Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Heterologous production of human papillomavirus type-16 L1 protein by a lactic acid bacterium

  • Naima G Cortes-Perez1,
  • Pascale Kharrat1,
  • Philippe Langella1 and
  • Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán1Email author
BMC Research Notes20092:167

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-2-167

Received: 30 March 2009

Accepted: 24 August 2009

Published: 24 August 2009

Abstract

Background

The expression of vaccine antigens in lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a safe and cost-effective alternative to traditional expression systems. In this study, we investigated i) the expression of Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) L1 major capsid protein in the model LAB Lactococcus lactis and ii) the ability of the resulting recombinant strain to produce either capsomer-or virus-like particles (VLPs).

Results and conclusion

HPV-16 L1 gene was cloned into two vectors, pCYT and pSEC, designed for controlled intra- or extracellular heterologous expression in L. lactis, respectively. The capacity of L. lactis harboring either pCYT:L1 or pSEC:L1 plasmid to accumulate L1 in the cytoplasm and supernatant samples was confirmed by Western blot assays. Electron microscopy analysis suggests that, L1 protein produced by recombinant lactococci can self-assemble into structures morphologically similar to VLPs intracellularly. The presence of conformational epitopes on the L. lactis-derived VLPs was confirmed by ELISA using an anti-HPV16 L1 capsid antigen antibody. Our results support the feasibility of using recombinant food-grade LAB, such as L. lactis, for the production of L1-based VLPs and open the possibility for the development of a new safe mucosal vector for HPV-16 prophylactic vaccination.

Background

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) infection is closely associated with the development of cervical cancer (CxCa) [1], the second cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide (~250 000 annually) [2]. Therefore, a prophylactic vaccine against HPV-16 is thus a priority to prevent this type of cancer. HPV-16 L1 major capsid protein is able to self-assemble into virus-like particles (VLPs) which are structures that are morphologically similar and immunogenic as to native HPV [17]. Prophylactic vaccines based on highly purified VLPs were successfully used in trials in women with a significant reduction observed in the incidence of both HPV-16 infection and HPV-16 related CxCa [3], and now two vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, have been approved for use against this cancer. In developing countries, where about 80% of CxCa occurs [2], immunization programs would be more efficient and economical if vaccines are temperature stable, required less doses to immunize and could be administered without the need for specially trained personnel and instruments (eg. needles).

Alternatively, mucosal vaccines (e.g. administered by oral, intranasal, rectal or vaginal route) are more convenient than systemic vaccines, because they are easier to administer, relatively cheap to produce and less invasive, an especially important criteria when used with children and immunosuppressed patients [5]. Furthermore, mucosal vaccines can stimulate serum-IgG and mucosal-IgA Abs (to neutralize toxins and viruses) and induce CTL activities [6].

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are non-pathogenic and non-invasive Gram-positive bacteria considered as being promising candidates for controlled and targeted administration of vaccine antigens to the mucosal immune system [79]. Because of their long and safe association with humans and their food such bacterial vectors represent a good alternative to the use of classical attenuated pathogenic bacterial carriers. Moreover, some LAB strains are well known for their probiotic effect in humans [for a review see Reference 9]. Previously, we reported HPV-16 E7 production in Lactococcus lactis, the model LAB [1012]. Mucosal immunization with recombinant L. lactis expressing E7 antigen and secreting biologically active IL-12 induced an E7-specific response and displayed therapeutic effects against HPV-16-induced tumors in mice [11, 13]. This was the first study demonstrating the potential of recombinant non-pathogenic and non-invasive L. lactis-based vaccines to help control HPV-related CxCa. An alternative strategy to combat HPV-related cancer is the prevention of infection with HPV. VLPs obtained by the expression of HPV L1 major virion capsid protein using recombinant vectors are good candidates for a prophylactic HPV vaccine. Expression of HPV-16 L1 protein (for vaccine purposes) via heterologous LAB, including Lactobacillus casei and L. lactis, has been previously shown to generate VLPs [7, 14, 15]. Therefore, in this study, we sought to determine whether L. lactis is able to produce HPV-16 L1 protein using the NICE system [32] and whether L1 protein produced by recombinant L. lactis is able to self-assemble into either capsomers or VLPs.

