Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Short Report
  • Open Access

The structural insights of stem cell factor receptor (c-Kit) interaction with tyrosine phosphatase-2 (Shp-2): An in silico analysis

  • 1, 4, 5,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Research Notes20103:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-14

©  Mukhopadhyay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

  • Received: 12 August 2009
  • Accepted: 22 January 2010
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Stem cell factor (SCF) receptor c-Kit is recognized as a key signaling molecule, which transduces signals for the proliferation, differentiation and survival of stem cells. Binding of SCF to its receptor triggers transactivation, leading to the recruitment of kinases and phosphatases to the docking platforms of c-Kit catalytic domain. Tyrosine phosphatase-1 (Shp-1) deactivates/attenuates 'Kit' kinase activity. Whereas, Asp816Val mutation in the Kit activation loop transforms kinase domain to a constitutively activated state (switch off-to-on state), in a ligand-independent manner. This phenomenon completely abrogates negative regulation of Shp-1. To predict the possible molecular basis of interaction between c-Kit and Shp-1, we have performed an in silico protein-protein docking study between crystal structure of activated c-Kit (phosphorylated c-Kit) and full length crystal structure of Shp-2, a close structural counterpart of Shp-1.

Findings

Study revealed a stretch of conserved amino acids (Lys818 to Ser821) in the Kit activation domain, which makes decisive H-bonds with N-sh2 and phosphotyrosine binding pocket residues of the phosphatase. These H-bonds may impose an inhibitory steric hindrance to the catalytic domain of c-Kit, there by blocking further interaction of the activation loop molecules with incoming kinases. We have also predicted a phosphotyrosine binding pocket in SH2 domains of Shp-1, which is found to be predominantly closer to a catalytic groove like structure in c-Kit kinase domain.

Conclusions

This study predicts that crucial hydrogen bonding between N-sh2 domain of Shp-1 and Kit activation loop can modulate the negative regulation of c-Kit kinase by Shp-1. Thus, this finding is expected to play a significant role in designing suitable gain-of-function c-Kit mutants for inducing conditional proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells.

Keywords

  • Stem Cell Factor
  • Activation Loop
  • Protein Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
  • Catalytic Cleft
  • Protein Epidermal Growth Factor

Findings

Research hypothesis

The c-Kit controls major signaling cascades in hematopoietic stem cells. Earlier study indicated that the catalytic domain of c-Kit consists of many important loop regions, such as catalytic loop (786-796), activation loop (810-839) and substrate-binding loop (829-837), which play crucial role in the activation of Kit kinase domain [1]. Transformation of c-Kit kinase domain from an inactive to hyperactive state is reported to occur on the basis of three distinct molecular phenomena. These are (i) binding of ATP to glycine rich loop residues (596-601), (ii) release of self-inhibitory interaction between substrate binding loop and activation loop, and (iii) loss of intramolecular H-bonds between Lys818-Asp816 and Asn819-Asp816 [1].

Binding of stem cell factor (SCF) to its receptors triggers dimerization coupled transphosphorylation of c-Kit catalytic domain [2–4], which then emerges with a dual phosphorylated tyrosine containing conserved motif (Y568V569Y570) in human c-Kit [5]. Interestingly, this motif acts as a common docking site for SH2 and SH3 domain containing proteins [6]. The adaptor protein APS, Src family of kinases and Shp-2 tyrosine phosphatase bind to Y568. Similarly, Shp-1 tyrosine phosphatase and the adaptor protein Shc bind to Y570; whereas, C-terminal Src homologous kinase (Chk) and the adaptor Shc bind to both Y568 and Y570 [7]. Shp-1 is known as a negative regulator of various receptors in hematopoietic cells, including c-Kit kinase [8, 9]. Shp-1 and Shp-2 share both sequence and structural homologies [10]. Previous studies have shown that a gain of function mutation, Asp816 to Val816 (a molecular representative of mastocytosis) in Kit activation loop leads to extensive degradation of Shp-1, indicating disruption of Shp-1 and c-Kit interaction [11, 12].

Though SH2 domains of both Shp-1 and Shp-2 are known to interact with c-Kit, the molecular basis of this interaction has not been elucidated. The present study suggests some important residues in Kit activation loop and N-sh2 domain that play crucial role in negative regulation of c-Kit kinase.

