Open Access

Preliminary investigation of the transmission of tuberculosis between farmers and their cattle in smallholder farms in northwestern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

  • Anwar Nuru1, 4Email author,
  • Gezahegne Mamo3,
  • Aboma Zewude1,
  • Yitayal Mulat5,
  • Gashaw Yitayew2,
  • Aschalew Admasu2,
  • Girmay Medhin1,
  • Rembert Pieper6 and
  • Gobena Ameni1
BMC Research Notes201710:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2349-z

Received: 25 September 2016

Accepted: 16 December 2016

Published: 7 January 2017

Abstract

Background

The feeding habits and close physical contact between Ethiopian farmers and their cattle promote the transmission of tuberculosis (TB) between the farmers and their cattle. This study aimed to investigate the transmission of TB between farmers and their cattle in smallholder farms in northwestern Ethiopia.

Results

A total of 70 human TB lymphadenitis (TBLN) cases visiting the Felegehiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Bahir Dar City and 660 cattle were investigated. Half of the cattle were owned by households with TB cases, and the remaining half by TB free households. Among the 70 human TBLN patients interviewed, 65.7% (46 out of 70) of the respondents were not aware of zoonotic TB, and 67.1% (47/70) of them consumed raw milk. Positive cultures of TB were obtained in 40 of the 70 cases where TBLN tests were positive with fine needle aspiration cytology. Spoligotyping resulted in 31 different patterns, of which 25 isolates were Mycobacterium (M.) tuberculosis, and the remaining were M. africanum (4 isolates) and M. bovis (2 isolates). None of the animals showed positive test results for bovine TB by comparative intradermal tuberculin test.

Conclusions

Based on the identification of M. bovis from two patients diagnosed with TBLN, we obtained preliminary evidence of zoonotic transmission of TB in northwestern Ethiopia. We did not identify a direct route of transmission between cattle and its owners. This is the objective of further investigations.

Keywords

Cattle Farmer Transmission Mycobacterium bovis Tuberculous lymphadenitis

Background

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) consists of closely related species such as Mycobacterium (M.) tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. africanum, M. canettii; M. caprae, M. pinnipedii and M. microti [1]. M. bovis primarily causes bovine tuberculosis (BTB) in animals and its transmission to humans has a public health importance [2]. A review of zoonotic TB [3] estimates the proportion of human TB cases due to M. bovis to account for 3.1% of all forms of TB; 2.1% of pulmonary and 9.4% of extra-pulmonary forms. Consumption of unpasteurized milk from infected cows [4] and aerosol transmission, especially where human share common premises with infected animals [5] are considered the usual mode of transmission of TB from animals to humans.

Since there are no effective animal TB control programs and lack of routine milk pasteurization procedure in low income countries [6, 7], the prevalence of human TB due to M. bovis is likely to be higher in countries where BTB is endemic in cattle [5] and high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus [8]. In Ethiopia, the presence of BTB in cattle [918] and human due to M. bovis [9, 19, 20] were reported previously. After isolating M. tuberculosis from animals it was also suggested the presence of human to animal transmission in Ethiopia [2123]. However, the direct link of transmission between the specific cattle and its owners were not confirmed. Identification of similar strains of MTBC species both in humans and animals using molecular techniques was therefore essential to provide evidence based suggestions on the occurrence of transmission. This study was formulated to investigate the transmission of zoonotic TB between cattle and its owners in smallholder farms in northwestern Ethiopia.

This study did not confirm a direct link of transmission of TB between specific cattle and its owners in the present study. However, there is preliminary evidence of zoonotic transmission of TB in the smallholder farms of northwestern Ethiopia. This is because molecular characterization by spoligotyping identified strains of M. bovis from two human TB lymphadenitis (TBLN) cases. The majority of the respondents (including the two individuals with M. bovis) were identified by the questionnaire as consumers of raw milk and unaware of BTB. None of the animals showed positive test results for TB by comparative intradermal tuberculin (CIDT) test.

