primers. The presence of CRISPR/Cas-induced indels was determined by direct examination of the sequencing chromatograms. The primers used in this study and PCR conditions are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. DNA sequencing was conducted at the NCSU Genomic Sciences Laboratory ( T1 generation lines were screened for the absence of the hptII selectable marker, as well as the absence of segregating WT QPT2 loci. GenBank accession numbers for the QPT gene family are: XM_016656561 (QPT1_T), XM_016652759 (QPT1_S), NM_001326216 (QPT2_T) and NM_001326058 (QPT2_S).

Greenhouse and field growth and evaluation

Seeds were germinated and grown in a growth chamber for 48 days. Twelve plants per genotype (T2 generation) were subsequently transplanted to 9″ pots and transferred to a greenhouse. Each plant was topped upon the first appearance of bud formation and suckers were removed manually for the next 10 days. The mid-rib was removed from leaves selected for alkaloid analysis and the lamina was dried to completeness in a drying oven. Alkaloid analysis was conducted by the NCSU Tobacco Analytical Services Lab as described previously [16]. For field-grown plants, seeds were sown on float trays in a greenhouse for 73 days with occasional mowing to promote root growth. Transplants were transferred to the field and grown using standard agronomic production practices. Statistical analysis was performed on the various measurements by conducting individual t-tests between mutant qpt2 lines and their relevant WT controls.

Results and discussion

To determine the effects of knocking out QPT2 function into tobacco, two varieties representing each of the major tobacco market types, flue-cured (K326) and burley (TN90), were selected as the recipient backgrounds. Previous tobacco genome analyses revealed that TN90 possesses the QPT2_T and QPT2_S genes derived from the ancestral species N. tomentosiformis and N. sylvestris, respectively, while K326 only contains the QPT2_T copy [17]. A 20 bp CRISPR/Cas9 target (plus 3 bp PAM) site was selected based on the following criteria: (1) its location in near 5’ end of the gene; (2) the presence of several polymorphisms in the comparable region of QPT1; and (3) the absence of any other sequences the public tobacco reference genomes that matched this sequence. The target sequence shown in Fig. 1A met all these requirements. A list of all sequences in the tobacco genome that possess up to three mismatches in comparison to the QPT2 target site as determined by the algorithm Cas-OFFinder is shown in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CRISPR/Cas9-induced knockout mutations in QPT2_T and QPT2_S. The 20 bp sequence targeted by the nuclease is underlined and the PAM site is shown in red type. A Alignment of tobacco QPT2 and QPT1 genes in the region of the target site. The 3 bp deletion and two single nucleotide polymorphisms that are found within the comparable 20 bp region of QPT1_T and QPT1_S are highlighted in blue. Other polymorphisms among the QPT genes are highlighted in gray. Gene mutations found in the three lines that were characterized in the greenhouse and field are shown in B. Inserted nucleotides and the positions of deleted nucleotides (dashes) are represented in green type. The numbers in black type correspond to the QPT cDNA sequences beginning at the start ATG codon; orange numbers represent amino acid position

K326 and TN90 were transformed with the QPT2-targeting CRISPR/Cas9 construct and T0 individuals were screened for QPT2 mutations. In K326, 15 T0 transformants were examined for mutations in QTP2; 9 possessed an indel in at least one allele of QPT2_T (60% efficiency). In TN90, 24 T0 plants were genotyped for QPT2 mutations; 18 contained a mutation in at least one allele of QPT2_S (75%), and 12 contained an indel in at least one allele of QPT2_T (50%). One K326 plant (K19) and two TN90 plants (T8 and T21) were selected for further analysis. K19 was biallelic for a 1 bp insertion and 1 bp deletion at the QPT2_T locus (Fig. 1B). T8 was homozygous for the same 1 bp insertion at QPT2_T and was monoallelic for a 2 bp deletion at QPT2_S. T21 was monoallelic for a 1 bp insertion at QPT2_T and was homozygous for a 1 bp insertion in QPT2_S. Each of these mutations caused frame shifts that would lead to premature stop codons anywhere from 12 to 76 bp downstream of the mutation. Given that only the first 33 aa of what is normally a 351 aa protein would be retained in each of these mutant loci, it was assumed that these mutations would result in the complete loss of gene function. PCR amplification and sequence analysis of the QPT1 genes in these same individuals confirmed that no QPT1 gene had been mutated. Plants K19, T8 and T21 were self-pollinated and numerous T1 progeny were genotyped to identify those that had lost the CRISPR/Cas9 vector and were homozygous mutant at all QPT2 loci. Chromatograms of each QPT gene in the region targeted for mutagenesis in T1 generation plants of lines K19, T8 and T21 are shown in Additional file 3: Fig. S1.

Twelve T2 generation individuals for each of the qpt2 mutant genotypes, along with their corresponding WT controls, were randomized within the same greenhouse and grown to maturity. Upon the first observation of bud formation, the date was recorded and the plant was topped by excising the floral meristem together with the first 6–8 immature leaves. The plants were grown an additional 10 days post-topping, at which time the following data were collected: plant height, leaf number and total leaf weight. In addition, an equivalently positioned leaf (5th or 6th leaf from the top) was selected for alkaloid analysis.