Results and discussion

HPV-16 L1 production by Lactococcus lactis

The capacity of L. lactis to produce and secrete L1 protein was examined using lactococci strains harbouring pCYT:L1 and pSEC:L1 plasmids (Figure 1), respectively. Non-induced and induced culture samples were examined by Western blot using HPV-16 L1-specific monoclonal antibodies. As shown in Figure 2A, no L1 signal was detected in either cell or supernatant fractions of induced cultures of the negative control L. lactis (pGK-). In the absence of nisin, no L1 signal was detected in either L. lactis (pCYT:L1) or L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain, indicating that NICE system allows tight control of gene expression. Induced cultures of L. lactis (pCYT:L1) strain resulted in a clear band at the expected size for native L1 (~58 kDa) was observed in the cell fraction whereas no signal was detected in the supernatant. Similar analysis of L. lactis (pSEC:L1) resulted in a clear band in the cell fraction corresponding to SPUsp45-L1 precursor (pre-L1, ~60 kDa). Unfortunately, since a major non-specific band (which migrates at the expected size for native L1: ~58 kDa) reacts with anti-L1 antibodies in supernatant samples, L1 secretion cannot be determined. This non-specific band most probably corresponds to Usp45, the predominant L. lactis-secreted protein, and frequently detected by immunoblotting when using protein G-horseradish peroxidase conjugate [10, 16].
Figure 1

Schematic representation of pCYT:L1 (A) and pSEC:L1 (B) plasmids. A DNA fragment encoding L1 (see Materials and methods) was fused in frame with a DNA fragment containing the Usp45 signal peptide (pSEC:L1), derived from the predominant L. lactis-secreted protein. In pCYT:L1, the fragment encoding SPUsp45 is absent. In these plasmids, L1 expression is controlled by the nisin-inducible promoter (P nisA ) and harbors the Usp45 ribosome binding site and the rho-independent trpA transcription terminator (ter) [10] for clone stability.

Figure 2

Expression of HPV-16 L1 protein by recombinant L. lactis. A) L. lactis strains were grown and induced with 1 ng/ml of nisin for 1 h. After centrifugation, non-induced (- nis) and induced (+ nis) culture samples were treated as described in materials and methods and L1 production and secretion analyzed by Western blot. L. lactis strain contains pCYT:L1 plasmid encoding for a cytoplasmic form of L1 and L. lactis strain contains pSEC:L1 encoding for the precursor preL1 (i.e. SPUsp45 fused to L1). B) L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain was grown and induced with 10 ng/ml of nisin for 1 h. After centrifugation, induced (+ nis) culture samples were treated as described in results and discussion and L1 production and secretion analyzed by Western blot. Arrows indicate positions of L1 mature and precursor forms. Abbreviations: C, cell lysates; S, supernatant fraction; M, positions and sizes of molecular mass markers.

In order to better determine the secretion of L1 protein by recombinant L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain, we modified the protocol of immunoblotting by using a higher dilution of protein G-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (1:10,000) and a higher concentration of HPV-16 L1-specific monoclonal antibody (0.5 μg/ml). We also used a higher dose of nisin (ie. 10 ng/ml) for the induction of L1 expression. As shown in Figure 2B, the modifications in the protocol of immunoblotting and induction resulted in two bands, a clear band in the cell fraction corresponding to SPUsp45-L1 precursor (pre-L1, ~60 kDa), and a weak band in the supernatant fraction corresponding to the secreted mature L1 protein. Smaller-sized L1 products are also observed, reflecting degradation by HtrA or ClpP proteases or incomplete L1 synthesis at high expression levels (ie. 10 ng/ml of nisin). L1 secretion appears to be low, as about only 5% of the protein is detected in the supernatant.

Production and secretion of HPV-16 L1 virus-like particles by L. lactis

To determine whether recombinant L1 protein undergoes intracellular assembly into either capsomers or VLPs, TEM analysis was carried out. As shown in Figure 3 (panel C and D), structures morphologically similar to VLPs are present in L. lactis (pCYT:L1) strain and have similar sizes (30–50 nm in diameter) and morphologies as VLPs produced in other prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems (~55 nm) [14, 15, 1720]. Surprisingly, VLPs are also present in the cytoplasmic fraction of L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain (Figure 3, panel E and F); however, most of these VLPs are localized at the intracellular periphery of the bacterial cells (arrowheads). This phenomenon could be due to the self-assembly of small quantities of SPUsp45-L1 precursor into VLPs, which are dealt with the L. lactis secretion machinery via the translocon complex (early steps in the secretion) [21], suggesting that the Usp45 signal peptide (27 amino acids residues) does not interfere with intracellular assemblage of VLPs. Interestingly, some of these VLPs appear to be secreted or released out into the external medium (arrows) (Figure 3, panel G and H) by an unknown mechanism. It may be possible that the nascent secreted L1 protein undergoes self-assemble into VLPs during later stages of the secretion process. No VLPs were observed in negative control L. lactis (pGK-) (Figure 3, panel A and B).
Figure 3