Methods

Study design

The study design was cross sectional. Human patients diagnosed with TBLN at the Felegehiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (located in Bahir Dar City) and their cattle traced to the village of origin of the patients were tested for symptoms of TB, microbial culture evidence of the M. tuberculosis complex species, and lineage using a genetic test. In parallel, a comparable number of cattle owned by TB free households, who live in the proximity of the TBLN patients, were examined. TBLN patients were human patients with enlarged lymph nodes, and who were clinically and cytologically diagnosed as TBLN. TB free households were defined as follows: absence of TB suggestive clinical signs and absence of symptoms at the time of meeting with the investigator collecting data from the consenting individuals. Clinical signs and symptoms included a history of fever and/or cough of greater than two weeks of duration, a failure to gain weight, a loss of appetite, a decline in weight, symptoms of extra-pulmonary TB (EPTB) such as swollen lymph nodes, and the absence of confirmed TB cases in any member of the household during the last 10 years.

Sample and data collection from human subjects

Basic demographic data, and information related to awareness on BTB and its public health implication, and consumption habit of milk and meat were collected from each TBLN patient through an interview using semi-structured questionnaire. Collection of fine needle aspiration (FNA) sample and FNA cytology (FNAC) was done by the pathologist. FNAC was used for the diagnosis of mycobacterial lymphadenitis. FNAC positive samples were drained in a tube containing 1 ml phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution and used for mycobacterial culture.

Comparative intradermal tuberculin

CIDT was carried out to test cattle for BTB according to the OIE protocol [24]. After two sites, 12 cm apart, on skin of middle third of the neck were shaved and the thickness of each was measured with a caliper, two types of purified protein derivative (PPDs) (supplied by Prionics Lelystad B. V., The Netherlands) were injected intradermally into the two sites. One site was injected with an aliquot of 0.1 ml (ml) of 2500 IU/ml bovine-PPD (B-PPD) and the other was injected with 0.1 ml of 2500 IU/ml Avian-PPD (A-PPD). The skin thickness at each injection site was measured again after 72 h. An animal was considered to be positive for BTB if the skin reaction at the PPD-B site minus the skin reaction at the PPD-A is ≥4 mm.

Culture and spoligotyping

TB cultures were performed using the procedure described by the National TB and Leprosy Control Programme Guideline [25] that was adopted from WHO guideline [26]. Briefly, FNA samples collected from TBLN patients in this study were processed and inoculated on duplicate Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) slants, one supplemented with pyruvate and the other with glycerol. All the tubes were incubated at 37 °C and slants with no growth at week 8 were considered negative. Bacterial colonies from culture-positive samples were Ziehl-Neelsen stained to identify acid fast bacilli (AFB). Cultures positive for AFB were inactivated by heating at 85 °C for 45 min in a water bath and spoligotyped as previously described [20].

Data analysis

All the statistical data were analyzed by STATA statistical software, version 12 (Stata Corp., Collage station, TX, USA). Chi square test, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were applied for selected demographic factors verses awareness, and milk and meat consumption habits. Statistical significance was assumed if the confidence interval (CI) did not include one among its values or whenever P value was less than 5%.

The generated spoligotype data were converted into binary and octal formats and entered into the open source spoligotype database available at the website http://www.pasteur-guadeloupe.fr:8081/SITVIT_ONLINE/tools.jsp to establish the lineage, sublineage, and the shared international spoligotype (SIT) number. In addition, the online tool “Run TB-Lineage” (http://tbinsight.cs.rpi.edu/run_tb_lineage.html) was used to predict the major lineages to which the strains belong by a conformal Bayesian network (CBN) analysis.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by Ethical Review Board (Ref. Number IRB/05-02/2013) of the Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University. All human subjects were given written consent to participate in the study and their cattle to be part of the study.

Results

Level of awareness of the farmers and their food consumption habits

Among the 70 human TBLN patients interviewed, 65.7% (46/70) of the individuals did not know that cattle can transmit BTB (it stands for bovine tuberculosis caused by M. bovis in cattle and other mammals including man). The majority (67.1%, 47/70) of the patients had the habit of consuming raw milk. 54.3% (38/70) of the patients ate only cooked meat products although the cooking temperature levels and time could not be specified. The majority of the patients (73.7%, 28/38) ate cooked meat without understanding the risk of contracting BTB from raw meat.

