Skip to main content

Variation in sequences containing microsatellite motifs in the perennial biomass and forage grass, Phalaris arundinacea (Poaceae)


Forty three microsatellite markers were developed for further genetic characterisation of a forage and biomass grass crop, for which genomic resources are currently scarce. The microsatellite markers were developed from a normalized EST-SSR library. All of the 43 markers gave a clear banding pattern on 3 % Metaphor agarose gels. Eight selected SSR markers were tested in detail for polymorphism across eleven DNA samples of large geographic distribution across Europe. The new set of 43 SSR markers will help future research to characterise the genetic structure and diversity of Phalaris arundinacea, with a potential to further understand its invasive character in North American wetlands, as well as aid in breeding work for desired biomass and forage traits. P. arundinacea is particularly valued in the northern latitude as a crop with high biomass potential, even more so on marginal lands.


Slight changes in the genetic code, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and single sequence repeats (SSRs) can be directly linked to phenotype differences. Hence, the development and characterisation of novel genetic markers can be of great help to breeders. SSRs have been commonly applied in quantifying genetic variation and analysing the gene flow and parentage in plants [1]. Some recent applications also include hybrid identification [2]. Single sequence repeats are abundant in the genome, multi-allelic and polymorphic and often can be cross-amplified on related species [3]. Next-generation sequencing can provide large numbers of SSRs as demonstrated in this study and is even more useful once converted into routinely applicable genetic markers.

The genus Phalaris belongs to the tribe Aveneae of the subfamily Pooideae of the grass and cereal family Poaceae [4]. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) is a tall, perennial C3 grass which is distributed throughout Europe and in temperate regions of North America and Asia [5, 6]. On many sites it forms dense monospecific stands [7]. Considered an invasive wetland species [8, 9], P. arundinacea has been successfully introduced into nearly all continents except Antarctica. It is most commonly found growing along water margins and as such has been long recognised as a crop with a high biomass potential, particularly on marginal lands. Reed canarygrass, although not as productive as other grasses (i.e., Panicum virgatum) presents a unique set of characters that make it particularly tolerant to Northern climates [10]. Its high genetic variability has been observed in differences in production rates [8], forage yields [11] and photosynthetic characteristics [12] among others. Other non-crop uses of reed canarygrass include phytoremediation [13], erosion control [14] and paper production [15]. The newly developed primers presented in this publication were tested across a wide range of environmentally and climatically different regions from six European countries of Northern European distribution (Table 1). A subsample of three reactions per primer with one exception (primer TeaPh_nSSR_25) were chosen for sequencing (Fig. 1). These microsatellites can potentially be used for fingerprinting, GenBank accession characterisation and cross-amplification with other important and closely related forage grass species like P. aquatica [16]. Furthermore, microsatellite markers are routinely used to infer invasion routes of invading species [17], and as such could aid in understanding its invasive success in Northern America. Publically available genomic resources for the genus Phalaris are generally scarce; hence the primers are of high value for future research.

Table 1 Eleven genotypes characterized in this study
Fig. 1

Representative image of amplified product for ten different EST-SSR markers. The samples were run on 3 % MetaPhor™ gel and three or, in one case seven different genotypes from wide geographic locations were amplified. The gel was post-stained with 3x gelRED for 1 h. Lane M—100 bp DNA ladder (New England BioLabs, Herts, United Kingdom); sample order and geographic distribution are defined in Table 1


Total genomic DNA was extracted from eleven genotypes which were collected as part of the European Grass Margins project (Table 1) by either fresh extraction in liquid nitrogen or freeze-drying prior to extraction following a standard cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [18]. Initially ninety primer pairs were designed using the Primer3 online programme ( from a normalized EST library consisting of 18,682 P. arundinacea transcripts [19] (sequence data available at the Sequence Read Archive at NCBI, accession number SRP045256) upon searching for microsatellites with Gramene SSRIT (Simple Sequence Repeat Identification Tool; The following core criteria were applied for primer design: (1) primer melting temperature between 57 and 63 ℃ with 60 ℃ as optimum; (2) primer size (bp) ranging from 18 to 27 ℃ with 20 ℃ as optimum; (3) product size (bp) ranging from 100 to a maximum of 400 with 200 as optimum; and (4) CG clump of two. We found microsatellites varying in repeat motifs from di- up to nona-, the majority of which were dinucleotide repeats. The primers used in this study were selected from a range of SSR repeat motifs (Table 2). All primers were synthesised by Metabion international AG and were subsequently tested by PCR on standard agarose gels first. Out of 90 initially tested SSR markers 43 were retained since they produced clear banding pattern in the expected size range on a 3 % MetaPhor™ agarose gel in 1 × TAE buffer. The further selection process of eight SSR markers which were characterized in detail was based on the indication that they might be highly polymorphic. The PCR products were run on a pre-stained gel with Ethidium bromide and placed at 4 ℃ for around 20 min to aid in obtaining optimal resolution and gel handling characteristics, as per manufacturer’s specifications. Primer details and GenBank accessions are provided in Table 3. A template DNA volume of 1 µL (40 ng/µL) was amplified with initial denaturation step for 5 min at 95 ℃ followed by 35 cycles each with a denaturation of 30 s at 95 ℃, 20 s at a primer specific annealing temperature, and extension of 20 s at 72 ℃, followed by a final extension at 72 ℃ for 7 min. The reaction mixture contained 1 × reaction buffer consisting of 1.25 µM dNTPs, 10 µM of each primer, and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs, Herts, United Kingdom). The primers were tested for polymorphism originating from six European countries, in a total of eleven samples each from a different geographic region (Table 1). Purified PCR products (QIAquick PCR purification kit, Germantown, USA) were then sequenced by Sanger sequencing from both ends by GATC Biotech Ltd., London, England.

Table 2 A collection of forty three successfully amplified primers
Table 3 Eight highly polymorphic nuclear EST-SSR markers with GenBank accession numbers and size range

Results and discussion

43 out of the 90 initially designed microsatellite marker primer pairs proved to amplify successfully with discreet bands. Eight highly polymorphic SSR loci for P. arundinacea were identified which ranged in size from around 300 to 200 bp in length (Table 3). Sanger sequencing revealed numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), motif changes as well as indels in the genotypes of Phalaris from the different geographical locations (Fig. 2). Changes in the motif length varied from tetra- to tri-, di- and even mononucleotide repeats. In some instances the repeat motif was longer than expected (from tetra- to hepta- and nonanucleotide repeats). Changes were also observed from penta- to tetra- and hexanucleotide repeats. These microsatellite markers are useful for studying genetic diversity and population structure as well as for elucidation of P. arundinacea invasive status. As an increasingly important energy crop and well established forage crop species, the improvement of bioenergy and palatability traits for livestock, P. arundinacea might be of interest to breeders worldwide. The markers can be also further cross-amplified in closely related taxa like P. aquatica, an important forage species in Australasia, and other members of the genus Phalaris like P. minor a widely spread grass weed. These eight microsatellite markers will be of interest and value in addressing taxonomic and biogeographic issues because of the samples’ wide geographic distribution.

Fig. 2

Example of motif changes, indels and SNPs in the microsatellite region of nine representative samples. a fragments amplified with primer TeaPh_nSSR49; 1 Poland (accession number KU316491); 2 Ireland (accession number KU316495); 3 Ireland (accession number KU316498). b fragments amplified with primer TeaPh_nSSR80; 4 Poland (accession number KU316501); 5 Poland (KU316502); 6 Poland (KU316514). c fragments amplified with primer TeaPh_nSSR46; 7 Germany (accession number KU316457); 8 Denmark (KU316467); 9 United Kingdom (KU316471)


  1. 1.

    Smulders MJM, Esselink GD, Everaert I, De Riek J, Vosman B. Characterisation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris) varieties using microsatellite markers. BMC Genet. 2010;11:41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Turchetto C, Segatto ALA, Beduschi J, Bonatoo SL, Freitas LB. Genetic differentiation and hybrid identification using microsatellite markers in closely related wild species. AoB Plants. 2015;7:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chase M, Kesseli R, Bawa K. Microsatellite markers for conservation and population genetics of tropical tree species. AJB. 1996;83:51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Forster JW, Hand ML, Cogan NOI, Hayes BJ, German C, Smith KF. Resources and strategies for implementation of genomic selection in breeding of forage species. Crop and Pasture. Science. 2014;65:1238–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sheaffer CC, Marten GC. Reed canarygrass: An introduction to grassland agriculture. In: Barnes RF, Miller RF, Darrell A, Nelson CJ, editors. Forages. Iowa: IOWA State University Press; 1995. p. 335–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ghica A, Samfira I. Bibliographic study of genetic process in Phalaris arundinacea. Res J Agric Sci. 2011;43:65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Apfelbaum SI, Sams CE. Ecology and control of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Nat Areas J. 1987;7:69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lavergne S, Molofsky J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:3883–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Martina JP, Von Ende CN. Increased spatial dominance in high nitrogen, saturated soil due to clonal architecture plasticity of the invasive wetland plant, Phalaris arundinacea. Plant Ecol. 2013;214:1443–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ramstein GP, Lipka AE, Lu F, Costich DE, Cherney JH, Buckler ES, Casler MD. Genome-wide association study based on multiple imputation with low-depth sequencing data: application to biofuel traits in reed canarygrass. G3: Genes |Genomes |Genetics. 2015. Accessed 13 July 2015.

  11. 11.

    Rydberg PA. Phyotogeographical notes on the Rocky Mountain region. V. Grasslands of the subalpine and montane zones. Bull Torrey Bot Club. 1915;42:629–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Brodersen C, Lavergne S, Molofsky J. Genetic variation in photosynthetic characteristics among invasive and native populations of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Biol Invasions. 2008;10:1317–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Picard CR, Fraser LH, Steer D. The interacting effects of temperature and plant community type on nutrient removal in wetland microcosms. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96:1039–47.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rice J, Pinkerton B. Reed canarygrass survival under cyclic inundiation. J Soil Water Conserv. 1993;48:132–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pakhala K, Pihala M. Different plant parts as raw material for fuel and pulp production. Ind Crops Prod. 2000;11:119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Carlson IT, Oram RN, Suprenant J. Reed canarygrass and other Phalaris species. Agron Monogr. 1996;34:569–604.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Estoup A, Guillemaud T. Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: Why, how and so what? Mol Ecol. 2010;19:4113–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Haiminen N, Klaas M, Zhou Z, Utro F, Cormican P, Didion T, Jensen CS, Mason C, Barth S, Parida L. Comparative exomics of Phalaris cultivars under salt stress. BMC Genom. 2014;15(Suppl 6):S18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

SB, MK, TS, TV and TRH conceived the study. SB, MJ, MK, TV and TRH wrote the manuscript. SB, MK, MJ and TV conducted the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We are grateful to Yasmin Soppa and Niall McLoughlin for technical help in the lab.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have any competing interests.


This study has been financed under the collaborative European Community Framework FP7 project GrassMargins (KBBE-2011-5-289461).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Barth.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barth, S., Jankowska, M.J., Hodkinson, T.R. et al. Variation in sequences containing microsatellite motifs in the perennial biomass and forage grass, Phalaris arundinacea (Poaceae). BMC Res Notes 9, 184 (2016).

Download citation


  • Poaceae
  • Microsatellite markers
  • Phalaris arundinacea
  • Reed canary grass
  • SSR