Production and secretion of VLPs by L. lactis strains. Electron micrographs of L. lactis (pGK-) (panel A and B), L. lactis (pCYT:L1) (panel C and D) and L. lactis (pSEC:L1) (panel E to H). The different strains were grown and prepared as described in material and methods. L. lactis-derived VLPs (arrows) have diameters ranging from ~30 to 50 nm (red bars = 50 nm). In L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain, VLPs are localized at the intracellular periphery of the bacteria cells (arrowheads). Bars = 100 nm. Magnifications, A X50,000; B-G: X85,000; H: X140,000.

L. lactis-produced VLPs are recognized by a conformational antibody

In order to determine whether conformational epitopes are retained and displayed on the L. lactis-produced VLPs, an ELISA assay was performed using a monoclonal antibody that recognizes conformational epitopes present in HPV-16 VLPs (see material and methods). Total protein cell extracts from L. lactis strains were assayed using a conformational anti-HPV16 L1 antibody. As shown in Figure 4, cell extracts from L. lactis (pCYT:L1) and L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strains resuspended in PBS pH 7.0 (assembled VLPs) react with the anti-HPV16 L1 capsid antibody, indicating that conformational epitopes are displayed on L. lactis-derived VLPs. Note that the L. lactis (pCYT:L1) ELISA signal is significantly higher with L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain. This could be explained in part by a higher quantity of intracellular-VLPs in L. lactis (pCYT:L1) strain, as observed by TEM analysis (Figure 3, panel C and D). Indeed, ELISA results are based on cell lysates to coat the plates and L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain was designed for secretion. Hence, it does not retain much VLPS and/or L1 protein intracellularly and most VLPs are secreted to the external medium (Figure 3, panel G and H).
Figure 4

L. lactis -derived VLPs display conformational epitopes. ELISA plates were coated with total protein cell extracts (diluted in PBS pH 7.0) obtained from either L. lactis strain and assayed with a conformational anti-HPV16 L1 antibody. The data are the means of two independent experiments. Bars represent the means ± standard deviations. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) obtained with JMP software are denoted by an asterisk (*) between recombinant L. lactis strains and control L. lactis (pGK-) strain or by two asterisks (**) between L. lactis (pCYT:L1) and L. lactis (pSEC:L1) strain.

Samples from the negative control L. lactis (pGK-) do not react with the conformational antibody (Figure 4). As expected, the anti-HPV16 L1 capsid antibody was not able to recognize protein cell extracts from either L. lactis strain resuspended in carbonate buffer pH 10.0 (disassembled VLPs, data not shown).

Conclusion

Infections with HPV are closely related to the development of CxCa [1]. For this reason, several development strategies for prophylactic HPV vaccines have been explored [1720]. A potential vaccine candidate for the production of such prophylactic vaccines is the HPV-16 L1 major capsid protein which can self-assemble into VLPs. In fact, VLPs have been able to induce long lasting protective immune responses, and a human systemic vaccine based on highly purified VLPs (derived from different types of HPV: 6, 11, 16 and 18) is currently commercialized [22]. This vaccine could in theory prevent ~70% of CxCa cases [22, 23]. Unfortunately, the high costs associated with its production and distribution hinders its widespread application. A lower-cost alternative could be the use of LAB for VLPs production instead. In fact, recombinant LAB could be used either as a cell factory for VLP production or as a mucosal vaccine. Indeed, mucosal vaccines are more suited and convenient than systemic vaccines, because they are easier to administer and relatively inexpensive to manufacture. In addition, since mucosal surfaces are the primary site of interaction between an organism and its environment and represent the major portal of entry for pathogens (e.g. HPV-16), development of effective mucosal vaccines is advantageous.