Results

Multiple sequence alignment of c-Kit kinase related protein

Activated Kit kinase, triggered either by ligand-dependent or ligand-independent manner, generates several phosphorylated tyrosine containing docking motifs in its juxtamembrane domain. Multiple sequence alignment study showed a conserved regulatory motif "EEINGNNYVYIDP" in juxtamembrane domain of Kit kinase (Fig. 1). Further analysis of "EEINGNNYVYIDP" by Motif scan showed a conserved dual tyrosine residue, which is positioned as Y568V569Y570 in human c-Kit (Additional file 1). These two tyrosine residues, Y568 and Y570 at positions +1 and +3 act as docking molecule for various kinases as well as SH2 and SH3 domain containing proteins. Amongst SH2 and SH3 domain containing proteins epidermal growth factor receptor, platelet derived growth factor receptor, PLCg, N/C-sh2, Abl kinase, Src family kinases and phosphatases (Shp-1 and Shp-2) are important [13–15]. The alignment study also revealed deletion in the above motif (YV deleted at +1, +2 positions) in transforming tyrosine-protein kinase Kit (Swiss prot ID P04048), normally synthesized as Gag-Kit-Pol polyprotein. The crystal structure data of c-Kit also expose Y568 and Y570 as the primary dual tyrosines to get phosphorylated following in vitro trans-phosphorylation reaction [5]. So they predominantly act as primary docking site in vivo to the downstream signaling molecules. These two residues belong to juxtamembrane switch motif of c-Kit (stretched in 560-571 residues) and is also a part of auto inhibitory JMD (spanning from 553 to 663), which makes a putative α helix. This juxtamembrane segment in c-Kit makes a wedge that stabilizes inactive conformation by preventing rotation of the small kinase lobe towards the large kinase lobe to generate active kinase conformation. Point mutations in this motif are associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, as they abolish the regulation of Kit kinase activity [16, 17]. In Gag-Kit the deletion of "YV" in "EEINGNNYVYIDP" motif and other deleted auto-inhibitory JMD residues before the same motif suggest two possible reasons for its transformation. The first reason could be due to the abrogation of Shp-1 mediated negative regulation, as Shp-1 can not be recruited to YVY. The second reason may be due to change of JMD mediated auto-inhibition of kit kinase to its hyper-activated state [18–20].
Figure 1
Figure 1

Multiple sequence alignment of c-kit juxtamembrane domain. Multiple sequence alignment in combination with phylogenetic tree was generated by PIR-ALN for Kit kinase with other kinase family members. Alignments show dual tyrosine containing conserved Y568V569Y570 stretch of residues in "EEINGNNYVYIDP" motif, which is used as a docking platform for SH2 and SH3 domain containing proteins.

Multiple sequence alignment of the ligand: Shp-2 and Shp-1 with SH2 domain containing proteins

To identify the crucial residues in Shp-2 and Shp-1 that can interact with tyrosine kinases, multiple alignments of SH2 domains of phosphatases with other SH2 domain family proteins was performed. The SH2 domains of p85 subunit of PI3 kinase, LCK, HCK, Src and c-ZAP showed conserved phosphorylated tyrosine-binding pockets (PY pockets) comprising of "FLARPS" in N-sh2 and "FLVRES" in C-sh2 domains phosphatases (Fig. 2). PY pockets represented three fully conserved amino acid residues: F, L and R. The functionally important residues in this motif initiate strong decisive interactions between guanidinium group of invariant arginine residue at a conserved position in SH2 and anionic PY phosphate group, as shown in structure of p85 subunit of PI3 kinase [21]. This PY pocket showed 100% conservation of Phe and Arg at +1 and +4 positions, 85% conservation of Leu at +2 and 71% conservation of Ser at +6 positions, respectively in N-sh2 domain containing proteins (Fig. 2). This explains positive role of PY residues in N-sh2 domain interaction. Whereas, LCK and HCK contain 23%, 27%, 25% and 29% conservation of Phe, Arg, Leu and Ser at + 1, +4, +2 and +6 positions, respectively in C-sh2 domain. The position of this PY pocket was then identified in crystal structure of Shp-2 and displayed in Rasmol prior to docking (Additional file 2A). The recognition of phosphorylated tyrosines in c-Kit by SH2 domain, and binding of these tyrosine residues to SH2 domain may occur in a typical "plug and socket" manner. It is similar to SH2 domain bound phosphotyrosine peptides complexes, as shown by NMR and X-ray structural studies [21, 22].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Multiple sequence alignment of SH2 domains of Shp-1 and Shp-2 for analysis of PY pocket residues. SH2 domain alignment show conserved PY pockets, such as "FLVRES" in C-sh2 and "FLARPS" in N-sh2 domains of both Shp-1 and Shp-2. Percentage of sequence identity, conservation of residues in PY pockets as well as sh2 domains are shown as change in color intensity. PY pocket is found to be highly conserved in N-sh2 domains, in comparison to C-sh2 domains.