In both the TN90 and K326 backgrounds, plant height was reduced between 13 and 20%, and leaf number decreased by an average of 2–4 leaves per plant in the qpt2 mutant lines (Fig. 2A and B). Total leaf weight was decreased approximately 13% and 17% in lines T8 and K19, respectively, in comparison to their WT controls; a more substantial decrease of 27% was observed in line T21 (Fig. 2C). Line T21 also displayed the greatest difference in flowering time, with buds appearing on average 11 days later than WT TN90 plants. T8 plants flowered an average of 6 days later than WT (Fig. 2D). Flue-cured line K19 flowered on average 4.5 days earlier than its WT control, but this difference was not considered statistically significant.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Growth characteristics and alkaloid content of greenhouse-grown tobacco plants possessing knockout mutations in QPT2 genes. Blue bar graphs show data comparisons among mutant lines T8 and T21 and their corresponding TN90 WT control; green bar graphs depict the K19 mutant and its K326 WT control. Measurements include: plant height (A), leaf number (B), leaf weight (C), flowering time (D), nicotine (E) and nornicotine (F). For flowering time, days = days post-transplant and transfer to the greenhouse. Means and standard error bars are shown above each genotype. Asterisks indicate significant differences between qpt2 mutant lines and their corresponding WT control at P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**) and P < 0.001 (***) as determined by t-tests. BLOQ, below level of quantification

In contrast to the modest differences in overall growth phenotypes observed between WT tobaccos and their corresponding qpt2 mutants, alkaloid profiles differed dramatically (Fig. 2E and F). Nicotine levels in the qpt2 lines were reduced between 91 and 96%; similar reductions were observed in nornicotine content. Anatabine and anabasine comparisons were not included because their levels were below the level of quantification in the majority of the qpt2 individuals.

Overall, the results from the greenhouse study suggested that knocking out QPT2 function in tobacco may represent a viable means for producing low alkaloid tobaccos, and warranted further evaluation in a field environment. In keeping with traditional agronomic practice, seeds from each line were initially planted in float trays in a greenhouse prior to transplanting the young plantlets to the field. Within the greenhouse float trays there were no obvious phenotypic differences between the qpt2 mutant and control lines (W. Smith, personal observation). Tobaccos in the burley (T8, T21 and TN90 WT) and flue-cured (K19, K326 WT and an unrelated low nicotine line in K326) backgrounds were transplanted to the field in separate experimental plots, comprised of 30 plants per line planted in a randomized complete block design. Surprisingly, the growth of all three qpt2 lines was extraordinarily suppressed in the field. By 32 days post-transplant, qpt2 individuals were just marginally larger than when transplanted from the float trays (Fig. 3). As the growing season continued and the control plants grew large, shading provided an additional impediment to their growth. As a result, none of the qpt2 lines within the designed experiments grew taller than 30 cm, nor did they flower, which precluded the ability to obtain meaningful alkaloid data. By chance, however, extra K19 plants had been chosen to serve as border rows for an unrelated experiment within the same field. Despite remaining stunted throughout the entire growth season, in the absence of undue shading competition, most of the K19 border plants developed to the extent where they initiated flowering. The K19 border plants were topped, treated with suckercide and a subset assayed for alkaloid content. Additional file 4: Fig. S2 shows representative K19 border plants on the day of harvest, and how the average nicotine content of the qpt2 plants was 99% reduced in comparison to that observed in K326 WT plants grown in a different part of the same field.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Tobacco plants harboring qpt2 knockout mutations display a severe growth phenotype when grown in a field environment. A Control and mutant lines T8 and T21 in the TN90 background; B Controls and mutant line K19 in the K326 background. Tester and control lines were randomized within rows. Red arrows point to plants homozygous for qpt2 mutations; full-sized plants correspond to control and other entries. Picture was taken 32 days after transplant

Our results support the notion that QPT1 genes alone can largely accommodate the plant’s need for NAD, and other products of the pyridine nucleotide cycle, under conditions of minimal environmental stress, and that an additional contribution from QPT2 genes is required when grown in the field. The physiological demands of outdoor growth that necessitate this additional contribution are unknown, but may include: (1) stresses associated with transplant shock when transferred from the greenhouse to the field; (2) mechanical stresses caused by exposure to wind; and (3) increased temperature extremes and variable water availability. Although genome editing-mediated knockout of QPT2 loci yielded tobaccos with dramatically reduced leaf nicotine content, the associated negative impacts on plant growth and development under standard field conditions precludes the use of lines possessing these mutations for the commercial production of low nicotine tobaccos.