In this work, we used the model LAB, L. lactis, to produce HPV-16 L1 protein and we demonstrated by Western blot analysis that full-length L1 protein could be efficiently expressed in L. lactis. We also demonstrated for the first time that L. lactis-derived L1 protein can self-assemble into structures morphologically similar to VLPs intracellularly by TEM experiments. Most important, these VLPs display conformational epitopes as confirmed by ELISA analysis. This is the first time that HPV-16 L1 protein is produced in L. lactis using the NICE system [32]. This system allows controlled gene expression by addition of nisin, an antimicrobial peptide used as a natural preservative in the food industry, and more importantly, the level of gene expression can be up-regulated more than 1000-fold. Since, L. lactis is a non-colonizing bacterium, a system allowing the bacterium to be preloaded, such as with NICE system, with antigen before in vivo applications (vaccine development, for example) are highly desirable.

Note that recombinant L. lactis provide a possible means for targeting L1 protein to humans. However, the use of genetically modified microorganisms raises legitimate concerns about their survival and propagation in the environment and about the dissemination of antibiotic selection markers (such plasmids used in this study) or other genetic modification to other microorganisms. Thus, before recombinant bacteria could be applicable to humans a biologic containment of recombinant microorganisms is necessary [33].

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential of the use of recombinant LAB for the production of HPV-16 VLPs and suggests the development of a new mucosal prophylactic HPV-16 vaccine.

Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids used

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. Lactococcus lactis strains were grown in M17 medium (Difco) supplemented with 0.5% glucose (GM17) at 30°C without agitation. Escherichia coli was grown in Luria-Bertani at 37°C with vigorous agitation. Plasmid constructions were first established in E. coli and then transferred to L. lacti s by electrotransformation [24]. Plasmids were selected by addition of antibiotics as follows: for L. lactis, chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml); for E. coli, ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml). Isolation of plasmid DNA was performed by using a Mini-Scale purification system (QIAGEN S.A.). Lysozyme (10 mg/ml) was added prior to the lysis step and incubated for 30 min (37°C) to prepare the protoplasts. PCR (Cetus apparatus; Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT) was performed using Vent DNA polymerase (Promega), and DNA sequences were confirmed by sequencing (MWG-Biotech AG). Restriction and DNA-modifying enzymes were used according to the supplier's recommendations.
Table 1

Bacterial strains and plasmids used.

Strains

Genotype

Reference

E. coli TG1

supE, hsd, Δ5, thi, Δ(lac-proAB), F'(traD36 proAB-lacZΔM15)

[30]

L. lactis MG1363

Wild type, plasmid free

[29]

L. lactis NZ9000

MG1363 (nisRK genes into chromosome), plasmid free

[27]

Plasmids

Replicon

Plasmid characteristics; cloned cassettes characteristics

Reference

pcDNA3-L1

ColE1

Apr, plasmid containing the HPV-16 L1 sequence

[31]

pCR:TOPO

ori pUC

Apr

Invitrogen

pCR:TOPO:L1

ori pUC

Apr, plasmid containing HPV-16 L1 sequence without ATG start codon

This work

pCYT:E7

pWV01

Cmr; gene, expressed from PnisA encodes E7

[10]

pSEC:E7

pWV01

Cmr; gene, expressed from PnisA encodes SPUsp-E 7 precursor

[10]