Docking of Shp-2 and c-Kit cytoplasmic domain

The protein docking study was performed using activated/phosphorylated crystal structure of Kit cytoplasmic domain and Shp-2 (which mimics interaction of ligand-dependent or independent activated Kit Kinase with Shp-1 in vivo) [8]. The bound ligand-substrate complexes were generated on the basis of different repulsion values used in the programme and the best chosen values were 6.6 and 6.4A° (Table 1). We also plotted different repulsion values against the distances measured between N-sh2 domain of Shp-2 and an activation loop residue Asp816 (Table 1 and Fig. 3A), as it plays crucial role in maintaining closed or open conformation of Kit kinase domain. The data showed that Ile571 and Val569 of "EEINGNNYV569YI 571DPTQ" came into close vicinity of Asp26 and Tyr100 of N-sh2 domain, whereas Asp816 stayed predominantly closer to Tyr100 of N-sh2 by 4.7A° (Additional file 2B, 3A, 3B). Thus we propose that there can be a possible mode of interaction between N-sh2 and activation loop residues containing Asp816, relevant to the modulation of conformation in activation loop.
Table 1

Residues found to be predominantly closer between N-sh2 and c-Kit

Repulsion values for docking (A°)

Residues found closer in Shp-2 bound Kit c-Kit: N-sh2

Distance observed c-Kit: N-sh2 (A°)

Domains interacting

6.6

Ile571-Asp26

8.59

Kit Juxtamembrane and PY pocket

6.6

Val569-Tyr100

7.07

Kit Juxtamembrane and N-sh2

6.6

Asp816-Tyr100

4.68

Kit activation loop and N-sh2

6.4

Ile571-Tyr100

5.66

Kit Juxtamembrane and N-sh2

6.4

Val569-Tyr100

4.46

Kit Juxtamembrane and N-sh2

6.6

Asp816-Tyr100

6.17

Kit activation loop and N-sh2

Repulsion values 6.6 and 6.4 A° show that conserved Juxtamembrane residues and activation loop residues are predominantly closer to N-sh2 domain residues.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Analysis of predicted interactive zones of Shp-2 and c-Kit. A. Distances between interactive zones of both Shp-2 and Kit kinase based on different repulsion values. Shp-2 bound Kit kinase complexes are generated using different repulsion values from 5.8A° to 6.6 A°. Distance measured between Asp816 of Kit activation loop and Tyr100 of N-sh2 domain (as Tyr100 has been found to be prevalently closer to activation loop in all models). Among the 1-6 complexes, only 6.4A° and 6.6 A° based models have activation loop residue Asp816 closest to N-sh2 domain. B. Analysis of the catalytic cleft and the residues involved. Residues such as Cys788, Lys818 and Asn819 (orange), Thr916 and Phe 848 (blue), Thr847 and His790 (green), Asn787, Asp786 and Lys 918 (white), Lys786, Leu 912 and Tyr646 (mauve color), contribute in making a catalytic cleft like structure in c-Kit.

Checking of errors in docked complexes

Examining the substrate-bound complexes of Shp-2 is extremely essential while determining the distances between residues of interacting domains. The analysis showed negligible inter-atomic clashes, zero bumping into each other, and very few intramolecular constraints in Tyr100 of N-sh2. To verify hydrogen bonding, we changed the torsion angle from -156.66 to -116.66 between amino group of Tyr100 and the carboxyl group of Asn819, which showed that the hydrogen bonding of 4.76A° converted to 3.67A° (Additional file 3B).

Analysis of protein-protein interaction

The most striking feature observed in Shp-2 bound Kit complex was the presence of a catalytic cleft like structure made of important residues, like Lys786 to Cys 788, Lys818, Asn819, His 790, Asp792, Thr847, Phe 848, Leu 912, Thr916, Lys 918 and Tyr646, which are highly conserved among c-Kit related kinases (Fig. 3B). These residues were found to be in very close proximity to Tyr100, Ala75, Gly76, Glu79, Met82, Gly83 and His85 of N-sh2, therefore expected to interact to form a stable conformation.