Respondent’s awareness was only significantly associated with age in such a way that individuals between 29–39 years of age (AOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.53) and elderly, 50+ years (AOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.78) were less likely to be aware of BTB compared to the 18–29 year olds (Table 1). The risk of milk and meat consumption habits were not significantly associated to age, sex and educational status of the respondents (Table 2).
Table 1

Level of awareness on zoonotic tuberculosis among tuberculous lymphadenitis patients in northwestern Ethiopia

Demography factors

Number of respondents

Number of respondents aware of BTB*

COR (95% CI)**

AOR (95% CI)***

Age (years)

 18–28

17

10 (58.8%)

1.0+

1.0

 29–39

17

2 (11.8%)

0.10 (0.02–0.54)

0.06 (0.01–0.53)

 40–50

13

7 (53.8%)

0.82 (0.19–3.50)

1.20 (0.22–5.57)

 ≥50

23

5 (21.7%)

0.19 (0.05–0.78)

0.16 (0.03–0.78)

Sex

 Male

52

19 (36.5%)

1.0

1.0

 Female

18

5 (27.8%)

0.67 (0.21–2.16)

2.88 (0.50–17.0)

Educational status

 Illiterate

21

4 (19.0%)

1.0

1.0

 Read and write only

11

4 (36.4%)

2.43 (0.47–12.5)

4.68 (0.66–33.3)

 Primary (1–6)

11

4 (36.4%)

2.43 (0.47–12.5)

2.72 (0.44–17.0)

 Secondary and above

27

12 (44.4%)

3.40 (0.90–12.8)

2.04 (0.43–9.65)

* Bovine tuberculosis

** Crude odds ratio

*** Adjusted odds ratio

+ Reference value (1.0)

Table 2

Habit of boiled milk and cooked meat consumption of tuberculous lymphadenitis patients in northwestern Ethiopia

Demography factors

Number of respondents

Consumed boiled milk only

P value

Consumed cooked meat only

P value

Age (years)

 18–28

17

5 (29.4%)

0.939

11 (64.7%)

0.549

 29–39

17

5 (29.4%)

9 (53.0%)

 40–50

13

5 (38.5%)

5 (38.5%)

 ≥50

23

8 (34.8%)

13 (56.5%)

Sex

 Male

52

17 (32.7%)

0.960

29 (55.8%)

0.672

 Female

18

6 (33.3%)

9 (50.0%)

Educational status

 Illiterate

21

7 (33.3%)

0.303

10 (47.6%)

0.673

 Read and write only

11

4 (36.4%)

6 (54.5%)

 Primary (1–6)

11

1 (9.09%)

5 (45.5%)

 Secondary and above

27

11 (40.7%)

17 (63%)

P < 0.05 referred as significant

Tuberculosis in farmers

All the 70 FNA specimens were cultured in LJ media and mycobacterial growth were detected in 57.1% (40/70). The binary and octal description, SITs and lineage or sub-lineage are summarized for each isolate in Tables 3 and 4. Among the 40 isolates, spoligotyping identified a total of 31 different patterns, of which the majority (80.6%, 25/31) were M. tuberculosis, and the remaining were M. africanum (13.0%, 4/31) and M. bovis (6.40%, 2/31). The M. tuberculosis strains belonged to Euro-American lineage (68%, 17/25), East-African Indian (24%, 6/25) and Indo-Oceanic (8%, 2/25). Seventeen strains corresponded to the existing patterns in the SITVIT2 database. Fourteen patterns were not in the database are documented as orphans. The most common strains were SIT53 and SIT289, each with 4 isolates.
Table 3

Spoligopatterns of shared types and corresponding lineages identified from tuberculous lymphadenitis patients in northwestern Ethiopia

SIT

No. of isolates

SITVIT clad by KBBN

Major lineage by CBN

Octal number

Binary format

37

1

T3

EA

777737777760771

42

1

LAM

EA

777777607760771

50

1

H3

EA

777777777720771

52

1

T2

EA

777777777760731

53

4

T

EA

503777740003771

131

1

T3

EA

777717777760771

134

2

H3

EA

777777777720631

149

2

T3-ETH

EA

777000377760771

168

1

H3

EA

777777777720671

334

1

T

EA

577777777760771

602

1

H1

EA

777777770000771

1745

1

T3

EA

773737777760771

25

2

CAS1-Delhi

EAI

503757740003471

26

1

CAS1-Delhi

EAI

703777740003771

289

4

CAS1-Delhi

EAI

703777740003571

982

1

BOV

M. bovis

416773777777600

665

1

BOV_1

M. bovis

616773777777600

The 40 isolates were grouped into 31 different spoligotype patterns (strains). Of which 17 strains (patterns) have registered in the SITVIT2 database and the remaining 14 patters were orphans and presented in this table. Five patterns were in clusters, containing 14 isolates (2–4 isolates per cluster), and the dominant strains were SIT53 and SIT289 with 4 isolates each. The fifteen strains were belongs to Euro-American (12 patterns) and East-African Indian (3 patterns), and the remaining two strains were belonging to M. bovis

KBBN knowledge-based Bayesian networks, CBN conformal Bayesian network

Table 4

Spoligopatterns of orphan strains and corresponding lineages identified from tuberculous lymphadenitis patients in northwestern Ethiopia

SIT

No. of isolates

SITVIT clad by KBBN

Major lineage by CBN

Octal number

Binary format

Orphan

1

Manu2

EA

577747777742670

Orphan

1

H3-Ural-1

EA

757777777420771

Orphan

1

T1-RUS2

EA

000000077760771

Orphan

1

T3-ETH

EA

777000077760771

Orphan

1

LAM

EA

777777607760771

Orphan

1

CAS1-Delhi

EAI

503757740003471

Orphan

1

CAS1-Delhi

EAI

503767744003571

Orphan

1

CAS1-Kili

EAI

541347400003460

Orphan

1

AFRI

MA

400000047177671

Orphan

1

AFRI

MA

700000007177371

Orphan

1

AFRI

MA

400000047177571

Orphan

1

Manu_ancestor

MA

715203477377571

Orphan

1

EAI4-VNM

IO

743777774003571

Orphan

1

Manu2

IO

757777777423771

Fourteen of the total 31 strains were identified as orphan strains in the present study and indicated in this table. The orphan strains belonged to four major lineages including Euro-American (5 strains), East-African Indian (3 strains), M. africanum (4 strains), and Indo-Oceanic (2 strains)

KBBN knowledge-based Bayesian networks, CBN conformal Bayesian network

Tuberculosis in cattle

All the study cattle were tested for BTB with CIDT and interpreted at a ≥4 mm cutoff point. None of the animals were positive for BTB. Further analyses such as microbial cultures and genotypic tests were not conducted to isolate and characterize mycobacteria from cattle tissues. As a result, comparisons with MTBC strains identified in human subjects were not performed.

Transmission of mycobacteria between farmers and their cattle

The results of this study did not provide evidence of direct transmission of the MTBC species between farmers and their cattle in the smallholder farms of northwestern Ethiopia. However, there is preliminary evidence of zoonotic transmission of M. bovis between animals and two human TBLN patients. Further investigations are required to determine whether M. bovis is directly transmitted from animals to their owners.

Discussion

Level of awareness of the farmers and their food consumption habits

This study evaluates the awareness of respondents as it pertains to BTB and the risk of zoonotic transmission from raw milk and meat consumption habits in relation to their age, sex and educational status. Respondents’ awareness on BTB was generally poor (34.3%, 24/70), and magnifies the public health implication of the disease in the study area. Our finding is consistent with 35, 25.7, 6.9, 29.7 and 15% awareness levels reported in earlier Ethiopian studies [12, 13, 17, 27, 28]. The low level of awareness observed in the present study could also be related to the low level of BTB in the study area. Earlier epidemiological studies have also indicated that the level of disease awareness among famers is related to the prevalence of the disease in that specific area [29] in such a way that awareness on BTB was lower in low prevalent settings compared to high BTB prevalent areas [30].

Awareness of BTB among human TBLN patients in this study was associated with age. Clusters of ages between 29–39 and 50+ years were less likely to be aware of BTB compared to the younger ages (18–29 years). The observed difference in the level of awareness between the different age categories was difficult to interpret. However, it could be related to the expanding nature of education to village level in Ethiopia. As a result, the younger ages have rather more access to education, and had knowledge on BTB and its zoonotic importance compared to the elder one.