The main limitation was that this study was conducted during a single year in a single field environment. It is thus possible that the detrimental effects of knocking out qpt2 function may not always be as extreme as documented in this report. Nevertheless, the fact that field growth can, if even only under certain environments, result in the type of severe growth reduction reported here would prevent consideration of mutations of this nature for commercial deployment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Quinolate phosphoribosyltransferase


Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide


Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated 9


RNA interference


Cauliflower mosaic virus


Polymerase chain reaction


Base pairs


Amino acids


Wild type


Single-guide RNA


Protospacer adjacent motif


Below level of quantification


  1. Donny EC, White CM. A review of the evidence on cigarettes with reduced addictiveness potential. Intl J Drug Policy. 2022;99: 103436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. United States Food and Drug Administration. Tobacco product standard for nicotine level of combusted cigarettes. Fed Regist. 2018;83:11818–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xie J, Song W, Maksymowicz W, Jin W, Cheah K, Chen C, et al. Biotechnology: a tool for reduced risk tobacco products. Rec Adv Tob Sci. 2004;30:17–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis RS, Drake-Stowe KE, Heim C, Steede T, Smith W, Dewey RE. Genetic and agronomic analysis of tobacco genotypes exhibiting reduced nicotine accumulation due to induced mutations in Berberine Bridge Like (BBL) genes. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez DH, Payyavula RS, Kudithipudi C, Shen Y, Xu D, Warek U, et al. Genetic attenuation of alkaloids and nicotine content in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Planta. 2020;251:92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Qi Q, Humphry M, Gillis T, Fisher A, Patra B, Singh SK. NIC1 cloning and gene editing generates low-nicotine tobacco plants. Plant Biotech J. 2021;19:2150–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sui X, He X, Song Z, Gao Y, Zhao L, Jiao L, et al. The gene NtMYC2a acts as a ‘master switch’ in the regulation of JA-induced nicotine accumulation in tobacco. Plant Biol. 2021;23:317–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis RS. Potential mandated lowering of nicotine levels in cigarettes: a plant perspective. Nic Tob Res. 2018;21:991–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dewey RE, Xie J. Molecular genetics of alkaloid biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Phytochem. 2013;94:10–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shoji T, Hashimoto T. Recruitment of a duplicated primary metabolism gene into the nicotine biosynthesis regulon in tobacco. Plant J. 2011;67:949–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan SM, Kane KA, DeBoer KD, Sinclair SJ, Brimblecombe R, Hamill JD. Structure and expression of the quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase (QPT) gene family in Nicotiana. Plant Sci. 2012;188–189:102–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan S, Pandey SS, Jyotshna, Shanker K, Khan F, ur Rahman L. Cloning and functional characterization of quinolinic acid phosphoribosyl transferase (QPT) gene of Nicotiana tabacum. Physiol Plantarum. 2017;160:253–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xie K, Yang Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Mol Plant. 2013;6:1975–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bae S, Park J, Kim J-S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1473–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bovet L, Campanoni P, Lu J, Hilfiker A, Kleinhaus S, Laparra H, et al. CLCNt2 mediates nitrate content in tobacco leaf, impacting the production of tobacco-specific nitrosamines in cured leaves. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:741078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis RS, Lopez HO, Bowen SW, Andres KR, Steede WT, Dewey RE. Transgenic and mutation-based suppression of a Berberine Bridge Enzyme-Like (BBL) gene family reduced alkaloid content in field-grown tobacco. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sierro N, Battey JND, Ouadi S, Bakaher N, Bovet L, Willig A, et al. The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3833.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Tyler Steede of the NCSU Tobacco Analytical Lab for conducting the alkaloid analysis, and Kevin Stroup for maintaining the field plots.


Funding was provided under Grant (2014-1405) by 22nd Century Group Inc. The funding entity played no role in the design of the study, the analysis and interpretation of data, or in the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



RD designed the research, interpreted the data and wrote the paper. WS conducted most of the experiments. YM designed the CRISPR/Cas9 vector and generated the T0 generation transgenic plants. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph E. Dewey.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Primers and PCR conditions used in this study.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

Sequences most closely related to QPT2 target sequence in the TN90 reference genome as determined by Cas-OFFinder.

Additional file 3

: Figure S1. Chromatograms of the tobacco QPT genes in WT (A) and genome edited backgrounds T8 (B), T21 (C) and K19 (D). To help align the chromatogram information with the sequences shown in Fig. 1, the ‘TGG’ PAM sites are indicated. Sequences for QPT2_T, QPT2_S and QPT1_T are shown in the forward direction; QPT1_S sequences are shown in the reverse complement. For line K19 plants that are heterozygous for the alternative mutant alleles in QPT2_T, each allele can be read independently from the chromatogram after the point where the two patterns diverge as shown in (D).

Additional file 4

: Figure S2. K19 (qpt2_t/qpt2_t) border row plants on the day of field harvest (110 days after transplant). Average nicotine content from 19 topped K19 border plants (K326 qpt2qpt2) and 19 topped K326 WT plants grown in a separate part of the field is shown on the accompanying graph. Means ± standard errors of means are shown. The difference in nicotine content was significant at P < 0.001 as determined by a t-test.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, W.A., Matsuba, Y. & Dewey, R.E. Knockout of a key gene of the nicotine biosynthetic pathway severely affects tobacco growth under field, but not greenhouse conditions. BMC Res Notes 15, 291 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Quinolate phosphoribosyltransferase
  • CRISPR/Cas9
  • Low nicotine
  • Nicotiana tabacum