Evaluation of hydrogen bonding between catalytic cleft and SH2 domains

Shp-2 bound activated Kit kinase complex mimics the physical interaction between autophosphorylated Kit kinase domain with the SH2 domains of Shp-1, both in vitro and in vivo (Fig 4A). We have detected that certain N-sh2 terminal residues, like Ser28, Ala75, Gly76, Glu79, Met82, Gly83, His85, Tyr100 and Pro101 (Fig. 4B, displayed in red colored balls and sticks) are making distinct hydrogen bonding with the c-terminal Kit kinase lobe residues (Fig. 4B, displayed in violet color balls and sticks). These results showed that residues from Lys818 to Ser821 in Kit catalytic cleft make distinct hydrogen bonding with both PY pocket and N-sh2 domain, for example Lys818 and Asn819 with Tyr100, Asp820 with His85, and Ser821 with Met82 (Fig. 4 and Table 2). Residues from 649-653 of N-terminal Kit kinase lobe were found to make hydrogen bonding with the C-sh2 domain residues. These interactions were detected specifically in surrounding of c-terminal kinase groove (Fig. 4B, in golden yellow) made of Leu783 as the tunnel-making residue inside groove. All the hydrogen bonding detected between conserved catalytic cleft and Kit kinase domains are at 2-3A° in distance. The earlier homology modeling study on Kit kinase has shown that release of auto-inhibition of activation loop is largely dependent on the disruption of intramolecular hydrogen bond interactions between Asp816 with the peptide backbones of Lys818 and Asn819, which transits the activation loop into a more flexible conformation [1].
Table 2

Hydrogen bonds detected between Kit kinase & SH2 domains

Positions of residues in substrate (Donor: c-Kit)

Position of residues in Ligand (Acceptor: Shp-1)

Distance of H-bonds in A°

649:ND2

192:O

2.54

649:ND2

193:O

1.12

650:N

192:O

2.03

650:ND1

195:OE1

2.11

650:ND1

195:OE2

2.07

650:NE2

195:OE2

2.98

652:N

195:OE1

1.44

652:N

195:OE2

2.64

653:N

195:OE1

2.56

655:N

200:OD1

2.04

656:N

200:OD1

2.86

671:OE2

196:O

2.27

671:OE2

199:O

2.66

775:NE2

213:O

2.18

782:N

3:OG

2.12

785:OG

3:OG

2.52

785:OG

103:OD1

2.89

802:N

211:OE1

2.27

803:N

211:O

2.68

807:NZ

197:O

2.51

807:NZ

198:O

2.53

818:NZ

28:OG

2.51

818:NZ

100:O

2.83

819:ND2

100:OH

2.50

820:O

85:NE2

2.92

821:OG

82:O

2.03

847:OG1

83:OE1

2.83

847:OG1

83:OE2

2.09

848:N

83:OE2

2.84

849:N

83:OE2

2.19

849:OE2

79:O

2.58

849:OE2

83:OE1

2.49

849:OE2

83:OE2

1.91

915:N

76:OE2

2.49

916:OG1

75:O

2.71

A: Represents hydrogen bonds between activation loop residues and N-sh2 domain residues B: Shows kinase lobe residues preceding c-terminal tail of c-Kit and N-sh2 domain residues

Figure 4
Figure 4

Analysis of docked complexes and H-bond interactions between ligand and substrate ( 2shp-1pgk.pdb). A. The docked complex show two SH2 domains as ribbons (pale golden color) and the blue color ball and stick structures show the residues of SH2 domains that interacted with Kit catalytic residues (stretch of violet color). The golden color displays the groove like structure in Kit catalytic domain. B. H-bonds are detected between SH2 domains and Kit cytoplasmic domain. Discontinuous white lines appear as the H-bonds between SH2 domain residues (red color ball and sticks) and Kit kinase lobe (pink color ball and sticks) residues. The white background displays important hydrogen bonding between Kit activation loop residues comprising Lys818 to Ser821 and N-sh2 domain residues.

Our study suggest that subsequent loss of the above intramolecular hydrogen bonding, Lys818 and Asn819 of Kit activation loop might be interacting with conserved PY pocket residue (Ser28 and conserved Tyr100 of N-sh2 domain) for physical blocking of activation loop motifs for further interaction.