pCYT:L1

pWV01

Cmr; gene, expressed from PnisA encodes native L1 protein

This work

pSEC:L1

pWV01

Cmr; the gene expressed from PnisA encodes SPUsp-L 1 precursor

This work

Cloning of L1 gene from HPV-16 in L. lactis

A 1,606-bp DNA fragment encoding HPV-16 L1 protein (without ATG start codon) was PCR amplified from the pcDNA3-L1 plasmid (Kindly provided by Dr. Willem J.G. Melchers, Table 1) using primers Nsi I-L1 HPV16 (5'-GATGCAT CA CAACAGGTGACTTTTATTTACATC-3') for the coding strand and L1 HPV16 (5'-GTTACAG CTTACGTTTTTTGCGTTTAGCAG-3') for the complementary strand. The PCR product was cloned into pCR:TOPO (Invitrogen), resulting in pCR:TOPO:L1. L1 gene was then purified from Nsi I/SpeI-cut pCR:TOPO:L1 and cloned into purified backbones isolated from NsiI I-SpeI-cut pCYT:E7 and pSEC:E7 resulting in pCYT:L1 and pSEC:L1 (Table 1). In the resulting plasmid pSEC:L1 (Figure 1), L1 gene is fused in frame with a DNA fragment containing the ribosome binding site and the signal peptide of usp45 (SPUsp45), the gene encoding Usp45, the predominant L. lactis-secreted protein [24]. In pCYT:L1 (Figure 1), the fragment encoding SPUsp45 is absent. In both pCYT:L1 and pSEC:L1, expression of L1 is controlled by the PnisA promoter [26]. These plasmids were introduced into L. lactis strain carrying the regulatory genes nisR and nisK (Table 1) [27]. As a negative control, NZ9000 was transformed with an empty vector (pGK-).

Inducible expression of L1, protein analysis and immunoblotting

For the induction of L1 expression from the nisin promoter, strains were grown to an optical density (OD600) = 0.6, followed by induction with 1 ng/ml of nisin (Sigma) for 1 h. Protein samples were prepared from 2 ml of L. lactis induced cultures. After centrifugation (5 min, 10,000 rpm), the cell pellet and supernatant were treated separately. To compare the amounts of secreted and cell-associated proteins, both cell and supernatant fractions were concentrated and sample concentration calculated as follows: the equivalent of 1 ml of 1 OD600 unit of the sample (either cell or supernatant) was concentrated in a 100 μl final volume as described below, and 10 μl was loaded for SDS-PAGE. Supernatants were filtered on 0.2 μm pore-size filters (low protein retention; Millisar NML Sartorius) and treated with 1 mM PMSF and 10 mM DTT, followed by the addition of 100 μl of TCA (100%) to precipitate proteins. Samples were incubated for 10 min on ice, and proteins were recovered from the pellets after centrifugation at 4°C for 10 min at 13,000 rpm. The resulting pellet was dissolved in 1/20 volume of 50 mM NaOH. The cell fraction was obtained by cell lysis in 70 μl of lysis buffer (25% sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], and 10 mg/ml lysozyme) complemented with 1 mM PMSF and 10 mM DTT. After 30 min of incubation at 37°C, cells were lysed with 30 μl of 20% SDS. Equal volumes of 2× loading buffer were added to all samples and 10 μl of each sample were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide (10 and 12%) gel electrophoresis. Western blotting on PVDF membranes (Millipore) was carried out using an HPV-16 L1-specific monoclonal antibody (0.25 μg/ml, CamVir 1, BD Pharmingen). Immunodetection was performed with protein G-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Bio-Rad) at a dilution of 1:5000 and an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Dupont-NEN) as recommended by the suppliers.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

L. lactis strains were induced as described above and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M of sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 1 hour at room temperature. Samples were then post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide containing 1.5% potassium cyanoferrate before gradually dehydrating in ethanol (30–100%) and embedding in Epon resin. Thin sections (70 nm) were collected onto 200 mesh copper grids and counterstained with lead citrate before examination with Zeiss EM902 TEM operated at 80 kV (Carl Zeiss-France, MIMA2 Microscopy Platform, UR1196, INRA, Jouy en Josas, France). Images were acquired with a charge-coupled device camera (Megaview III) and analysed with ITEM Software (Eloïse, France).