The majority (67.1%, 47/70) of the respondents in this study consumed raw milk, and is consistent with the previous study conducted in Central Ethiopia [28], reported 79.3% (46/58) of livestock holders had habit of raw milk consumption. We, therefore, suggest that improving knowledge and awareness of milk borne transmission is important to prevent zoonotic TB in human in the study area.

Tuberculosis in farmers

Molecular characterization by spoligotyping identified strains of M. tuberculosis as the major causative agents of TBLN in human patients participated in this study. This finding is compatible with previous studies in Ethiopia [3133]. However, M. bovis was isolated from the two TBLN cases even though cattle owned by these patients were none reactor for CIDT test. Thus, we suggest the potential zoonotic transmission of M. bovis from animal since the two TBLN cases with M. bovis were identified by the questionnaire as consumers of raw milk and undercooked meat product.

SIT53 and SIT149 were the dominant strains identified in TBLN patients participated in the present study. These strains also isolated in human FNA and sputum samples collected and studied previously in Ethiopia [32, 3436], and suggest the presence of similarity in the population of mycobacterial strains that causes PTB and EPTB.

Tuberculosis in cattle

We did not demonstrate that TB is transmitted from human TBLN patients to their cattle in this study. All cattle were found negative for BTB after CIDT test, and none of the cattle tissue had cultured for mycobacterial growth. However, SIT53 and SIT149, which were isolated from human TBLN patients in the present study, were also isolated from cattle [21, 23] and goat [22] previously in Ethiopia, which indicate possible human-to-animal transmission.

Transmission of mycobacteria between farmers and their cattle

A potential transmission of zoonotic TB was observed in this study since there was isolation of M. bovis from two human TBLN cases even though direct link of transmission between specific cattle and its owners were not confirmed. Similar findings were reported from previous Ethiopian studies [9, 19, 20]. These studies isolated M. bovis from human pulmonary TB (PTB, it is an infectious disease principally caused by M. tuberculosis, which is primarily a human pathogen and characterized by the growth of tubercles in the tissues, especially the lungs) and/or TBLN cases, and suggested the occurrence of transmission of zoonotic TB between livestock and humans. However, despite close contact between humans and livestock, and low level of awareness of zoonotic TB, including the high consumption rate of raw milk by farmers in the study area, the prevalence of M. bovis in human TBLN patients recorded in the present study was lower than expected. This could be related to the overall low prevalence rate of BTB in the study area as it was shown in the present study and 1.27% prevalence reported previously in northwestern Ethiopia [18]. The small sample size (70 TBLN) could also contribute to the recorded lower isolation rate of M. bovis from farmers in the study area.

Conclusions

Our data revealed that many of the study participants were unaware of BTB and its public health consequence. M. bovis isolates were identified from two human subjects raising cattle. These subjects were diagnosed for TBLN and there was no evidence that the TBLN was caused by simultaneous presence of M. tuberculosis. Although a direct transmission route was not proven here, it is possible that TB caused by M. bovis is a zoonotic disease in northwestern Ethiopian. However, further investigations are required to prove a direct transmission route from cattle to owner. Continued education of the public, particularly farmers with livestock, is important to protect the zoonotic pathogen as a potential public health threat in the area.

Abbreviations

AFB: 

acid fast bacilli

A-PPD: 

avian purified protein derivative

B-PPD: 

bovine purified protein derivative

BCS: 

body condition score

BTB: 

bovine tuberculosis

CBN: 

conformal Bayesion network

CI: 

confidence interval

CIDT: 

comparative intradermal tuberculin

DR: 

direct repeat

EPTB: 

extra pulmonary tuberculosis

FNA: 

fine needle aspiration

FNAC: 

fine needle aspiration cytology

LJ: 

Lowenstain Jenson

LN: 

lymph node

M.: 

mycobacterium

Ml: 

milliliter

MTBC: 

mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

PPD: 

purified protein derivative

SIT: 

shared international type

TB: 

tuberculosis

TBLN: 

tuberculous lymphadenitis

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AN participated in the design of the study, data collection, laboratory work, statistical analysis, interpretation of data, and drafted the manuscript. GM, GA participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, and review of the manuscript. AZ carried out the spoligotyping and participated in the interpretation of the spoligotype data. YM participated in the clinical examination of TBLN patients, and carried out collection of FNA samples and FNA cytology. GY and AA participated in TB culture and interpretation. GM participated in the design of the study, statistical analysis and revision of the manuscript. RP participated in the review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was jointly funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH, USA) through its H3 Africa Program (Grant Number: U01HG00747201), Addis Ababa University through its Thematic Research Program, and University of Gondar. We thank Minichil Bantie and all technical staffs of Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Bahir Dar Regional Health Research Laboratory Centre, Health Centers and Agricultural Offices of Amhara Regional State for assisting the data collection and laboratory works.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this study is included within the article.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Financial competing interests

Non-financial competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University
(2)
Bahir Dar Regional Health Research Laboratory Centre
(3)
College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University
(4)
College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Gondar
(5)
Felegehiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital
(6)
J. Craig Venter Institute

References

  1. Forrellad MA, Klepp LI, Gioffré A, Sabio y García J, Morbidoni HR, de la Paz Santangelo M, et al. Virulence factors of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Virulence. 2013;4(1):3–66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. OIE (World Health Organization for Animal Health). Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2009. Chapter 2.4.7. 2009. http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/fr/Health…/2.04.07_BOVINE_TB.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  3. Cosivi O, Grange JM, Daborn CJ, Raviglione MC, Fujikura T, Cousins D, et al. Zoonotic tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4:59–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashford DA, Whitney E, Raghunathan P, Cosivi O. Epidemiology of selected mycobacteria that infect humans and other animals. Rev Sci Tech. 2001;20(1):325–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Empress. Tuberculosis. Empress Transboundary Animal Diseases Bulletin 40. 2012. http://www.fao.org. Accessed 20 Feb 2016.
  6. Ayele WY, Neill SD, Zinsstag J, Weiss MG, Pavlik I. Bovine tuberculosis: an old disease but a new threat to Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8(8):924–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Müller B, Dürr S, Alonso S, Hattendorf J, Laisse CJM, Parsons SDC, et al. Zoonotic Mycobacterium bovis-induced tuberculosis in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(6):899–908.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Park D, Qin H, Jain S, Preziosi M, Minuto JJ, Mathews WM, et al. Tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(11):1343–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gumi B, Schelling E, Berg S, Firdessa R, Erenso G, Mekonnen W, et al. Zoonotic transmission of tuberculosis between pastoralists and their livestock in South–East Ethiopia. EcoHealth. 2012;9(2):139–49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Gumi B, Schelling E, Firdessa R, Aseffa A, Tschopp R, Yamuah L, et al. Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in pastoral cattle herds in the Oromia region, southern Ethiopia. Trap Anim Hlth Prod. 2011;43(6):1081–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Admasu P, Berihun W, Niguse A. Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle of Yeki District, Southern Ethiopia. Afr J Basic Appl Sci. 2014;6(5):135–40.Google Scholar
  12. Tigre W, Alemayehu G, Abatu T, Deressa B. Preliminary study on public health implication of bovine tuberculosis in Jimma town, South West Ethiopia. Global Vet. 2011;6(4):369–73.Google Scholar
  13. Romha G, Gebreegziabher G, Ameni G. Assessment of bovine tuberculosis and its risk factors in cattle and humans, at and around Dilla town, southern Ethiopia. Animal Vet Sci. 2014;2(4):94–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tschopp R, Bobosha K, Aseffa A, Schelling E, Habtamu M, Iwnetu R, et al. Bovine tuberculosis at a cattle-small ruminant-human interface in Meskan, Gurage region, Central Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:318.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Firdessa R, Tschopp R, Wubete A, Sombo M, Hailu E, Erenso G, et al. High prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle in Central Ethiopia: implications for the Dairy Industry and Public Health. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52851.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mamo G, Abebe F, Worku Y, Hussein N, Legesse M, Tilahun G, et al. Bovine tuberculosis and its associated risk factors in pastoral and agro-pastoral cattle herds of Afar Region, Northeast Ethiopia. J Vet Med Anim Health. 2013;5(6):171–9.Google Scholar
  17. Zeru F, Romha G, Berhe G, Mamo G, Sisay T, Ameni G. Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis and assessment of Cattle owners’ awareness on its public health implication in and around Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia. J Vet Med Animal Health. 2014;6(6):159–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nuru A, Mamo G, Teshome L, Zewdie A, Medhin G, Pieper R, Ameni G. Bovine tuberculosis and its risk factors among dairy cattle herds in and around Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop Vet J. 2015;19(2):27–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Firdessa R, Berg S, Hailu E, Schelling E, Gumi B, Erenso G, et al. Mycobacterial lineages causing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis, Ethiopia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(3):460–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Nuru A, Mamo G, Worku A, Admasu A, Medhin G, Pieper R, et al. Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolated from tuberculosis patients in Bahir Dar City and its surroundings, Northwest Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/174732.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Berg S, Firdessa R, Habtamu M, Gadisa E, Mengistu A, Yamuah L, et al. The burden of mycobacterial disease in Ethiopian cattle: implications for public health. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(4):e5068.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kassa GM, Abebe F, Worku Y, Legesse M, Medhin G, Bjune G, et al. Tuberculosis in goats and sheep in Afar Pastoral Region of Ethiopia and isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from goat. Vet Med Int. 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/869146.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Ameni G, Tadesse K, Hailu E, Deresse Y, Medhin G, Aseffa A, et al. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis between Farmers and Cattle in Central Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76891.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. OIE (World Health Organization for Animal Health). 2008. Bovine tuberculosis. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals (mammals, birds and bees). 2008. http://www.oie.int/doc/ged/D7710.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  25. FMOH (Federal Ministry of Health). Tuberculosis, Leprosy and TB/HIV Prevention and Control Programme: Manual, 4th ed. Addis Ababa: FMOH; 2008.Google Scholar
  26. WHO (World health Organization). Culture. In: Laboratory Services in Tuberculosis Control. Geneva: WHO. 1998. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_TB_98.258_(part1).pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2016.
  27. Ameni G, Erkihun A. Bovine tuberculosis on small-scale dairy farms in Adama Town, central Ethiopia, and farmer awareness of the disease. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epizoot. 2007;26(3):711–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Biru A, Ameni G, Sori T, Desissa F, Teklu A, Tafess K. Epidemiology and public health significance of bovine tuberculosis in and around Sululta District, Central Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8(24):2352–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Brook RK, McLachlan SM. Factors influencing farmers’ concerns regarding bovine tuberculosis in wildlife and livestock around Riding Mountain National Park. J Environ Manag. 2006;80(2):156–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Munyeme M, Muma JB, Munang’andu HM, Kankya C, Skjerve E, Tryland M. Cattle owners’ awareness of bovine tuberculosis in high and low prevalence settings of the wildlife-livestock interface areas in Zambia. BMC Vet Res. 2010;6:21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Beyene D, Bergval I, Hailu E, Ashenafi S, Yamuah L, Aseffa A, et al. Identification and genotyping of the etiological agent of tuberculous lymphadenitis in Ethiopia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009;3(6):412–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Biadglegne F, Tesfaye W, Sack U, Rodloff AC. Tuberculous lymphadenitis in northern Ethiopia: in a public health and microbiological perspectives. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e81918.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Garedew L, Mihret A, Ameni G. Molecular typing of mycobacteria isolated from extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients at Debre Birhan Referral Hospital, central Ethiopia. Scand J Infect Dis. 2013;45(7):512–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Garedew L, Mihret A, Mamo G, Abebe T, Firdessa R, Bekele Y, Ameni G. Strain diversity of mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary tuberculosis patients at Debre Birhan Hospital, Ethiopia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17(8):1076–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Debebe T, Admassu A, Mamo G, Ameni G. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014;47(4):333–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Belay M, Ameni G, Bjune G, Couvin D, Rastogi N, Abebe F. Strain diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in afar pastoral region of Ethiopia. Bio Med Res Int. 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/238532.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017