Discussion

The activity of c-Kit is controlled through two important mechanisms: either by juxtamembrane segment auto-inhibition or by phosphatases mediated inhibition. The c-Kit is auto-inhibited by its juxtamembrane segment as it forms a V-shaped loop, inserted directly into the kinase lobes and displaces αC helix of Kit [23]. Subsequent to the activation of Kit kinase, the intramolecular H-bonds between Lys818-Asp816 and Asn819-Asp816 are disrupted, which further destabilizes the activation loop, releasing the steric hindrances associated with the rearrangement of the lobes. This phenomenon allows correct positioning of residues in and from active site, thus opening up the activated structure of Kit kinase (Additional file 4).

On the basis of our investigation, we propose that in activated c-Kit, the residues Lys818 and Asn819 make intermolecular hydrogen bonding with N-sh2 domain residues "Tyr100 and Ser28" as a result of the disruption of intramolecular hydrogen bonding with Asp816 (Fig. 5). The constitutive change of Asp816 to Val may also lead to deleterious effects by disrupting these H-bonds with Lys818 and Asn819, as Asp816 has the capability to stabilize a positively charged α helical dipole by virtue of negative charge in its side chain and also serving as an amino-terminal capping to Ile817, Lys818, Asn819 and Asp820. So a point mutation to hydrophobic or aromatic amino acid would potentially destabilize this interaction, thereby forcing activation loop to transit from inactive to active confirmation, disrupting the Shp-1 association. This leads to an enhanced ubiquitinin-mediated degradation of Shp-1 [12]. Strikingly, Asp820 signature molecule of systemic mast cell disorder (SMCD) [represented as Asp820Gly] forms a hydrogen bond with the His85 of N-sh2 domain [24, 25]. This also explains the role of Asp820 in Shp-1 binding. So it is considered that, Kit activation loop residues play a critical role in Shp-1 mediated negative regulation of Kit kinase.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Hypothesis generated on basis an in silico interaction of c-Kit (PDB: 1pgk) and Shp-2 (2shp). N-sh2 domain of Shp-1 recognizes the dual-phosphorylated tyrosines at juxtamembrane (Y568V569Y570) by PY pocket. Shp-1 forms a stable complex with c-Kit kinase by making intermolecular H-bonds with Lys818 and Asn819, using Tyr 100 and Ser28 of N-sh2 domain, following disruption of the intramolecular hydrogen bonding of Asp816 with Lys818 and Asn819 in activated c-Kit.

Conclusion

In summary, our study has revealed that certain activation loop residues in c-Kit are crucial for interaction of kinase with Shp-1, which may play a vital role in Shp-1 mediated down-regulation of c-Kit kinase activity. We propose that point mutation in Lys818 to Ser821 and Thr847 to Glu849 residues in Kit catalytic domain may lead to the generation of hyperactive functional variants of c-Kit. These may be implicated as efficient gene therapeutic candidates for conditional over-expression in the regeneration of hematopoietic compartments.

Methods

Multiple alignments of c-Kit

Using protein information resource (PIR) based multiple sequence alignment tool: PIR-ALN, a phylogenetic tree and multiple sequence alignment were generated for c-Kit and its kinase family members [26].

Motifs scan of c-kit cytoplasmic domain

Motif Scan search identified short protein sequence in kinase domain of c-kit motifs that are either recognized by modular signaling domains, phosphorylated by protein Ser/Thr- or Tyr-kinases or mediate specific interactions with phospholipid ligands to initiate c-kit mediated cell specific signaling [27].

Detection of phosphotyrosine binding motifs in SH2 domains of tyrosine phosphatases

The SH2 domain containing proteins were aligned using CLUSTALW for detecting recognition and binding motif in Shp-2, which initiate recruitment of SH2 domains to Kit kinase [28].

Docking study on c-Kit and Shp-2 interactions and visualization

We have used GRAMM (Global Range Molecular Matching) program to generate Shp-2 bound Kit kinase complexes and predicted H-bond interactions between them. The principle and the methodology of GRAMM are available at the web address http://vakser.bioinformatics.ku.edu/resources/gramm/gramm1/install/readme.pdf. Different repulsion values were applied during docking to determine the best fit complexes (Fig. 3). These repulsion values in A° were determined by three factors, rij (distance between ligand and receptor), U (energy of repulsion) and R, "range" of the potential (the grid step) using the mathematical relationship [29, 30], as shown in the Additional file 5. Distances lesser than 10A°, between important residues (within the predicted interactive zones), decided the best positioning of two proteins for further analysis (Fig. 3). We have used crystal structure of Shp-2 (protein tyrosine phosphatase), 2shp, a full length structural relative of Shp-1, solved at a resolution of 2A°) [13] and activated crystal structure of human c-Kit cytoplasmic domain (PDB: 1pkg; solved at a resolution of 2.9A° as ligand and substrate) [5]. Analysis of models for the number of inter/intra-molecular clashes, formation of hydrogen bonding and visualization of model images were done by VMD programme.

List of abbreviations

HCK : 

Hematopoietic cell kinase

LCK : 

Lymphocyte Specific Protein Tyrosine Kinase p56

PY : 

Phosphotyrosine binding pocket

GRB-2 : 

Growth factor receptor bound protein 2

PSSM : 

Position-specific scoring matrix

GRAMM : 

Global Range Molecular Matching

SCF : 

Stem cell factor

Shp-1/2: 

Tyrosine phosphatase-1/2

Src : 

Sarcoma proto-oncogene

c-ZAP : 

zeta-chain [TCR] associated protein kinase 70 kDa

JMD : 

Juxtamembrane domain

APS : 

adapter protein with Pleckstrin homology and Src homology two domain.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. R.S. Sowdhamini and Dr. Saikat Chakrabarty of NCBS, Bangalore for extending support in performing the protein-protein interaction studies. Dr. Geetanjali Yadav of NCPGR, New Delhi extended help in analyzing complexes, for that first author is thankful. The first author is indebted to the Director, NII for kind permission to conduct the study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India
(2)
Stem Cell and Gene Therapy Research Lab, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India
(3)
Department of Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
(4)
Gene Regulation Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India
(5)
Current Address: Department of Neuroscience, School of Medical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Malaysia

References

  1. Foster R, Griffith R, Ferrao P, Ashman L: Molecular basis of the constitutive activity and STI571 resistance of Asp816Val mutant KIT receptor tyrosine kinase. J Mol Graph Mod. 2004, 23: 139-152. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2004.04.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lev S, Yarden Y, Givol D: Dimerization and activation of the kit receptor by monovalent and bivalent binding of stem cell factor. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 10866-10873.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blechman JM, Lev S, Givol D, Yarden Y: Structure-Function analysis of the kit Receptor for the steel factor. Stem cells. 1993, 2: 12-21.Google Scholar
  4. Jiang X, Gurel O, Mendiaz EA, Stearns GW, Clogston CL, Lu HS, Osslund TD, Syed RS, Langley KE, Hendrickson WA: Structure of the active core of human stem cell factor and analysis of binding to its receptor kit. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 3192-3203. 10.1093/emboj/19.13.3192.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mol CD, Lim KB, Sridhar V, Zou H, Chien EYT, Sang B, Nowakowski J, Kassel D, Cronin CN, McRee DE: Structure of a c-kit Product Complex Reveals the Basis for Kinase transactivation. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 31461-31464. 10.1074/jbc.C300186200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lennartsson J, Jelacic T, Linnekin D, Shivakrupa R: Normal and Oncogenic Forms of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Kit. Stem Cell. 2005, 23: 16-43. 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kimura Y, Jones N, Klüppel M, Hirashima M, Tachibana KJ, Cohn B, Wrana JL, Pawson T, Bernstein A: Targeted mutations of the juxtamembrane tyrosines in the Kit receptor tyrosine kinases selectively affect multiple cell lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 2004, 101: 6015-6020. 10.1073/pnas.0305363101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Paulson RF, Vesely S, Siminovitch KA, Bernstein A: Signaling by the W/Kit receptor tyrosine kinase is negatively regulated in vivo by the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp1. Nature Genetics. 1996, 13: 309-315. 10.1038/ng0796-309.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen HE, Chang S, Trub T, Neel BG: Regulation of colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling by the SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase SHPTP1. Mol Cell Biol. 1996, 7: 3685-3697.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhong-Yin Z: Protein tyrosine phosphatases: Structure and Function, Substrate Specificity and Inhibitor Development. Ann Rev Pharma Toxico. 2002, 42: 209-234. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.42.083001.144616.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Longley BJ, Metcalfe DD, Tharp M, Wang X, Tyrrell L, Lu S, Heitjan D, Ma Y: Activating and dominant inactivating c-KIT catalytic domain mutations in distinct clinical forms of human mastocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 1609-1614. 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1609.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Piao X, Paulson R, Geer P, Pawson T, Bernstein A: Oncogeinc mutation in the kit receptor tyrosine kinase alters substrate specificity and induces degradation of the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 93: 14665-146669. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14665.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hof P, Pluskey S, Pagaanon SD, ECK MJ, Shoelson SE: Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2. Cell. 1998, 92: 441-450. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80938-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Price DJ, Benjamin R, Yigong F, Shuxian J, Avraham S, Abraham H: Direct association of Csk homologus Kinase (CHK) with the Diphosphorylated site Tyr568/570 of the Activated c-KIT in megakaryocytes. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 5815-5820.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kozlowski M, Larose L, Lee F, Le DM, Rottapel R, Siminovitch KA: SHP-1 Binds and Negatively Modulates the c-Kit Receptor by Interaction with Tyrosine 569 in the c-Kit Juxtamembrane Domain. Mol Cell Biol. 1998, 18: 2089-2099.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Casteran N, Sepulveda PD, Beslu N, Aoubala M, Letard S, Lecocq E, Rottapel R, Dubreuil P: Signal transduction by several KIT juxtamembrane domain mutations. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 4710-4722. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206587.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng F, Liu XH, Xie Q, Liu WQ, Bai CG, Ma DL: Expression and mutation of c-kit gene in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2003, 9: 2548-2551.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Besmer P, Murphy JE, Geroge PC, Qiu F, Bergold PJ, Lederman L, Snyder HW, Brodeur D, Zuckerman EE, Hardy WD: A new acute transforming feline retrovirus and relationship of its oncogene v-kit with the protein kinase gene family. Nature. 1986, 320: 415-421. 10.1038/320415a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chan PM, Ilangumaran S, Rose JL, Chakrabartty A, Rottapel R: Autoinhibition of the Kit Receptor Tyrosine Kinase by the Cytosolic Juxtamembrane Region. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23: 3067-3078. 10.1128/MCB.23.9.3067-3078.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Lennartsson J, Jelacic T, Linnekin D, Shivakrupa R: Normal and Oncogenic Forms of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Kit. Stem Cells. 2005, 23: 16-43. 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0117.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Waksman G, Shoelson SE, Pant N, Cowburn D, Kuriyan J: Binding of a high affinity phosphotyrosyl peptide to the src SH2 domain: crystal structure of the complexed & peptide free forms. Cell. 1993, 72: 779-790. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90405-F.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Pascal SM, Singer AU, Gish G, Yamazaki T, Shoelson SE, Pawson Y, Kay LE, Forman JDK: Nuclear magnetic resonance structure of an SH2 domain of phospholipase c-γ complexed with high affinity binding peptide. Cell. 1994, 77: 461-472. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90160-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. CD Mol, Dougan DR, Schneider TR, Skene RJ, Kraus ML, Scheibe DN, Snell GP, Zou H, Sang B, Wilson KP: Structural Basis for the Autoinhibition and STI-571 Inhibition of c-Kit Tyrosine Kinase. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 31655-31663. 10.1074/jbc.M403319200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Pignon JM, Giraudier S, Duquesnoy P, Jou-nault H, Imbert M, Vainchenker W, Vernant JP, Tulliez M: A new c-kit mutation in a case of aggressive mast cell disease. Br J Haematol. 1997, 96: 374-376. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2042.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Dior Y, Leaker M, Caruana G, Bernstein A, Freeman MH: Mastocytosis cells bearing a c-Kit activating point mutation are characterized by hypersensitivity to stem cell factor and increased apoptosis. Br J Haematol. 2000, 108: 729-36. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.01935.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Srinivasarao GY, Yeh LS, Marzec CR, Orcutt BC, Barker WC: PIR-ALN: a database of protein sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 1999, 15: 382-390. 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.5.382.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Obenauer JC, Cantley LC, Yaffe MB: Scan site 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3635-3641. 10.1093/nar/gkg584.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Vakser IA: Evaluation of GRAMM Low-Resolution Docking Methodology on the Hemagglutinin-Antibody Complex. PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics. 1997, 1: 226-230. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1+<226::AID-PROT31>3.0.CO;2-O.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Vakser IA: Long-distance potentials: An approach to the multiple-minima problem in ligand-receptor interaction. Protein Eng. 1996, 9: 37-41. 10.1093/protein/9.1.37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mukhopadhyay et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us