HPV-16 VLP ELISA

ELISA analysis was performed as described previously [28] with some modifications. Briefly, L. lactis-derived VLPs and L1 protein were recovered as follows: 10 ml of induced-L. lactis cultures were pelleted and resuspended in 3 ml of either PBS pH 7.0 (assembled VLPs) or in carbonate buffer (50 mM sodium carbonate, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.01 M of dithiothreitol, pH 10.0) (disassembled VLPs). Cells were then lysed with 0.1 g of acid-washed glass beads (150–210 μm, Sigma). Cellular debris were eliminated by centrifugation and 200 μl of supernatant containing VLP's or L1 protein were applied on ninety-six well plates (Nunc Maxisorp) and incubated at 4°C for 8 h. Plates were washed twice with PBS plus 0.1% Tween-20 and blocked at room temperature for 1 h with 5% non-fat dry milk in PBS. After plate washing, 100 μl of either an anti-HPV16 L1 capsid antigen (HP16M-1521-5, Austral Biologicals) or anti-L1 (BD Pharmigen) diluted 1:50 in 1% non-fat dry milk in PBS were added. After 2 h of incubation at room temperature the plates were washed and 100 μl of a secondary anti-mouse IgG antibody (alkaline-phosphatase conjugated goat, Sigma-Aldrich, France) diluted 1:2500 in 1% non-fat dry milk in PBS was added and the plate incubated 1 h at 4°C. The plates were washed and the reaction developed by addition of 200 μl of p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate (Sigma-Aldrich, France) dissolved at 10 mg/ml in sodium carbonate buffer. The plates were incubated at room temperature until yellow colour was developed (30–60 min). Finally the reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 μl of 2 M NaOH. The absorbance was immediately measured at 405 nm (A405 nm).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Christine Longin (MIMA2 Microscopy Platform, UR1196, INRA, Jouy en Josas, France) for her help in TEM analysis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Equipe Interactions des bactéries commensales et probiotiques avec l'hôte, Unité d'Ecologie et physiologie du Système Digestif, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique

References

  1. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007, 8: 890-907. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Castellsagué X: Natural history and epidemiology of HPV infection and cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008, 110: S4-7. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.07.045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Koutsky LA, Ault KA, Wheeler CM, Brown DR, Barr E, Alvarez FB, Chiacchierini LM, Jansen KU, Proof of Principle Study Investigators: A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2002, 21: 1645-1651. 10.1056/NEJMoa020586.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Schiller JT, Castellsagué X, Villa LL, Hildesheim A: An update of prophylactic human papillomavirus L1 virus-like particle vaccine clinical trial results. Vaccine. 2008, 19: K53-61. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Neutra MR, Kozlowski PA: Mucosal vaccines: the promise and the challenge. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006, 6: 148-158. 10.1038/nri1777.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Levine MM, Dougan G: Optimism over vaccines administered via mucosal surfaces. Lancet. 1998, 9: 1375-1376. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79439-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Corthier G, Langella P: Recent advances in the use of Lactococcus lactis as live recombinant vector for the development of new safe mucosal vaccines. Recent Res Dev Microbiol. 2004, 8: 147-160.Google Scholar
  8. Hanniffy S, Wiedermann U, Repa A, Mercenier A, Daniel C, Fioramonti J, Tlaskolova H, Kozakova H, Israelsen H, Madsen S, Vrang A, Hols P, Delcour J, Bron P, Kleerebezem M, Wells J: Potential and opportunities for use of recombinant lactic acid bacteria in human health. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2004, 56: 1-64. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wells JM, Mercenier A: Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008, 6: 349-62. 10.1038/nrmicro1840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Langella P, Miyoshi A, Gruss A, Guerra RT, Montes de Oca-Luna R, Le Loir Y: Production of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68: 917-22. 10.1128/AEM.68.2.917-922.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Cortes-Perez NG, Le Loir Y, Alcocer-González JM, Tamez-Guerra RS, de Oca-Luna RM, Langella P: An inducible surface presentation system improves cellular immunity against human papillomavirus type 16 E7 antigen in mice after nasal administration with recombinant lactococci. J Med Microbiol. 2004, 53: 427-433. 10.1099/jmm.0.05472-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortes-Perez NG, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Le Loir Y, Rodriguez-Padilla C, Gruss A, Saucedo-Cárdenas O, Langella P, Montes-de-Oca-Luna R: Mice immunization with live lactococci displaying a surface anchored HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003, 5: 37-42. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00778-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Cortes-Perez NG, Lefèvre F, Guimarães V, Rabot S, Alcocer-Gonzalez JM, Gratadoux JJ, Rodriguez-Padilla C, Tamez-Guerra RS, Corthier G, Gruss A, Langella P: A novel mucosal vaccine based on live Lactococci expressing E7 antigen and IL-12 induces systemic and mucosal immune responses and protects mice against human papillomavirus type 16-induced tumors. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 7297-7302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Aires KA, Cianciarullo AM, Carneiro SM, Villa LL, Boccardo E, Pérez-Martinez G, Perez-Arellano I, Oliveira ML, Ho PL: Production of human papillomavirus type 16 L1 virus-like particles by recombinant Lactobacillus casei cells. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 745-52. 10.1128/AEM.72.1.745-752.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cho HJ, Shin HJ, Han IK, Jung WW, Kim YB, Sul D, Oh YK: Induction of mucosal and systemic immune responses following oral immunization of mice with Lactococcus lactis expressing human papillomavirus type 16 L1. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 8049-57. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Cortes-Perez NG, Ah-Leung S, Lefèvre F, Yang G, Pang Q, Wu C, Zeng Y, Adel-Patient K, Langella P: Current prophylactic and therapeutic uses of a recombinant Lactococcus lactis strain secreting biologically active interleukin-12. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 14: 80-89. 10.1159/000106086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirnbauer R, Booy F, Cheng N, Lowy DR, Schiller JT: Papillomavirus L1 major capsid protein self-assembles into virus-like particles that are highly immunogenic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 12180-12184. 10.1073/pnas.89.24.12180.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nardelli-Haefliger D, Roden RB, Benyacoub J, Sahli R, Kraehenbuhl JP, Schiller JT, Lachat P, Potts A, De Grandi P: Human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particles expressed in attenuated Salmonella typhimurium elicit mucosal and systemic neutralizing antibodies in mice. Infect Immun. 1997, 65: 3328-3336.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Buonamassa DT, Greer CE, Capo S, Yen TS, Galeotti CL, Bensi G: Yeast coexpression of human papillomavirus types 6 and 16 capsid proteins. Virology. 2002, 15: 335-344. 10.1006/viro.2001.1289.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Biemelt S, Sonnewald U, Galmbacher P, Willmitzer L, Müller M: Production of human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particles in transgenic plants. J Virol. 2003, 77: 9211-9220. 10.1128/JVI.77.17.9211-9220.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Le Loir Y, Azevedo V, Oliveira SC, Freitas DA, Miyoshi A, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Nouaille S, Ribeiro LA, Leclercq S, Gabriel JE, Guimaraes VD, Oliveira MN, Charlier C, Gautier M, Langella P: Protein secretion in Lactococcus lactis: an efficient way to increase the overall heterologous protein production. Microb Cell Fact. 2005, 4: 2-10.1186/1475-2859-4-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunne EF, Datta SDE, Markowitz L: A review of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines: recommendations and monitoring in the US. Cancer. 2008, 113: 2995-3003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Frazer I: Correlating immunity with protection for HPV infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2007, 11: S10-16. 10.1016/S1201-9712(07)60016-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Langella P, Le Loir Y, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A: Efficient plasmid mobilization by pIP501 in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175: 5806-5813.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. van Asseldonk M, Rutten G, Oteman M, Siezen RJ, de Vos WM, Simons G: Cloning, expression in Escherichia coli and characterization of usp45, a gene encoding a highly secreted protein from Lactococcus lactis MG1363. Gene. 1990, 30: 155-160. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90428-T.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM: Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62: 3662-3667.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuipers OP, de Ruyter PG, Kleerebezen M, de Vos WM: Quorum sensing-controlled gene expression in lactic acid bacteria. J Biotechnol. 1998, 64: 15-21. 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00100-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Christensen ND, Dillner J, Eklund C, Carter JJ, Wipf GC, Reed CA, Cladel NM, Galloway DA: Surface conformational and linear epitopes on HPV-16 and HPV-18 L1 virus-like particles as defined by monoclonal antibodies. Virology. 1996, 223: 174-184. 10.1006/viro.1996.0466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gasson MJ: Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic acid streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J Bacteriol. 1983, 154: 1-9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson TJ: PhD thesis. 1984, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  31. van Kuppeveld FJ, de Jong A, Dijkman HB, Andino R, Melchers WJ: Studies towards the potential of poliovirus as a vector for the expression of HPV 16 virus-like-particles. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2002, 15: 201-208. 10.1016/S0928-8244(02)00396-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Mierau I, Kleerebezem M: 10 years of the nisin-controlled gene expression system (NICE) in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005, 68: 705-17. 10.1007/s00253-005-0107-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Steidler L, Neirynck S, Huyghebaert N, Snoeck V, Vermeire A, Goddeeris B, Cox E, Remon JP, Remaut E: Biological containment of genetically modified Lactococcus lactis for intestinal delivery of human interleukin 10. Nat Biotechnol. 2003, 21: 785-9. 10.1038/nbt840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bermúdez-Humarán et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement